|
Related:
Media hails Obama’s Speech As Call For “New
World Order”
Barack Obama's July
24th speech in Berlin brought to light the Democratic Presidential
candidates' globalist views, mirroring those of the Council on
Foreign Relations and other globalist think tanks. Obama's praise of
the European Union, calls for the "tearing down" of walls between
nations and religions, and finally for world unity against climate
change and terrorism reveal that an Obama Presidency will not bring
change, but rather a continued erosion of national sovereignty and
steps closer to world government.
Interestingly,
Obama's speech was delivered beneath the "victory angel" statue in
Berlin.
As the Guardian reported on
the 21st,
"The centrepiece of the
European leg of Obama's visit will be his Berlin speech. Liberal
and conservative politicians in Germany expressed consternation
that Obama plans to address the crowds from beneath the golden
angel statue which graces Berlin's Siegessäule, a landmark which
Hitler moved to its present location as part of his bid to
transform Berlin into the world capital Germania."
Obama's speech stated in
part:
"That is
why the greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide
us from one another. The walls between old allies on either side
of the Atlantic cannot stand. The walls between the countries
with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls
between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and
Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must
tear down."
...
"Yes, there
have been differences between America and Europe. No doubt,
there will be differences in the future. But the burdens of
global citizenship continue to bind us together. A change of
leadership in Washington will not lift this burden. In this new
century, Americans and Europeans alike will be required to do
more -- not less. Partnership and cooperation among nations is
not a choice; it is the one way, the only way, to protect our
common security and advance our common humanity."
...
"The
terrorists of September 11th plotted in Hamburg and trained in
Kandahar and Karachi before killing thousands from all over the
globe on American soil.
As we speak, cars in Boston and factories in Beijing are melting
the ice caps in the Arctic, shrinking coastlines in the
Atlantic, and bringing drought to farms from Kansas to Kenya.
In this new
world, such dangerous currents have swept along faster than our
efforts to contain them. That is why we cannot afford to be
divided. No one nation, no matter how large or powerful, can
defeat such challenges alone. None of us can deny these threats,
or escape responsibility in meeting them. Yet, in the absence of
Soviet tanks and a terrible wall, it has become easy to forget
this truth. And if we're honest with each other, we know that
sometimes, on both sides of the Atlantic, we have drifted apart,
and forgotten our shared destiny."
Barack Obama's
remarks mirror those of Richard Haass, the president of the Council
on Foreign Relations, who stated that the problems of climate change
and terrorism would
require a surrender of national sovereignty
and ultimately the formation of a world government. "Some
governments are prepared to give up elements of sovereignty to
address the threat of global climate change," stated Haass. "The
goal should be to redefine sovereignty for the era of globalization,
to find a balance between a world of fully sovereign states and an
international system of either world government or anarchy."
Obama
is not the only presidential candidate
with globalist ideals. John McCain's proposed League of Democracies
and
support of North American integration
is one example. Hillary Clinton's open support for world government
is another.
Obama's promise of "change" will bring
no such thing. A continuation of globalist policy towards world
government and weakened national sovereignty will undoubtedly be
pursued.
|
