What's the reason for the swine flu vaccination program?

David Rothscum
David Rothscum Reports

Posted 27 September, 2009

As I have explained before, vaccinations have been used for various purposes that differ from those the recipient is told about. With money granted by the Rockefeller family, vaccines have been developed that sterilize the women injected with them, viruses have been developed and spread through vaccines that cause cancer, and as this report will go on to show, viruses have been developed to specifically target the brains of those exposed to them, by the same people that developed the vaccines against these viruses that are supposed to protect us against them.

Because not enough information is available yet about the coming swine flu vaccine it's impossible to tell for sure what to expect, but certain possibilities are important to point out because we have seen them before and have every reason to expect them again.

Profit

First and foremost it should be obvious to anyone that a lot of money can be made by selling these vaccines. In fact, as the head of the vaccine research of Novartis explained, Novartis desperately needed this outbreak:

Rino Rappuoli, head of vaccine research at Novartis, says that before the pandemic arose the company had been discussing the need to close vaccine-manufacturing plants because of financial losses.

Novartis is part of the inner core of Bilderberg. It's CEO, Daniel Vassella was appointed Chairman of the Board in April of 1999. However, in 1998 Vassella already attended the yearly Bilderberg conference, which lasted from the 14th until the 17th of May. Vassella became a yearly attendee after 1998.

Although the complete list of deaths this company is responsible for is impossible to tell, we know that an experimental vaccine it used in Poland killed 20 homeless people. (Mirror)

A look at the ingredients Novartis and other companies are planning to use for the swine flu vaccine will reveal that we can expect many more people to be injured from this pandemic vaccine.

Induction of brain damage in the public

Anyone who has looked into vaccines should be aware by now that vaccines contain a lot of ingredients that are linked to brain damage. The best known of these are Mercury and Aluminum. High levels of exposure to both are linked to Alzheimer's disease. One study looking at Aluminum in the water supply found that levels above 0.1 mg/liter double one's risk of Alzheimer's disease. Another study found that the blood levels of Mercury are on average twice as high in people with Alzheimer's, and the levels in people with early onset Alzheimer's are up to three times higher. It's likely that both mercury and aluminum in vaccines play a role in many brain disorders we find in people nowadays. Most of this information can be easily found online by anyone willing to look for it, therefore I won't spend too much time on this. It's important to note though that Alzheimer's was practically non-existent decades ago, but is now a serious epidemic that destroys the lives of millions of people worldwide.

On the CDC's own website we find that: "the age-adjusted annual death rate from Alzheimer's increased from 0.4 per 100,000 persons in 1979 to 4.2 per 100,000 persons in 1987".

Others point to a 9000% increase in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in 23 years.
In 1979 year, according to statistics from the Centers for Disease Control, 653 people died of Alzheimer's disease in the United States. Twenty-three years later, in 2002, 58,785 people died of Alzheimer's.

This epidemic is leading to the creation of a new prison system. Increasing numbers of elderly are locked up in giant nursery homes where they are forcibly drugged, and according to eyewitnesses who had to spend time in these nursery homes themselves, sometimes secretly euthanized. In the Netherlands, some nursery homes force children of patients to sign a declaration that gives the nursery home the right not to medically treat patients when they become ill. Sometimes personnel are caught euthanizing patients, as has happened in the Netherlands.

The growing epidemic is changing our culture, with growing numbers of people moving from trend to trend that is supposed to keep them from developing this disease, and marketing departments of various companies happily responding to this new demand from people who wish to avoid the fate of their parents whom they see withering away. In Europe, Nintendo's best selling product is a scientifically unvalidated game for it's DS console known as "Dr. Kawashima's Brain Training", that uses puzzles to test the "brain age" of the puzzler, a soothing euphemism for dementia. Of course few of the happy customers of any of these hypes ever stop to wonder what is responsible for these new epidemics that cause them to hop from trend to trend in a desire to prevent them from becoming a victim of breast cancer, infertility, obesity, dementia, or any of the variety of other new epidemics that we are witnessing today.

For this we should take a look at the history of the Influenza vaccine. As I have pointed out before, the history of the pharmaceutical giant called Merck begins with the American George W. Merck, who headed the biowarefare program of the American military during the second world war. As I've also pointed out before, the Rockefeller Institute was instrumental in developing the first cancer virus, that ended up in the Yellow Fever Vaccine this Institute distributed.
The reason I remind my readers of these events is because the Influenza vaccine shares elements of both stories, and to understand the history of the Influenza vaccine it helps to understand these other two stories.

The Influenza vaccine was developed by a man named Thomas Francis Jr.
Thomas Francis Jr joined the Rockefeller Institute in 1928, and continued to work at various institutions founded and controlled by the Rockefeller family. In 1934 he became the first American to isolate the Influenza virus. In 1940 Francis published a study he did into the Influenza virus. Francis tried to create an influenza virus that specifically targeted the brains of those exposured to it. As the report itself mentions, the study was conducted under a grant from the International Health Division of The Rockefeller Foundation.

The report begins with Francis explaining that his own efforts to create a virus that would persist in the brains of those exposed failed:

In our laboratory repeated efforts to adapt the virus of epidemic influenza
to the brains of mice had been completely unsuccessful. The virus ordinarily
failed after intracerebral inoculation to survive in the brain more
than one or two days.

However, Francis found out about a different strain that did infect the brain of chickens, and he himself went on using this strain in his new attempt to find a potent virus that killed mice by attacking their neural cells:

It was decided, therefore, to attempt a similar adaptation by
cultivation of influenza virus in tissue cultures containing embryonic
chick brain and either Tyrode's solution or physiological salt solution.
Since our earlier unsuccessful attempts had all been made with the PR8
strain while the reported positive results had all been obtained with the
W.S. strain, the W.S. strain was used.

After using an experiment to prove that this strain is more potent than the other strains of Influenza in targetting the human brain, Francis goes on to explain how the mice he exposed to this strain of Influenza died from convulsions:

On the llth passage definite neurological signs in the form of
hyperesthesia and tremor were observed and one mouse died in convulsions.
All mice of the 12th passage presented marked signs on the 3rd and 4th
days and were sacrificed. Two of the mice of the 13th passage were killed
when quite sick on the 3rd day, two others were found dead on the 6th day.
Since that time the virus has been uniformly pathogenic by the intracerebral
route, producing a consistent clinical picture and a fatal infection 4 to 5
days after inoculation with 5 per cent brain suspension (Experiment 1,
Table II). This strain (WS-7) has been carried through 67 serial passages.
The usual course of the disease is briefly as follows: On about the 3rd day
the mice appear huddled, their fur is ruffled, and they are hypersensitive to
external stimuli. A generalized tremor is present. On the 4th to 6th
day the animal dies in tetanic convulsions.

As his own report goes on to prove, this experiment was not meant to simply create a virus that would grow well in cultures of brain cells. Francis went on to test whether the virus would still persist in the brain if it had been retrieved from the lungs

Since the present experiments have dealt solely with strains of virus
grown in tissue culture, it was of interest to know whether the W.S. strain
of virus maintained by intranasal infection of mice also possessed neurotropic
attributes. Accordingly, virus of the W.S. strain, which had been
carried for 9 to 15 intranasal passages since removal from regular tissue
culture medium, was tested. Suspensions were made of the infected lungs
and with them mice were inoculated intracerebrally. Virus prepared from
lungs of the 9th and 13th passages failed to survive serial intracerebral
passage--in the first instance probably because passages were made at 7
day intervals. With virus from the 14th and 15th intranasal passages,
however, fatal nervous infections were obtained after 6 and 3 intracerebral
passages, respectively (Experiments 4, 5, 6, 7, Table II).
On the basis of the foregoing investigations, it seems clear that a period
of prior adaptation in embryonic chick brain is not required in order to
bring out the neurotropic qualities of the W.S. strain of influenza virus.

Francis goes on to report something remarkable, that the virus will infect the brain when the mice are injected with it, but will not infect the brain when the mice are exposed through their nose, instead the virus will simply persist in their lungs:

The neurotropic activity does not develop at the expense of the pneumotropic.
Where one exists, there the other is found in equal concentration.
The effect produced is, however, strictly governed by the route of inoculation.
While both pneumotropic and neurotropic virus can be recovered
from the brain after intracerebral inoculation or from the lung after intranasal
inoculation, the neurotropic effect is not produced by intranasal
injection nor is the pneumotropic effect observed after intraeerebral
injection of the virus.

In 1941, a year after publishing this study he was recruited by the American military to develop a vaccine against Influenza.

The question that needs to be answered now is whether the Influenza vaccines we have today are also capable of infecting the brain with the Influenza virus, and what the effects of this are. Unfortunately, reports of this are widespread, the Influenza vaccine infects the brain, with various effects, just like Francis described in his study back in 1940.

Reports like these are countless, and many more can be found by anyone willing to look. It's also important to look at certain ingredients in the vaccine that seem to help the virus, or other ingredients of the vaccine, enter the brain. One of these ingredients is Polysorbate 80. Polysorbate 80 which is found in many vaccines is normally used to help transport medicines across the blood brain barrier. Another ingredient in Influenza vaccines is Sodium Deoxycholate. As I pointed out in a previous report, this vaccine ingredient can cause permanent damage to the blood brain barrier.

Studies have been done showing that an infection with Influenza can increase the risk of Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's by destroying brain cells. This was with the naturally occuring virus, which leaves you wondering how much worse the effects are when the virus is injected, together with various other chemicals that also attack the brain.

Mass Sterilization

As far fetched as it may seem, it's not impossible that the vaccine is meant to spread infertility.
As I've explained before, vaccinations have been used before to sterilize women.
The idea of an Influenza pandemic leading to widespread infertility was probably first mentioned in a popular movie called Children of Men. The movie never explains the mysterious epidemic of infertility, but an Influenza pandemic took place in 2008, and the last child was born a year later. Another reference to such a scenario can be found in an episode of the popular television series named Stargate SG-1. The year is 2010, and a vaccine against aging has left at least 90% of humanity permanently sterilized. Since filmmakers often use their works of art as a warning or form of social critique, it would be interesting to find out whether the people who wrote these scripts worry about the other purposes vaccines can be used for.

The pandemic vaccine that the swine flu Vaccine will likely be based on contains 4.86 milligram of Polysorbate 80, also known as Tween 80. This is practically a hundredfold increase in the amount of Polysorbate 80 when compared to the amount found in Gardasil, the Cervical cancer vaccine by Merck, which contains 50 microgram of Polysorbate 80. Polysorbate 80 is supposedly in our vaccines as a stabilizer. Why one vaccine needs 100 times the amount of this stabilizer as the other is beyond me, but it's reason enough to question the intent of this vaccine.

A study done in Slovakia found that when newborn female rats are injected with Polysorbate 80, the rats grow up to be infertile. We can only hope the fictional story depicted in Children of Men will not turn out to be an accurate portrayal of our own future. But, whatever may happen, the vaccine companies are well prepared for any backlash from the public. In the United States, vaccine makers and federal officials will be legally immune from lawsuits that result from any new swine flu vaccine that is brought on the market. Whatever horror these companies (that got away with accidentally injecting people with viruses that cause cancer), may unleash, it will be impossible to criminally prosecute them.