Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
via The Ripple Effect: Another Tin Foil Ripple Farm Report round-table discussion with James Corbett from the Corbett Report, Sam Tripoli from the Tin Foil Hat podcast, and Pat Miletich from The Conspiracy Farm podcast. (WARNING: profuse profanity throughout)
Video courtesy: The Ripple Effect YouTube channel
SHOW NOTES:
Do You Believe in the Deep State Now? by Robert Merry
How To Tell If Someone Is Controlled Opposition
Intro and analysis (not so much an intro as a complementary addition to Brandon Smith’s piece below :-): There are so many anomalies and contradictions with Trump, many specific bullet points which the trumpist cult crowds are largely completely unaware of, his biography, his honey trap-pedophile specialist mentor, Roy Cohn, his many connections to the rabid Zionists and mafia, Rothschild connections, chabad connections, how Cambridge Analytica and PsyGroup waged psychological digital warfare campaigns for him, etc. – all of which absolutely cannot be explained away by arbitrary associations and coincidence theory. [1]
This has resulted in a new form of iliteracy on the alternative level, primarily among newcomers among the so-called truth movements, but also some veterans. A co-opting of the truth movements through psychological operations. Most veterans are not deceived in spite of the trumpist simulacra, what I call fake awakening, fake rabbit holes, limited hangouts, cognitive honey traps to hook the already awakened by mimicry. 4th generation warfare and cognitive infiltration.
https://paradigmet.blogspot.com/2019/01/trump-is-pied-piper-for-new-world-order.html
Please! The guy with the white earphones and the sucker in this mouth does not have to yell into the mic. He can be heard just fine.
Woah, manbearpig got WD-40 handed back to them… aaaawkwaaaard!
Somewhat on the trail of what was discussed in this talk, about how information should be judged on its own, without relying too much on the context set by the one bringing the information.
On the local “news” site there’s an article about how some far right politician nobody was a guest in one of the morning shows on the “national” television. The topic of discussion was abolition of the income tax.
I can link the article, but it won’t mean much to anyone, I’d just like to lay out some statistics I found interesting:
– the article in total has 3364 characters
– the initial paragraph is 329 characters long
– the closing paragraph, the only one relevant to the topic at hand, is 512 characters long
– the rest of the article, some 2515 characters, is used to depict the far right politician nobody’s unsavory past, past speeches and whatnot
This type of thing doesn’t have even the most basic components required for a journalist effort.
Speaking of gatekeepers, Edward Curtain wrote (another) fantastic essay detailing his recent experience with such:
http://edwardcurtin.com/counterpunch-shadowboxes-and-loses/
Life is short, time is precious, and God bless the brawlers!
BabeRuthManBearPig knocked it outta the park again.
Russ Baker
Some years back, on several occasions/yearly events, I have met Russ Baker at the JFK Lancer Events in Dallas.
For example: 2013 and 2015 below
http://911blogger.com/news/2013-12-07/jfk-50th-anniversary-jfk-lancer-north-texans-911-truth
and
http://911blogger.com/news/2016-01-03/november-dallas-2015-north-texans-911-truth
I well remember standing in front of him, asking his views about 9/11 as our 9/11 group was giving out free info/DVDs.
He did not want to go there. At all.
Great line from Ricky (Ricardo):
“…It is one of those things where you look around and you feel like you’re in some church that you don’t belong to….”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yq0IhtLrk4w&feature=youtu.be&t=24m44s
At one brief point in the conversation, wives / girlfriends were brought up as having no strong interest in ‘conspiracy type topics’.
Spouses and others we come in contact with…
I guess we underestimate how much influence we have.
I was married for 29 years before we got divorced. We are still great friends and I am often over to my ex-wife’s place.
While we were married, my wife mostly wanted to have nothing to do with conspiracy type stuff. No strong interest. Although, she did let me show her stuff about 9/11 back in 2005 (a time when that was considered taboo). She had no strong interest in organic methods nor supplements nor alternative health.
At least, this had been my consideration. But I think I was wrong. I think that she had been paying attention. It was just a different interest level.
Now, when we talk on the phone or I am over at her place, she initiates conversations and topics which she has been researching on her own.
For example:
Recently, she asked me what all this Flat Earth stuff was about…she tried to research it with an open mind, but it didn’t make any sense. ( I told her that it doesn’t make any sense, because it doesn’t make any sense…that it could be part of a disinfo/marginalization/confusion campaign.)
And Sunday, she showed me all these supplements which she now was taking. She ranted on AOC (Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) and the New Green Deal silliness, and also brought up aspects of how the Constitution is not followed citing the “Article” or Amendment.
Heck, she goes to Colorado sometimes to get CBD oil which helps with vertigo, and does a lot of alternative health practices.
She researches and discovers stuff on her own.
Her interest line is much like the interest line of many Corbett Members.
My point
is that just by displaying “our line of interest” in matters of substance, this aspect can rub off onto others.
Homey, that was a magnificent tightrope walk of gender bias I think if ever seen. You have displayed great skill and genteel decorum.
I noticed in some previous comments above here an unusual diametric line of thought that in my unsophisticated youth would have attributed, incorrectly I might add, to gender bias mind. That bias was the product of a successful campaign of propaganda. I realize that now and try to avoid it as it is a mine field. In search of the reality of life here on earth I came across THE CORBETT REPORT.
I speculated it may be a ” round table type” publication. For who? For why? Recently the publisher came clean in a #Propaganda watch editorial. I have come a little closer to understanding by comparison to the past history, how it repeats its self and why. How to combat the parts that favor those who would do wrong to others and what sets them apart from the motivations and methods to achieve the same outcomes, using the same methods. How do you tell them apart?
For one , using “the round table” as example. Propaganda was used as a weopon of aggression. It was censored by the publishers at
175 Piccadilly , useful editorial submissions were allowed by a gate keeper. Probably Rothschild at 178 Piccadilly.
Here the difference of the agorist anarchist libertarian Publisher is stark. There is no censorship but one. 500 word limit to one block of type, but no limit to the blocks. Or content or meaning. A defining refreshing policy.
The lack of censorship will be a good indicator of gatekeeping intent. Certainly unnerving to authoritarian battered souls who have not yet shed the propaganda put deeply into psychic place.
Im a firm believer that there are no stupid questions just stupid
( orders) requests. Thanks to F-IW Russel and this site publisher.
That’s been one of my key indicators as well, and one of the reasons I consider James Corbett to be a genuine man of integrity and a continual source of invaluable information.
Assuming I’ve not misread the exhaustive and numerous indicators pointed out by manbearpig over several weeks’ time, I believe Caitlin Johnstone does censor.