I’m not sure if you’ve heard, but everyone’s talking about The Great Replacement these days. So, what is the theory? Who’s Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi and what was his plan? And if there is a replacement going on, where does it go from here? Join James for this surprising deep dive into the future of humanity.
Video player not working? Use these links to watch it somewhere else!
WATCH ON: 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
or DOWNLOAD THE MP4
SHOW NOTES
The Great Replacement Theory Explained
Here’s Proof That the Great Replacement Is No Longer a “Theory”, Highlights
Tucker Carlson’s Great Replacement Theory Is Spectacularly Wrong
Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the Munich Security Conference
Benjamin Franklin: Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind, 1751
The truth behind Indian extremists’ anti-Muslim ‘great replacement theory’
Donald Trump: “We will finally complete the biometric entry/exit visa tracking system”
Radosław Sikorski: The West-West Divide: What Remains of Common Values MSC, 14.02.2026
Episode 453 – Don’t Worry! The Border Problem is About to be Solved!
Practical Idealism by Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
Pan-Europa by Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi society
Tesla Optimus Gen 3: Elon Musk Reveals a New Humanoid Robot
It sure seems like the Optimus robots at Tesla’s event were under human control
Tesla Optimus robot takes a suspicious tumble in new demo
Will migrants and robots be competing for the same jobs?
FROM IMMIGRANTS TO ROBOTS: THE CHANGING LOCUS OF SUBSTITUTES FOR WORKERS
AI could replace foreign workers in Japan, Team Mirai says
Gen Zer explains why her generation is screwed when it comes to sex
‘I won’t have Children due to Climate Change’ | BirthStrike | BBC | Victoria Derbyshire | 4 Mar 2019
💔 HEARTBREAKING: Michael Bennett’s Soul-Stirring “After I’m Gone” Performance!
I agree with Benjamin Franklin. Just saying.
@kumro
I would love to get your input on this poll I put together on a related subject:
https://gavinmounsey.substack.com/p/poll-of-the-month-whiteness
As of this date 5/13/26, seems to me that a huge number of people are waking up to their ploys (plan). In every discipline we see this yet only a few seem to be buying the story. By “few” I mean those who only watch mainstream news and are blind enough to believe the propaganda. Interesting the only Gen Z’s shown are the ones that go along with the lies being fed to the public. Apparently they never heard of the covid and climate change hoax so why not buy into the world falling apart scenario? If that were true and if I were a Gen Z, I wouldn’t want to bring a new child into that world either. This is what I see coming: people waking up to what’s being done to humans in every aspect of their lives and not wanting that. They will turn away and the plan of the oligarchs will fail.
T
“…..By “few” I mean those who only watch mainstream news and are blind enough to believe the propaganda…..”
It’s all over the net and tailored to the youngsters in different ways….. I was just treated to the YT algo trying to feed me endless (badly acted) videos of guys “tossing their cheating wife to the curb” with a side order of “this is why women suck” vids and the comments were all carefully designed to feed into the “stay single forever” mindset.
The mainstream has broken it’s banks and is leaking its sewage into the culture in new and interesting ways. The Internet is TV mk 2 now and even worse then the original.
Honestly if you take a week off the Internet then start on a new device with a new identity you can see how the other half lives it’s online life and it’s no wonder that they go crazy
Duck ,
I think your right here . The cell phone is the God awfulest machine ever put in mans hand.
Yup.
One day in the future I think people will look at photos of kids with iPads n phones and think we must have been nuts or evil
The people who don’t want to breed are doing us all a favor…..I told some antinatalist that I fully supported her because it ment more room and resources for my descendants. she got mad for some reason because at the end of the day it’s all about PERFORMING a role the screen told her was cool.
I made the mistake of clicking a YT video about a guy breaking up with his cheating wife and the algo started feeding me endless (quite clearly staged) clips of the same story. It’s kinda interesting to go down propaganda rabbit holes sometimes but it’s not even well done stuff. I guess if I was a woman I’d have some similar kind of mind poison about how guys are all rapists or how billions of women are dying because they can’t murder babies or something like that. Honestly it’s really good to journal what the algo feeds you so you can see what not to do
I can not say that loosing a bunch of mentally ill incels and feminists will actually make the world a worse place…..if people get crazy anxiety about imaginary things like climate doom and can’t function in the easiest time to survive that’s ever existed then that’s kinda pathetic and disgusting TBH.
People who are open to self destruction programming will remove themselves from the gene pool. It’s sad but you can’t save people who want to drown.
The tech bros are just as foolish, with their stupid AI cults and rationist delusions. Chris Knowles (secret sun) said a while back that the ruling class is acting like their scared because it’s dawning on them the techno utopia is not coming….as for the Jewish interests pushing this kinda crap- those folks always saw off the branch their sitting on, every single time
Speaking as an American, the way the corporations have arranged modern life for most people in greater metropolitan areas, it’s not really set up for working class people to start and have families.
I think the media would like to say that young people are blaming it on “fear of climate change,” when it’s more practical than that.
Responsible people, I think, can see that starting a family when they can barely take care of themselves, would be irresponsible.
The corporations like to have mass layoffs, every couple years. They may force employees to relocate. Salaries haven’t really increased to match inflation. Housing costs have skyrocketed hundreds of percent from prior decades. It’s extremely difficult to maintain stability or continuity.
All of this was by design.
They wanted to reduce the population.
They built these corporate systems to keep people from having children.
They even discourage work place romances. That’s an H.R. issue. That’s grounds for termination.
Of course they’re not going to admit any of this.
They severely punish unmarried parents. The state does everything it can to keep fathers underwater on child support.
In Texas, if a man falls behind on child support payments, the state WILL take away his driver’s license, which can negatively affect his ability to find and keep a job.
If there weren’t all these systemic impediments to having children, people would start having more children.
“They call this war a cloud over the land, but they made the weather and then they stand in the rain and say ‘Shit, it’s raining!'” – Character, Ruby Thewes, – Cold Mountain
Painfully accurate. I have five adult children. None are married and no children. The propaganda and technology has been wildly successful at convincing them there’s no hope for the future. PS: I need to renew my subscription .
Fortunately, not everyone is on-board with the AI-Robot replacement agenda…
Today’s News (Wed 5/13)
Humanoid robot’s Southwest flight sparks instant airline policy change
3:02 minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnw913voYHA
A Dallas business owner attempted something he believes had never been done: flying commercially with his 3.5‑foot humanoid robot, Stewie. …he bought Stewie a passenger ticket and boarded a Southwest Airlines flight with him. …(This) led Southwest to implement an immediate policy change regarding humanoid robots on flights….
~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
College graduates who despise AI and the elite who promote it…
EXCERPT
…“To stand in front of a graduating class of artists and communicators and discuss Jeff Bezos and Howard Schultz, is to spit on our efforts to flip the script,”
Nicholson School of Communication and Media graduate Houda Eletr told the Orlando Weekly.
“I’m embarrassed to have had to endure the most embarrassing, unskippable, tone-deaf, ad-like commencement. Boo to AI and boo to your agenda.”
“It will not be the rise of AI that is the next Industrial Revolution; it will be the boo-ers who refuse to take a check from the top 1% to present an empty agenda. It will be humans for humans,” Eletr added.
Wednesday May 13, 2026 – The New York Post
UCF Grads Boo Commencement Speaker Over Pro-AI Remarks
105 seconds
https://corbettreport.com/the-ai-wars-you-are-not-prepared/#comment-186896
DESCRIPTION
Gloria Caulfield was met with loud boos from communication and media graduates at the University of Central Florida after declaring artificial intelligence “the next Industrial Revolution” during Friday’s commencement ceremony.
RE:
“America’s Got Talent” – Michael Bennett’s Soul-Stirring “After I’m Gone” Performance!
Mar 02, 2026 – Forbes Magazine – By Leslie Katz
‘America’s Got Talent’ Fans Fooled By AI-Generated Contestant’s Sob Story
https://www.forbes.com/sites/lesliekatz/2026/03/02/americas-got-talent-fans-fooled-by-ai-generated-contestants-sob-story/
EXCERPTS
A video of an aging rocker named Michael Bennett performing a heart-tugging song on America’s Got Talent is eliciting powerful reactions around the globe. But the heavily tattooed musician with long white hair and thick silver rings on his fingers isn’t real. He’s AI-generated.
In one YouTube video making the rounds on social media, “Bennett” sings “After I’m Gone,” a tear-jerker of a ballad that conveys the pain of being ignored by his child. “You walk past everything I gave, like it was nothing at all,” the AI-generated musician sings while accompanying himself on electric guitar. “I gave you my whole life. You can’t give me one call.”
The gravelly voice sounds convincingly human, but a closer watch of the video suggests otherwise. There’s the lone tear on the man’s left cheek that remains static, never rolling down his weathered face. Then there are the numerous fake audience members who can’t contain exaggerated crying that tips into the uncanny. At times they even sob before he starts singing. Former America’s Got Talent judge Heidi Klum, her skin and hair bearing a telltale AI sheen, weeps so hard it stretches credulity.
A spokesperson for Fremantle, the entertainment production and distribution company behind America’s Got Talent, said in an email on Monday that it is unfamiliar with a contestant named Michael Bennett and confirmed that the video is AI-generated and not real footage from the talent contest…
…Wait, That’s A Different Nose
There are plenty other such videos of Bennett, though, and they’re proliferating fast — not just on YouTube, but on TikTok, Instagram and beyond — sometimes generating hundreds of thousands of views. In them, the singer’s appearance and voice keep shifting. The shape of his nose changes, and his voice takes on a new, higher timbre. No matter. While some viewers immediately identified Bennett as fake, the overwhelmingly majority appear to have found their new favorite artist….
[Much more in article. For example: A fake background story.
— Be sure to see the last picture in the article – AI generated family in hysterical, sobbing tears.]
I prefer the artist singer ‘Tony Bennett’ [rip] Now He Had Real Talent
In my opinion, there are two realities involved here. 2D and 3D. When one spends countless hours every week in 2D “realty” proving this and that opinion harvested in 2D reality the mind begins to adjust to the premise that 2D reality is significant and, as goes the mind so goes the body. People becoming highly stressed, falsely directed, and profoundly propagandized with fear and division.
Thus so much anger, illness, etc.
Those of us who have either intentionally or fortunately spent most of our lives in 3D reality our world is quite immune to the nonsense as we have embraced a different “movie” or “play” regarding what life is about and what is truly important. We are made fun of as being “tree huggers” or “tin foil hat wearers” from the 2D folks who speak out of fear of change or cancellation.
A simple proof is devote no more then 30 mins online a day, and then use what would have been the online time and go for a walk in a park bare foot, tell the water you drink you love it, fly a kite, lay on the grass and just be do this for a week and see what being out with the Earth (Pachi Mama) can do for you.
How healing real life can be.
Right in front of everyone here in the 3D world are pictures/hard evidence of a Great Reset from about 200 years ago and people are infiltrating the 2D world to wake people up.
Go ahead and roll your eyes or stop reading now if you want.
The missing history of the Tartarian times and the Mud Flood evidence indicates something, not sure what, but SOMETHING very important occurred and the current controllers are using all thier pathological brilliance to attempt to stop the unfolding of truth.
So if one has not yet put together the recent historical false flag events and still believe all the “Bigs” Medicine, Government, Industry, Education, Entertainment, etc. really give a crap about your well being or mental physical health, remember, you have been warned.
I am but one of so many now who are coming from a place of love to help people break the chains of their propagandized prison lives. When the pretend UFO contact happens and people of various faiths and beliefs are “hearing” their Masters voice in their native tongue do you thing the “non believers” who live the 3D world will be safe??
Listen to the late John Trudell’s speech from 1980 sum up reality in one min.
JOHN TRUDELL MAY 1980 (speech)
https://old.bitchute.com/video/FBo2nzK6ky2X/
Somehow the link to Ship Of Fools got switched into the John Trudell link.
Here’s the correct link…
https://old.bitchute.com/video/gT1muR1A1KAP/
I had to do a double-take at about 25:30. Did it say, “Americans used to spend over 6 hours a week with friends; now the average person gets 35 minutes a day of face-to-face socializing.”?
Ummm… is that a misspeak or does someone not understand hours and minutes? I mean… I’m pretty sure it’s a misspeak because of the chart (or maybe my hearing has gotten that bad), but still, lol.
And then there’s what’s right after.
Remember the great machine in Babylon 5? I pretty much view it as something people in the oligarchy desire: a planet-wide machine with one person in the veritable throne while a bunch of workers who believe in the cause they believe it to have.
I certainly agree with everything you say here, James, and I understand that your concern is less human demographic shifting and more replacement of humans with non-humans. That is certainly the ultimate goal. However, I don’t think AI and robotics implementation fully explains how human demographic shifting fits into the globalists’ agenda. I think there’s more to be said about the purpose of encouraging mass migrations.
I see it as having two broad, complementary purposes. First, it is meant to supplant people’s identities and beliefs in favor of a new global identity and belief system. e.g., (because I’m American) “Don’t be a bigoted American Christian who has the same beliefs as his forbears and eats steak. Instead, understand how your beliefs are harmful to others, replace them with these universal morals that come from on high and eat these ecologically-friendly bugs instead.” This is much easier when you’re surrounded by people who have very different beliefs and cultural practices than you. Cultural dominance is replaced by a vacuum begging to be filled. The other purpose is for those who don’t conform to this cultural dissolution to fight endlessly with both their old neighbors who conform to the new ways as well as their new neighbors. In other words, divide and conquer. You’re either on board with the globalist agenda or you’re litigating petty squabbles… or both.
That’s not to mention something else you’ve clearly broached. “Travel ban! Travel ban!”. One has to awe at the elegance of the whole stinking plan.
I fully agree. Thank you for this.
Lol!
Makes me think of the James Bond movie Moonraker.
Drax wants to have a space colony of people of ‘superior specimens’ from all races – a Noah’s ark operation to repopulate the Earth after all life has been eliminated.
Most people at the time the movie came out (1979) thought that was such a fanciful notion.
Curious, you saw this theme also in two other 1979 movies – The Black Hole (a mad scientist with no regard for human life) and Star Trek TMP (V’ger wants to destroy all “carbon units” since they are not “true life forms”).
I swear, something was in the zeitgeist at that time – with transhumanist and eugenics themes.
Oh,
Another idea for the Film, Literature, and New World Order series:
Logan’s Run 1976 – predicted the technocratic plan of reducing population into AI controlled cities.
It’s damaging to one’s credibility to deny the obvious.
America 1960 census: 88.6% White.
*School and entertainment is filled with decades of anti-White narratives originating predominantly from a certain supremacist ethno-religious group*
America 2020 census: 61.6% White and falling.
Is this just disinformation fed to us by screens? No, you can walk around public spaces and see it.
In typical media, The Great Replacement is either a far-right scary conspiracy theory, or the glorious inevitable future, depending on if someone is against it or for it.
It’s damaging to one’s reputation to deny obvious reality, but it’s also damaging to one’s reputation to deny sacred cows. Would Derrick Broze be okay with it if James’ acknowledged it? Would the bulk of James’ audience be okay with it? It is praiseworthy that James was even willing to touch the subject while having a comment section.
Is resistance to non-White immigration being leveraged for digital ID? Of course, like covid, false flag hacking, or anything else available. Does that mean the non-White immigration and it’s deleterious effects are just a bogey-man in the minds of excitable simpletons? Absolutely not, it’s obviously happening; I’ve watched a city change over three decades.
Would the New World Order, and the aforementioned ethno-religious supremacists it semi-consciously serves, prefer robotic slaves to human slaves? Absolutely. White slaves are seen as effective and innovative, but with an increased rebellion risk. It was hoped that a Light-brown mixed race would offer decent performance with lower rebellion risk, but that isn’t panning out (yes, Kalergi never published anything directly advocating for that, even though his name is pinned to that strategy). If the robots could be more productive, less demanding, and offer essentially no rebellion risk, that would cover them for their “year 6000” fantasy nicely.
Human replacement is an important issue, but it doesn’t make White replacement an obsolete concern. The group doing this is trying to get rid of Whites specifically because they think it will help them enslave or genocide the other peoples of the world.
Even if they’re wrong about that, It’s a tragedy to lose any race of human from an anthropological perspective, but an outright disaster to lose the people that made 95% of the inventions from 1700 to 2005. You’re reading this on a computer powered by electricity, largely because of the sub-species of Human currently on the chopping block. If we want a world resistance to centralization of power, that endeavor stands to benefit from innovation, not just technologically, but also via things like debt-free monetary schemes. Were the Whites to get their own exclusive country again, under their own media and schools for over a generation, they would make themselves into a problem for our unwanted controllers.
Tedman
The issue you will have is that you are talking to priveliged people (I think Mr Corbett once talked about the average age of his audience ) who either
A) are boomers who grew up in a mostly white Euro society and have insulated themselves (by income, education or location) from the effects of that going away
Or
B) have been programmed by media into seeing themselves ONLY as individuals with no greater identity then themselves (as the saying goes, when your wrapped up in yourself you make a very small packege)
They are generally smart, and self motivated and other good traits but no one is perfect
So either they don’t see or dont care about what happens to society for the next generation.
Do I hate non whites? No, I am even friends with some.
Do I want to live in a place where I’m the minority? Nope. What sane person would want that?
You will never reach people I describe because it’s seen as low class to see race as the reality it is – south Africa went from being a pretty good place to live for most whites and blacks (hence so many blacks illegally immigrated there during apartheid) to being a dump for most whites AND blacks but you will still find such people as I describe there putting their fingers in their ears and singing that every thing is awesome.
I also have friendly relations with several non Whites. It’s generally too difficult of a nuance to tell one that I want a White exclusive country (or like 85+%), and I don’t have anything against them personally, it’s just that I want to avoid my people’s extinction, and help prevent those that would openly enslave the globe from doing so. I lost my mixed race best friend of 29 years from trying to just explain race realism to him at a time when he was hyped up on Trump coverage. Some people won’t figure it out until the situation gets dramatically worse. Some not even then. Even so, sometimes I still try.
Your profile of the Corbett audience sounds plausible. My dad is similar. Hard to make progress with him, but even still, sometimes I feel compelled to try.
South Africa went that way precisely because of people who think like the above subjects. The Churches were influential in selling it, but it ultimately was allowed by the public opinion of well-meaning but woefully misinformed people who didn’t want to be rude. I don’t have the answer. I clearly don’t have the courage to risk what I have by publicly fighting state propaganda on race. Still, posting in this very small comment section is a weak action I can take.
I appreciate you broaching this subject James.
Love that superiority complex brimming, eugenics obsessed and completely unhinged Benjamin Franklin quote you shared.
I find it interesting that some people consider certain countries to be “white countries” (despite the fact that as I elucidate on in the post I linked above, below the first comment in this thread, the concept of a “white” person is an invented, political, economic and oligarch benefiting term that has no biological nor solid cultural foundation).
Why have so many internalized this identity? Does it really offer any benefit what-so-ever?
BTW, Canada is full of people obsessed with variations of the “Great Replacement” fear (they want to ‘keep Canada a pure white place’). This is a strange idea to me considering Europeans replaced the original inhabitants of this land. Is one replacement righteous and worthy? and the other something to be feared? Why?
Well I have more questions than answers, but thanks for evoking them my friend.
G
“…..This is a strange idea to me considering Europeans replaced the original inhabitants of this land. Is one replacement righteous and worthy? and the other something to be feared? Why?…..”
Why?
That’s a simple question to answer…. Because being white people they don’t want to end up as a subjugated people who get badly treated by the new majority.
I am sure the Indians felt the same way, and the fact that they couldn’t stop their own replacement and the way they were treated is PLENTY of a lesson as to why smart people who care about their kids don’t want to be over run by others.
“Righteous ” or “wrong” are words of religion and morals, while I certainly believe in religion and morals it’s kinda funny to imagine that letting yourself get deleted or being to weak to stop others over running you is praise worthy when it really just makes you a looser.
The Unabomber was quite right when he described the folks who think being weak makes one moral, I have known lots of weak people and TBH they are generally less moral because they can’t afford morals
Whites defeat Indians:
Indians displaced, put on reservations, allowed to participate in White economy.
Indians defeat Whites:
All the males and old women killed, young women taken as slaves and regularly beaten by jealous squaws.
@tedman
This is a particularly fishy red herring you have offered.
Your comment says a lot more about you than it does about “squaws”.
Who exactly are these “whites” you mention? Can you define them for us all please?
Ahh….no one knows what “whites” are but everyone knows what people of color are.
It’s pretty easy whites are the people who get called “colonizers” while the non whites are the people who don’t get called that – even when they do all the exact same things with as much or more savagery.
That’s the Boomer way to identify the groups anyways….those poor slobs watched too many “dances with wolves” type bs propaganda and had their brains cooked
Who are the “Whites”? In this instance, mostly Western Europeans from ~1500 to ~1900 who traveled to North America. Throughout the 1500’s, many settlements were wiped out. The survivors were often either tortured for sport, or raped and enslaved. The Tribes had been doing this to each other for millennia. On occasion, captives escaped and reported.
The Haitian Revolution is another representation of what happens when Whites lose. French Liberals helped foment a slave rebellion. The former slaves killed the plantation owners, then the middle class French that worked there, then the French Liberals, then the mixed-race people.
When Whites won control of a territory, they usually didn’t torture-murder-rape the former inhabitants to extinction. Often they try to give the conquered people the White’s religion, language, forms of government, moral codes (no torture or slavery), basic technology, and get them working to export natural resources in exchange for imported manufactured goods.
While you expressed the perspective that one racial replacement is as good as another, I’m countering that it’s historically been a far more devastating thing when a land falls from White rule rather than into it. While I don’t expect Canada to get outright slaughtered as it would have in centuries past, I do expect a scenario similar to modern South Africa.
Tedman
“…..While I don’t expect Canada to get outright slaughtered as it would have in centuries past, I do expect a scenario similar to modern South Africa……”
Yes.
The slaughter can only happen when the whites are reduced to a small enough number……since they will presumably still be richer then the non whites they will hated a lot by then and there will have been a decade or two of South Africa style race murders being common.
But it’s said that South Africa still holds some white liberals who think everything is ok so by the time the whites actually realize what’s coming it will be rather late to do much about it….most people won’t wake up until it’s Hotel Rwanda or Haiti time, because most people think having the correct nice opinions is more important. They will turn themselves up in knots to not see ….because they love themselves more then their children.
Evil-lootion in action I guess. More room for sensible folks if they can make it thru, after their gone I guess,
I’ll toss this in…
Wed May 20
South African Farming Crisis May Trigger Food Shortages Across The Continent
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/south-african-farming-crisis-may-trigger-food-shortages-across-continent
EXCERPT
…South Africa has around 142 race-based laws which largely discriminate against white citizens, especially when property, business and government office is involved. The Expropriation Act of 2024 allows the socialist government to confiscate any land of their choosing to “redress past discriminatory laws or practices” (land owned by white citizens)…
…The problem is, when land is seized or forced into sale to black owners, farming production reportedly collapses. That is to say, once the white farmers are gone, crop yields fail and the black owners often resell the land and leave. In other cases, the new owners allow the land to languish, using the homes for living but never cultivating the surrounding property….
In a leaked manual from an ANTIFA cell (2019?), it spoke about the glorious future they were fighting for, seemingly tailored for poor drug addicts. Among the soaring rhetoric, It said they would use bio-metric digital ID to suppress the racists, when Whites get to 30% they’ll bring in Africans by the cargo ship load, and you’ll be able to just do drugs and not work in comfort in the world they’re building. It also insisted that while the Israeli government may be doing something akin to colonialism, it’s very important that we don’t hold it against American Jews, who are our comrades against oppression.
It had some similarities with “The New Order of the Barbarians” by Dr. Lawrence Dunegan, and Agenda 2030 ‘predictions’ and ‘narratives’, which gave it moderate credibility in my eyes. Years later, I still wonder if the Tribe wants to step on the gas when Whites hit 30%. Maybe the Soros wing is out of agreement with the Bank of International Settlements wing? Sometime around 2022 Henry Kissinger made a statement about Muslim immigration being a mistake because they represent a pro-Palestinian pressure group, and Immigration went all-in on India after that. So, I wonder if they changed plans, if it was never the plan, or is there going to be a step change once under 30%? Just a possibility for things to be different than South Africa.
@tedman
Thank you for elaborating.
The swampy decomposing fish aroma of your red herring offering has only increased in its potency.
So anyone that arrived in north america after 1900 is not “white” by your definition? Fascinating.
How about the term “Caucasian”, do you see this as interchangeable with the term “white person”? If not, why not?
Since Duck and I have been over much of the territory in previous discussions (as he and a few others in these threads also have a proclivity to talk about indigenous people in a cartoonish pedestrian 50-s hollywood manner) I will refer to you read the following posts to clear things up for you.
1. https://corbettreport.com/dissent-into-madness-the-weaponization-of-psychology/#comment-148050
I am fully aware of the conflicts that existed between the various indigenous tribes of what is now called North America and while I cannot speak to the validity of your claim about human sacrifice I would suggest that we should keep in mind that demonization and dehumanization of the perceived “enemy” or targeted “sub-human class” of an empire is a time tested psychological warfare technique that has been employed in both real time conflicts and retrospectively as “victors write the history books”.
Lets assume that some isolated tribe of indigenous people (or several out of hundreds of different cultures that existed here) engaged in the behavior you describe. Even if that were true, if I look at the history of the imported European institutions and statist belief systems I would say that the repeated and widespread examples of viscous torture, mutilation, child abuse and psychopathic mass murder of dissidents that were par for the course in the history of those institutions and statist organizations are far more disturbing, immoral and evil than any isolated incidents of what you point to in North American indigenous history.
There were many cultural practices that existed in what we now call “North America” (or Mshike Mnise which means “Turtle Island” in the Anishinaabemowin language) before the Europeans came to claim the land as their own and commit genocide (killing off up to 98% of the local population in some areas). Though there was a great diversity in their cultural practices and belief systems, they all shared several common themes.
Some of these cultures formed democracies (such as the Haudenosaunee Confederacy) others were matriarchal societies but the one through-line that can be observed in the traditional views and spiritual teachings of all of the indigenous cultures of Turtle Island is that they recognized all of our fellow non-human beings on Earth as animate, imbued with a spirit and as persons deserving of our respect and reverence.
@tedman
2. https://corbettreport.com/new-year-open-thread-2025/#comment-172647
You have made sweeping generalizing statements that lump all of the hundreds of different cultures from that area into one group of “indians” and then you describe their attributes and behaviors as though you are talking about one uniform village of people) that is nonsensical.
I don’t know if you summon up some image of an Apache brave charging into battle from a movie or something when you talk about indigenous peoples from Turtle Island, but I have got news for you, they are not all the same and they behave very differently based on their unique cultural backgrounds.
There were hardcore slave collecting warlords on the Mississippi 600 years ago that clearcut forests and behaved like Romans, they created massive mudslides, floods and crop failures through their hubris and learned the hard way about how exploitative ways of living come back to bite you in the behind.
There were very peaceful peoples that did not believe in violating others, they practiced some degree of self-defense, but did not specialize in killing, so when hegemonic forces arrived, they faced a similar fate to those poor Tibetan people on the border of China that keep getting killed and beaten down.
Then there were those that valued precision of language, diplomacy, scholarly knowledge and wit over physical prowess (though they could also hold their own in a fight).
There were trophy hunting marauders, and pacifist meditators, totem pole carving artists and food forest cultivating farmers, each with their own diverse history and customs that motivated them.
There were certainly abusive groups of humans here prior to European arrival, there were also others that far surpassed Europeans in their intellectual, horticultural and social technologies. Being able to discern the difference between the two will save you from looking dumb and will offer you solutions based intel for that which is cominh ahead.
@tedman
3. https://corbettreport.com/new-year-open-thread-2025/#comment-172604
Rogers and Colden admired these Indigenous people of the Eastern Woodlands, but not every European did. “The Savage does not know what it is to obey,” complained the French explorer Nicolas Perrot in the 1670s. Indians “think every one ought to be left to his own Opinion, without being thwarted,” the Jesuit Louis Hennepin wrote twenty years later. The Indians, he grumbled, “believe what they please and no more” — a practice dangerous, in Hennepin’s view, to a well-ordered society. “There is nothing so difficult to control as the tribes of America,” another Jesuit unhappily observed. “All these barbarians have the law of wild asses — they are born, live, and die in a liberty without restraint; they do not know what is meant by bridle and bit.”
Indigenous insistence on personal liberty was accompanied by an equal insistence on social equality. Northeastern Indigenous peoples were appalled by the European propensity to divide themselves into social classes, with those on the lower rungs of the hierarchy compelled to defer to those on the upper. The French adventurer Louis Armand de Lorn d’Arce, Baron of Lahontan, lived in French “Canada” between 1683 and 1694 and frequently visited the Huron. When the baron expatiated upon the superior practices of Europe, the Indians were baffled.
‘When an Indian Child has been brought up among us [Franklin lamented in 1753], taught our language and habituated to our Customs, yet if he goes to see his relations and makes one Indian Ramble with them, there is no persuading him ever to return. [But] when white persons of either sex have been taken prisoners young by the Indians, and lived a while among them, tho’ ransomed by their Friends, and treated with all imaginable tenderness to prevail with them to stay among the English, yet in a Short time they become disgusted with our manner of life. . .and take the first good Opportunity of escaping again into the Woods, when there is no reclaiming them.’
Influenced by their proximity to Indigenous societies — by being around living, breathing role models of human liberty — European colonists adopted their insubordinate attitudes, which “troubled the power elite of France,” the historian Cornelius J. Jaenen observed. Baron d’Arce was an example, despite his noble title; as the passage he italicized suggests, his account highlighted “Indian freedoms” as an incitement toward rebellion.
In the most direct way, Indigenous liberty made indigenous villages into competitors for colonists’ allegiance. Colonial societies could not become too oppressive, because their members — surrounded by examples of free life — always had the option to vote with their feet.
I don’t think you’re stinky G, even metaphorically. I appreciate your anti-statist stance. I’m hoping I can give you some new information. Why 1900?
North American settlements started out with populations primarily from Western and Northern Europe, however that started to change in the 1880’s after lots of Jews fleeing Russia came to America and immediately started lobbying to loosen immigration restrictions. At first this let in Eastern Europeans and Mediterranean peoples, which I personally would place under the “White” umbrella, but they were somewhat different from the founding populations. Jews would continue to work tirelessly to diversify the Anglosphere and Europe, which brings us to the video topic of the “Great Replacement”. This was not just a legislative effort, Franz Boas made it his life’s work to inject ignorance of racial differences into American colleges and schools from 1899 to 1942, and his fanatical acolytes had a lot of success spreading this fashionable ignorance through out “The West”, leading us to sleepwalk into suicide. So, I see the late 19th century as the start of our diversity woes.
I think the 1950’s depictions of natives were quite sanitized, if campy at times.
Comments on reply 1
I don’t think human sacrifice was common in North America, I think that was mainly a Mesoamerica and South American thing.
Native Americans I’ve met have been varied. Some were very nice. The point of bringing up their warfare is that our modern propaganda is designed to depict them as these peaceful egalitarian forest hippies, who were living in balance with nature until the evil White man came and stole their land. In actuality, their land was changing hands for millennia from tribal warfare, and they would start forest fires for war, some hunted with buffalo jumps, and they hunted the woolly mammoth to extinction.
Yes, Europeans have a history of torture back in the old country.
My understanding is that something like 90% of the Natives were inadvertently killed by the introduction of new-world diseases, and without that, they probably would have destroyed the colonies of the 1500’s and 1600’s.
Comments on reply 2
I’m sure there was a large diversity of tribes and cultures, but local ones described to me as “peaceful” in the Seattle public school system, I’d later discover had done a lot of savage stuff, even tortured one of my ancestors. On this topic, peaceful is realtive.
Comments on reply 3
Sometimes a tribe would go back on it’s agreement and slaughter a town. There’s a potential dark interpretation to just doing as one pleases.
Wasn’t it common for tribes to have chiefs, and people with more or less status within the tribes?
I have to give it to you G, the quote about Whites raised with the Indians preferring to return to the Indians after Whites tried to indoctrinate them back, makes an impression on me. I hadn’t heard of that before.
Ahh good old reliable Duck 🙂 Always ready to ride hard to fight for the “might makes right” modo and remind us how we would not want to end up like those “losers” the “Indians”.
Subjugation occurs where you are and where I am, and yet these “less than white” bad guys you seem to be wanting to put on the boogie man poster are not the ones doing the subjugating my friend.
The oligarchy and their subservient statist apparatuses subjugate you, and they love it when people divide themselves into little aggressive color coded tribes and fight amongst themselves. It keeps you busy spinning your tires fighting and demonizing your fellow non yacht owning humans (based on trivial superficial outward differences) while the plutocrats tighten the noose around your neck and simultaneously tell you they are keeping you safe from “the others”.
I am less concerned about being a “loser” and more concerned about losing my soul trying to win within the oligarch rigged game of statism and trivial race based tribalism.
Winning only to live with a dead heart and empty soul is not worth it for me.
G
“…. Winning only to live with a dead heart and empty soul is not worth it for me…..”
That’s fine if it’s your choice,
I don’t know if you have kids but if you do I must say that choosing subjugation for them so that you can feel good about yourself does not strike me as very moral.
As to might makes right? While that is certainly debatable it’s even more questionable to imagine that self righteousness makes right….honestly that sounds more like selfish self involvement,.but you do you man.
@Duck
Thanks for offering your two cents.
The alliances I forge with knowledge keepers from different cultures, community projects I work on with diverse peoples and food forests I am planting will offer the opposite of subjugation to the kids of the next generation.
And if a giant army of evil Mexicans, or Ethiopians or Trumpians invades and decimates everything I have worked to co-create, it will have still been worth it to build sandcastles on the beach while choosing actions that nurture and enrich the soul (knowing that all physical things are impermanent anyways).
For a flashback to some more of my thoughts on why choosing actions that are moral and creative is worth it regardless of what is headed your way:
https://corbettreport.com/february-open-thread-2023/#comment-146981
There was a leaked Amazon memo about how racial diversity is useful for preventing the formation of labor unions. I wish to put forth the notion that those who rule us did their best to get racial diversity into the West specifically to make it harder to organize against them.
In 2011, bankers undermined Occupy Wall-Street by sending in agents to diversity-monger. The leaders of the movement were mostly young White men, so it was disruptive when loud angry voices started derailing meetings and berating them for not having more women and people of color in movement leadership. Being young well-meaning Whites from New York, they didn’t have an answer for that.
It would be great to overthrow our shadow masters any way we can, including via a racially diverse coalition, but there’s some likely difficulties with that approach that may be hard to appreciate if one’s baseline is to assume all human races have identical psychology.
Ted man
“…. There was a leaked Amazon memo about how racial diversity is useful for preventing the formation of labor unions…..”
That is true, they have the same policy at some grocery chains to keep the workers from trusting each other……I forgot which book but as I recall the more diverse a population is the LESS trust and civic engagement there is
Makes sense since diversity in population has always been accompanied by more government power since the groups all look to power for favors and safety.
You are also correct about human psychology being different in different cultures and races…..the worst thing about white people is that they STILL cant accept that not all people want to do things the way euro’s like to do stuff. Most people who think “we are all the same” are ignorant and have never met anyone outside their own little class bubble OR they only deal with other peoples from a position of rich westerner.
I forget the details, but I was convinced by an explanation that the circumstances of surviving deadly winters in Europe lead to a unique level of reciprocal trade with strangers, whereas the rest of humanity had a stronger proximity-based affinity. (self, then family, then tribe, etc). I think more than with other humans, they needed to trade with strangers to make it. I think this inadvertently bred them to treat strangers more fairly, so Whites are more likely to assume non-Whites share their good will for others. East Asians also got the deadly-winter / fertile growing season prefrontal cortex development, but for whatever reason, people in China seem to hardly care when strangers gets run over, and their already low concern gets really stark when a foreigner gets injured there.
Another big ramification of a survival requirement of reciprocal trade seems to be a heightened guilt reaction. Whites that felt a heightened sense of guilt for screwing someone survived better in Northern Europe (and the genes spread out and dilute from there), whereas in some other environments, screwing strangers could be a survival advantage. A proclivity for guilt is easily hijacked.
Another factor here is that human races with particularly small prefrontal cortexes don’t seem as inept in conversation as they are in tasks that require abstract thinking. They can be clinically retarded when it comes to math or planning, but not seem nearly as badly damaged as a clinically retarded White of equal IQ. This illusion, due to them not being broken and having normal social circuitry, makes it easier to assume equal abilities if you just have passing conversations with them.
I worry I’m getting a little astray from the video topic, the Great Reset. To tie it back, liberal and conservative Whites, compelled to avoid feeling bad about being “racist”, will do their best to rationalize racial sameness. On top of the abstract thinking that requires, a desire to be fair to strangers makes them vulnerable to an order to evaluate everyone as isolated individuals. The non-whites they knew at school and work don’t seem so different in conversation, and the non-whites on screens for mass consumption usually seem sharp, so they feel comfortable in the equality belief, which they deep down fear being seen as out of compliance with. This makes them relatively blind to the Great Replacement, and makes them not appreciate the civilizational consequences thereof.
Sorry for usually leaving many of your points uncommented. Yes, at least Whole Foods uses diversity to reduce worker solidarity too. Yes, studies over the years find reduced community trust in more diverse areas. Yes, diverse countries are historically held together by government force and then fracture along racial lines. Yes, upper crust non-whites are smarter and more moral than lower class ones, and can create a misleading impression. I’m feeling bad about giving G so many replies, I think he’s had enough of the subject.
Ted Man
“…. I’m feeling bad about giving G so many replies, I think he’s had enough of the subjec….”
I would not worry, he is smart enough that he will rationalize away any uncomfortable facts.
It’s the intellectual version of shoving his fingers in his ears and chanting that he can’t hear you. Pretty consistently he will give an initial argument and then trail off and block out unwelcome truths.
As to the IQ thing have you checked out Dr Dutton the jolly heretic? He would know more about that, though he is a PITA for not linking to sources properly. I think he was talking about the Euro vs Afro behavior sets in terms of fast vs slow life strategy so that would be kinda be the winters you’re talking about. That would explain why blacks tend to hit puberty faster and also tend to have higher testosterone levels (which is why the females tend to have bigger bones too)
That said another selection event was the number of executions that weeded out the most of the more impulsive whites in the Middle Ages…..I don’t really think there is a genetic component to morality but self control is def genetic
Duck,
I wrote you a multifaceted post, my computer lost power, and now there’s no reply button on your last comment, so I’m trying to reply on one of my comments to see if you see it.
To summarize my lost 3000 character post; morality requires abstract thinking, abstract thinking comes from the prefrontal cortex, the relative size of the prefrontal cortex comes from your genes. Imagining how others would feel, or pondering the ramifications of your acts on larger society requires abstract thinking. Environments with deadly winters, but fertile enough summers to make enough food to last through the winter, requires the ability to imagine something that doesn’t exist: the future. This functionality seems to also come with the power to delay gratification, impulse control, and a natural sense of time, which are all things smaller prefrontal cortex peoples lack.
Thanks for sharing Dr. Dutton.
Ted man
CS Lewis said something like “I’d rather play cards with an uneducated
Man who had been taught “gentlemen don’t cheat” then a moral philosopher who had been brought up amongst card sharps “
We kinda agree but differ on.a point here….
The reason IQ is not massively important in morality is that it doesn’t work by “reasoning out “ things…..generally it works via mirror neurons giving you an idea about how others feel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror_neuron
And it’s not a massive cognitive load requiring high IQ to follow the basic training rules of morality….the point of codes of morals is to SIMPLIFY things Nd they do that well – there is no reason to be thinking about the social effects of having an affair or stealing stuff because generally speaking everyone is following the simple set of instructions “do this don’t be doing that” or they are choosing to ignore those set of instructions because a)self control is lacking or
b)they are choosing to do bad because they are actually bad people
We in the modern west have a very elevated idea of intelligence and reason because it’s what we were good at and thus we elevate it but considerhow many smart people are evil today? They are just as evil as dumb people
There are plenty of intelligent pedos on the Epstein list and Bill Gates is probably a lot smarter than me……even when we act morally we do not think “if I give this old lady a ride then society gets better”….in fact the moral desire for justice very easily ends up in socially harmful “social justice “ and cops framing a known criminal and putting him away for life is MORALLY wring but SOCIALLY good.
I’m just reading the Bi Cameral Mind and you can think of morals as the voice that tells people “do this don’t do that” and run in a pretty simple list rather then requiring us to reason it out from first principles.
That’s what I think anyway, I know some smart people who are very immoral and dumb people who follow the Bible morality very well. It’s a choice that doesn’t need a lot of brain power and has IMO very little to do with it – morals are the simple rules to follow and being moral or not is an act of will
The most recent replies lack reply buttons, but a reply button from 4 posts ago seems to work.
It’s certainly true that High IQ alone doesn’t make people good, but there’s some anti-social behaviors that are much more common among the low IQ. The smart evil look ahead to avoid consequences, the low IQ act impulsively for short-term gain, and often don’t even understand that the cops are now coming for them because of their myopic actions.
White people are the disproportionate majority of any animal welfare outfit. It’s a trend that holds for both Atheist and Christian Whites. Black people are the disproportionate majority of people harming animals for fun on uncensored video sites. Sure, not all Whites, not all Blacks, but it seems like a pronounced trend.
It’s my impression that Black defendants are more remorseless in court. From dozens of recordings, it seems like they don’t care about the victims even slightly, or even act cruelly towards the victim’s grieving families. Having read some essays from public defenders, it sounds like Blacks have zero gratitude for their public defenders, whereas other races treat them with respect. From the essay it sounds like it partially comes from lack of comprehension of their situation.
Studies of identical twins raised apart typically find that people with the same set of DNA end up living very similar lives. They go into similar professions, get married at similar ages to similar partners, their IQ scores correlate with 0.75 R-correlation values. I’m sure upbringing makes a difference (identical twins raised together IQ correlation is 0.85), but I think there’s either a baseline level of inbuilt morality, or their ability to absorb moral programming is built-in.
I think you’re right that moral choices are seldom arrived at intellectually. I think you’re right that there’s plenty of smart immoral people and dumb moral people. However, I contend that there’s a correlation between lower IQ races and certain kinds of bad behavior.
Replacement Migration:
Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?
https://web.archive.org/web/20160413073733/http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/migration/migration.htm
It sure is is you don’t care what kind of people make up the population…..import the third world and you become the third world.
certainly plenty of meat and veggie to get our teeth into here, thanks for your excellent report J.C.
No james, the end goal doesn’t change the fact that white civilization is under attack. Whites are the ones that matter, as this is happening only in white countries. Obviously ziojews and their corrupt allies are orchestrating this attack, but apparently you are too chicken to be truthful about this war.