Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
WATCH THIS VIDEO ON ODYSEE
Fact: the RSS global mean temperature anomaly dataset shows a least-squares linear regression trend of 0.0C from February 1997 to October 2015. But what does this really mean? And what is the significance of this global warming pause? Join me in today’s Thought For The Day as we explore this question.
SHOW NOTES:
Global Warming Hiatus, On Pause? #QFC @CorbettReport
IPCC AR5 Technical Summary (see Box TS.3 for pause discussion)
RSS Global Mean Temperature trend analysis Feb 1997 – Oct 2015
What Is The Average Global Temperature?
Global temperature datasets – overview
RSS upper air temperature data
NOAA State of the climate 2008 (See page S22 for pause discussion)
Pielke Jr. praises NOAA for making 15 year falsifiability claim
Climate change is unfalsifiable woo-woo pseudoscience
Phil Jones makes 15 years “before we get worried” claim
Contributions of Stratospheric Water Vapor to Decadal Changes in the Rate of Global Warming
Global warming lull down to China’s coal growth
Climate impacts of changing aerosol emissions since 1996
Oceans moderate climate change
Trenberth debunks himself: The oceans didn’t eat the global warming ‘missing heat’
Research Suggests Pacific Trade Winds Cause Pause
Slowdown in Tropical Pacific Flow Pinned on Climate Change
Slowdown due to Montreal Protocol!
66 excuses for the pause in global warming
The Recent Slowing in the Rise of Global Temperatures
Climate Oscillations and the Global Warming Faux Pause
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus
Congressman now threatens to subpoena commerce secretary over global warming report
US CLIVAR Summer 2015 edition of Variations
Has NOAA ‘busted’ the pause in global warming?
Curry on the Cowtan & Way ‘pausebuster’: ‘Is there anything useful [in it]?”
Hi James,
you may have already talked of this.
http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/bernprop.html
It seems like a classic use of the propaganda techniques of Edward Bernays by the so called Climate “authorities”……Controlling what people think.
https://youtu.be/p8ERfxWouXs particularly around the 10 minute mark
Dear James:
I feel that you have made a pretty good case for skepticism regarding the human impact on global warming. As with the skepticism (absolute certainty), regarding the fallicy of the “official” 911 story, it would be great to hear more about the motivation behind the global warming agenda. I have a feeling that this topic would make for a complete podocumentary similar to the one you created regarding the federal reserve. It might shift the focus from the argument for or against global warming to the more nefarious reseans why there has been such a strong push to promulgate this “official” story.
Hi James,
It’s interesting to note that the CEO of Apple was interviewed on the U.S. Television show “60 Minutes” last night and he said that one of the factors that justified Apple’s decision to export a good deal of their engineering to China and various other Asian Countries was the lack of qualified scientific minds being produced by colleges in the U.S. The ongoing incompetence of the Climate Science Sector probably contributed a great deal to this decision !
Just for posterity: essay by Eric Worrall posted on Wattsupwiththat:
The oceans swallowed my global warming? Desperate butt covering from alarmists who are facing increasingly embarrassing questions about the failure of the world to end.
14 July 2022
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/07/21/climate-alarmists-respond-to-the-global-warming-pause/