A single video can change the world. This week’s mission, if you choose to accept it, is simple. Watch this video on The Philosophy of Liberty. If you like it, share it.
Video player not working? Use these links to watch it somewhere else!
WATCH ON: 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
or DOWNLOAD THE MP4
WATCH IN GERMAN ON: /
SHOW NOTES
The video is available here: The Philosophy of Liberty
It is also available with music and no narration, with narration and no music, with different music, as sketch animation, with different different music, etc. What’s more, it’s available in dozens and dozens of languages at JonathanGullible.com.
That is a good place to end up in. Knowing the parts, their functions and their expectations easily fit in a new beginning. An original starting place unspoiled by the old way; the prejudices and all . One disturbing result of all this equality is the lack of cultural diversity. It must proceed to a one world government, sans that a one world singularity. This is by far the most difficult thing to put into practice in or at this time line we are on. A problem of exponential complexity. Whipping the brains clean on a global basis is what TPTSB want. Can we be on the same time line with them? The same procedural flow chart to a common end? X must be done so Y can be put into place? This boundaries on madness. I can change going toward the future but I know others who can not change. Nor will they ever. They can’t reason their way out of or into logic.Short of a catalyzing event like Pearl Harbor. A new paradigm. . What can force ethical behavior? Mutually assured destruction?
You’re a sly one Mr.Corbett. You make my head feel like a seasick 🐊.
>”It must proceed to a one world government”
I don’t see how that follows.
Andrew, good catch , you get an ‘ob’.but
Read on to “sans that” or forget that guv’ment idea completely and go with a world ” singularity.” It will always try to bring you back to a centralization of organisation.
I believe the Frank Russell’s ‘ Then There Were None’ , will be a model for the future. If like the Sargent Major in the story does and we could stop the world ” I want to get off” , as he did leave the star ship . It could be a successful tactic. What’s the chances of a successful application? Count the ways and see if your head doesn’t hurt too.
What do you mean by “world singularity”?
Andrew,
Singularity of thought. See Joe Plumber ‘s work I just posted. It’s not fantasy but more science fiction cum fact.
The opposing of two systems of existence. TPTSB will resist to the bitter end .
Sharing this volentaryist philosophy will crash into primitive mans desires. Non aggression will have to reach a world singularity of thought, ethical thought, for peace to be realized. Competition of any kind is a sin to the hard core . They are in trenches and there is little that will change their minds. They literally will kill everything if they can’t get their way. Gaza is a modern example of a very old human flawed behavior. Kill them all , science will save us kind of thinking. Getting to the end, will we kill our way to accomplish our goals? Rage is human and they are outrageous. Out of the human family. Out of ethical principles. Hold on to principles. They separate us from the animals in the bush.
> “TPTSB will resist to the bitter end”
Likewise.
andrew, my suggestion is, don’t feed the troll.
he’s spewing a fountain of nonsense.
maybe a bot, maybe a disinfo agent, maybe a disturbed individual.
at any rate, not someone to engage with.
cheers.
reflector
How’s the bush? Like an animal you neither offer comparison, source material or facts. Just ab-homo- men cliches like a sot. Using your intuition to guide people away from civilization to cower in the social isolation and vulnerable fringes of the woods? Running away from the problems? Can you hear the foot steps behind you? Jackal, jack ass or jester? What’s it gonna be with those big ears. Join in ,have some fun use some humor at least. E J Doyle was right about sots with one friend in the palm of their hand unable to communicate even with its monolithic structure.
Cheers mate. You might be a broken clock , right at least once a day. Glad you are here.
I firmly believe in these principles, yet they seem harder and harder to live by as society approaches the proverbial rat utopia.
i hear where you’re coming from.
however, society is not some fixed monolith.
your society is the collection of voluntary associations that you choose to engage in.
when certain individuals or groups act against your interest (government, banks, media, bad actors), find a way to distance yourself from them, stop relying on them, stop interacting with them, find a way to exist independently of them.
and find others who share your values and mutual interests and build bridges there.
learn to grow your own food, generate your own power, conduct commerce outside the captured and taxed slave-system, etc.
it’s not an all or nothing deal, and the more you move in the right direction, the more you can live your truth, and the more you can remove the aggressors and slavers from your life.
>”when certain individuals or groups act against your interest (government, banks, media, bad actors), find a way to distance yourself from them, stop relying on them, stop interacting with them, find a way to exist independently of them”
That strikes me as rather glib. These associations are increasingly *imposed* upon the public and not voluntary.
Andrew
Some associations are, naturally, un chosen. You don’t generally get to pre select which kids you are going to have for example 🙂
But the vast majority of what people THINK is forced upon them they actually choose for themselves- no one MAKES you use a credit card. No one MAKES you work for x or y corporations, no one makes you carry a mobile phone or buy from Amazon or use Netflix.
The vast majority of people who complain about their lack of freedom forget that you can always choose to do without most of the services they complain about….you just have to accept that you will be in some way “poor”. Most folks want to have their cake and eat it- they want the convenience and comforts the slave system provides without having to actually do what massa says.
Find ways to replace or do without one thing the system provides and it has that much less power over you.
>”Some associations are, naturally, un chosen. You don’t generally get to pre select which kids you are going to have for example”
People do get to choose whether or not they associate with their kids after having them, and, in these enlightened times, before having them. Not so much *while* having them, but this example seems beside the point, at any rate.
>”But the vast majority of what people THINK is forced upon them they actually choose for themselves- no one MAKES you use a credit card.”
Yet everyone in the USA is forced to use credit, directly or indirectly, as a consequence of debt-based monetary policy.
>”No one MAKES you work for x or y corporations, no one makes you carry a mobile phone”
Even some of these cherry-picked examples come down to a Hobson’s choice at the time one “decides”.
Andrew
We are kinda agreeing, it’s just that you (rightly) think the price of freedom is more than most people want to pay. Like I said people want the bait AND the freedom
“…. Yet everyone in the USA is forced to use credit, directly or indirectly, as a consequence of debt-based monetary polic….”
Take a dollar bill and buy something with it (something small, lol) and it serves the exact same function as a copper coin or a strip of bronze or a bag of beads.
Your not a bank and you personally have zero need to interact with “money as debt” in your day to day interactions- true it does mean you get hit with inflation tax if you keep cash as an asset but thats you choice. For exchange it functions like any ither medium.
Does anyone make you get a mortgage? Or carry a credit card? Or even an ID? Nope- you won’t have the same access to services someone who does have those things but thats only a “hobsons choice” if you can not live without thise services.
Basically if you NEED to live a comfortable life where everything is convenient and easy then you need to make your peace with being a part of the system.
I recall a poster here during coof days who decided to get their vax shot because their wife couldn’t take the social pressure of not getting it. That was his choice, the pain of non conformity was More important then his health and freedom. I think thats a dumb choice , but at the end of the day he (not me) will have to pay for, or benefit from, his choices.
Duck: I found resistance to coercive authority exhilarating, at 28, 1971, when I stopped paying my 10% long distance call tax. I “saved” about a dollar, but it inspired me to find ways to stop paying lots of other taxes, e.g., sales, income, gas. I put myself at risk and by 1974 I was being pursued by IRS agents. I do best when endangered. I escaped but saw everyone around me going to jail. I quit working and went into business for myself. Now, at 83, near my end, I am still “relatively” free or “less enslaved”. I will die a free thinking anarchist, free from “The Most Dangerous Superstition” (Larken Rose). Taking action made a major difference by changing my attitude. It took me by surprise and empowered me.
Vikuntaryist
True, you can be more or less free and most choose less. I am glad it worked out for you and you stuck to your principles
no one is EVER totally free, not will anyone ever be because we live in a real physical world.
“It is better to eat the black bread of freedom than the white bread of slavery” – An Eastern European Defector saying.
Iamfree
“….. It is better to eat the black bread of freedom than the white bread of slavery” – An Eastern European Defector sayi……”
Thats a good saying but the sad thing is people just love that soft white bread spread with hydrogenated vegetable oil slop.
We have been living in the wealth anomaly for generations now where people think they neeeeed the high living standard only the machine can supply at the cost of their freedom…..if the economy was great most people whi THINK theybwant freedom over comfort would still be kissing the systems backside and saying it was chocolate
most of our problems are self-created.
instead of talking in general terms about imposed associations, how about giving specific examples?
i can tell you in my own life, i built up a business from scratch, had 10 employees at its peak, never had a business license, never filed taxes, paid all employees and vendors in cash.
since then, i’ve closed the business, bought an off-grid property, in the process of building unpermitted dwellings, learning to grow my own food, generate my own power, etc.
many people can’t conceive of not going to their mcjob, filing taxes, being dependent on the systems of government, media, healthcare, education, commerce that aren’t in our interests.
if you feel that there’s associations that are imposed upon the public, then, stop being the public. you are your own person.
there’s a few things that are difficult to get around, such as having a driver’s license and insurance, but, aside from a few minor things like that, we are mostly free to live life on our own terms.
I’m glad you got yours and I’m sure it took a lot of work, yet many people have gone to prison for attempting the same thing.
Andrew
“….. yet many people have gone to prison for attempting the same thin……”
My chickens have a very happy and safe life (until I decide to kill them) while wild chickens have a dangerous life…..freedom is quite dangerous and can get you killed or uncomfortable which is why most people don’t actually WANT it
Freedom is not freedom from risk
There’s no such thing as a wild chicken.
Andrew
The paradox Duck offers the chickens is much the same normal people face in trying to understand TPTSB. Taking the birds offspring isn’t enough to satiate the appetite for that appetite also wants power. Killing does that . Taking life when there is no ethical cause, just fulfilling a need created from those 7 deadly sins. Taking the eggs are not enough for some.. Much has been said on that
Our paradox ? To be at peace with the likes of them, man must kill them all. Then that singularity of thought may over ride our rage against that part of humanity we find so unacceptable. The difference between juggernauts is one demands rulers while the other demands rules without rulers. But,, as you indicated above , if I read you correctly,…” “Likewise” we must set our principles aside and kill them all in this physical world. It goes without saying this is a thought , where thoughts form the spiritual world from the whole cloth of the physical world we are never without the paradoxes of principles.
Gbw
“….To be at peace with the likes of them, man must kill them all. Then that singularity of thought may over ride our rage against that part of humanity we find so unacceptable…..”
But the true paradox of the chicken is that if they killed me then they would have to find their own food and shelter.
Fewer of them would survive (jungle fowl really only do WELL in the jungle) and thus ten paradox is that I actually provide them with a service.
Much as people whine about freedom the majority really like to live in the nice safe “coup” and have their slop delivered by Amazon and Netflix.
If people want to be free from the farmer then they have to be able to say no to free stuff….mr Corbett has had a few solutions watch Epps about how people can do things for themselves and live outside the system somewhat.
Duck,
Does the chicken you talk about , that wants to kill you use a carrot and a stick approach to your soft white underbelly of Duck cutlets? No? I have no idea what you mean. You fail to see the compromises you make for the eggs . Than you face the paradox of the chicken 🐔 killings and the making of eggs. Who came first and how is this a irrevocable end to chickens?
The city on the hill , that’s the Swiss money managers who look down at the tax cattle in the valleys, that’s us . The hilltop people want more eggs and know that killing us off will hinder the egg supply but killing is their one joy above all other duties they must perform to keep themselves happy. It Does nothing but terrorize the valley folk decreasing egg production.
Now what is the one thing that you could remove from this scenario which prevents this from becoming a paradox by creating a paradox.? Why do you feel killing the chicken can be justified? Do you fear the uncompromising Duck killing chicks and think you must kill them too for security? You got the eggs why do you need more ? For starvation ? The people on the hill have needs too. Take your time 🦹🦆.
Andrew
I beg to differ about chickens…..where do you think domestic chickens came from?? Bill Gates lab?
While most chickens are as helpless as most humans when off the farm there ARE plenty that can take care of themselves. I introduced a feral chicken into my flock. It had lived wild for a good while, surviving on its own. Her genes strengthened the genetics of my chickens- a number even have the weird neck ridge of feathers she had.
My bantams can live quite well off what they find if indint feed them, and unlike chickens in a factory farm (or people who need comfort from the system) they can survive and be free if tjeir willing to risk the bad outcomes tjat might happen.
Most people don’t want freedom, they want comfort
And…
About the same is being said here by Joe Plumber. The shift away from the old to the new. He is talking about Heath freedom and ethics of who owns your health. It overlays somewhat here but it is still somewhat centralized but it leans heavily to freedom and liberty with what you own and how you use it.
https://youtu.be/1_FwK8P1KAc
Turn it here and go on and turn it everywhere until there are none.
From the Solarie Report. 2 and one half hours long.
You can’t paint a picture of the Financial Industrial Complex in 30 seconds. Reality is not what you think. This may be the best report on defining TPTSB. Simon Dixon and Catherine Austin-Fitts break down the complex world we live in.
You may ask : and I will answer.
Why is it so long?
~~~ knowledge never comes quick, have the patience to learn. If you ask the question then stick around long enough to get the answer. The answers these people have, took decades to form. Stop being quick stupid.
What does this have to do with The Corbett Report?
~~~ Catherine Austin-Fitts ‘ introduces the connection at the beginning, financial freedom, being sovereign, owning yourself. Trust in rules; which they both believe in.
Enjoy, enough jaw jacking now git to it.
https://youtu.be/gT_jxglvbyg
Thanks for the link James. Sort of an odd voicing/narration, sort of like Alan Watts from the 60’s.
The phrase was originally Life, Liberty, and Property not he pursuit of Happiness but the controllers didn’t want such notions ringing the ears of Proles. Pooh bah, WE will own the property and charge you taxes on it till you die, then charge your kin taxes for your dying.
A nice visual of the “exchange of property” was in Dances With Wolves when Lieutenant Dunbar got Wind In His Hair’s knife and sheath for his Army Jacket…”Good trade” both 🙂
Part of the game of getting people to accept others claim to their property (Condemnation, also called eminent domain under the Fifth Amendment, written of course by the wealthy) is found in the New World Order’s use of the propaganda of “God’s will” in people who have given away self legitimizing themselves to the Priest Class interpreting a book of lies, murder, rape, and more.
Blah, blah, blah, anything is “God’s will”
Like the Dead in ‘Truckin’ sang…”Set up, like a bowling pin Knocked down, it gets to wearing thin They just won’t let you be…”
And ironically beyond the cliche’ lie, we are not a “Christian Nation”…The Constitution of the United States of America makes zero reference to a god or Christianity. (Other than the freedom to believe any nonsense you want) Yet found everywhere these days is the creeping nonsense about new found Christianity, like you know, in those jail house conversions. No one ever asks WHY there is always a salute to the armed forces and bomber fly overs at football games now do they?
And just “what” is liberty anyway? Finding a clan or ‘tribe’ with the same cognitive bias one carries from his propagandized life and believes he/she has ‘The Truth’ and then selecting information that supports their views, ignoring contrary information, pointing fingers and name calling and canceling, etc. other.??
The closest, many who are still alive, to clutching that elusive power was in the 60’s when “do your own thing” was a mind set not of selfishness or greed but rather to instill the reality you have a right to be, do, eat, dress, etc. what ever you want.
One of the best lessons I gather in my life quest for sure:
I’M A FREE MAN (song)
https://old.bitchute.com/video/tNdAxAV9Ed9o/
Lots of people say this about this video but it doesn’t really resonate with me. Amuch stronger video, in my opinion, is “message to the voting cattle” (based on a speech in Larken Rose’s novel The Iron Web. Gives me goosebumps every time i watch it.
That video may be old, but oh my!
I just want to be clear, I was referring to the “The Philosophy of Liberty” video.
to put it in other words ; this IS natural law
I absolutely embrace all of these concepts. I appreciate the opportunity to have all this ideas in one simple video to send to all of my friends. After watching it I went through my texting queue and sent it to everyone in it. Doing my small part to see if it could go viral. Huzzah! Thank you.
For ever humanity has sought safety, comfort and ease from the vagaries of nature, or from each other that’s why ‘leaders’ get away with so much BS, telling us if we do this or that we’ll be safer, more comfortable and how much easier life is doing everything with that bit of ‘smart’ plastic; yet no matter how often, or about what we seek to feel safer, no matter how much we do to make things safer and easier, there’s something about life that always confronts us with dangers and discomforts. We invented disinfectants to combat the dangers of dirt, yet created a new danger, pollution. I don’t need to go into any other examples, I’m sure most commenting here know for themselves, so the moral to that story appears to be that we have to learn to accept that no matter which path we take in life there will be dangers, and that in order to find better ways of living this life we need to be brave, and prepared to face fears and discomforts. Faint heart and fears ‘guiding’ us, as is often the case when we follow imposed leaders, has lead us up the garden path and into the mire. We are entering unknown waters, but there’s lots of good advice around to help us cope, even though it’ll be trial and error, without these there is rarely success. So gird your loins chaps! ♥️🤔💥🙃🤢🏄 I know that was all a bit trite, but we definitely are going to need to be brave, stoic, determined, inventive, and ethical, and to spread ideas such as those in the video above. Thank you James