Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
WATCH THIS VIDEO ON BITCHUTE / ODYSEE / YOUTUBE
The social engineers will tell you that green lights are blue or there are five lights when there are only four. They want you to repeat their lies. They want to break you down. Don’t let them. Say it with me: That is a GREEN light!
Damn. Now each and every time I pass by a green (blue) light, I’ll hear James say, “That’s greeeennnn lights!”.
Thanks for that.
😉
Back in the early 1980’s when women wore dresses to work, I was one of three owners of a women’s wholesale apparel place. One guy was the buyer, one guy would sell the goods to other retail stores, and one guy (me) would liquidate the inventory which the retail stores would not buy from our wholesale place.
For three years I traveled continuously putting on women’s dress sales in different cities around the United States. Every week, I would be in a different city and set up a large three day “Fashion Sale” in a convention center or Hotel ballroom. On opening day, often a hundred women would be waiting outside the doors for us to open. They would rush in and grab stuff in a panic before someone else grabbed it. Like the movies. In fact, I shot footage of this frenzy buying to use for my TV ads.
For a period of time, I traveled with a petite lady who helped me manage things. Prior to rolling into a city, I placed a “Help Wanted” ad in the newspaper for people to help with the dress sale and set up the racks. Usually 20-40 people would show up on the day prior to the sale. I would hire maybe 10-20. Then we would go to work setting things up and doing promotion.
CHICAGO – This is a true story. Money for Nothing
In downtown Chicago I had booked the Penthouse Ballroom of a very upscale Hotel. So, the morning prior to the sale, my helper the petite lady and I are walking into the Hotel. The Hotel Manager is all bug eyed panicky. When I reach the Penthouse Ballroom it is filled with more than 300 people wanting to work (not 20-40 people). Most of the 300 people were from the rough neighborhoods. If you understand that Chicago has a very, very rough side, you will know what I am talking about. The upscale Hotel was having a tizzy with all these rough looking people riding up and down the elevators with the suit & tie guests.
I had to get this mob out of there. I told the petite lady with me to pick 20 or 30 quickly and we’ll let the rest go. As she was pointing to people picking them, the crowd of 300 closed in and engulfed her.
I yelled “Hold it! Hold it!” Everyone stopped.
I had to think fast. Trying to stall, I just made up a silly statement.
#1 – “Okay. All the people who think that they should be paid money even though they don’t work for it, even though they do nothing, stand over there on that side of the room.”
#2 – “And all the people who think that they should be paid money only if they earn it, only if they work for it, stand on this side of the room.”
I rephrased the statements in simple terms several times so there would not be a misunderstanding, plus I was stalling anyway.
Two choices…
#1 – Get paid money, but you don’t have to earn it.
#2 – Get paid money if you earn it.
I kid you not. The room split in two. 150 folks went to one side and 150 went to the other. I couldn’t believe it.
My think…I mean…come on…even if a job candidate really believed that they should get money for nothing, you never tell the boss or hiring manager that concept. At least be smart enough to lie and say: “Oh yea Boss. I should only get paid money if I earn it.”
Of course I told the folks on that side of the room (get money for no work camp) that they could leave.
I further whittled the remaining 150 down by doing other questions with two choices.
What struck me on this scenario was how embedded a weird concept can be with an individual. …and an inability for them to recognize things.
That’s certainly interesting how the left crowd reacted. I’m willing to bet there was some herding mentality at play, I’d dare to venture majority waited for someone to break the ice before deciding to follow suit.
If this 50% ratio translates globally, we’re in deep deep trouble.
If this wasn’t a first hand story I’d say it sounds like propaganda.
It even has a (not) convincing, “This is a true story.”
If it is true, then it only proves one of my favourite sayings that I think I made up:
The average person is stupider than average, or stupidly close.
Is that mean? No, just average.
I agree.
My jaw dropped.
I literally could not believe what I was seeing.
That is why I kept rephrasing the two choices.
I was just making up something to DO (an action to perform) in order to stall. This was a huge mob. Normally, just women show up for these temporary type Fashion Sale jobs. But this time, it seemed like the pimps came too. A lot of big guys.
CONTROL
On the stall technique… Primarily, despite what I thought were silly statements, my objective at the time was to “control bodies”. A person can gain more influence and control on another individual by gradually introducing steps of control. Especially effective is getting someone else to move their body or change location at the direction of the “controller”. Start with easily accepted directives and work up from there.
The bad guys do it all the time in society.
But there is “good control”.
EXAMPLES
When the girlfriend takes your hand and leads you somewhere.
When you pick up the baby and do this and that with the baby, maybe changing a diaper.
Good control can also increase affinity or liking of someone…certainly it can increase trust.
Doing a “Simon Says” type exercise (a mimic my actions type thing) where everyone wins and no trickery is involved will help the individuals. Having each individual take turns “controlling” the group body movements will produce improvements within the individual.
Once when I was visiting a “Special Ed” classroom, I sat down with a kid who had a hard time controlling himself (ADHD style). I had him sit quiet across from me and play the game of “mimic my arm movements” mirror image style. I made it where he could easily accomplish the actions. Then I did a turn-about & let him do it to me.
After that, he was much more calm. And more friendly.
I should mention something about “Self-Determined”.
A mentally healthy individual who is self-determined, actually doesn’t mind being controlled by others (if it is good control). He or she is self-determined enough to know that he is in control of himself, and makes that choice. A self-determined individual will protest poor control or control by people/entities he doesn’t like.
Gaining more ability on the topic of control helps one become more self-determined.
On those personal areas in life which we have a hard time controlling (such as disciplining oneself to finish a task, or a drug addict getting off drugs), an individual is less self-determined. Being weak at control with certain areas correlates with one’s self-determinism in those areas.
I may not have expressed things well.
Basically, there is a direct association with control and self-determinism.
The part that sounds most like propaganda is the conservative racist republican talking point “lazy people just want free stuff and services.” But maybe they do after all?
About good control:
At Burning Man, rather than have police everywhere, volunteer rangers are trained to assist people and de-escalate problems – something police should be trained more to do.
For example, if you come across a person who is perhaps drunk but certainly furious and at the end of their rope, you don’t talk to them eye-to-eye or face-to-face confrontationally – you keep to the side of them at an angle which is more passive and safer for everyone. You also diffuse the situation by asking questions, not just about the situation, but other details more and more about what they had for breakfast or what good things they did or were looking forward to and before you know it you’ve calmed them down. Also asking them to do physical things of little importance while you “organize” yourself preparing to help them. ie. Hold this while I get my pen and paper, let’s walk over there, what’s this over here…
I only got a brief glimpse of their amazing training and it’s easy to see how we’re all so easily manipulated.
I (think I) invented “crowd is as stupid as the most stupid individuals in it.”
Holds water.
Holds water like a box of chocolates as stupid does.
Also, I invented “you can’t outsmart stupid, you have to outstupid it.”
It seems that the “green” in U S traffic signals includes a blue component, according to several sources including https://www.quora.com/How-do-red-green-colorblind-people-determine-which-colors-are-which-on-a-horizontal-traffic-light. Also, Wikipedia refers to an article from Japan Times (http://www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2013/02/25/language/the-japanese-traffic-light-blues-stop-on-red-go-on-what/#.WRmAuuWGNPZ) which states that “in 1973 a decree was issued according to which the ‘go’ light should be changed to the bluest possible hue of green.”
How often does the MSM repeat Assad is a monster who gassed his own people – but that is not what is reported by independent journalist who have been there (Eva Bruntlett and Vanessa Beeley). But when I bring this up, I am a crazy conspiracy theorist and/or Russian puppet.
The powers that shouldn’t be convinced people there was nothing wrong with a bullet that zig zags … and when the public finally caught on and changed the story to well, if we move Connolly to here and turn him this way, a computer says it works. Well, if a computer program says it’s true, it must be true, right?
The examples are endless of how the elites convince us of things that just aren’t true. Iran is the biggest exporter of terrorism and the greatest cause of instability in the Middle East. Guess when Saudi Arabia is propping up the petrodollar, it would be inconvenient to admit the truth.
If you speak out against a war, you are not being patriotic b/c you are not supporting the troops. Well, if I really support the troops, do I want to put them in danger to fight an unjust and unnecessary war? But that is silly thinking.
When you stop to think about it, it can make you dizzy thinking of all the things you are being manipulated into thinking.
Excellent statement of the situation with examples.
I have a Mongolian throat mantra which stabilizes my role in all this.
“Repeat The Message.”
It is one of the axioms of marketing.
It is applicable to religion, politics, health, science, truth, lies, etc.
So, while sometimes feeling ‘helpless’ against the establishment’s propaganda charade, one very stable and simple action which I can do is to “Repeat The Message”.
In other words, to continue to just put the truth out there to others who I run into.
mongolian throat mantra
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPN4ImIoVm0
Thanks – that really helps b/c I often get tired and frustrated and, being an introvert, I stop trying to spread the truth. But as we know the powers that shouldn’t be continue to repeat their lies so that more people will believe them … I need to remember that every time I repeat the truth, either in person, in a blog, or a comment section online, there is a chance that someone’s eyes will be open.
We must keep trying to spread the truth … after all, they’re never gonna stop trying to spread their lies.
Those are some very pleasant harmonics. I’ll give it a listen later with my headset on. Feels like those alfa and beta waves tracks, but with a lot more punch.
Looks good. What movie is this from? Is it good?
It sounds like a Gyoto Monks and the Bulgarian Ladies Choir mashup. 🙂 Gyoto Monks and Tuvan Throat Whistlers tend to get more cases of throat cancer due to their extreme vocals.
This inspires me to put up some of my old mixes on YouTube with added video.
My Merideth Monk + Sheila Chandra + Mickey Hart Mashup (4m36s best in stereo headphones):
https://web.archive.org/web/20051031200910/http://www.wickedsunshine.com:80/GCBEC/GCBEC-Audio/208-MonkChandraHartMix.mp3
Something to meditate to?
Or chill to this:
https://web.archive.org/web/20051031202233/http://www.wickedsunshine.com:80/GCBEC/GCBEC-Audio/209-PostChillMix.mp3
Sorry, it was listed on YouTube:
Mongol The Rise To Power of Genghis Khan (MOVIE)
(I download everything before I watch it.)
The second chill 12:50 track is another of my mixes of other’s music.
Okay (putting on my Sophist’s hat), so it is a green light. Very well. We concede the point. But one MUST inquire as to what SHADE of green it is – there are 40, after all, so they say.
Perhaps one might perceive in it a sort of bluey green? Or, maybe a tad more greeny-bluey green? In any event, it is, broadly speaking, undeniable that there is a distinct air of liminality wherein the shades of dark green feather into those of light blue. It cannot be denied! Which leads to the conclusion that one can, broadly speaking, reasonably assert that the light is blueish. And if blueish, then blue.
But by all means hold to the claim that the light is green, if you wish. After all, what is true for me might not necessarily be true for you. Is not all reality subjectively perceived? Which raises the issue as to the validity of discussing the concept of reality as a given in the first place. And if one cannot even be confident of the soundness of the notions one holds on the matter of reality as the field of essences and existents, how can one talk about accidental attributes of essences, such as colour (not color)?
Ah – the little matter of context: THEY WHO WOULD CONDITION US! Yes. Very good.
One would need to delve into the meta-context of transcendent, dynamic, truth in order to adequately address that issue. Just to say, as an opener: what is the dynamic behind the twisted motive of those who are driven to deceive on such a massive scale, the entire race of humans? At such vast expense and labour to perfect the strategy, and to have been driven to achieve such an odious, unnatural task for such an extended period of time – millennia!
Time to raise one’s eyes and consider the bigger picture, fellows.
Once upon a time, there was a Frenchman by the name of Alphonse Ratisbonne, who was, whilst strolling through an unimpressive old Roman church, miraculously drawn from the darkness of error to the light of perfect knowledge of metaphysical reality in an instant of time. And his story, of the journey from a Jewish banking family to becoming a Catholic convert – and (O NO!) a priest and missionary among the Jews, is no fairy tale.
Not relevant to the question of whether the light is green or blue? Ah, and I suppose there is no relation between the practice of gaslighting and the demoralization of society either.
An interesting idea for examination would be the strategy of moral destruction THEY devised and put into action as the means of achieving dominion over “the masses”.
E. Michael Jones has written widely on this issue; his books and articles can be found at his Culture Wars website.
Coincidentally, someone asked me about chemtrails the other day.
This is cool…
LIVE Radar
http://www.flightradar24.com/33.03,-96.87/9
We have all been “Gaslighted”
We have all been gaslighted in the technocratic idea that science
is infallible. Usually mixed with with a believe in authorities.
Sites like this make it clear that there are many reasons for
us not to believe in authorities.
What has Corbett been gaslighted on?
Well, Corbett has been gaslighted into the denial of all/most of
the paranormal. And that is against my own direct observations,
which have confirmed certain paranormal phenomena. The common
idea that people observing paranormal phenomena are crazy or
drugged is gaslighting in its pure form.
This denial, which is very common, is related to the idea
that the scientific method can be used in non-physical phenomena
and consciousness.
It is the same as saying there is nothing under the surface of
water, because we can only see its surface.
The scientific method can not tell what is under the water’s surface,
because we can not model or control the fish and life that might
be living in the water. We can tell that there might be something,
but it is easier to just deny everything,
and call the observers crazy.
There is also the problem that people who used drugs, had near-death-
experiences or have psychiatric problems, often observe
paranormal phenomena. So this gives some people the idea that these
observations are somehow created by errors in neurons.
But this is all just a denial of the non-physical reality, that
everyone can observe inside, like… love.
And this results in non-working psychiatry, misunderstanding of the
psyche, crazy religions, and false ideas of how neural
networks actually work.
So this materialistic approach is a big failure.
But almost every scientist will deny this,
because they all have been gaslighted.
(I used to be one of them too).
We need a change in the paradigm of science:
http://www.reddit.com/r/paradigmchange
The most important change is that we have to learn to observe
without prejudice and without trying to label things.
zyxzevn and dwayner,
I don’t get your impressions from my perspective of James Corbett.
Of course, I can’t speak for him.
My impression is…
While James probably has personal deep thoughts on religion or out-of-body experiences or paranormal activities, James Corbett has decided that he is not going to delve into these topics in a public forum.
It is as simple as that.
If I was wearing his shoes, I wouldn’t either.
And as a sidenote: I have had out-of-body experiences. I have friends who also have had out-of-body experiences.
Also, I remember being born and even described the hospital to my Mother who verified it. (By the way, it is nasty stuff they put in your eyes which really stings as a newborn during the early 1950’s.) I remember picking my parents as they were driving. And more….
dwayner,
As far as “Pollyanna-ish”…
My impression is that Corbett personally doesn’t care for the “gleeful, all will be sweet, light and airy fairy wonderful if we just have positive thoughts”.
Personally, I don’t care for that.
I have known people who had this “always gleefully sunshiny lightness, always synthetically airy fairy joyous” type demeanor”. It is not real world to me, because there is some dark stuff going on.
I guess a person could have that airy fairy attitude as the guards march the individual into the Nazi Camp furnace.
There is nothing wrong with having a positive attitude. Nor with putting attention on good things. Nor joy.
A positive attitude alone won’t dig the dirt to make a garden.
But really, I can’t speak for Corbett.
I don’t know.
I just think that ya’ll have a wrong evaluation.
In fact, I will tell you something about “evaluating others”.
It can’t be done. (done correctly)
If someone wants to cause a fight with the spouse, just “evaluate” the spouse. Tell the spouse: “You did that because you are this way.” If you want to introvert someone and make that person less capable, start to tell them “how they are” or “why they do what they do” or “how their character is”.
I do think that everyone has paranormal experiences.
We call in paranormal, because we can not model it in our current
scientific theories, and it breaks with the models that our science
has of the world.
The scientific method has its value, but starts with a theory, based
on existing theories from which the experiments are built and the
observations are judged.
But this is all wrong. We should start with the observations first.
This way we do not shoot the messenger, or do not
gaslight the observers.
In my experience the reality is much stranger than we think.
So to deal with that reality, we should not neglect it,
otherwise we are telling ourselves lies.
A similar problem is in many conspiracies.
Usually there is a cover up, so we have limited amount
of pure observational evidence that we can work with.
But there are some observations anyway, otherwise we should
not talk about them.
If we would start with the theory-first approach, based on
established theories, we can never spot the crimes.
We often can proof cover-ups. The fact that there is no
clear 911-pentagon video, is proof of a cover-up.
The fact that most UFO materials are locked away, or filled with
black lines, is proof of a cover-up.
If I would follow the scientific method, I would have to stop there.
Because I would need to introduce new theories that would not match
with previous theories, and I would have no proof of it.
Like the theory that the government works together with criminals,
or that they are afraid of them too. I have no idea.
But if I would start with observation first, I can just add it to my
list of observations. Like the observation that a lot of money
disappeared at the pentagon that day. And the observation that
the plane was not flying normally.
All these observations together form a case. Not a theory.
And with the case, we can try to apply certain theories that
match with what we see.
This change in methodology is necessary to change the
paradigms in science.
In my research, I also found many things in pure physical sciences
that are plain wrong. Like the idea that magnetic field lines are
real entities.
But also many observations make a good case, that we have gone
into the wrong direction with science.
At http://www.reddit.com/r/paradigmchange I am collecting many
such cases.
On a global level, I think this change in science can
change the way we live together.
Because if we can accept that we are more than just bodies
that need sex and food, we can work together in spirit.
For example, meditation has already a great effect in schools and
psychology/ psychiatry and in prisons. It can reduce or remove
the need for drugs and violence.
It can also help people with power to change their way of living,
and start sharing their (usually inherited) wealth with others.
It is a way we can “combat” the need for power and also help us
to see through the sociopathic behaviours.
And it may stop the religious wars, because if people can experience
their spirit, there is no difference between religions.
It is a simple solution, but I think it can just work if we
do it together.
And if you think that I am crazy, you have not checked my link yet.
😉
zyxzevn,
I track with what you are saying.
I really do.
I am no stranger to this subject matter and like I mentioned previously, I have had my personal observations and experiences (many of which I won’t put on this forum).
Keep following your path of interests.
After all, it is your path.
Science depends on observation, not control, just a quick thought.
Philosophical Materialism is what this is. Scientists today start with the assumption that there can only be natural causes, so that is all they will look for and the only thing they will accept. Despite the fact that even the origin of our own universe points to something outside our natural world taking place. The world is frankly much more complicated then most people give it credit for, and we should be willing to be open minded about everything; especially those who have seen how much of our preconceived notions are in fact lies propagated by men at the top.
If we’re just a simulation the apocalypse should be a cakewalk.
But only if you believe…
The change in science that I am proposing, is to start with observations,
and not with “theories”.
This prevents us from gaslighting the observers, when it does
not match our world views.
This is what is happening now, and it is affecting my life, and
everyone’s lives in a negative way.
In short: Do not shoot the messenger.
Triangulate! And not like some Illuminati pyramid.
Like the chicken and egg, dinosaurs had eggs before chickens existed so the egg came first. Observation came first but it’s a cycle.
By our observations we’d never know about radio to radiation except by observations with theories that get proved, solidified and are adapted as extra-sensory awareness that is then observed an further theorized upon.
Corporate news, conspiracy news, infiltrator news, fake news, truther news, well meaning but often mixed up news, are all perspectives that when processed logically can triangulate well and lead to some truths as the Corbett Report often illustrates.
Nature AND nurture, parents and school and community, genetics and epigenetics and dynamical genetics. Balance is the key. Koyaanisqatsi means “life out of balance”. We’re on the edge of the greatest extinction ever known.
We need a revolution of the mind and openness, transparency, and de-privatized proprietary knowledge, back in the sciences, education, media, politics, banking, corporations, society, and the world at large or we will drown in all of the toxic secrets we can’t even see coming.
When I was in college, I was asked in a discussion if I believed in psychic powers. When I replied that I had experienced events which I couldn’t explain any other way, the whole class (to include the professor) grew uncomfortable and changed the subject. Of course, college mostly solidifies most people’s opinions in a large degree. Of those that study, anyway. I’ve always found it interesting how we are so insistent on putting people at the peaks of their youthful beauty and sexual desire together and expect them to study some boring (to them) textbook. I was 32 when I started. Had I been 18 I would have flunked out. Takes time to both study and “socialize.”
I went to Valdosta State University in Georgia. It was a college when I started, but changed (in name only as I was a grad student and it takes a minute to make such a drastic change) to a university while I was enrolled. I had started as an economics student, but changed my major after taking a history class. I could have taken 1 more business class for my minor, but I hated the field. Accounting classes taught you how to fill a slot in corporate accounting, and economics just cheered tax cuts for the rich. I’m for the elimination of taxes myself. So I got my minor in law. I loved reading the old court cases. We actually had 2 practical legal systems at one time. More if you count people like judge Roy Bean and the like. Not to mention Louisiana’s Napoleonic law. North and South saw things differently. The North (with their newfangled, uppity large scale industry) and the South (with its time honored traditions of being broke ass farmers) had their biases placed on opposite sides. Many court cases on pigs hit by trains, with the verdict depending upon geography. Yeah, I nerded out. My last year I worked (supposedly) as an assistant for my history classes. Those conversations were my real education. Some truly spectacular professors, who could have taught anywhere, but chose to teach there because it was their home. Funny. I wanted the economic degree so I could become a stock analyst. Got my MLA in history and became a broker (made it to branch manager in a small firm) and then a financial advisor for American Express. And now I live on a river.
Yes I did move up! Oh yeah, that’s how you can tell the second rate professors; by their academic jealousy. College is mostly petty politics for them. They could teach Machiavelli a few things, but their purpose was always laughably petty. I walked for my bachelor’s, as I was the first to graduate college, but I didn’t for my Master’s. As if I had even learned the right questions at that point. They wanted me to become a professor, but I wanted to make history, not teach it. Also, PC and feminazis ruled in the 90s on the campuses, and they both disgusted me. Plus, all the worries about being accused of sexism, harassment, and the temptations of the flesh (which I rarely resisted), sort of detracted it from my pursuit of my doctorate. Also, they like to funnel your knowledge into a tiny speck of time. My studies would have taken me to Chapel Hill to study Jackson’s killing of the bank. But I’m more of a generalist at heart. Oh well, I blather on.
I had a friend in a similar situation. He was one of the flight controllers fired by Reagan. He said the real problem was the government wanted a monkey system that any dummy could operate. The only problem was that it wasn’t safe. Guess what they use. Try not to think of that the next time you fly!
Hey, after you leave, you could form your own ems company and I could take you public. Just set you up offshore and keep the take under 10 million. Wanna keep your scams small.
Honestly, that light does look bluish to me. I wouldn’t call it green, maybe cyan.
Color picker tools says: 11% RED, 100% GREEN, 78% BLUE
http://prntscr.com/febyq5
This is making it cyan, almost by definition
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyan
What’s more startling to me is that it’s blinking. Why does it blink? I’m fairly confident it’s due to global warming, eh climate change alarmist agenda.
That last line….
Man! Drinking beer with you ought to be a lot of fun.
I’ve had my fair share of kudos.
Usually I don’t drink, have just one or two drinks. But when I do have two drinks I’m another man and how much can that guy drink I do not know.
Love your ‘banter’ and humour James – Keep up the good work!
To be sure, my Gimp dip stick gives an RGB value of {43,255,211}–so it’s full throttle on the G but it’s got a hefty does of B.
It’s practically cyan. We’d need a higher quality picture to confirm, but that ain’t no green. I’d go as far as to state claiming this is green is proof of being brainwashed 😛
“It’s green because we know it’s green”
thanks for posting yt version . . . i have limited bandwidth, and can download as mp3
= ORANGE is the “new” colour. =
The colour orange used to be labeled and considered a shade of “red”. (People with “red” hair, etc.)
http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2011/01/the-color-orange-was-named-after-the-fruit/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orange_(colour)
Less easy to Google cite, as I recall from documentaries, historians talking about the crucifixion and the Shroud of Turn stated that back in the old days they used to label our “wrists” as “hands” because they weren’t specific enough or hadn’t invented the word “wrist” yet. They also crucified corpses through the hands which could rip through the hand and fail, as well as spiked through the wrists which held up the body weight, as is illustrated on the shroud. This was relevant because the bible said they nailed his hands but may have meant wrists.
=
My favourite ST:TNG episode was the high ground where hottie Dr. Crusher is kidnapped by terrorists and sympathizes with them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_High_Ground_(Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation)
=
Also, I wrote two new Steemit articles where I’d appreciate votes and feedback:
Is Bitcoin Another Establishment Trap?
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@jasoncarswell/is-bitcoin-another-establishment-trap
OSAPAP 001 – A New Open Source Anti Propaganda Animation Project
https://steemit.com/introduction/@jasoncarswell/osapap-001-a-new-open-source-anti-propaganda-animation-project
This reflects very well my thoughts on this issue I expressed elsewhere on this site.
The problem as I see it is that bitcoin is touted as government free while it’s nothing of the likes. It does have some important security and core features making it a good currency, but there are several glaring issues built in. How does one prevent monopoly?
For over a year now I’ve been hearing that everything is about to hit the fan.
I thought it was strange that the X22 Report and SGT Report were saying this so much while there was an election that would be effected. Also the media was ignoring it. Kinda like 2008.
Some have said that they are intentionally doing a controlled collapse and that we won’t know about it until it’s already happened.
That said, perhaps investing in Bitcoin before a dollar crash is like investing in American Airlines before 9/11.
Corbett’s Recommended Viewing had this video The Everything Bubble: Stocks, Real Estate & Bond Implosion .
I thought it was pretty good. I understand what Mike Maloney is showing with the graphs and peaks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0Oz2R0u4VM
Mike Maloney has worked with Robert Kiyosaki.
Robert Kiyosaki will be a featured speaker at The Red Pill EXPO in Montana on June 23 & 24.
The Red Pill EXPO – https://redpillexpo.org/
Thanks.
Here’s something I haven’t heard for a long while:
The Insurance Bubble.
You need insurance for your insurance for your insurance.
Even better, get insurance on other people’s insurance they’ve taken against someone else’s property.
Makes sense.
I think everyone here would agree that James Corbett, you should announce, link, and promote your appearances on other channels, forums, media, etc.
Freeman Fly ‘Resistance Without Anger – James Corbett’ (2017-05-28):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fPQ2puFmnc
If you already do, I apologize and wish to know where I can go for that.
ha! I am laughing.
Yeah, I’ve had pilots and even meteorologists tell me those were contrails! Their eyes just glaze over when you ask how that super-cooled air insulates itself in the most dissipative environment on the planet. Much like those morons who, after you answer their question, but they didn’t have the brains to understand (or even hear) what you say, so they say “okay, but what about” and then ask the same damn question. I generally just look at those and then just turn my back on them and walk away. I’ll let the state have them.
in addition to mkey’s most thought-provoking comment posted during the BI gone days of the last eon of BI (Bodily Integrity), in the year 3 BC (3 years before Covid) where he stated:
“I’d go as far as to state claiming this is green is proof of being brainwashed ?
“It’s green because we know it’s green”
my egocentric impression upon seeing this video today would inspire the following, as an echo to what both mkey and herrqlys already alluded to long ago:
“…I’ll give you one last chance! Look carefully and just tell the 97% truth and all will be well for you, the pain will stop and the gaslight will be turned off: JUST SAY IT!! MAN IS CAUSING THE CLIMATE TO CHANGE!! TODAY’s WEATHER IS THE HOTTEST IN RECORDED HISTORY BECAUSE OF MAN-MADE CO2 AND COW FARTS!!! LOOK UP CAREFULLY AT THAT CLIMATE, (NO NO! NOT OVER THERE AT THAT CLIMATEGATE!!) OVER THERE AT THE MELTING ICECAPS! BE A MANN AND JUST SAY IT!!!!”
fascinating to ponder just what visual, audio, semantic and other cues combine with our cognitive faculties and our emotions to form our perception of reality…
Melting ice caps, haven’t heard that since way way back a few days ago when RFK mentioned it in his interview with that guy about the thing. And the other 0.0005% thing.
Melting ice caps, he said. That reminded me of the polar ice thickness graphs Mr. T has brought on on so many occasions that its graphical facsimile is permanently etched into the tissue in my eye sockets, making it so that I can see intermittent flashes of it as I roll my eyes.
The only hurdle being it’s upside down when I see it. But so is the world these days, so I guess ot evens out.
There is a problem, that really has nothing much to do with the deeper meaning of James Corbett’s essay. It is this:
The spectrum of visible light is, essentially, continuous from deep red to a purplish blue. That is it appears to the average human eye. Now it is possible to divide this spectrum into pieces, and give each piece a name. In a past life, I had to memorize a whole book of these colors (The Munsell Book of Colors). They are named by Hue, Lightness, and Saturation. Hue was given a name, and in the edition of the book I have, each name is of the form 2.5 Red, 5 Red, 7.5 Red, and 10 Red. The next color is 2.5 Yellow-Red, 5 Yellow-red, etc. all the way around in a circle. The physical reality is that the colors are in a line, not a circle. The lightness is given a number from 0 to 10, where 0 will look black no matter what hue it is. And something that reflects all the incident light would be given a lightness of 10; ie., very bright. Saturation is the purity of the color. So a red with a low saturation would appear pink. and an American Stop sign has a quite high saturation, perhaps 9. Most saturations are in the range of 0 to 10, but higher saturations do occur sometimes. The book I have has about 4000 color chips in it. It takes a while to memorize it, but for the work I was participating in, it was necessary to do that. And I disagreed with the names of some of the colors (the hues). But that does not matter. I disagreed about many of the hues between Blue and Purple-Blue. I could learn that. And if I were going order paint, I could give the Munsell name of the color I wanted and presumably get it. (Probably not at my local paint store).
The point is that the names of the colors is arbitrary, so if the Japanese call the most permissive indication Blue and the Americans call it green, it is not important, provided the drivers do the right thing. It is a little worse in railroading where in some countries, signals use blue, green, yellow, and red signal colors. As far as I know, though, railroads do not allow color-blind locomotive engineers where colored lights are used for signals.
On the green thing, in the RR industry in which I worked calling out advance signals was required by operating rules for those occupying the head end of any train. Although the signals were ‘green’ tradition passed down was changed to ‘high blue’ and that’s what was stated and repeated, as a means of confirming all ahead clear. From a distance they did indeed appear more blue, than green, and I suspect it’s also why so many mountains, green in color, were called ‘blue mountains’, for how they appeared in the distance.
An old video from YouTube reminds me of the theme of this short video.
2+2=5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHAuGA7gqFU
Horrifying.
Reminds me of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0rYN0B5xNM&t=1s
and
Write this 100 times on the chalkboard:
Forcing an experimental and potentially lethal mRNA injection on the world, including children and teenagers and pregnant women, at the risk of losing their job and or university prospects
IS PERFECTLY NORMAL !!
I must admit that Japanese green light is not as green as the ones here in Canada.
Dare I say there may even be a slight tint of blue in it!
This harkens back to the ol’ Laurel vs. Yanny debate. 🙂
Someone once told me that traffic signals are just suggestions. Not sure how that turned out for him. For the record, definitely a tinge blue in there. BTW, is the red / green (blue) traffic walk signal a man or woman? Who has right of way in relation to parallel white lines on roadway – pedestrian or vehicle? (hint – different between Japan and Australia). Finally. depending on how you pronounce ‘hashi’, you are referring to a bridge or chopsticks…
I don’t care what anybody says… that light is a single shade of plum, Floating in Perfume, Served In a Man’s Hat! hahaha! FOr all you Simpson lovers out there
I did a psychology experiment at university in which we had to look at a light and describe how it moved – three along, two up and so on. I was the very last to see it move but I really did see it move. Turns out it never moved at all..
and that ladies and gentleman was how I discovered I was a conspiracy theorist. Peer pressure means nothing to me and I simply will not go along with things.
Richard Feynman made a controversial but crucial discovery in physics. Physicists almost all went along with it apart from Paul Dirac … who was autistic.