Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
via World Alternative Media:
Josh Sigurdson talks with James Corbett of The Corbett Report about the heightened level of tyranny throughout the world creating a sort of prison planet over the course of 2020.
With the excuse of an illness, the governments of the world have managed to use a crisis to their extreme benefit and to the absolute servitude of the public.
Was this thing created in a lab? Regardless of whether it was or wasn’t, how’s it being used against the public?
What is the ultimate end game? James digs deep into the technocratic global government being created, influenced heavily by China and utilizing the crisis to install social credit tied to bank accounts.
This is THE battle for humanity as James points out. This is extraordinarily important and cannot be disregarded.
With social credit scores tied to medical tyranny, if we don’t act now, we may be done forever. Time is running out.
Stay tuned as we continue to cover this issue closely!
VIDEO COURTESY W.A.M. BitChute / Flote / LBRY / YouTube / Newsletter
I really like the idea of transitioning people off of YouTube by posting trailers or an abbreviated video which links them to an alternative social media platform of their choosing. It is a similar concept to how James’ subscriber newsletter gives a few teaser paragraphs for non-subscribers but if you are a subscriber you get the whole thing (although even if you aren’t a subscriber you can still read the whole article by clicking on his URL link to the full version).
Lab Created Coronavirus
In this “Interview 1578 – James Corbett on The Future of Humanity”, the topic of a Lab created coronavirus briefly came up in the conversation. Of course, the subject was about the Covid-19 virus.
According to Robert F Kennedy, Jr., with previous SARS coronavirus small scale epidemics, two were lab created.
Kennedy says: “That is not controversial. Everybody agrees with that.”
QUEUED VIDEO (Around the 38 minute mark)
https://youtu.be/QLi6ZrFp6vQ?t=2226
YouTube Releases Conspiracy Debunking Fact-Check Feature… What Could Go Wrong??
https://www.bitchute.com/video/xDux2WIcNw0l/
Press for Truth with Josh Sigurdson of World Alternative Media
Solution:
Make a wiki together with creators,
that link different videos (and articles) about the same
topics with each other.
The idea is to lay out all information clearly, and not to
promote your channel/idea.
Also add if your information is direct recordings,
opinions, ideas, hypothesis, etc.
And how much it is in line with basic scientific understanding,
or theoretical speculation.
Speculation or real?
The goal is to give people exactly what they are looking for.
The people working on the wiki should only this as goal.
The science part is not meant as self-censorship, but for clarity.
In this field there is a lot of mix-up between speculation and
scientific evidence. And no, I do not mean the peer-reviewed narrative
following censored science.
If you want to claim that G5 is causing Covid, you can do it,
but it will be in the category speculation.
If you don’t understand EVERY step of the science behind it,
it is partially speculation. You can use known experts in the field,
if you like. Like Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
There are some 5G theories spread around that claim it, but these seem
to be based on misunderstanding. But due to speculation people
went on with it.
There was a paper out for one day, claiming it. I read it, and it is
full with practical and theoretical holes. Based on that, I think it
was a planted distraction. Like 9/11 energy-weapons from space. So be
careful with such theories. Check them with some other people that know
more about these things.
On the other hand, if you explain that the virus came from a lab,
there is some certainty. That is because some experts came out with
that information. Not only explained they how it is made,
but also we can see from the virus-genes that it was not natural
at all.
It is certainly good to add different viewpoints together on the same topic.
But these viewpoints need to be separated in how much they are in line
with our current understanding of science.
Example:
I could talk about spirits and angels fighting for control of the human mind.
While it may be true, and fun to discuss,
almost no-one would have any clue what I talk about.
And most people would not believe anything of it.
So I place my ideas deep in the speculation part.
Similar to the gay frogs meme.
I can explain how frogs change biologically due to gender-changing
chemicals in the water. That part seems solid science.
From there I can add a speculation, that this might also affect the
biology of humans. And can refer to some studies that showed that there may be an effect.
WEBSITE – Agorist Connections
Corbett Report Member mas says:
“…I could find nothing functional on the non-dark web to enable counter-economy buyers and sellers to find each other online.
So, I started
https://Agorist.Market
to fill this void for our community.
Listings are free for Agorists accepting payment outside the banking system. All business inquiries and transactions are peer to peer, separate from the website. The opportunity to share more about this project would be welcome. Also, if there is something serving this purpose which I overlooked, it would be good to know about and it will be listed on the site as another resource for our community.”
Sourced comment
https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1576-james-corbett-on-solutions-for-resisting-technocracy/#comment-93402
Its how humans survived in the wild… we had to believe and trust our leaders. Now a parasite class have found a way to turn that against us.
When they get enough people to follow and reach the flip over point when everything goes to the new normal.
We have not got there yet, but I suspect we’re getting close when I see people IN CARS wearing masks
We are reaching a point when the majority really do believe and have internalized the idea that only the materiel world is real.. true or a lie its a philosophical dead end that takes away the fear of a higher power from the leaders and sap’s the will to resist from the people.’
People who think only their own material life matters will never win anything.
The oligarchs are not strong, they are just attacking a weakened, sick culture and it wont get better until people fix themselves and then their families and then their associates at which point things will right themselves.
“I’ll play my role of doubter.”
Sounds like you’re still sitting on the fence.
One thing James hasn’t addressed to date, if I’m not mistaken, is the demography of Covid normies.
Although face mask compliance in my area is virtually 100% (much to my disgust) I get the feeling that the <25 yr. generation is totally brain-washed.
Perhaps there are some in the 25-59 age category who have doubts.
I don't think TPTB honestly care too much about the 60+ year olds.
They're probably certain they won't be able to mount much of a resistance
to their new world order and won't be around all that much longer.
But surveys of the populace on this important issue is sorely needed.
Don't count on the MSM delivering one anytime soon!
“… don’t think TPTB honestly care too much about the 60+ year olds.They’re probably certain they won’t be able to mount much of a resistance to their new world order and won’t be around all that much longer..”
You are prob right that the younger generation are pretty much neo-boombers in their levels of acceptance, like the actual boomers they enjoy signaling resistance to authority while embracing the system laid out for them.
Ten years ago this level of lockdown was not believable…in ten years hence the levels of pushback may be for practical purposes nonexistent unless we hit a major bump before then to wake people up
One of the reasons, of which there are many, that this would not have happened 10 years ago is that the normalcy with tech had not reached the point where it is today – it’s not that big a deal to do EVERYTHING online now.
We got used to entertainment online, and ordering online and working on line, communicating online. It was not really that big a step to move education online, ordering all necessities online, church online, live theatre online.
We can zoom everything now. Even 12 step Anonymous meetings.
A good number of us hate all of this, but I would say that the majority, though bothered, are not horrified. Are not seeing this as a theft of inalienable rights.
I shudder to think of 10 years hence. But I was not born with an iphone in my hand. No one under thirty will blink an eye at chips, quantom dot vaccinations, tracking, tracing, bio-everything.
That’s not a judgement against under thirties. I just think it’s a fact of life.
Its a fun game to ask someone if they can prove that the earth is flat or not. It kinda forces the issue that much of what we consider knowledge has been handed down through various layers of players. Without being at least an amateur astronomer, most would be hard pressed to have any first hand evidence to base an explanation on. The game can show how empowering direct experience is.
My own way out has to do with being a navigator. when doing the spherical trig required to work out an approximate position, the formulas that result in distances from an assumed position wouldn’t work on the flat earth projections..
But seriously, maybe the earth is flat in some parallel flat universe? and the flatearthers are going through a consciousness shift into the bizarness of 3D. Or
maybe its only spherical because we are limited to 3D sensory consciousness?
or
maybe someone was pissed at being taught when young about wide spread pre-columbus flat earth believers, so they started a wild rumor?
I think we’ve got more pressing questions than musing about the existence of other dimensions (we’re in the 3rd, deal with it), like:
How to bolster ones protection from illness due to exposure or propagation of cognitive dissonance? that is the thing I see trying to brake everyone, most are not conscious of it; it has been permeating everyone.
or
How to share land so that everyone (that wants it) can feel welcome, and have a sense of being “home”, able to thrive, and have a modicum of autonimity, yet firstly have the will to improve or look after the health of that land, and so look after future generations of all creatures (except the gatesee muckfangers species, they were running a deadend dna code that fizzled).
Here in Aus, at an oceanside park on a sunny sunday, a small drum circle attracted people who were inspired to dance. People started to have lots of fun, which attracted more dancers and a few more drummers. Then (you guessed it) the cops showed up and started issuing $1000/person fines.
One friend lamented, “If that had happened back home in Africa” (Ghana), “it wouldn’t matter about their guns, two or three of them and hundreds of us, ,,oh man, someone would whistle which the crowd understands as “were in this together”, and then we would tackle them, sure someone may lose an arm but the cops wouldn’t get away with what they’re doing here..”
In Aus: corporate gatherings 40 people max, non corporate 20 (WTF), no weddings in Victoria but statewide mandatory masking and more or less house arrest, even if you have a letter from DR, no mask means we’ll beat you up bad,, elsewhere “20 person weddings but no dancing”. and on and on. Most are indifferent, or feign not being bothered. Aus people put up with lotsa bull shark from the “authorities”.
Fight for your life and learn to love it (a little bird told me).
I’d define living off-grid as a right. And I’d define a right as something that you are willing to kill someone over to keep. If you are not willing to kill someone over it, then it’s just a privilege.
Octium
A right is something you are willing to DIE for… plenty of people are willing to KILL you for your wallet, but they still dont have a right to it.
🙂
Alchemist
“..When someone unopposed to violating your natural rights is in a position of power over you, you are not free…”
Freedom never existed if thats true… leaders always accrue more power if able and society will never be without leaders.
Freedom exists in that rare moment that YOU can push back, when you and your fellow’s are able to flex your own , equal or almost equal power, back at them
Magic, I believe James has minimized FE in the past, so I doubt that he is on board. However his basic mindset is to be sympathetic to these type of borderline issues. James, please correct me if I am wrong. I’m looking forward to seeing what you say in reply to MagicBullet.
Stopping at a red light is for the greater good.
If I’m not sick I cannot make you sick (well, literally). So wearing a mask is not for the greater good.
But wear it if you like. It’s a free country, right?
It is not that they like being controlled it is that they know no better.
With the US tumbling into Christian fascism it is notable that
Huxley noted:
“There will be in the next generation or so a method of making people love their servitude and producing dictatorship without tears so to speak. Producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda, or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.”
– Aldous Huxley, From a speech for the Tavistock Group, California Medical School, 1961
It is not that they like being controlled it is that they know no better.
With the US tumbling into Christian fascism it is notable that
Huxley noted:
“There will be in the next generation or so a method of making people love their servitude and producing dictatorship without tears so to speak. Producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda, or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.”
– Aldous Huxley, From a speech for the Tavistock Group, California Medical School, 1961
The directors of Netflix are listed at https://www.netflixinvestor.com/governance/officers-and-directors/default.aspx . Susan Rice is one, but not Bill Gates. A list of major shareholders, who seem to mainly comprise investment funds with broad ownership, is on “page 96” (the 102nd page) of the Proxy Statement posted at https://s22.q4cdn.com/959853165/files/doc_financials/2019/ar/Netflix-2020-Proxy_Updated.pdf . Don’t see Bill there either. Of course there can be “understandings” and off-the-public-record arrangements which we can only surmise.