16 Comments

1. paul823 on 11/21/2025 at 1:35 pm

   I only logged into to golfclap that graphic….nice. 🙂

   Log in to Reply
2. ejdoyle on 11/22/2025 at 1:26 am

   We live or try to in a world of such madness.
   Just how did the controllers pull off this idea of international bullying is OK. The UN?? Please. Presidents?? Invisible geographic lines called countries?? All that crap that people just take for granted these days.

   So I am your neighbor and I like your property and I have a religious path that justifies all “not like you” people can be tortured, raped, murdered, bombed, etc for any reason. So with help of some other neighbors many miles away, who give you weapons and money, you carry out a disgusting genocide in front of all the neighborhoods for decades.

   And on and on it goes…taxes, wars, forced inoculations that kill you, limits and controls on most all facets of life till we embrace our imprisonment with the hope of a 2 week vacation to be charged to our fiat currency bank accounts.

   DO YOU THINK WE’RE GONNA LAST (song)
   https://old.bitchute.com/video/Kykg3jVHnrU4/

   Log in to Reply
3. G on 11/22/2025 at 9:20 am

   The swamp is overflowing with all the ugliness and dishonorable behavior that statism has always entailed and will always entail.

   Statism is the swamp.

   https://gavinmounsey.substack.com/p/implanted-sociopolitical-identities

   Log in to Reply
4. G on 11/22/2025 at 9:35 am

   RE: the “Meat Allergy Caused By Tick Bite” story and the connection with deer populations.

   Humans hunting is helpful where there are out of control deer populations, but that is just a stop-gap-measure, as humans will never hunt deer as well as the predators that God designed to primarily do that for their diet.

   Sure you can unleash a bunch of killer drones and kill all the deer, but that causes a whole different constellation of problems as well.

   Beings like wolves hunt deer in a way that alters how deer interact with plants, trees, and more importantly, riparian zones. This changes the behavior of rivers, the depth of soil, the quantity of fish in the rivers and increases biodiversity in general while keeping deer populations in check.

   I will offer the following comment/NWNW flashback for some context on what I mean.

   https://corbettreport.com/nwnw582/#comment-174052

   Log in to Reply
   • AnimalsArentFood on 11/23/2025 at 3:34 pm

     @G

     “out of control deer populations”

     There are no ‘out of control’ deer populations. There are only populations that have become more dense than they previously were, and, even with an apparent predator deficit, that density self-corrects via migration/dispersal and a fall-back of starvation or dehydration. A deer population is only ‘out of control’ in the minds of humans who have slapped their structures, roadways, technologies and triple-stacked corpora right in the middle of the deer’s forests, fields and migration/dispersal pathways.

     “Humans hunting is helpful”

     Helpful for the humans and their 55 MPH steel splattercraft, not for the deer. For the deer it’s just more pain, suffering & death (and hunters frequently miss their kill shots so it’s often long-term pain & suffering that the hunters deliver – not quick release).

     It’s not a difficult concept to grasp.
     Imagine you and your family live in a densely populated Indian city where food & potable water are becoming scarce and the ‘elites’ have decided to kill 15% of your city’s ‘out of control’ population via an engineered ‘outbreak’ or ‘natural disaster’ to prevent possible future starvation.
     Would you be happy they killed you or a loved one to prevent possible starvation, or would you have preferred to be given the chance to seek out a new place to live?

     Log in to Reply
     • G on 11/24/2025 at 1:01 am

       @AnimalsArentFood

       Firstly, I respect your compassion based perspective regarding our four legged kin.

       My wife and you would get along well as she has held quite a few park rangers hostage on our forest walks to tell them how immoral and unnecessary their deer “culling” operations are and how they could be tranquilized and shipped up north.

       When I said out of control deer populations, I was referred to the quantity of deer in the area where I live, where humans have killed every last natural predator for hundreds of kilometers in all directions about 150 years ago. Similar situations can be observed in Ireland and Scotland. I cannot speak to Albion or Eire in their carrying capacity for deer, but here in the eastern woodlands of Turtle Island (aka southern Ontario) the few forests that are left provide amazing abundance in food for deer and the endless monoculture crops that dominate the landscape are also foraged by the deer. This is the great lakes region so they are not wanting for water or food. If left to their own devices, deer here could become impressive (and highly ecologically destructive) in numbers. I say ecologically destructive as without predators keeping the deer moving, their grazing habits and diet changes. They eat tree seedlings aggressively, and prevent natural germination of the next generation of elder trees from taking hold in forest regeneration zones/abandoned fields.
       This is a big issue for Ireland and Scotland too, where the landscape used to be 70% ancient biodiverse oak, rowan, apple, hazelnut, birch and scots pine forest and now that humans have finally stopped chopping down the few forests left, the elders are unable to let their next generation set down roots, as the deer eat the seedlings before they can grow tall enough to move beyond their reach.

       As you astutely point out, their migration capacity is crippled by the ugly infrastructure of modern industrial civilization (especially here in the highly “civilized” and sustainably decimated (oops I mean sustainably “developed”) south of Ontario, Canada.

       I am aware of how human hunting can often end in unnecessary suffering (especially in modern days when people no longer have the reverence and respect that was instilled in them while hunting in past generations via an animistic ethos and worldview that taught them to see the four leggeds and other non-human beings as kin). I was pressured to go hunting by family when I was younger so I know exactly what is involved.

       Humans can partially take on the beneficial role (ecologically speaking) that wolves take on when hunting deer, that is what I meant by “helpful”, but I agree there will be unnecessary suffering involved and I would prefer that wolves, cougers, lynx and other natural predators were doing that job for a number of reasons.

       Since I am involved with the work of planting food forests to feed communities, protecting tree seedlings against over grazing is something I tend with monthly.

       Log in to Reply
       • G on 11/24/2025 at 1:14 am

         (..continued from above)

         RE “Would you be happy they killed you or a loved one to prevent possible starvation, or would you have preferred to be given the chance to seek out a new place to live?”

         I would rather that the elegant, resilient and genius design of the Creator of all things was allowed to function as intended (which would not involve humans engaging in a futile attempt to play god, doing “cullings” of deer while also supressing the predators from doing their sacred job).

         As someone that seeks to live regeneratively (for my life to serve as a balm for the ecosystems that support me, increasing biodiversity ) as well as someone that acknowledges all beings as sentient and deserving of respect I take responsibility for the killing required to provide my body with food. I kill plants to eat them but I thank them for their life and reciprocate by saving and sharing their seeds so their lineage can go on.

         I have little respect for people that support factory farming through buying corporate meat products that came from animals that needlessly suffered there and more respect for those that choose to eat meat but also take responsibility for the killing themselves (raising animals regeneratively or hunting them where that is ethically possible).

         I may have mentioned this before, but it seems pertinent here… I had a friend that was pressured by his family that owns a chain of cattle operations and slaughter houses to work in one and it psychologically damaged him. After working there a few months he became depressed, angry and disconnected. Started drinking heavily and got in a car crash.

         When people buy meat from a store without knowing where it comes from they are funding not only animal suffering but also the psychological torture and damage inflicted on humans that work in those facilities.

         Thus, if people are going to eat meat, I would encourage them to not outsource the pain of killing onto other people and take on that responsibility themselves. Otherwise one is getting temporary pleasure at the cost of other humans suffering (and of course the suffering of the animals in many cases as well).

         That said, I have known people that hunt with reverence and precision, with very little to no pain being felt on the part of the deer, wild boars or rabbits they hunt.

         Having been asked to kill many birds and deer (that would eat the grapes and soft fruit) as part of my job on my parents orchard/vineyard growing up and being traumatized by the suffering I inflicted , I personally would only kill and eat animals out of desperate need in an emergency now.

         So for me it is not black and white, and I do not judge hunting as inherently “bad” or “good” as depending on who is doing it, for what reason, how they are doing it, with what worldview they are doing it and what they are hunting, that could either be beneficial for the larger ecosystem and involve integrity, or not.

         Thanks for the comment.

         Log in to Reply
         • AnimalsArentFood on 11/24/2025 at 7:23 pm

           @G This is quickly going to become a hot mess because of this site’s line spacing & horizontal compression making a couple paragraphs look like a small novel. I think maybe I’ll reply once more then you can have the final word. Or I can drop it now if you want.

           Log in to Reply
           • G on 11/25/2025 at 11:52 pm

             @AnimalsArentFood

             I welcome your thoughts if you feel like discussing this further.

             Your call.

             Log in to Reply
       • AnimalsArentFood on 12/06/2025 at 7:21 pm

         @G

         Caution: Rambling Ahead (read only if bored)

         Time to Shine
         “If left to their own devices, deer here could become impressive (and highly ecologically destructive) in numbers”
         You could argue that this is just a lucky break for the deer.
         There’s no grand memo stating that the things which deer can destroy must retain their numbers.
         We don’t live in a static balanced world; it’s ever-changing. Even without the presence of humans, things are regularly thrown completely out of balance in regions and subsequently settling into a different balance.
         A single extreme snowstorm in a region could devastate the population of an ill-equipped above-ground predator, such as a hawk, without doing nearly as much damage to their burrowing, hoarding rodent prey.
         The following year, is it required that some big-brained bipeds show up to kill a bunch of rodents in order to keep the greatly increased population from devastating a particular plant or insect species?
         Or should this just be considered the rodent’s lucky break – their time to dominate for a while and spread further than they ever could before?

         Unmentionables
         What about all the other woodland critters that have flourished now that the wolves are no longer eating them?
         Don’t we need to murder a bunch of them too?
         Not much talk about those critters is there?
         Almost as if this all actually started with humans wanting to kill and eat deer (often just kill, for fun) and keep the deer off their splattercraft trails, so they proceeded to scrounge for excuses of “balance” and “starvation prevention” (bless their empathetic hearts) to try to excuse some murderin’ they already wanted to do (or were raised doing and don’t want to face the fact that they’ve been doing something horribly wrong).

         Deer Beneficiaries
         What about all the things that have benefited from the deer themselves?
         • Areas of nutrient-depleted soil that became nutrient-rich from deer moving nutrients from one area to another via their droppings.
         • Fruit-producing plants that have spread further than before thanks to those same seed-containing droppings.
         • Flourishing dung beetles
         • Flourishing mycelium
         • Flourishing of plant species that deer don’t eat
         Are these bad things that will surely need to be reversed to restore balance? Or are they simply new things of a new balance?

         Greater Good
         Just keep in mind that you’re taking an end-justifies-the-means stance that involves hurting and killing as the means.
         That’s one of the most dangerous things a human can do.
         It’s critical that you mentally put yourself in the place of the victim of the means.
         You have to ask yourself if you would still be okay with the means if it was you or your loved ones who were the victims.
         That is how we find alternative courses of action. That is how we prevent end-justifies-the-means atrocities.

         Log in to Reply
         • G on 12/09/2025 at 9:47 am

           @AnimalsArentFood

           Thanks for the in depth expression of your perspectives.

           I appreciate your attention to detail and though I have different perspectives than you on several topics you brought up I respect your form of self-expression.

           I have experienced a couple pretty devastating losses in my life recently, so I am gonna have to defer replying to this for when I am in a better place.

           That said, I will indeed reply in full at some point.

           I thank you for providing your perspectives here.

           Log in to Reply
       • AnimalsArentFood on 12/06/2025 at 7:26 pm

         @G

         Induced Psychopathy
         “I was pressured to go hunting by family” “asked to kill many birds and deer … as part of my job”
         Truly terrible. One of the best ways to break a human’s mind and callous their heart. Usually irreversibly.
         Also, at this point, I think the word “hunting” itself is problematic in terms of normalization and desensitization for something horrible.
         Have a look at these two phrases side-by-side:
         • “My children enjoy going into the woods to murder, skin and disembowel the woodland creatures that live there.”
         • “My children enjoy hunting.”

         Bad Spectrum
         “I do not judge hunting as inherently “bad” or “good”
         I’m in agreement with you that there is a spectrum tied to motivation, but it is a spectrum of bad.
         On one end, a brutal act of murder unavoidable for survival. On the other end, a brutal act of murder for pleasure.
         In between, motivations of profit, fashion, laziness, nutrition boosts, peer pleasing, religious instruction, ignorance, misconception, misguidance, etc.

         Log in to Reply
       • AnimalsArentFood on 12/06/2025 at 7:30 pm

         @G

         Responsible Killing
         “more respect for those that choose to eat meat but also take responsibility for the killing themselves”
         Nearly all people who eat factory-farm meat are raised into an extreme mental disassociation from what they’re actually eating and the horror that produced it.
         They can often describe it with words but they have no genuine grasp of what they’re describing.
         This quote from Paul McCartney is pretty close to accurate: “If slaughterhouses had glass walls, everyone would be vegetarian.”
         Disassociated consumers buying factory farm products don’t bother me much. They’re usually unwitting accomplices who are empathetic enough that they would choose to leave bacon off their plate if you were to lock them in a room with a living pig and a knife and tell them to go retrieve the “bacon”.
         In fact, just let that consumer spend 20 minutes in the same room with a pig then send in a man with a knife to kill the pig, but before proceeding, ask the consumer if they want the pig to be killed for their bacon or if they’d rather skip the bacon and let the pig live. Nearly all of them would let the pig live.
         What’s my point?
         The meat eaters that truly worry me are the ones that have become so cold that they could actually kill the pig.
         The “hunters” and slaughterhouse workers worry me.
         They are serial killers who just happen to currently have a no-killing-humans policy (maybe).
         Lastly, guns and bows aren’t the most cruel choice for killing but they are pretty bad.
         The sportsmanship argument is fraudulent. If sportsmanship is what they truly have in mind, they should strip naked, leave their weapons at home and head out to kill with their bare hands.
         Instead they’re using technology.
         And since they’re already using technology, they might as well be using more advanced, less cruel technology. Fearless, painless killing could be achieved with different technology/methods.

         Plant Murderer
         “I kill plants to eat them but I thank them for their life”
         This is the point I have arrived at.
         Do plants have a desire to live?
         Do they feel pain as some research has possibly indicated?
         Is the pain felt in such slow motion that a painless death is possible if we move fast enough?
         Do they enjoy music?
         Do they desire, enjoy or feel anything at all?
         As a child I was taught that they don’t but I’m not so sure now.
         I struggle with cutting tree limbs & pulling weeds.
         I increasingly want to eat just the produce of plants and not parts of the plants themselves.

         Log in to Reply
5. HomeRemedySupply on 11/23/2025 at 10:13 pm

   OVERTON WINDOW shift – e.g. Georgia U.S. congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene

   “The Overton Window is the range of subjects and arguments politically acceptable to the mainstream population at a given time.”

   I am not a ‘Statist’, and I know very little about Marjorie Taylor Greene.
   However, some of her recent statements caught my eye.

   Friday November 21, 2025 – The Independent
   Read Marjorie Taylor Greene’s full four-page statement resigning from Congress: ‘I refuse to be a battered wife’
   https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/marjorie-taylor-greene-resigns-full-statement-donald-trump-b2870306.html

   EXCERPTS – MTG says:
   “I’ve always represented the common American man and woman as a member of the House of Representatives which is why I’ve always been despised in Washington DC and never fit in.

   Americans are used by the Political Industrial Complex of both Political Parties, election cycle after election cycle, in order to elect whichever side can convince Americans to hate the other side more.

   And the results are always the same.

   No matter which way the political pendulum swings, Republican or Democrat, nothing ever gets better for the common American man or woman.

   The debt goes higher.

   Corporate and global interests remain Washington’s sweethearts.

   American jobs continue to be replaced whether it’s by illegal labor or legal labor by visas or just shipped overseas.

   Small businesses continue to be swallowed by big corporations.

   Americans’ hard earned tax dollars always fund foreign wars, foreign aid, and foreign interests.

   The spending power of the dollar continues to decline.

   The average American family can no longer survive on a single bread winner’s income as both parents must work in order to simply survive.

   And today, many in my children’s generation feel hopeless for their future and don’t think they will ever realize the American dream, which breaks my heart…

   …I’ve fought against Covid tyrannical insanity and mandated mass vaccinations, and I’ve never voted to fund foreign wars….”

   Log in to Reply
6. HomeRemedySupply on 11/23/2025 at 11:08 pm

   FBI is after ARCHIVE.TODAY

   Tuesday November 11, 2025
   FBI Seeks To Unmask Anonymous Web Archiving Service Owner
   https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/fbi-seeks-unmask-anonymous-web-archiving-service-owner

   EXCERPTS
   The FBI has issued a subpoena to Canadian domain registrar Tucows seeking to unmask the anonymous owner of Archive.today, a popular web archiving service used by millions worldwide.

   The subpoena, dated last Tuesday and posted publicly on Archive.today’s X account, states it relates to a federal criminal investigation being conducted by the FBI, as The Verge reported. However, the document provides no specific details about what alleged crime is under investigation.

   The FBI is requesting comprehensive identifying information from Tucows, including customer or subscriber name, address of service, and billing address associated with Archive.today, per The Verge report.

   Beyond basic contact details, the subpoena demands an extensive array of data such as telephone connection records, including incoming and outgoing calls and SMS or MMS records, payment information like credit card or bank account numbers, internet connectivity session times and durations, device identifiers, IP addresses, and details about services used such as email, cloud computing, and gaming services.

   The subpoena instructs Tucows not to disclose its existence indefinitely, as any such disclosure could interfere with an ongoing investigation and enforcement of the law, as recounted by Gizmodo.

   That request became moot when Archive.today publicly posted the document. Journalist Max Blumenthal, editor of The Grayzone, drew attention to the subpoena on X, emphasizing that Archive.today is used by journalists and researchers to “document edits to articles, bypass subscription walls and avoid giving traffic to the failing corporate media.”…

   Log in to Reply
   • AnimalsArentFood on 11/24/2025 at 7:52 pm

     Good find. They want to write false history and that doesn’t work out so well if the real history is recorded someplace publicly accessible.
     If we don’t see them launching the same attack on archive.org, it’s likely because archive.org is already complying.

     Judging by a few things we’ve seen, it’s probable they have indeed already begun complying, or their purpose all along was to slurp up the Internet for the knowledge-hoarding cabal then burn/modify what’s publicly accessible.

     • They had a scamdemic-era statement about taking action against ‘misinformation’ in the archive.
     • They recently partnered with Google for ‘enhanced archive searching’ (cough bullsh!t cough).
     • They’ve started heavily purging or restricting highly interesting and rare (but technically copyrighted) material that average people spent decades collecting and uploading.

     Log in to Reply