via ANTIJANTEPODDEN: Investigative journalist James Corbett has investigated how psychology is being weaponized to target dissidents. In this episode he explains the absurdity of the old diagnoses of anarchia, which was too much love for freedom, and drapetomania, which was the mental illness of slaves running away from their masters. Over the last three years, we have seen a medical doctor being diagnosed and force medicated for corona insanity. This was because of his resistance to the government narrative in Switzerland. We have also seen an increased willingness to pathologize conspiracy theorists, and to label people as domestic terrorists for using their right to share their opinions. Even though the methods used against us are ugly, and the majority just go along uncritically, James Corbett shows examples of how modeling disobedience can dramatically turn the situation around.

Latest Post
RECENT POSTS
Interview 991 – New World Next Week with James Evan Pilato
![]() |
This week on the New World Next Week: the IRS goes global as world taxation comes into view; GM crop trials to begin in the UK this year; and new technologies promise advances in 3D printing. |
Negative Inflation, Cyber Insecurity, Paris Circus – Geneva Business Insider
Interview 990 – Geneva Business Insider with David L. Smith
![]() |
This month on the Geneva Business Insider James and David discuss: the unfolding deflationary cycle in the commodities markets and its long-term effects; the suspiciously convenient timing of Obama’s new cybersecurity proposal; and the continuing hypocrisy of the Paris Hebdo circus. |
Solutions: Guerrilla Gardening (video)
Episode 299 – Solutions: Guerrilla Gardening
![]() |
The problems are obvious: food safety scandals, the death of family farming, food supply insecurity, the revolving door between corporate lobbyists and government regulators, and many more. The problem should be equally obvious: rolling up our sleeves and getting in the garden. Join us today as we explore this simple, natural solution to one of our most fundamental problems. |
Interview 989 – Pearse Redmond Peels the TOR Onion
![]() |
The TOR Project promises its users a modicum of privacy protection from would-be information gatherers, both smalltime crooks and nation-state cybersecurity agencies. But do these promises hold up to scrutiny? And who is behind the TOR Project itself? And why did a TOR developer recently doxx a critic on Twitter? Joining us today to dissect this onion stew is Pearse Redmond of Porkins Policy Review. |
NEWSLETTER
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

























