Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
The 9/11 Timeline is back! As dedicated researchers will know, the Complete 9/11 Timeline was an invaluable repository of 9/11-related information that became inaccessible several years ago. But now it’s back, thanks to the International Center for 9/11 Justice. Joining us today is IC911 Executive Director Ted Walter to talk about the 9/11 timeline, demonstrate how to use it, and inform people how they can support 9/11 truth by spreading the word about this important research tool.
Video player not working? Use these links to watch it somewhere else!
WATCH ON: 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
or DOWNLOAD THE MP4
SHOW NOTES:
The indispensable Complete 9/11 Timeline is back — spread the word!
Hi James,
curious to know where is your new assistant?
I read the section on Israel and I had never even heard of the 2005 Amman bombings before, but am not surprised that it may of been another false flag. I also liked the Sibel Edmonds section.
Right. On. I will be sharing the tool and this video far and wide! For such a seminal and multi-faceted event this Timeline sets a standard for Internet-age information storage and dissemination.
Building 7 didn’t Epstein itself.
The working theory, one that sounds more reasonable than the official theory which does not even accept the fact a third building was demolished, is that building 7 tripped and fell.
I doubt that. I heard that it committed suicide because it was denied entry to a women’s bathroom. It was almost 17 yrs old at the time, a very vulnerable age for delicate entities.
Just want to report that, as of now, I am getting the following message on any query: “Error establishing a database connection”.
Isn’t that convenient?
Maybe the Health Ranger’s independent, liberty-minded AI “Enoch”, which will be released for free this week, might be a good basis for the mentioned AI basis.
See David A. Hughes’ remarks on his tour of the 9/11 museum — 3 parts on his substack
…And Dr Judy Woods still has the best explanation of 9/11. All the other 9/11 stuff is just window dressing (JamesC’s work) or outright deception (Richard Gage et al..)
https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/documentaries/
“And Dr Judy Woods still has the best explanation of 9/11”
Who is “Dr Judy Woods”?
Dr Judy Wood is a material scientist who wrote the seminal book, Where Did The Towers Go?
In it she addresses the key 9/11 evidence that both the official narrative (pancake collapse) & the “official alternative” narrative (thermite) ignore. Namely that the buildings were turned to relatively cold dust in mid air.
Key observations were lack of rubble/debris other than dust, failure of ‘bathtub’ to fracture, lack of high temperatures in dust cloud & within footprint, weirdly ‘toasted’ cars in odd places relative to the buildings, etc.
The book is very thorough & documented. Really, just the fact that a bunch of people survived uncrushed & unburied in a stairwell under the towers would be enough to make an intelligent middle school kid doubt both Rumsfeld & Gage.
To me, it sheds doubt on Corbett’s credibility that he has never thoroughly addressed the inconsistencies in the thermite-narrative that Wood illuminates.
Check out her book. It’s really good.
There is a lot of gas lighting going on in her video and asking you to deny what you can clearly see with your own eyes. Here are a few examples..
6:45: “that’s not a collapse, it is not an explosion, it’s a building frothing up into powder… ”
The strange thing is you can actually see the buildings falling to the ground. You can count how long it takes for the entire building to entirely collapse to the ground. If the whole building ‘dustified’ what am I looking at for the 7 or so seconds from the time it starts to fall to the time its completely on the ground? I can’t seem to come up with any video examples of ‘dustification’ but the hundreds of examples of controlled demolition look very very similar to the videos of the wtcs
A little later she has a slide of an apparent ‘squib’ on the screen.
14:21 “folks like to think thats a squib, some type of explosion, but there should be a whole lot more of them and why doesn’t it squirt out very far? One thing that comes to mind is water tanks. You pump it up into approximately 10 story intervals, another holding tank, pump it up from there. So you’re going to have these water tanks staggered all throughout the building at some regular interval. So what happens when this pressure vessel begins to weaken and starting to dustify? At some point its suddenly going to give way and the contents are going to squirt out. I think thats what that could look like. I don’t know what this is but that makes a lot more sense to me then a bomb.”
I’m not even sure where to begin with this one. So she says there should be a lot more (squibs) but she’s looking at a static imagine of a single one. If you watch the videos you can actually see them on almost every floor timed exactly the same as you would expect if each floor was rigged with demolition to go off right as the floor above it was about to come down on top of the next one. This is actually how they get buildings to collapse fully without resistance (at free fall speeds). I have no idea what water tanks she’s talking about. For the sprinkler systems?? Either way I would not expect a water tank burst to blow out a window with that much pressure. (How much pressure do water lines have 70lbs, 100lbs? Thats not going to blow out a window and shoot out that amount of dust and debry). Also I wouldn’t expect a water tank to burst BEFORE the floor above has even reached the one where the burst occurs. Her explanation makes absolutely no sense while squibs from demolition makes complete sense.
There are countless examples of the ‘trust me bro’, flatearth type nonsense that doesn’t at all match up with observation. Discrediting Corbett (and others in the 9/11 truth community) because they don’t go along with this nonsense is absolutely asinine imo.
I disagree with Judy Woods ideas. She does not even present a complete theory.
She just lists strange things.
There is good evidence for demolition:
We can clearly find remains of thermite oxidizers in the dust.
This causes chemical damage to the cars and surrounding buildings.
The amount of explosives was be estimated by explosives experts and
is about 2x the amount that is used for a civilian demolition.
But a lot was not even burned fully, and the amount is likely even more (3x or 4x).
The demolition also shows a classic demolition pattern.
The goal of a good demolition is to create a path for the building to fall, without disturbances.
With exact timings you destroy each layer of the building, in such a way
that each layer falls with minimal contact with the underlying layer.
And at the same time you need to be close to the underlying layer to minimize wind-disturbance.
(which is large due to movement of the fall).
The walls are blasted sideways to prevent any disturbance in balance.
This all means that the building falls near free fall.
Starting from the top, or from a “pile-driver”.
And this is exactly what we see in the videos of the 3 towers.
The demolition is a very fine-tuned engineering job.
It takes months to design and calculate.
Many things need to be prepared at the crucial places,
and we see many people at work doing exactly that.
It seems to start a year before with the “Gelatin” E-team project,
who show a photon of themselves with many boxes of demolition cords.
And it ends with a 2 week work on the elevator shafts.
Now imagine a space-laser or (mini) nuclear device..
(Mini nuke is another favorite alternative theory)
If the method would be effective, it would destroy all floors simultaneously.
And with that, this timing would be off completely.
All floors would likely collapse at the same time,
unlike what we see in the destruction of the 3 towers.
There would also be a wind-unbalance.
And the side-walls would still be standing, as the laser or nuke would
not be aimed at the sided.
And both would leave clear traces that can be recognized.
(not just a round hole or chemically burned beams)
(nor the tritium from the exit-signs)
From AlienScientist we can learn that Judy woods theory
and the nuke theory were introduced AFTER
the architects and engineers had concluded that there was clear
evidence of a demolition using Thermite and explosives.
I like Dr. J Farrell’s speculation which amounts to a “yes and”, but the simple paraphrase goes: “there were likely 3 levels of operators of that day, and none knew of the level above.”
The first were Arabs or even agents with stolen Arab identity with plans to hijack planes,,
The second who were using the unsuspecting first as cover and other, were those war hawks and secret agents that left all the fingerprints that researchers have dug up which include controlled demolition, missiles disguised as planes, coinciding war game excersizes, open/empty vault in the basement, preplanned narrative broadcasting, fraudulent reports and on and on.
The third level, unsuspected by the second level, left a few bits of evidence that no one has a case-closed explanation for. Principally the turning of the majority of steel and concrete 1,000,000 tons of dense mass (buildings 1 & 2) into thick white powdery dust in 13 seconds, the remaining debris pile was negligible, albeit only to the ground floor, the 8 basement sublevels were untouched by the collapse but did have random explosions, two of the complex buildings remained standing though with 20m diameter cookie cutter holes as if punched cleanly from roof through 6 (or so ?) stories to the ground floor, the hundreds of cars more than a block away, with slumped metal body panels yet as new plastic liners (sounds microwavish), exploded windscreens and some melted aluminum engine heads into puddles in front of the cars (cant see thermite oxidizing dust doing that or whatever you mean by “chemical damage), this same effect has been seen in Paradise, Lahina, & LA.
Dr Woods pointed in the direction of d.e.w. as a possibilty yet added that it may be a technology or format that is not widely known about.. Interferometry is a fledgling branch of physics.
I chuck it in the “hard tellin not knowin” basket with the likes of crop circle making, megalithic stone joinery, pyramids and the like
She is a forensics materials science phd. I found her book posed valid questions
The “Big Three” – JFK, Oklahoma City, and 9/11 each have an official story and each has a set of facts that easily contradict the official stories. That’s a good start – we are dealing with cruel entities willing to perform the unspeakable in order to establish historical inflections. I.e. – they will lie, steal, and murder in order to set the stage to achieve their goals.
Re: Dr. Judy Wood, I have studied her book “Where Did The Towers Go” and watched a video presentation by Dr. Wood. There is no doubt that Dr. Wood is on to something, specifically, the lack of rubble at WTC 1 & 2 compared to the measured volume of dust found in the vicinity. “Dustification”, Dr. Wood calls it. What’s that about ?
Re: “…the other 9/11 stuff is just window dressing (JamesC’s work) or outright deception (Richard Gage et al..)”. This is where I disagree with you 1968d. Both JamesC and Richard Gage provide valuable insights into these puzzling, horrible events.
More important than the false flag was the huge expansion of the deep state’s power with “The Patriot Act” made possible by the aftermath, e.g., the unchallenged official claims, specifically the rush into a 20 year war.
I spontaneously shouted out, pointing at a TV screen showing the demolitions in a crowded room of about 50, on 911, noon pct., “This is nothing compared to what the govt. will do to us using this as an excuse.”
What are your favorite 9/11 videos?
Anything from a feature film/documentary to a short 5-10 minute piece?
I’m thinking about videos that are must haves in your 9/11 research collection.
Videos that sealed the deal on any aspect of 9/11.
Penn & Teller’s “Bullshit” series tried to debunk the conspiracy of controlled demolition.
At the time this video came out, I had never heard of this theory, at all.
I thought, from day-one, 9/11 was an orchestrated event by the American government, but just took it at face value that planes alone could take down those buildings.
The Penn & Teller piece was meant to dissuade viewers away from these theories.
All it did for me was send me down a rabbit hole of conspiracy theories, and now I’m convinced it was controlled demolition.
Thanks Iamfreeiamme for the story. I am familiar with Penn & Tell but never saw any of their 9/11 stuff.
It sounds like they have been backing the official 9/11 story from day one and never wavered from it.
I have quite a few faves and will post a couple at a time.
9-11 ‘Tuesday Morning in September’
This video is well worth taking the time to watch it in its entirety if you haven’t seen it before.
It chronicles the entire attack of the twin towers from an amateur across the Hudson river.
He seems to have recently purchased his camera and was eager to use it before the attacks began.
It is rich in detail.
Of note. Plane approaching WTC2 and striking it.
He witnesses both towers being blown up and uses bold assertive language in real time:
“There must have been a big fuckin’ bomb they had in there”.
“There was a gigantic fuckin’ explosion…”
“The tower on the right, I just saw it fuckin’ explode. A huge explosion and it all fuckin’ fell.”
Rick Siegel – 911 Eyewitness Hoboken
By his statements at the end I’m not sure if Siegel grasps who the terrorists were.
But the video is rich with details and clues not seen anywhere else.
Especially the smoke rising at the base of WTC2 before it was blown up! Big clue!
Also all of the mega explosions that can be heard before the towers were blown up.
This one’s a keeper!
Watch it all if you haven’t seen it.
I definitely remember the movie ‘loose change’ had me going down that rabbit hole.
Yes ‘Loose Change’ is definitely a keeper.
It set the bar in terms of quality and richness of information/clues. 👍
The Michael Hess videos are precious.
They document several things.
Most here know about the Barry Jennings story.
His ‘accomplice’ was Michael Hess, former New York City corporation counsel.
The first video documents Hess walking to WTC7 after the towers had been hit.
The second video documents Hess screaming for help from the 8th floor of WTC7, where he and Jennings were trapped.
The third video documents Hess being interviewed on radio on 9/11 as a WTC7 explosion witness. This interview took place before his handlers could get to him and force him to change his explosion story.
From this video:
“I was up in the Emergency Management Center on the 23rd floor and when all the power went out in the building another gentleman and I walked down to the 8th floor where there was an explosion and we’ve been trapped on the 8th floor with smoke, thick smoke all around us for about an hour and a half.”
The fourth video documents Hess after he changed his 9/11 story.
IN AN INSTANT – 5 DIFFERENT THINGS HAPPENED! – Michael Hess.mp4
Gone is the explosion!
It has been replaced by:
5 different things happened.
– Lights went out
– Stairwell filled up with smoke
– Sprinklers went on
– Building began to shake (like an earthquake) [Oh really? Why do you think? Office fires?]
– The stairway ran into a wall. [Oh really? With no explosion happening first dear Michael?]
“In my mind I assumed there had been an explosion in the basement”
“I don’t know why that hit me that way”
“I figured there was an explosion in the basement, maybe.”
“My position, and I’m quite firm on it, there were no explosions.”
Oh really, now you say there were no explosions?
Why when you were interviewed on 9/11 on the radio you told all the listeners (without a gun held to your head) that there was an explosion and you were trapped?
For some reason this fourth video is not coming up in any search engines.
Fortunately I downloaded a copy of it a long time ago.
The evidence speaks for Controlled Demolition, however Al-Qaeda would have hijacked the planes if they could have. This is why it was so easy to pin it on them.
Rehearsals?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCNloTPLg-U
https://corbettreport.com/qfc-wtc93/
James, do you know if there are already cases brought to court?