The Carbon Bubble Cometh (and Open Thread)

by | Oct 9, 2018 | Articles | 132 comments

by James Corbett
corbettreport.com
October 9, 2018

So as I (p)reported this weekend, all the usual suspects in the lying, fake news-promoting, bankster-funded corporate mouthpiece media have responded to the latest hot air from the IPCC by dutifully repeating the line that we only have 12 YEARS TO AVERT CLIMATE ARMAGEDDON!!1! And how will we avert this disaster, precisely? By raising carbon taxes and blowing the trillion-dollar carbon trading bubble, of course. Yay.

For those who are confused by the fact that we had only 3 YEARS TO AVERT DISASTER!!1! last year, don’t fret too much over the discrepancy. As I detailed at the time, we’ve been getting different X YEARS TO AVERT DISASTER!!1! warnings for the last 30+ years now, all of which set a different, completely arbitrary timeline for the end of the world. To which the global warming true believers respond: “Details shmeetails, it’s Settled Science™! End of argument!”

So while I’m off this week working on my next major project (coming to The Corbett Report in the very near future), I’ll take the liberty of reposting some of my previous work on the climate issue. These include reports exposing the IPCC; drilling down on the actual science behind the doomporn platitudes; interviewing actual climate scientists; exposing the data fabrication which the climate cult regularly engages in; and explaining the carbon eugenics philosophy which (aside from the obvious financial incentives) motivates the whole scheme. Stay tuned to the front page of corbettreport.com for a different “featured video” from the climate change archives every day.

In the meantime, as I mentioned at the tail end of last week’s New World Next Week, I am taking this week off from new productions while I’m busy working on my next project, so Corbett Report members are invited to use this space to comment on these developments or whatever else is on your mind. It’s an open thread, so feel free to discuss all the latest news or open up discussion on more esoteric matters. Links, resources, insightful commentary and respectful disagreement always welcomed, of course.

To join the conversation, please login and leave your comment below. For those who are not yet Corbett Report members, please CLICK HERE to sign up today.

132 Comments

  1. Regarding the idea that man can change the climate or can influence the weather I am worried about HAARP and EISCAT. These are two huge installiations not to study weather and climate but to experiment and tinker with it.
    HAARP is in Alaska and EISCAT in Norway. Both close to the North Pole. Now think about this. Climatechange want us to believe the ice on the North Pole is melting. If it happens the North Pole will be the Northern Pole sea. Accesible for ships. Who’s navy rules the waves?
    What can we think of this? The nation with the superior navy is tinkering with the climate in the Nort Pole region. A coincidence? At the same time we have to believe that industrial produced CO2 is the cause of global warming. I would like to see both installations dismantled.

  2. Saudi Arabia sells Canadian assets as dispute escalates
    https://www.ft.com/content/b33505ba-9aff-11e8-9702-5946bae86e6d
    EXCERPTS
    The Saudi central bank and state pension funds have instructed their overseas asset managers to dispose of their Canadian equities, bonds and cash holdings “no matter the cost”,…
    Expelled the country’s ambassador
    Frozen new trade and investment with Ottawa
    Suspended a student exchange programme to Canada
    Halted Saudi Arabian Airlines flights to the North American country….

  3. I personally entered the whole conspiracy rabbit hole through the UFO subject and related government cover up – then 9/11. Just wanted to let the community know that recently Richard Dolan has become very active on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnaIeNm-jSa1l8yHrn7PlQg). Like Corbett, I like Richard Dolan a lot, and think that members here might like him as well. Two of my very favorite truth guys. Meaningful criticism encouraged.

      • Yes, I’ve often thought that the apparent increase in UFO activity after WWII seemed related to nukes. And the fact that UFO’s have directly interacted with nuclear facilities in very in-your-face ways leads me to wonder the same as you state.

        It also occurs to me that these nuclear explosions may be damaging a part of reality unknown/unseen to our senses, perhaps in the realm of these “others” and their UFO’s. It certainly isn’t helping out *our* environment any.

  4. Let me describe my side of the story that I based upon the data
    from Abby Martin.
    The country is full with criminals and CIA.
    Both use the “socialism did this”-propaganda to try to get a majority.
    The “opposition” is causing most violence from the reports that I have seen.
    The neutral media is under attack by criminals directly (people get shot if they report the positive side).
    The international market is blocked, so it generates no income.
    The state-less companies are hijacking the market and raising prices
    using monopoly tactics.
    The US media is continuously presenting faked reports of hunger and such to create an urgency. It is to push a need for war.

    So there is a continuous coupe going on, in their media,
    in their finance and in the streets (violence).

    So the situation is a mixture of:
    phoenix project – controlled violence in the state,
    controlled media – just like in the US
    economic hitman – the usual business
    extreme sanctions – stopped the international trade/ oil-sale

    Solutions

    I disagree with any violent action, especially a war or intervention.
    This would create a new Libia with their own slave-trade.

    The idea that they should sell their oil-sources is actually what
    started the trade-ware. The state reclaimed the oil-sources
    when the owners started using it as a pressure tool.
    There is too much violence to get capitalism back, unless
    you arm the whole population.

    Some people propose that their problems might be solved by going more socialistic. Which is fair as the US companies still have far too
    much influence in the system.
    It would become more like in western Europe.
    Yes, we have a far more socialistic state here in Europe.
    But the corruption is a bit too high. So you will not get a
    (former) Sweden, but a Greece.

    Trading oil and goods with China and other “free” countries.
    This can bypass the trade-blockage that the US has setup.
    The IMF is just a puppet of the US banking system.

    I think the real solution would to go the anarchy way,
    as in anarchapulko.
    This would give the power back to the people themselves
    and not to corporations (which is what the US wants).
    The income of oil can be shared.
    But I don’t think the people need to sell much oil when
    they have their power back.
    They need to defend it against the states, though, as they
    will certainly try to claim it.
    It is probably sold to some US company already.
    So the oil could be used to finance a small defense army
    (with local people included).

    But as it looks now, due to the US interventionism,
    China might become the protector.

  5. Goldfinger & Warburg

    Mike Malone has an interesting recent (4 minutes) video…
    The Real GoldFinger – Who Was This Secretive Banker?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYBSfwzWsMk

    Mike references this article entitled…
    The real Goldfinger: the London banker who broke the world.
    The true story of how the City of London invented offshore banking – and set the rich free

    by Oliver Bullough
    https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/sep/07/the-real-goldfinger-the-london-banker-who-broke-the-world

    For you young tikes, Goldfinger is a 1964 James Bond film.
    It was rated ‘R’, so my Dad bought my ticket insisting that I see it. He loved the Ian Fleming books.

    The film’s plot has Bond investigating gold smuggling by gold magnate Auric Goldfinger and eventually uncovering Goldfinger’s plans to contaminate the United States Bullion Depository at Fort Knox.
    ~~ “Oddjob” shows off – (90 seconds) https://hooktube.com/watch?v=AAbtiIrTqCE
    ~~ The Golden Girl (very risqué for the era)(90 seconds)
    https://hooktube.com/watch?v=USD2Y7wRNgk

  6. I must say that this whole thing looked like some sort of setup to me. I mean, first of all, he goes on Joe Rogan’s show, so he has to know that these guys smoke pot on the show regularly. And he just casually takes the blunt and takes a puff without thinking of any consequences of that action? Anyone that has ever smoked pot and watches this video knows that this guy didn’t even inhale the one puff that he did take, so it had no real effect on him. I’ve watched a lot of Joe Rogan and he’s not trustworthy to the truth at all for quite some time. I just found myself looking fascinated at the whole scene thinking that there just has to be some plan behind this craziness.

    I saw that Musk was on-board with the whole climate change narrative and tuned him out as far as anyone worth listening to for any kind of truth, but this is very interesting to see just how this whole scenario works itself out. So here’s a Murdoch puzzle piece…

  7. BREAKING NEWS!! It was announced today: The winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics goes to?…….wait…..holding breath with excitement (and irony)

    The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2018 was divided equally between William D. Nordhaus “for integrating climate change into long-run macroeconomic analysis” and Paul M. Romer “for integrating technological innovations into long-run macroeconomic analysis.”

    More Hot Air!!!

  8. https://skepticalscience.com is a site dedicated to debunking “AGW deniers”.

    Wikipedia gives this site a very positive and IMO very biased article for this website.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skeptical_Science

    I wanted to draw attention to what I think is very valid criticism of the main article on wiki in the talk section:
    Please take a look at this link:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Skeptical_Science

    I found this part in particular interesting:

    “Out of 28 sources, 15+ are Cook’s words or own site. 7+ are favorable reviews of the site, some which don’t include Wiki article assertions. The remaining are the only acceptable sources, because they specifically note origins, policy, and/or creation of the site. This giant, waving, red promotional banner is unacceptable.

    There is a massive amount of vague wording, “primarily”, “mostly”, “may be”, “mainly”, et al. These are all subjective comments and are rife in the article. One or two would be understandable to describe the site. These quantifiers are being used to describe everything from the creation, application, function, development, use and content.

    In addition, another conflict occurs with “trained as a solar physicist”, when Cook has had no formal training, education or employment other than a “year of study” post graduation (https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2010/12/skeptical-science-founder-john-cook/) for physics alone, and he did not receive any degree or certification. This claim is dubious, since according to Postgraduate_education#Australia, twelve months would grant an additional certification of some sort, so if it’s a year, would it not then have given him something tangible rather than “a year’s study”? (Honest question, as I’m unfamiliar with Australian education system and can only refer to internet sourcing and this needs proper attribution and addressing in the article.) In addition, he never worked in this field (same source), let alone research in it. While his specific path should be part of this article, then it should be clarified that his degree is ONLY in physics, no additional branches, and is an undergraduate degree with no employer, study, or scientific research was completed by him in this field. To prevent confusion due to this murky situation, it should be clarified his recent doctorate is in psychology, not physics or other climatology related fields, since the ordering and description in the current article is confusing in this situation (intent by editors is obviously unclear, but I believe this jumbled chronology is intentional, in looking in past edits/reverts). Also, it should be added to his information, any various other positions he holds and where, such as https://communication.gmu.edu/people/jcook20 and https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/peoplepartners/. This will clarify his standing and list achievements and associations for his work. Ironically, the lede refers to the founding to his current employment site, but then shifts to SS to source claims of the sites purpose, systems, etc.”

    • Wikipedia is such a great concept, and works extremely well for non-controversial subjects. I’ve found it completely unreliable for anything controversial, and it seems that many things are (unfortunately for Wikipedia users) increasingly controversial these days. It’s good to see that folks are still there who are at least forcing them work for it.

  9. One interesting point in the Jamal Khashoggi mainstream media coverage is that there is no attention given to the fact that Jamal Khashoggi is the cousin of Adnan Khashoggi a deceased billionaire arms dealer.

    For example this Washington Post article makes no mention of the connection:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/its-time-for-saudi-arabia-to-tell-the-truth-on-jamal-khashoggi/2018/10/10/fadc952e-ccb7-11e8-a3e6-44daa3d35ede_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.5ba9228f9f0c

    The mainstream media is omitting this important detail about Jamal Khashoggi’s family is enough convince me that the reports should be considered propaganda.

  10. Hey Y’All,
    The truth is that despite the apparent so called evidence, there actually is a lot more to science that is not taught in schools. Research the works of John Worrel Keely, Stubblefield, Tesla, Oliver Heaviside, T Henry Moray, Ron Brandt, Dmitry Ivanovich Mendeleyev, Lester Hendershot and a number of others. This is all to say what James and a number of you already know deep down in your spirits: The world we’ve been presented rather amounts to a “Matrix”. Any crisis of energy, and scarcity for that matter, is fiction.

    • ^This is all to say that the whole fossil fuel paradigm and hence false alternative energy “solutions” of wind nuclear solar etc. are all shams. There are real solutions with zero harmful effects and or have baked efficiencies but we like mushrooms are kept in the dark and fed (bull)sh*t. I encourage all to seek out the writings of the above scientists to shed light on what actually is real.

  11. Corbett says:
    “…so feel free to discuss…and respectful disagreement always welcomed, of course.”

    I am calling attention to…
    Interview 1388 – Emma Fiala on the Women’s March on the Pentagon
    Read “why” the title “Women’s March” was chosen.
    …and how the 9/11 Truth Action Project supports the march.(comment above the link)
    https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1388-emma-fiala-on-the-womens-march-on-the-pentagon/comment-page-1/#comment-55842

    I recommend watching Cindy Sheehan in this video.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mq8m0UFe4iE

  12. Why you have (probably) already bought your last car
    https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45786690?utm_source=pocket&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=pockethits

    You’ve probably seen headlines about accidents involving self-driving cars but the truth is they will be far safer than ones driven by you and me – they won’t get regulatory approval if they are not. That means tens of thousands of lives – perhaps hundreds of thousands – will be saved as accident rates plummet.

    That will generate yet another cost saving for our fleets of robo-taxis. The price of insurance will tumble, while at the same time those of us who insist on continuing to drive our own vehicles will face higher charges.

    The logical next step will be for human beings to be banned from driving cars at all because they pose such a risk to other road users.

    Thanks, Pocket. I’ll refrain from commenting as it’s really nothing we haven’t heard before.

  13. ‘THE GOOD CENSOR’: Leaked Google Briefing Admits Abandonment of Free Speech for ‘Safety And Civility’
    https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/10/09/the-good-censor-leaked-google-briefing-admits-abandonment-of-free-speech-for-safety-and-civility/

    One of the reasons Google identifies for allegedly widespread public disillusionment with internet free speech is that it “breeds conspiracy theories.” The example Google uses? A 2016 tweet from then-candidate Donald Trump, alleging that Google search suppressed negative results about Hillary Clinton.

    The document also bemoans that the internet allows “have a go commenters” (in other words, ordinary people) to compete on a level playing field with “authoritative sources” like the New York Times. Google-owned YouTube now promotes so-called “authoritative sources” in its algorithm. The company did not specifically name which sources it would promote.

    Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. To quote Alan B’stard.

  14. Facebook purged over 800 accounts and pages pushing political messages for profit
    https://web.archive.org/web/20181011211145/http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-facebook-political-messages-purge-20181011-story.html

    Derrick Broze pointed out the link. (I archived the page for EU prisoners)

    The accounts and pages, with names like Reasonable People Unite and Reverb Press, were likely domestic actors using clickbait headlines and other spammy tactics to drive users to websites where they could target them with ads, the company said. Some had hundreds of thousands of followers and expressed a range of political viewpoints, including a page which billed itself as the first publication to endorse President Trump. They did not appear to have ties to Russia, company officials said.

    How dare they use …. ads? Oh, won’t you think of the children?

        • Camille says: “That’s my youtube video. I’m just getting started doing this video thing.”
          Camille!
          Oh cool!
          I love seeing this!

          Great name for a YouTube Channel! “PLEASE STOP THE RIDE”

          BUMP

        • You hit my bailiwick with your video…

          Erie City Council Fluoride Debate
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7PKfazaUPA

          The Fluoride fight continues in the Dallas area…
          https://www.dogsagainstfluoridation.com/news-activism

          I detest “authority mandates”.
          For example, Houston, TX (Derrick Broze stomping grounds).
          In the early 1980’s citizens filed a lawsuit to end fluoridation.
          The Judge found that fluoridation “may cause or contribute to the cause of cancer, genetic damage, intolerant reactions, and chronic toxicity, including dental mottling,…”.

          This went to a higher court which basically said that even though the Houston City Council might harm the public’s health, they can do it anyways. The courts can not stop them. (i.e. that such proof of harm was not enough to arrest an exercise of police power.)

          • Thank you, HomeRemedySupply!

            That is quite the treasure trove of fluoride information! I came across this history of fluoride thing recently. Is it in there? http://www.fluoridation.com/exner.htm

            Isn’t that an interesting interaction there with the city council? The councilwoman who spoke of conspiracy theories has worked her whole career at the “local” paper and she won her seat on the council just days after joining the #MeToo club saying George Bush Sr grabbed her butt once. I see the media and hollywood campaign of #MeToo as a big psyop to further divide us. Do you know of the Canadian youtuber Jeff C who is currently operating under the channel Jeff Censored Live? He has lost so many channels as I’ve followed him over the years. His most recent channel Jeff Censored is still up but has been having videos pulled lately. While horrible things are pushed on Youtube, Jeff is repeatedly taken down for questioning the media.

            I was on his recent Jeff C and Friends show actually! I chimed in around the 2:49:30 mark, should you want to hear me talk about some things I’ve not yet got to making videos on.
            https://youtu.be/wKlX5JTLf6s

            One thing I mention in there briefly, and in the video you’ve seen, is Firstnet. I need to get on putting things together on that to share with people like Derrick Broze. I saw him stand up against 5G at the council meeting. He did great! The thing is that all of the states and territories have already signed on to Firstnet which is being rolled out by AT&T (with their deep government ties) and it will be the backbone of their 5G rollout. I don’t know that the local governments will defy that.

            I did a data dump on what I was looking at months back on Firstnet and a follow up post with a little more.

            https://steemit.com/life/@camille1234/trojan-horse-alert-5g-rollout-disguised-as-first-responder-network

            https://steemit.com/truth/@camille1234/trojan-horse-part-2

            • Camille,
              You have a nice voice. It is soothing and caring, yet professional with credibility. The voice is certainly appealing for videos or podcasts.

              Those are good resource notes about Firstnet and 5G.

              I enjoyed listening to you about how food is being co-opted. What insanity exists in the Corporate world!

              • FOOD – American Style
                Wow!
                Camille, You really did your research. Incredible stuff.

                I am going to have to read this again, but with more focused attention. There is a lot to take away.

                Thanks.

              • Camille,

                Saw this article(linked below)this morning on Yahoo. Had I not read through your report on what’s going on in the food industry and the extent to what is being developed and planned for the near future, the article would have hardly registered. I think I would have thought it some real quirky, unrealistic, isolated development by some little start up. But, that’s not the case. It’s actually part of a monumental shift in a food industry that plans to utilize every facet of artificial biological engineering!

                https://www.engadget.com/2018/10/24/cultured-chicken-nugget-available-end-of-year/?yptr=yahoo

                And speaking of Soylent Green (thank you mbp), I was imagining these developments might make that green stuff so very old school of an idea, unless of course, it’s ultimately planned that they’ll use it as their nutrient base to grow their “clean meat”, making it the perfect bio-“feed”back loop with minimal animal exploitation.

                However unfunny that is, I thank you, Camille, for enlightening this board.

              • HomeRemedySupply, manbearpig, and candlelight, thank you for reading my post and for your comments!

                I put my presentation to video and I linked it to a post with all of the sources. Perhaps it can reach more people this way.

                If You Eat Food You Don’t Want To Miss This!
                https://youtu.be/GC7QhttpfHs

              • Here is a presentation the CEO of JUST gave in Hong Kong. He covers a lot of what they are doing. At this part I have cued up he is talking about their “cellular agriculture” and the media required to grow the “meat”.

                Josh Tetrick at the GREENovation Forum: A Bold Vision for the Future of Food
                https://youtu.be/q56BDrP3tvE?t=763

              • Wow!
                Camille, thanks for putting all this together.
                This food topic is so under-the-radar.

              • “Fluoride” on the nutritional list!?!
                Geez!

                Thanks for noting that.
                I will use that.

  15. Pulled up James’ “How Bad Global Warming Science Hurts the Environmental Movement” on GooTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnlcLUbHG2I) and was a bit startled to discover this message underneath the video – appearing as if the video creator put it there: “Global warming is the observed century-scale rise in the average temperature of the Earth’s climate system and its related effects, as part of climate change. Multiple Lines of scientific evidence show that the climate system is warming.”, and points to this Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming?wprov=yicw1

    Same place as the Russian Government warning that appears along with RT videos.

    Just reminds me of what James has been saying for a very long time: one of these days, these videos will no longer be allowed on the platform.

  16. Open thread…

    Amy McGrath is a Kentucky candidate for the Democrats in the U.S. congressional race.

    She is reportedly a U.S. marine fighter pilot who flew 89 combat missions in Afghanistan and Iraq before retiring with the rank of lieutenant-colonel.

    “If Amy McGrath wins this race, the Democrats will take the House of Representatives,” says Ben Chandler, the former Democrat who represented the district from 2004 until he lost to Barr in 2012.

    “Amy McGrath is a war hero. Amy McGrath is a mother of three who has killed terrorists,” he said. “Now, I don’t know too many people who have that profile.”

    Made me feel sick when I heard this story on the radio today.
    War hero? Terrorists? …

  17. Solar science= Bullshit

    I will repeat it here again, and go a bit further:
    The mainstream science of the sun is filled with bullshit.
    It breaks with established physical laws of thermodynamics and
    electromagnetism.

    And because the sun is directly related to Earth’s temperature,
    we get bullshit for our climate science.

    On http://www.reddit.com/r/plasmacosmology/wiki
    I found 8 major errors in the model.

    Explanations

    1) Magnetic reconnection
    is a fantasy that has no relation with physics or reality. It is about field-lines that release energy when they connect. Never observed, and based on false ideas. It is like free energy. It would break with all physics that we know. And we would see it every day around us,
    because field-lines of very strong radio-waves bump into each
    other all the time. They should explode if we follow this theory.
    Still wikipedia and Nasa use it in their “explanations”.

    2) Magnetohydrodynamics
    Only works in situations that never happen in reality, not even on the sun. The Lorentz force is often seen as evidence for it, but it is the Lorenz force instead. (Electrical field due to change of magnetic field).
    Combined with it we have “frozen magnetic fields” that can not exist
    in the real world.
    They invented this to also ignore all electric currents that are necessary (by laws of physics) to produce magnetic fields.

    3) Electrical fields do not exist according to astronomers. But in experiments and in space we see electrical fields all the time.

    4) Mainstream: Sun has no condensed matter. Like a Fluid. But we see fluid-like behavior and radiation that corresponds with fluids or solids.

    5) Mainstream: Sun does have a surface. Only true when you close your eyes.

    6) Mainstream Sun model breaks with basic thermodynamics:
    a- Mainstream: outside of the sun is millions of degrees.
    This breaks with basic physics, the sun is much cooler inside.
    Is the outside of a fire so much hotter than the fire itself?
    Reality: Surface temperature is different and based on false measurements.
    b- Mainstream: heat spreads very slowly inside the sun.
    This breaks with thermodynamics.

    7) Mainstream: Pressure outside the sun is extremely low
    This breaks with the normal expansion of gas and plasma around an object.
    a – Reality: The sun is surrounded by gas and plasma, following a curve like around a planet. Which we can also observe.
    b- Mainstream uses pressure radiation as a significant force.
    Reality: pressure radiation does not do much.

    8) Chemical reactions on the Sun are fully ignored.
    They are clearly happening, and likely in combination with electro-chemistry.

    On the wiki I also explain how they should be replaced.

    What does all this mean?

    Most of “established science” contain major errors!
    This is about the sun that is visible every day.

    This means that even smart scientists are not likely to see
    through theoretical bullshit even when it is in front of their eyes.

    On universities smart people are trained to follow instructions and
    not to have their own ideas.
    “Obey the expert’. “Doubt free thoughts”.

    Because I was trained physics with applied techniques, not just
    with theories, I could see through this bullshit.
    And that even took me a lot of years.

    But people that are trained in this field are hard to talk with. They just
    refer to books or people that repeat the old errors. They have
    been brainwashed into this nonsense. Never to think for themselves.
    Or point to “straw-man alternatives” to make their bullshit seem better.

    But just look at my list.
    Using just basic applied physics, you can already see
    that these subjects are at least very problematic.
    1-> Radio-waves that bump into each other causing explosions.
    6-> A fire that is cold inside, but extremely hot on the outside.
    8-> No chemical reactions. Did they just forget it?

    I think this is a good subject to talk with your friends about,
    before talking about more political things.

      • …not very intuitive

        I think this is the problem with a lot of bullshit science.
        The theories have run wild without real evidence.

        Therefore I added the last 3 as simple examples.
        Like -6- Ever seen a fire that burns deep inside, but is only hot
        on the outside?
        I don’t think anyone has ever seen such a thing.

        When observations show that these theories are wrong:
        1) most people do not understand the problems.
        2) specialists in the area try to keep the theories and bend the
        observations so they fit the theory.
        3) PHD students graduate when they do not oppose the theories, and invent invisible stuff to explain the differences.
        4) scientists from other fields ignore the problem, can’t believe that something is wrong, and let the specialists deal with it.
        5) scientists that do see that something is wrong are treated as (1) or as lunatics / heretics. “how can you even believe that we make errors in science?”

        I could only find those errors because I actually understood what they were doing and dived deep into the fundamental theories behind it.
        I did not assume that they were right, because their conclusions were opposite of what I have learned in proven basic physics.

  18. Lately, I have noticed something regarding The Corbett Report and Google.
    When I use Google to find The Corbett Report, I just type in “Corbett Report“.

    In the past, the Home page would be one of the very first entries. At the top.

    Within the last week or so, both on my computer and on my phone, the “Contact” page is one of the first entries, followed by “About” or “Membership” pages, then followed by “Corbett Report YouTube”, then…get this… “The Corbett Report – Home Facebook”.

    No longer is the “Home” page even on the first page of entries for a Google search.

    And, there are some other oddities which I had never seen before when doing the Google search using the words “Corbett Report”, such as books on the first Google search page with pages citing a historical Mr. Corbett or historical ‘Corbett Report’.

  19. Unabashed climate change narrative support stand-alone commercial? on RT, complete with proper shaming. This is the 2nd one I’ve bumped into there recently. I only watch RT from time to time, so I don’t know if this is a new thing there or not.

    Encouraging to note that a lot of people are commenting negatively on the video and getting quite a number of likes.

    #ICYMI: Climate change, who cares?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhfrZ-Tp5C4

  20. Facebook now knows how many users were hacked last month: 29 million
    https://www.vox.com/2018/10/13/17973190/facebook-data-breach-29-million-users
    EXCERPTS
    The company had previously said as many as 90 million accounts could have been compromised…

    … In nearly half of the cases, hackers were able to see details like their users’ relationship status, the area they live in and part of their search history…
    …According to the most recent details, hackers could see the phone numbers and email addresses of 29 million users, and additional biographical information — including self-reported current city, education, work, people they follow, the last 10 places they were tagged in and the last 15 searches — of 14 million of those….

  21. Dr. Mark Skidmore – $21 Trillion “Missing” Money Huge Implications for Dollar

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4XRbcBz2Z4

    Michigan State Economics Professor Mark Dr. Skidmore says there is a limit to money printing even when all the global central banks are doing it. Skidmore says, “What does it mean when a central bank is buying equities, or buying debt with printed money in order to suppress interest rates and keep this game going? I think, overall, the whole world is awash in debt, and it’s expanding at a rate that is unsustainable. The only way it has been sustained is that interest rates have been falling for 30 years. Now, interest rates are no longer falling, and we are running up against a constraint. Now, if this $21 trillion in “missing” federal money really represents spending above and beyond what the official records indicate, then that has huge financial implications and huge implications for confidence in the dollar as the reserve currency. This is an enormous priority to address and not just cover up and say we are all good.” In closing, Dr. Skidmore says, “How can you have a democracy if you don’t have any transparency whatsoever? Having integrity and confidence is so essential to the whole system, and this just puts everything in question. . . . We should clean this up and show we are legitimate. If we don’t, we are just shooting ourselves in the foot.” Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Dr. Mark Skidmore, Professor of Economics at Michigan State University.

    Also on Redacted Tonight:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KfJO8Irjyo
    Truth About $21 Trillion Missing At The Pentagón w/ David Degraw

    Who stole the money?

  22. I wonder why when we (!) are literally drowning,  up to our collective necks in garbage, we are obsessing over ‘climate’ — what was gained and what was lost by having shifted the discourse away from pollution, emissions, toxic spills, the war machine, big Pharma/Argo, the polluters, pillagers, extractors… to ‘climate’?!
    Who profits? 
    And who profits from having an ‘Immigration Crisis’ instead of a ’War on the people, on the earth Crisis’?

    • Couldn’t agree more. I just made the following comment recently because I was triggered by this comment: “Human-caused climate change is reality. It doesn’t care about your feelings.”

      I say: Continuous earthly climate change is reality. It doesn’t care about human opinions. There are plenty of horrible things that people (corporations with governments) are doing to badly damage the earth and its people, completely outside the realm of co2 emissions – co2 emissions which actually feed plant life and green the earth.

      This climate change narrative is a steaming pile of distraction, taxes, and making people feel bad for being alive and breathing. And it’s a major cog in the desired one world government to rule all countries wheel. Wake up people, you’ve been scammed – again!

      Some of the really bad things that actually are happening: Fukushima, Deepwater Horizon (with Correxit application), fracking, corporate ownership of the U.S. and other governments, Federal Reserve & central banks all over the world and the wars and enemies that strangely and regularly align with those not under that central bank control.

      Human generated co2 is the very least of our worries folks.

  23. After 43 years of Conservative government in Oil Rich Alberta, The Environmental NDP do the impossible and win the 2015 election. Now we have a Carbon Tax to pay for our environmental sins. What became of the Conservative leader shortly after this historical upset…?

    https://www.google.ca/search?q=jim+prentice+plane+crash&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwinhYGqjYbeAhVCMXwKHZUSAy4Q_AUIDygC&biw=1920&bih=850#imgrc=JpzReWjuxcBbyM:

    Why, his small plane went STRAIGHT down killing all on board, naturally.

    • That is a pretty good tool list.

      Personally, I speculate that there exists a very, very large number of “accidents” caused by corporations and businessmen,(relative to ‘government accidents’) in the United States.
      But these fly under the radar and don’t draw much credible attention.

      Karen Silkwood is an example of someone who had an ‘accident’ when working in Oklahoma for a corporation. (Made famous by the movie).

      Also in Oklahoma is the ‘accident’ of Aubrey McClendon a few years back.
      https://www.corbettreport.com/welcome-to-the-driverless-future/#comment-42578

      In many cases, a corporation doesn’t need to perform a fatal accident.
      Another set of tools for the businessman includes data, technology, financial means, etc. to ruin, stress, make ill, or otherwise cause turmoil within the target’s household.

      Weaken the target with stresses, and then the target becomes ineffective.
      …After all, the government does this to everyone all the time.

  24. ‘Trouble brewing: climate change to cause ‘dramatic’ beer shortages’

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/oct/15/climate-change-to-cause-dramatic-beer-shortages-extreme-weather-price

    The heady combination of The Guardian and The University of East Anglia (ring any bells?) was always going to produce an interesting headline. Here it is. Wave bye-bye to your beloved beer, gentlemen..

    Clearly they want us all down the pub, brandishing pitchforks and vowing to pay more carbon taxes in a valiant attempt to halt this nightmare.

    Blah blah blah….

    • Digging a little further into the aforementioned article, we see that the spokesman for the ‘research’ is one Prof Dabo Guan, who is a Chair Professor in Climate Change Economics (at School of International Development, University of East Anglia) and, wait for it….

      “a Lead Author for the 5th Assessment Report of Working Group III, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. ”

      Yayyyyyy!!!!

    • Interesting how these “news” travel very quickly around the globe. Must be a coincidence, of course, to have it published in the local “media” on the same day. It was even on TeeVee.

  25. October 18 2018 – Barron’s
    Basically, this article shows where large amounts of Saudi Arabian money is invested in Tech Companies around the globe.

    ‘The Dirtiest Money on Earth.’ Silicon Valley Has a Saudi Arabia Problem
    https://www.barrons.com/articles/saudi-arabia-tech-fundraising-1539808510?siteid=yhoof2&yptr=yahoo

    EXCERPTS
    Uber Technologies, which landed a staggering $3.5 billion from Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund in 2016.

    (Tesla mentioned)

    Tech’s connection to Saudi Arabia extends deeper, indirectly, through SoftBank of Japan’s $93 billion technology investment fund. The Vision Fund gleans nearly half of its money—$45 billion—from Saudi Arabia, in an attempt by the country to diversify its holding beyond oil. Softbank’s investments include Slack, reportedly in line for a mega-IPO in early 2019; food-delivery service DoorDash; and WeWork, a co-working space company.

  26. This writing has been on the wall for a while now. They claim most of these migrant crisis are caused by climate change, ignoring the bombs flying over head thing.

  27. I’m sure Bill will get the taste of his own medicine as well. Just imagine how much co2 tax he’ll have to pay for using his jets. Those aren’t cheap, you know. That’s why he has several, you save up on group buys. A bunch of billionaires get together, pick up a whole lot of jets on ebay and save a bundle.

    • Thanks MBP for bringing this to our attention. I couldn’t stomach the prospect of watching the video, but reading through the quotes, it strikes me as nothing short of Evangelical. There seems to be little difference in terms of the dogmatism, hysteria, irrationality, and righteousness – not to mention the implied unquestioning obedience to The Word (doctrine) and those self-appointed as its ‘Prophets’.

      I find it frustrating when genuine environmental issues are twisted in such a way as to ram us toward totalitarianism.

      On a lighter note the ‘logic’ of this type of enviro-zealotry reminds me of a classic 3rd Rock from the Sun episode: Dick and Harry fall down a hole, S5, Ep18.

      Dick: “Harry, listen to me. There’s only so much air down here. So before you take a breath, think about whether you’re doing it out of habit or if you really need the oxygen.”

      Full episode here: https://vimeo.com/11697166

      • re: ‘genuine environmental issues’ – by this I’m referring specifically to my ‘pet peeve’ of ubiquitous herbicide/pesticide use. (And many other practices and technologies which have created toxic environments, including use of non-ionizing radiation by the telecom industry – 5G anyone?).

      • Yea! and when Harry concludes that Dick dislodged a boulder blocking the shaft, trapping them in the hole was in fact a clever maneuver
        “to keep the air supply from getting out!”

        LOL MPB! Good to see another 3rd Rock convert 😉

        Come to think of it, that scene is also a perfect allegory for geoengineering – just replace a couple of words:

        “to keep the sunlight from getting in!”

        Hmmm.. and plants need what for photosynthesis? Oh yeah…sunlight.
        And remind me again why the Brazilian rainforest and ocean phytoplankton are so important to mitigate man-made GW?
        Ohhh that’s right, they’re a… carbon sink
        Genius, pure bloody genius. I can totally see why you technocrats are the “High Commanders” of this mission!

        Philippe Grandjean is one of the world’s top scientists regarding toxicity

        Hey HRS, I’d not heard of him! Thanks for the link 🙂

    • MBP , my step son teaches at an old OSS AMERICAN School across the border. He is willfully blind to all but the basic English as a second language within a strick environment devoid of any outside thought. Saudi, Russian , ect,around 100 countries represented. Having meet a few ,on the surface are normal pimple faced high school kids. One time I asked to see their work product. No! It was forbidden!
      Can you share some of your students writings.
      I wish James would do a subscriber 100- 300 word short story for fun on some random topic of fiction. Probably corny, but might be fun and a break from the gloom of reality.

  28. Thanks for all the updates on climate change.
    Like ya’ll point out, the trend is getting worse. Ubiquitous…found even in the alternative health arena.

Submit a Comment


BOOK

Buy REPORTAGE, the new book by James Corbett

RECENT POSTS


RECENT COMMENTS


ARCHIVES