Have you ever heard an establishment mouthpiece, a political puppet or a globalist gopher say something like: “Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective—a new world order—can emerge. A new era, freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace”?
Or: “As our world becomes more complex, more uncertain, and more dangerous, we have an even greater responsibility to strengthen the multilateral system”?
Or: “The constructive contributions by INB relevant stakeholders were incredibly valuable. Together, we must sustain this progress during the coming months to realize our shared goal to forge a pandemic agreement that guides future global responses to pandemics”?
Yes, those are English words coming out of their mouths. But they’re not speaking English. They’re speaking Globalese.
You see, Globalese sounds like English and it employs English words, but it has its own dictionary, in which certain words have a completely different meaning. If you think you can understand terms like “sustainable development” or “international law” actually mean by looking them up in your standard English dictionary (or, even worse, Wikipedia), you’re sadly mistaken.
Thankfully, after decades of listening to these globalists speak, I have a fairly good grasp of Globalese. Today I offer my services to help you translate the Globalese gobbledygook in the United Nation’s new “Pact for the Future” into plain English.
Sorry, and you’re welcome!
“You do not represent me. I do not consent to your plans. I do not cede my authority as a sovereign individual to the UN or to any other body to make decisions for me and my family. I do not participate in your systems of control, and nothing you say, no compact you make, no treaty you sign, has any relevance to me. I am a free human being, and I make my own choices in life in cooperation with others in my community as I see fit.”
What a wonderfully concise yet comprehensive statement of individual sovereignty. I agree with every word of it, in principle.
God grant me the courage to stand for my principles in the face of violent coercion.
I have to admit that so far in this life there have been many occasions where my principles have taken a backseat to practicality.
I do believe that taxation is theft and makes me a slave in a real sense. Yet I’ve payed it all my life.
I don’t believe that I should have to seek permission from the state to drive a car. But I’ve always maintained a valid license.
So many ways that I’ve compromised my principles, I couldn’t list them all.
Will I have the fortitude to be a martyr when the red line is crossed?
Will I even know what the red line is when I’m facing it?
Hope I don’t have to find out.
My translation is “Eat ze bugs”! But yeah, no thanks. I will not comply.
Don’t panic! We are in God’s hands, right?
“We will end hunger, eliminate food insecurity and all forms of malnutrition”.
That is a pretty tall order, unless… The human population is drastically reduced. I think we can handle that. High tech war, bio-warfare, famines are well-versed plays that are pretty quick. But the long haul is also covered by our PRIDE in stylish impotence and abortion. Less people equals less hunger; simple technocrat math.
“sustainable agrifood systems” I reckon this involves centralized control of food production, which will involve high-tech lab grown food sources instead of farms.
What’s not to love?
Another brilliant article. Possibly your best. Thanks.
I remember Alex Jones way way back, screaming about globalists and agenda 21. I really couldn’t understand why globalists would want to destroy America (their biggest source of income) like he claimed. I get it now.
To me this is in many ways about elitism. The more socially elevated someone is the more likely they are to want to save the planet from the plague of eight billion peasants (as David Attenborough believes).
The Rockefeller Club of Rome had many of royal houses of Europe as honorary members. The British royal family have always been outspoken environmentalists.
“The drive . . . is to create a one world government … Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope . . . .”
– Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976
In 1979, McDonald helped found the Western Goals Foundation, with the aim of combating world communism. At the time, he also sponsored a House resolution, originally adopted at an American Legion national convention, calling for a congressional investigation of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission.
9/01/1983, McDonald, along with 268 others aboard Seoul-bound Korean Air Lines Flight 007, perished when a Soviet Su-15 interceptor shot down the Boeing 747-230B airliner with a missile near Sakhalin Island.
– – – – – – – – – – – – –
Senator Paul Wellstone, Congressman James A. Traficant, Congressman Sonny Bono, Senator John Heinz III on April 4, 1991, and two days later his partner in investigation John G. Tower. JFK Jr.
– – – – – – – – – – – – –
The powers that shouldn’t be who didn’t hesitate to assassinate JFK, RFK, MLK, Wellstone, McDonald, Webb, Hastings, Dr. David Kelly (whistle blower Iraq WMDs), the entire Polish executive branch, and countless others & pulled off 9/11 and false flags around the world, can take out anyone they want.
WHO WANTS US TO DIE (song)
https://old.bitchute.com/video/8CKubpwla5Lr/