Criminal Psychopaths Run The Government…Let’s Give Them More Power!!!

by | Jul 22, 2017 | Videos | 76 comments

Watch this video on BitChuteYouTube

We all know that the criminal psychopaths who populate the government will stop at nothing to achieve their sadistic ends. But you’ve gotta vote for someone, right? So why not vote for the criminal psychopath that promises you free healthcare? Or maybe the criminal psychopath that promises to keep you safe from the big, bad turban-wearing (Gladio-sponsored) boogeymen? Anyway, I’m sure it’ll all work out…

Bob Murphy on Trumpcare

The REAL Hastert Scandal: Pedophilia, Drug Money and Blackmail

Tjeerd Andringa Exposes the Kakistocracy

Political Ponerology

Episode 090 – Our Leaders Are Psychopaths

“Psychopathy” on


  1. I resent your use of the word “brilliant” when referring to anyone in power. 🙂

    • When I was a kid, I came across an old psychology textbook. I remember the definition (then) for insanity was someone who operated outside of society’s norms. That’s me! I’m so proud to be insane! You’d have to be crazy not to be insane in my book. 🙂

  2. I am so glad that James repeats the message about the psychopaths.
    This topic is urgently important.

    Like James points out, many people are somewhat “awake”; (that is they are aware of things like the 9/11 Cover-up).
    Yet, these “awake” people have a difficult time grasping that the system is run by psychopaths.
    By repeating the message, perhaps more folks will recognize what the real situation is.

    It’s a rigged game designed by evil, soulless nutjobs who con suckers into playing their game. Only the psychopaths win at this game and anyone else who plays is a sucker.

    • PF why do you need others to think for you? try thinking for your own solutions. That’s what the grown-ups do.

      • Yes, I just find it annoying when people who are too lazy to care about themselves always expect others to care more about them than they do themselves. Laziness and fear are the driving forces behind these types. Two of the most disgusting behaviors. Oh well, if he doesn’t figure it out, then it’s no big loss.Amazing how so many people don’t figure out that the sheep lies down with the lion because it is dinner until they become dinner. By the way, your English is better than many native speakers. I thought about offering corrections for you, if you want, in the spirit of helping; not to insult.

    • Yes, they are pathetic, but I think they deserve our attention; but only to crush them, as they are too dangerous to tolerate. There is a YouTube channel that you might find interesting in this regard. The Academy of Ideas. The Jung section pretty much covers them and why they are to be avoided (or crushed). Now, I’m off to the Library to see if I can get a copy of Thus Spoke Zathrusta (sp?) by Nietche. Ahhh, philosophy? The questions have always been there! Cheers Amigo, Jim from the state with real face-eating zombies: Florida

    • Principles of propaganda work both ways. Repeat something often enough and it will become the truth. Being the truth in the first place can’t hurt it.

      • Man! I agree!

        If the truth or a real situation is only said once, we are doomed.

  3. What do James and my fellow subscribers think of the UK Labour Party Leader, Jeremy Corbyn? Is he necessarily a criminal psychopath? He has actively campaigned against aggressive foreign policy for a long time, and indeed was the chair of the ‘Stop The War’ campaign in the UK.
    I am inclined to agree with James assertions in the main about politicians, but I honestly feel that Corbyn is the exception that perhaps proves the rule.

    • It’s a tricky one.. perhaps on a personal level he’s a decent guy that believes in a peaceful world. However his party is/would be all to ready to bomb innocent civiliations (ala Tony Blair).

      I think it’s a subtle game to make us follow a messiah, only for him/the party to let us all down by not delivering on promises – which will probaly lead to rioting and disorder, leading to punitive measures and further totalitarianism

    • There is a channel on Youtube called Bombard’s body language. She did a video on Corbyn. Maybe more than one. She’s very good at body language. I suggest you check out her take on him. Hint: He’s a politician.

    • PeaceFroggs, In the last paragraph, you bring up an interesting aspect.
      As for me, I have to view things from “different hats”, from different perspectives.
      While I am no fan of government nor the rigged system, when there is progress in the right direction within the system, I am glad to see it.

      EX – I think our legal system sucks. But when Monsanto or a pedophile get nailed by the legal system, I smile.

      • Froggy, as a statist, you should know that not all people here are anarchists. The mentally ill slaves are allowed.

      • Okay. That’s your take.

        • So you don’t understand anarchy. Hardly surprising given that you don’t understand so many other things. How do you even survive? You act as if authority is some kind of supreme deity that knows all and conquers all. It’s not. It’s a collective of idiots who are too lazy to think. Sort of like how I view you. Learn to think and grab those tiny marbles. Life will become a lot easier when you do so.

        • By the way, I know you don’t understand principles, but real men don’t run away. I’m staying in a fascist country and living as an anarchist. They can change, but I won’t. This is a thought process which requires a spine; something you don’t seem to understand. You seem to think that everyone must think the same way, that if it isn’t ALREADY a certain system, then others shouldn’t be there. That is your problem. It is called cowardice and defeatism. I don’t suffer from your illnesses or limitations.

        • pf. You are not a man. You are far less than a man. And you know nothing about anarchy. Or much of anything else as near as I can tell. You are simple a statistic. That was your choice when you embraced the collective. And statistics are still BS.

        • Lying isn’t helping. It’s just cowardice. Your idiotic question was already answered earlier by me. You’re just too lazy to pay attention that long.

        • That is called an ad hominem attack. It is used by the weak when they don’t have a real foundation for their argument. Which I have yet to see out of you on any of your comments.

          • All you said was that you don’t even know what an ad hominem attack is. That’s hilarious!
            Why should I even care about the government monitoring this board? You are so funny.

          • Another hilarious aspect of your last comment is that you think that I need to follow your rules on what an anarchist is when you don’t even know what anarchy is. Now if that isn’t hilarious, I don’t know what is. And I do know what is hilarious.

          • Once again, you prove you don’t understand anything to date. You don’t even understand what I’ve written. And yet, you seem confused that I don’t bother answering your idiotic questions. Maybe it’s because they’ve already been answered. You really are a sad excuse for a human. Oh wait, you’re not a human. You’re a statistic.

          • I am not your brother. you left humanity, not I. And yes, you are a statist. You don’t even know what anarchy means, yet you insist I follow your rules on it. You also make up baseless accusations about me; either out of stupidity or willful deception I neither know nor care, it’s all the same. In short, you are an embarrassment. But now I’m done. You aren’t even a challenge. Might I suggest that you arm yourself if you are going to engage in a battle of wits. But do it with someone else; you’ve already proven yourself too ill-prepared to amuse me for long. in the meantime, please look up ad ahominem. Is there anything you aren’t ignorant on? As if you would know.

          • You are not a human. You are merely a statistic. While you claim that is a new charge, it isn’t. You’re just too lazy to read the posts you respond to. As such, I am returning that favor and not reading yours. You have had nothing of value to offer to date, so why bother. I have already told you that this is over because you are to boring. That is not to mention childishly deceptive. In short, you are the enemy this site discusses. In the immortal words of Andrew Jackson, “If you’re not with me, you’re against me.” You chose poorly. Now good-bye

          • Aloha right back at ya! That video you linked to is amazing! The only problem I have with AA is they keep reinforcing that a person is an alcoholic. Of course, I’m a fan of Neurolinguistic programming, so to me it doesn’t help a person. But, if a person is ready to stop, such details won’t get in their way. Am glad to see you are working to help others less fortunate. Especially those who want to receive help. Those that don’t can’t be helped.

          • That was an extremely enlightening post! While I have been around many addicted people (I DO live in Florida), I had not made that connection before. Probably too close to the problem. I am sorry to hear that South America has changed so much. I have such fond memories of Panama. A beautiful country. I do remember having to leave Mexico because of the cartel (the modern one, not the old one). Is there nothing the mindless cannot destroy? Have faith, dear friend. You are doing what is needed to win. Ten thousand strategies all centered around change without leaders can never be defeated. 🙂

          • Glad you could help her. On pf, I have told him we’re done. I just delete his posts without reading them as he isn’t worth the effort. I don’t think he is a psycho though. Just another mindless willing drone. Good luck to you. Me? Today is housecleaning day. 🙁 So, I’m stalling a lot!

          • Pablo de Boer,
            Thanks for the insight above into drug/alcohol addiction. I got a lot out of it.

          • Aloha again, Pablo! Just thought I’d let you know that even though I normally delete my messages after I read them, I have not done so with yours concerning Jung. I have already read it several times because it is such an incredible message. It is always refreshing to read the words of people who are light years beyond me. It’s like a little window into God’s heart. Thanks again, Jim who is avoiding all those latex wearing zombies in Flouride-a!

          • No! Not more Jung! How will I ever get my work done when I see more of him to explore? 🙂 Thank you so much for that link. I have never read his work on dreams, though I have always enjoyed manipulating my own and bringing my own (day)dreams into reality. They are so much more than the mere cleaning out of our mind’s junk. Now, I have a new video to download tomorrow (I have budgeted myself to a mere 3 gig of data a month or else I’d never get anything done!).

    • Ron Paul
      You guys really make a strong and very important point.

      “Ron Paul […] perhaps used his platform as a politician to essentially denounce the system…
      …And to educate people…
      …The movement he inspired was a genuine threat to the state (and deep state), because the message was to de-legitimize and dismantle it….

      His message impacted the World like a religious crusade.
      Many folks “woke up”.

      • I hear ya 100%. Big time.
        “Beware of the Psychopaths” is such a crucial message.

        Corbett is one of the few brave ones who keeps pounding the table about it.

      • Richard,
        I must had misunderstood your statement.

        I am adamant that Psychopaths are the foundational problem for the world’s situation. Just like what James Corbett says here in a couple statements…

        I am not being obsequious towards Corbett. This is something which I feel very certain of.

        It is my contention that other situations or other problems could more easily be resolved if this “foundational Psychopathic aspect” was wildly recognized.
        Until what lies at the foundation is recognized, everything else becomes a patch on a tire that has gone flat many times.

  4. Thank you James for this thought and for reposting your earlier video that does a wonderful job of explaining the consciousness of psychopaths.

    What I like about your commentary is that you discuss facts and leave it for the viewer/listener to draw conclusions. You seem to avoid spiritual matters, but actually this video and the psychopath video can be analyzed from a spiritual point of view. My question for you is: if the crux of the world’s problems are that psychopaths, who are devoid of moral tethers, have created the system we’re experiencing, wouldn’t the solution to all the problems be to cultivate the opposite consciousness from the psychopaths?

    In the earlier video, you briefly discussed that there are also sociopaths who, through choices, have effectively dimmed or eliminated that troublesome morality that would stand in the way of achieving objectives. If it is true that we can make choices that justify doing what we know to be morally wrong, aren’t we all, to some degree, a bit like fledgling sociopaths? Perhaps sociopathy isn’t a social disorder, but rather an ubiquitous condition we all have to varying degrees. This question becomes very similar to what religions discuss as the battle between good and evil; or God and Satan.

    An example might be a policeman who knows that it is wrong to kidnap someone who hasn’t harmed anyone, yet has no compunctions about kidnapping and imprisoning a person whose vehicle has a suspicious smell. Another example might be that while we know it is morally wrong to keep animals in torturous conditions, we can justify eating chickens who were raised in such cramped quarters that they had to have their beaks chopped off to keep them from cannibalizing their cagemates.

    I propose that the solution to injustice is to be brave enough to examine our own beliefs and to be willing to identify when we use moral justifications in our own lives. It is easy to point a finger at the bad being done by others, but finger pointing doesn’t make the world a better place. Being a better person makes the world a better place.

    • anuttamadd, I enjoyed looking at many of the photos. Saw your nettle harvesting…I had nettle the other day.

      • I take nettle root every day so that I don’t have to get up in the middle of the night. It’s a miracle plant. One of many that I take every day. Let medicine by thy food, and tell big pharma to go to hell.

        • I agree. The root is great for us older guys …and also Pygeum and Saw Palmetto too.

          The Nettle leaves have some very interesting properties and biological components. Our dogs which have allergies get nettle leaf.

  5. If not all governments are run by criminal psychopaths, then I’d like to know the name of at least one government that isn’t?

    • ha!
      Octium nailed it.

    • You list psychopaths as examples?

      • Do you really think I would let you choose my battlefield? look it up for yourself. You don’t want to learn. You just want to justify your own pre-conceived notions. Which were based on nothing. Educate yourself. I only find you useful to mock as an example of what happens when you confuse asking for answers vs. learning. Other than that, you disgust me.
        I did note that you did not bother explaining how you are something more than a statistic. Could it be that at some deep spot in your unthinking mass that you know that is true?

        • An incomplete thought? Say it ain’t so!

  6. Ah yes, why just the other day when I was jogging down the road to hell, I couldn’t help but admire what a good job they had done in paving it with good intentions. It has such a lovely sheen! 🙂

    • I agree. I also think that psychopathy has been over-played. As a whole, we are a lot like a first year psychology student who suddenly believes they have all of the neurosis’ they are studying. Superficial personalities? Certainly. Criminality? Obvious. But psychopathy is not the sole explanation for what is happening. As a society, we have been given the opportunity to advance as a species; but our laziness has been making this so much harder than it need be. Many of these people are nothing more than successful criminals. It is the laziness of the people that give them their power. If there is true psychopathy involved, it is from their followers who actually carry out their insane notions, not the criminals and lunatics who tell them what to do and think.
      By the way, when I was in college, one of my English professors said that our language was constantly evolving. He also said that this evolution was driven from the masses, not from the academics. Sorry to call you one of the masses, but what I meant to say was that your English is quite acceptable. It’s creativity is also admirable.
      I do think that if one delves into this as much as James must in order to create such stunning works, it is almost inconceivable to believe that anything other than psychopathy is the answer. This is one of the rare areas I disagree with him. I think that they suffer from out-dated belief systems and criminality instead. The real problem is not the leaders though; it is those that carry out their ravings. The leaders thirst for money, power, and sex. They are relentless in their pursuit of these goals, and they have been working on them for far too long for them to be psychopaths. Cheers, Jim of the face-eating zombie state of Flouride-a

      • I think I should clarify one of my points. When I talk about psychopathy of the masses; I probably should have used the word collectives. After all, just like the Borg, they are of one mind.

    • I still feel that knowing about the Psychopaths is crucial. The system is built by psychopaths and their infected minions.
      In my opinion, this is foundational to understanding our situation.

      Here is a problem with the subject…
      There is a lot of data. And it is spread out, not tied into a concise synopsis, tied into a nice bow. People often have missing information.

      • That is true; psychopathy does play an important role. However, we are following one of Murphy’s rules of combat in that the enemy feint we are ignoring is actually their main offensive. At least that’s my opinion.

      • Richard, thanks for your help in clarifying a difficult subject. In front of me, I have three of my favorite books of all time. Meditations by MA (George Long trans.), The Prince, Sun Tzu’s Art of War (Sam. Griffiths trans.). All of these books are concerned with power (MA’s is power over the base self, but he wielded great power and waged a lot of war). Two are concerned with creating and maintaining power over others. Yet, they are hardly psychotic. Nor are they for the psychotic. The psychotic personality is not really capable of maintaining the long-range strategies with which these books are concerned.
        They are brutal, for that is the nature of the game they are playing. The game is power. While that is what a psychotic wants, that does not mean they are the sole possessors of that drug. Marcus most certainly was NOT a psychotic, in fact, he was the most brilliant and compassionate man I have ever studied. Yet, he successfully ruled in an extremely blood-thirsty time and place and he came out on top.
        The difference is motive. A psychopath is motivated differently than a person addicted to power. Both are weakened by these needs, but that does not mean they are the same. While I think Sun Tzu should be relevant to our wars, he is not. Other than the deception aspect of war, but that is the nature of war, not the nature of psychopathy.
        If you remember your Tolkein, then you may recall that Sam was the only one who was immune to the power of the One Ring. We have leaders who are addicted to power, but that is not the same as having psychopaths for leaders. This is important, because one needs to understand ones-self and their opponents; otherwise both are your enemies. This was probably insufficient for an explanation, but I don’t believe in fully explaining anything anyway. The mind that matters will be inspired to use the lesser explanation to find their own answers. Jim

        • Ah yes, Sauren! And I concur that we are being misled intentionally (of course!). While the money is important, though I don’t really worry about it very much; I think it’s important to realize the enemy is not a psychopath because only then can we understand that the enemy does understand fear. Because they fear us. A psychopath could conceptualize the emotion, but they would never truly experience it. In a very real sense, this makes the enemy far more dangerous than a mere shell of a person (which is all a psychopath is). But it also makes it easier to destroy once we know where to put the final bullet, so to speak.
          Our real enemy is an idea. It is the idea that the individual does not matter. That only the collective can achieve greatness. Even then, it is only for the select few.
          While I do concur that love is the weapon of choice, we must also rid ourselves of this notion that one person can do nothing. Strange how those people almost always vote for one person. It only takes one to begin anything.
          Only when we believe in ourselves, will we become free. Though FDR thought he put the last nail in the coffin of individualism, I think he was wrong. Which means they are capable of mistakes (which they constantly make). This means that we are all bound by duty to do what we are best suited for if we are to be free at last. Free at last! Another great individual.

      • Richard,
        I am adamant that Psychopaths are the foundational problem for the world’s situation. Just like what James Corbett says here in a couple statements…

        I am not being obsequious towards Corbett. This is something which I feel very certain of.

        It is my contention that other situations or other problems could more easily be resolved if this “foundational Psychopathic aspect” was wildly recognized.
        Until what lies at the foundation is recognized, everything else becomes a patch on a tire that has gone flat many times.

        • I contend that the entire system is designed by psychopaths.
          The psychopathic nature has infected the world, like a contagion of aberration.
          This makes the situations look muddy. The aberrations are embedded within society.

          One thing about psychopaths and their contaminated minions, is that they appear human. They often dress and act like regular people. Their social mask makes them difficult to spot. But they have no humanity.

          The psychopaths try to design a system which lets them do what they want. And what they want is not in the best interest of humanity.

          These soulless nuts migrate towards a psychopathic system because that system protects them and gives them more power.

        • HRS, Psychopaths are not inherently evil. They lack empathy, and that’s it. That doesn’t make them evil, it just means their humanity is incomplete. Just like most people. Yet, they are just as capable of living a beneficial life as anyone else. Just one example of this, among many I am sure, was present on the Lionel show. This researcher is a certified psychopath, and does research on psychopaths. Yet, he is not evil, nor does he have any intention (that I can tell) of becoming evil. An excellent source to understand psychopathy at a layman’s level and from a psychopath is “Memoirs of a Sociopath”. She teaches law and runs some web forum for psychopaths. While her opening story may shock you, it is done for shock’s sake. While I obviously cannot vouch for its’ validity, it does ring true to me. So, besides psychopathy not being an indicator of evil; it also does not explain everything else as well as the addiction to power does. To me, the addiction to power is far scarier than some pathetic, and ultimately incomplete, shell of a person. As anyone who has spent any time around junkies knows, junkies cannot have friends. But a psychopath can. Have fun, Jim who is avoiding the psyhopathic zombies of Flouride-a still.

        • Good Morning again HRS! I’m a little more awake now (my first reply was before my first cup of coffee after waking up at 3:30). I would like to refine what I wrote earlier.
          One of the main reasons I don’t believe psychopaths created this system is because they are simply incapable of it from a biological standpoint. They lack empathy and many of the emotions that normal people have. This doesn’t make them evil, and many of them live good, productive lives because they have found systems which allow them to function normally. All systems (including the universe) are chaotic, yet seek order. The universe does so through mathematics. Psychopaths often do so through some code of ethics.
          However, the great (as defined by Machievelli being someone who desires to leave their mark on the world) must understand emotions in order to manipulate them. To master something, you must also possess them. Psychopaths don’t. At least not in the way we understand emotions. They can mimic them, but they can never master them because they don’t experience them. This is why psychopaths generally don’t rise very high in any field. They can reach a certain level, but in any field there is a need to be able to emote with others in order to do your job effectively. These are the top positions. The only way this can happen in a government position is through an inherited power structure, such as a monarchy.
          Even old man Rothschild isn’t a psychopath. I watched a documentary on him (it was friendly, and by the BBC, but that doesn’t mean you can’t learn from it anyway) once and found him to be a very curious man, which is a sign of great intelligence. I also noted how he has an extremely severe case of OCD. This seems to affect every aspect of his life. However, this doesn’t mean he is an evil person. I did not sense that at all.
          What I am saying is that a person of great power MUST have mastery of their emotions and their reasoning abilities in order to manipulate other people of power. This requires a fully functioning mind. Psychopaths simply lack that ability.
          What I am also saying is that the true enemy we are facing is far more dangerous than a mere psychopath. So don’t worry! We have even greater enemies to help us become even greater people ourselves! Now enjoy your morning cup of coffee, Jim who knows that cardio is very important when running from latex wearing zombies in Flouride-a

        • Jim,
          I disagree.
          Psychopaths have evil intentions. They have no desire to benefit mankind.
          Psychopaths are soulless creatures with evil intent. Worms have a higher quality of humanity than psychopaths.

          There are only two fundamental directions of intent. Only two sides to the coin.
          The intent to better conditions and humanity.
          The intent not to better conditions and humanity.

          Like any type of character trait, there are many shades of grey.
          The Hare Test ranks them.

        • Oh well, on this we will have to disagree. Remember, popular opinion is always wrong. This is today’s popular opinion. Simply lacking empathy is not evil, that requires intent. Lacking empathy is simply lacking empathy. I’ve met evil, and the worst ones are never psychopaths. Cheers, Jim

        • Greetings Richard, I think that everyone is too emotional on this one for logic. To include Mr. Corbett. However, I think this is a dangerous emotion. One of the first steps of war is to demonize the enemy. How better to demonize someone that to call them a psychopath? Not all politicians are psychopaths any more than all Muslims are terrorists. Also, to call the institutions psychopathic in origin is to call every aspect of our civilization psychopathic. After all, they were created by the Greeks. They gave us Euclid Geometry (I was a history major and began my algebra studies right when they began the “new” and improved Algebra, so I don’t know what the hell it is) which Einstein called one of their greatest gifts. But lets just throw that away as a psychopathic culture invented it. Tragedies were born out of that society. This whole psychopathy rage is just simply a dangerous and childish over-simplification that doesn’t hold any water at all. We are dealing with people who are not psychotic. But they are far more dangerous than any psychotic could ever dream of being. The only person I am certain is a psychotic on the modern political scene (in Amerika) is Hillary. Note how out of touch she seemed to be? A classic case of a psychotic reaching beyond their grasp. I could go on, but I think it would be pointless. People confuse behavior with being. They are not the same. Cheers, Jim from the zombie state of Flouride-a

        • Richard,
          Yes, I intentionally avoided some of your specific questions.

          Here is the deal from my perspective.
          There is a tremendous amount of data surrounding the topic of Psychopaths. (Both from ‘experts’ and from ‘experience’/’observation’.)

          To try to nutshell everything or to try to place it in a synopsis which includes the evolution of thought could require a book. And that book is one person’s take (and it doesn’t matter whether that person is an ‘authority’ or not). I sure as hell am not gonna write some book on this thread.

          Everyone is going to have to put the pieces together for themselves.

          I have tried to communicate my take on the subject. If others don’t agree, I am fine with that.

          We are very fortunate that James has consolidated and gleaned very important information about Psychopaths.

      • Richard,

        I think part of the problem is that there is a tremendous amount of data to Understanding Psychopathology. And not all of the information comes from professionals in Psychology / Psychiatry, because they too have a limited view.
        We at Corbett Report are fortunate, because we are aware of so many frauds and evil men. This gives us further insight.

        In my opinion, the infection from Psychopaths is almost ubiquitous.
        This is a sick ailing world.
        It is infected and slowly rots of gangrene.
        The psychopaths deliberately infect it.

  7. By the way, Since I’ve been ranting on about psychopathy; I suppose I should offer a solution. Well, a strategy. I borrow from Sun Tzu for that. We are facing a far superior force in almost every way excepting the thirst for personal freedom. To try to organize and confront the existing system head-on is a recipe for defeat. In this case, (though not militarily; such violence is also a recipe for defeat); if we all lived our lives in accordance with our beliefs, spurning the mechanisms of control; we would be victorious. Say what? I know, it’s convoluted.
    For example, in my own instance, I am in the process of patenting a device I invented. With those proceeds, I intend to not only use the funds to help fund other products; but to form a charity which grows (among other things) organic food to supply local food banks and soup kitchens. By itself, it does nothing. Yet, it is an act of defiance that if multiplied a few thousand-fold, would be victorious. I’m not saying that everyone do WHAT I am doing. I am saying everyone act in accordance with their principles. It is by living by example of your politics that this system can be defeated. And by the way, this strategy is not my idea. It is one that is on-going now by many others. Live your life to elevate others and no authority can conquer you. Of course, that doesn’t mean you don’t crush the collective. They voluntarily gave up their humanity when they gave up their individuality. Dang-blasted zombies!

  8. Just got my daily Activist Post. The second article was this one. The first was our lord and savior Tonald Dump is now going to take down the DarkNet. Congrats James! You are an inspiration to individualists everywhere!

  9. Take a look at this : (Via

    “. . . journalist Benjamin Fulford has done. Going from the peak of his journalistic career, a massive salary and access to almost any door he wanted open, the former Asia-Pacific Bureau Chief of Forbes Magazine stepped away in disagreement of massive censoring and has since started reporting on geopolitical events that certain “elites” wish he would not. Blowing the whistle on a wide variety of topics, including 9/11 and Fukushima, Fulford has drawn the attention of many around the world and has even survived 5 assassination attempts.”

  10. Dear squashed frog: your first sentance lays a rotten egg and doesn’t do the goslings you propose further on any favors. They mislead the gaggle of goose thoughts that follow. James is as brilliant a word Smith as there has ever been and Unlikely to have proposed a false dichotomy as you propose. Also the assumption that in the primitive violent past at the birth of Rome being civil by today’s standards just did not exist. I would propose Leaders were made by ,not chosen for their psychopathic characteristic; namely ruthlessly violent,cunning,ambitious and mystically predestined and entitled to hold the leadership positions with all benefits included. First I would entertain the proposition that a pair of twins suckled at the teets of a she wolf in their formative years did not grow up being normal. Secondly, I would entertain that Shakespeare satires the honorable men you are suggesting(Wikileaks may not be a treasure of accuracy in the future) and supports James dialog that the politic like the egg is as psychopathically first as to politic as the psychopathic chicken is first to the political egg.
    I whole heartily agree that a government formed of anarcists is an oxymoron and will lack all psycopothy. Beinvenitos PeaceFroggs.Que’fueah?

  11. Smartphones making children borderline autistic

    Children struggle to read emotions and are less empathetic than a generation ago because they spend too much time using tablets and smartphones

    5 Ways Smart Phones Are Dumbing People Down

    If it is to be assumed people are going strange en masse, as it should, the reasons for this type of behavior should be considered as well. It’s not about lack of attention, but what we’re being programmed to pay attention to. It’s not about being docile or suffering from a lack of rage, but about the wrong things we get enraged over. Like the road rage or incorrectly-punched-ball-somewhere-10000-km-away rage. I’m not invoking mass rage nor violence, but if people would get angry over the important issues, which are aplenty, it could mean the difference of a tide turning scope.

    Well, I’m not going to leave you alone. I want you to get mad. I don’t want you to protest, I don’t want you to riot, I don’t want you to write to your congressmen because I wouldn’t know what to tell you to write. I don’t know what to do about the depression and the inflation and the Russians and the crime in the street. All I know is that first you got to get mad! You got to say “I’m a human being, goddamn it, my life has value!”

    What’s really scary here is that these changes get introduced quickly and with each generation problems accumulate REALLY quickly. Sane people are running out of supply and with them sane parents are going the way of the dodo. I don’t know if we have reached the critical point, but I’d say we’re damn close if not past the point of no return.

    • I think one easy solution to a multitude of problems is for the US to legalize drugs. “Gasp!” Yes, I know.. When I first heard about it, in an interview with former Florida state trooper Peter Christ, I was repulsed and shocked, like many of you are. But as I listened to him, it began to make sense. A quote made during the interview said “you can’t legislate morality”. That made a lot of sense to me, as did what he said. The example of alcohol prohibition which gave rise to the gangsters, is so apt here. The “war on drugs” has allowed narco cartels to amass wealth and influence in both Mexico and the US, not to mention South America. It’s promoted the rise in viscous crime in northern Mexico, which causes the mass influx of illegals into the US. It’s allowed the prison industrial complex to thrive as well as the increase in prison populations for non violent drug offenses. It’s allowed the militarization of the police and the watering down of many laws and overly tightening others. Legalizing drugs would break the financial backs of the cartel’s. It would free what, 60% of the prison inmates and free up tremendous financial resources across the US. It would solve our financial crisis by the regulation and sale of drugs legally and cut back the number of agents and officers in federal, state and local law enforcement agencies. It’s so funny that no one in the media will address the similarity between our drug problems and the alcohol prohibition issues in the early 20th century.

      Let’s face it, as long as there is a demand for drugs, there will be suppliers. Whether black market or legal markets, people will get drugs. So why not solve our financial problems and eliminate the “us vs. them” mentality being fostered throughout the law enforcement community.

      • I assure you, the first politician who makes strides toward drugs “legalization” is the next politician which will be buried alive in fresh concrete becoming a part of foundation of a shopping mall somewhere in the suburban area.

        To be completely honest and realistic, any drastic changes endangering the established status quo would lead to same. Shopping malls would start to be built with record low amounts of concrete.

        Of course you’re right there, drugs industry is a giant beast. There’s a lot of feedback in this process, stages of it feeding back into various other stages. Growth supporting growth, unnatural, cancer like.

Submit a Comment


Become a Corbett Report member