Interview 1746 – Richard Gage UNLEASHED!

by | Sep 8, 2022 | Interviews, Videos | 51 comments

Richard Gage, founder and former CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, joins me to discuss his current work at, including his podcast, Richard Gage UNLEASHED!, his upcoming 2022 9/11 Truth Film Festival livestream, his weekly webinars, his work with the Lawyers’ Commitee for 9/11 Inquiry and their upcoming film, 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom. We also reflect on the 21st anniversary of the “catalyzing and catastrophic” events of September 11th and discuss what motivates us to do this work.

Watch on Archive / BitChute / Odysee / Substack or Download the mp4


Richard Gage UNLEASHED!

Kevin Ryan on Parallels Between 9/11 and COVID

The Amazing Parallels Between 9/11 & Covid – RichardGage911 at Red Pill Expo

2022 9/11 Truth Film Festival livestream

Richared Gage webinars

Lawyers’ Commitee for 9/11 Inquiry

9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom film

Richard Gage on C-SPAN


  1. Kudos to Richard Gage for branching out to other false flag events such as the scamdemic!

    I have very mixed feelings about Richard.

    On the one hand I greatly commend him for all the work he has done over the years
    in bringing to the attention of thousands/millions of people the deception used on 9/11.

    On the other hand, I am very disappointed that the core of his 9/11 case rests on poorly researched evidence, his so-called ‘explosive evidence’ (thermite).

    It works for WTC7 (at least the start of its collapse).
    But as Niels Harrit has been careful to point out time and time again, thermite is not an explosive, it is an incendiary.

    Thermite simply could not have been responsible for hurling multi-ton beam assemblies, laterally, hundreds of feet away.

    • While I speculate that, perhaps, other types of explosives might have been used, let me mention something about your statement:

      Fawlty Towers says: “But as Niels Harrit has been careful to point out time and time again, thermite is not an explosive, it is an incendiary.”

      While ordinary thermite typically is not used as an explosive, it in itself does induce a violent exothermic reaction.
      But Niels Harrit, Jeffrey K Farrer, Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan are on this paper:
      “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe”.

      Explosives Found in World Trade Center Dust
      Scientists Discover Both Residues And Unignited Fragments Of Nano-Engineered Thermitic Pyrotechnics In Debris From the Twin Towers

      by Jim Hoffman
      The scientific paper “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe” conclusively shows the presence of unignited aluminothermic explosives in dust samples from the Twin Towers, whose chemical signature matches previously documented aluminothermic residues found in the same dust samples. The present review of the paper and related research is intended to summarize those findings for the non-technical reader….

        • I read the 9 part comment. It was very interesting and plausible. I have one question. What makes the nuclear device so unique that the radiation fallout be clean and not as bad? I would suspect a lot more people would have radiation poison or reports of radiation burns from exposure. People are so close to ground zero walking by everyday after 9/11. It would seem more people would be effected. Just my general skepticism about the nuclear device. Are there any sources or sites that explain this? Thanks.

          • First I want to be upfront and clear that I am not a nuclear expert!
            I learned about the nuclear devices from Pommer who is a nuclear physicist.
            He is positing that the devices’ construction were such that nuclear radiation was minimized (‘clean nukes’).

            As James points out here very often, the MIC is usually decades ahead of what we the public know about, in terms of military advancements.

            As I mentioned, and James has documented, the number of emergency workers cleaning up the site who have succumbed to cancers (thyroid in particular), likely due to radiation poisoning, is off the charts.

            Do some research yourself and you will learn of all the 9/11 emergency worker deaths.

            • I treated someone who was an EMT with severe lung disease secondary to being at the site during 9/11. He had pulmonary fibrosis. Nothing that would be a radiation health effect though.

              I haven’t looked at the health effects of others, just spoke to this guy when I was his nurse in 2016 for respiratory issues and he told me his story how he was at ground zero.

              • Fawlty Towers,

                Interesting article about increases in cancer among first responders on 9/11. I’ll check this out.

                We may never know exactly what was used to take the towers down. We can perhaps narrow it down to what’s more probable, but in the end might never know.

                It’s interesting how this is similar to the virus/no virus issue with Covid. People can get bogged down in details searching for an answer that may never be found.

                I think I know who was behind it and why it happened though and I can say confidently that the official narrative was a bunch of baloney. I remember seeing this on “the news” and thought it was so weird they found a passport or a drivers license or something at the scene supposedly left by the alleged terrorists. And I thought that was so odd. That little detail kind of stuck with me as being a little too convenient.

          • Actually the small nuke theory is the best I’ve heard in the 20 years I’ve been following the unofficial 9/11 investigation. I can’t remember the Russian guy’s name who first advanced the theory, but nothing else (and especially the outlandish “EMP” weapon) comes close to making sense of how the WTC towers were brought down. Thermite may have been used for a specific purpose, but it does not account for the explosions involved in those demolitions. I think one of the convincing items for the mini-nuke theory is the fact that all plans and proposals for building structures like skyscrapers have to include a plan for bringing the building down at the end of its useful life. Whatever the proposal for bringing down the WTC towers included with its original construction plan had to be used in the destruction of those towers on 9/11. The Russian analyst who put forward the mini-nuke theory also showed in his work that it’s not uncommon for construction engineers to propose mini-nukes for bringing down large structures like WTC. As far as radiation fallout with regard to mini-nukes, the Russian analyst addressed that too. It’s been at least 15 years since I studied his work, so I don’t recall all of its specifics. But still, it’s the most sensible and all-encompassing theory I’ve yet heard.

            • Yes I agree travail. I think we can even move beyond ‘theory’ at this point.
              There is far too much physical evidence pointing to mini-nukes to leave it as a theory now. I am convinced it is a fact.
              If someone can attribute all the points I outlined in my post on nuclear devices,
              to another device that could achieve the same effects, I am all ears!

              The Russian guy you mention above is Dimitri Khalezov who I mentioned in my post.

              As for the nuclear fallout. They tried their best to keep it to a minimum, but even still the thyroid cancers/deaths cannot be hidden and are now in plain sight for anyone who does the research.

              Also in my post is the evidence of nuclear radiation (leaking from the device before the buildings were taken down) that was captured in many videos as interference (links included).

              • Yes, Dimitri Khalezov was the Russian guy I was referring to. Thanks. He did great work on developing his argument. I remember watching the news with my wife a day or two after the event itself. When they reported they had just found the passport of one of the hijackers conveniently laying atop a heap of pulverized glass and concrete, my wife and I looked at each other and said, “this is all a hoax of some kind.” It was certainly clear to me from that the day forward this massive inside operation tolled the beginning of the end of life in america as we had known it. Thanks for your reply and for sharing all the knowledge of that insidious operation you’ve acquired and shared in your comments over the years.

      • Filmed on 9/11/04
        Confronting the Evidence – A call to re-open the 9/11 investigation
        (QUEUED on the description of the TOXIC DUST starting about 11:36)
        Radioactive aspects are also mentioned.

        DVD. The correct title is: A Call to Reopen the 9-11 Investigation: Confronting the Evidence.
        From the back cover of the sleeve:
        “Over 400,000+ pounds of lead, over 200,000+ pound of asbestos. More than enough mercury to contaminate 2,500 city blocks.
        Radioactive americium 241 from thousands of smoke detectors. Highest levels of vanadium ever recorded. Children in nearby schools have developed serious respiratory problems. Hundreds of firefighters can no longer work. Fourteen rescue dogs have died.”

        Hosted in part by Ed Begley, Jr.
        The DVD was distributed in 2005.
        This was one of the very first DVDs which came out about 9/11.
        Jimmy Wolters (of the ‘Wolter’s Homes’ business) spent tremendous amounts of his own money trying to get the word out.
        He even gave away free DVDs.
        I have one of the original DVDs in its sleeve.

        [Previous YouTube links of this video have been scrubbed. This video will probably exit the YouTube world eventually.]

      • This isn’t about this video. It’s about an older video (about a month old) titled something about Media. Anyway it was an interview between Allison Morrow (?) and James. In the Comments you posted a link to a an interview between Alison and a Canadian mechanic. Thank you for that.

        • Thanks Jenny.
          I like “Clyde Do Something”.

          He seems so genuine and just a regular guy with a young family.
          He laughs easily…I like that. His emotions are fluid.
          His in-laws live in Japan around Tokyo.

      • You are quite correct. The carbon based matrix of the nano-thermate does provide it with an explosive component.

  2. I love Richard Gage. He’s a genuine dude, and he has produced some incredibly impactful material related to 9/11.

    • He is. He really is a genuine dude.

      Corbett and Gage were smart in keeping this interview short. 20 minutes went by quickly.

    • Yes, yes.

      His ejection from AE911Truth brought disgrace upon the organisation.

  3. James you have interviewed James Perloff at least once before.

    Why don’t you invite him to another interview to discuss 9/11?

    The information that he possesses far supersedes that of Richard Gage
    or Neils Harrit when it comes to 9/11 physical evidence of a false flag attack.

    • Another interview with James Perloff? Yes, please.

  4. In this day and age when truth is used to peddle pervasive and pernicious poisons and lies, to distract, confuse, misdirect and otherwise manipulate humans,

    Richard Gage is very right to immediately connect the morbid 21st anniversary of the 9/11 mass murder to the current mass murder being enacted before our eyes in the form of so-called “Covid-19” bio-weapons, be they the purported pandemic malady or imposed remedy.

    In short, he is very correct to underline the role of past false flags in the current mass murder and reinforced enslavement of humanity, connecting their modus operandi,

    lest 9/11 become deadly once again by becoming a distraction from similar strategies being used to kill people and their children today, rather than a spotlight for understanding today’s false flags.

    If we were to draw an analogy, we might ask:

    who are the thousands of tower and airplane victims and who are the millions of Iraki victims in the Covid-19 pandemic/vaccination false flag? And should zeros now be added to those figures?

    • actually, 9/11 never stopped being deadly. my bad. and there’s not just the covid false flag being perpetrated on the world’s population…

      • Yes. If you got a good topic, I can write an article about it.

        • Did you write one about graphene oxide, and also anything on nanotechnology and if it’s really possible to control someone’s brain via this hypothetical technology? Some of this stuff seems like science fiction, but I don’t know enough about it to rule it out or not.

          To me it just seems like it can’t be done because they really don’t know enough about neuro-chemistry and the workings of the human brain on a molecular level.

          You may have done a write up on this already, but I’m not sure. I presume your expertise is in physics, material science and computer science so maybe this topic is outside of the scope of what you wish to discuss.

            • Thanks. Yeah, a more in depth write up on nano-tech would be very interesting, IMO.

            • 67,
              the 5g article makes stacks of unsupported claims, especially those that should have the most rigorous evidence, those that aim to disprove concerns of how they harm The occasional weird grammar hiccups made me wonder if it was written by a bot?

              • I cut/pasted some of my own articles together, and this causes the grammar to go wrong. Not native English either. Shall check the article again.

                If you think a claim is unsupported, place them in a comment.
                I collected a lot of research, and posted a lot of it in the article.
                I have chosen a technical approach, because most technical people think that radiation is ok.
                The science that i have read is usually a bunch of statistics that does not make hard conclusions.
                You can find lots of such peer-reviewed science on

                They also point out that they find problems, but do not know why. And that is why I wrote the article to point out cause and effect.

  5. AlienScientist had a good reply to that.
    You need a very very large satellite to do such a thing. Due to the energy necessary. Even with “free energy”
    And satellites would be spotted easily, because lots of people are tracking all satellites.

    Richard Gere has a good interview with an explosives expert.
    And he explains that the actors just used at least 2x more explosive material than they needed.
    And all this is excessive energy, that we can see in the videos and the corrosive damage to the environment.

  6. I personally think Richard Gage is controlled opposition used for misdirection. Thermite could not bring down 110 story skyscrapers, even with the core column supports compromised at the sub basement levels, I’m sorry.

    Dimitri Khalezov’s nuclear theory is the one that seems most plausible to me. It explains how the towers essentially disintegrated in mid-air.

    The thinktanks who put this operation together knew that years after the event, people would start to question what really happened, as more and more evidence surfaced. They knew how the internet would play a huge role in that. They probably used thermite as a red herring.

    • Thermate is useful for cutting steel columns. It is an incendiary. Reliable evidence from multiple sites with care taken in chain of custody has shown that thermate was used on the day in New York. The video footage of molten steel pouring out of at least one of WTC1 and WTC2 indicate that this was a location of its use.

      This does not fully describe the demolition. The video footage shows multi-tonne sections of the outer walls flying sideways at high speed. Thermate cannot do this, thus some form of explosive rather than incendiary was also employed.

      To support the nuclear theory which you suggest, were there increases in radioactivity in the region in the days following?

      Peace be with you,


    On 9/10/2022 (9/9 Friday in the U.S.), the Home Page of The Corbett Report featured…

    Flashback: Richard Gage in Kobe (2009)
    In this week’s blast from The Corbett Report past, James brings you his 2009 interview with Richard Gage in Kobe regarding the explosive evidence of the 9/11 demolitions to show you that the more things change, the more they stay the same. Also, he discusses the events surrounding this year’s 9/11 anniversary, including the upcoming 2022 9/11 Truth Film Festival where the False Flags: The Secret History of Al Qaeda documentary will be screened in its entirety and James will appear for a Q&A, and the Corbett Pirate Stream, where James and Broc will join Ryan Cristian of The Last American Vagabond for a livestream Watch Along and Q&A of Part 3 of that same documentary.
    [LINKS in script.]

  8. what’s truly most fascinating to me, a life-changing discovery that has gradually deepened and expanded since that pivotal year of 2008, when my eyes were first opened to the inconsistencies of the official sci-fi version of this horrific mass murder

    is the psychological aspect, literally mind-blowing…

    that people can look at the towers fall, years after the event, far removed from the initial shock and emotion that most experienced upon seeing those images for the first time, including myself,

    and still not see anything untoward… nothing at all…

    Though I was still unfamiliar with the term, in that grey dawn, I began to wade through the murky depths of understanding the power of what might be called “cognitive bias”: “my government would never do such a thing” …”

    the power of the latent fear that might be unleashed at the implications of an inside job

    are enough to keep most people in what I and others arrogantly describe as willful ignorance.

    It really makes me wonder what I more or less subconsciously refuse to see or admit out of deep-seated terror and erroneous fundamental assumptions…

    People seem to pragmatically prefer the blissful ignorance afforded by a limp shrug of the shoulders and a non-chalant “I guess we’ll never know”. I really do almost envy them.

    You just need to dispassionately watch the three towers fall to come to the irrefutable conclusion that these buildings did not fall from airplanes and fires as asserted by the official report. A simple, almost cursory glance at the images is enough to conclude that the official government line is quite obviously a colossal lie.

    No need to debate the technical intricacies of thermite or nuclear blasts or holograms or exosomes or prions or terrain theory to see the hoax.

    on the brazenly obvious surface, the official demolition narratives don’t pass the smell test; demolition of the WTC towers, the demolition of public health, of hospital emergency rooms, all causing the demolition of the world economy, of human rights of bodily autonomy and any vestiges of privacy,

    indeed, the imposed remedies, whether it’s a war on terror, lockdowns or reportedly rushed experimental vaccines

    are always worse than the engineered cause, (resulting in the demolition of a few Middle Eastern countries and the generational demolition of immune systems throughout the world’s populations), and are, in and of themselves, dead giveaways as to the true nature of the purported disasters that supposedly justify them… except for the opaque veil of cognitive bias held in place by fear…

    no need to hide it from “the people”, the majority are more than happy to hide it from themselves…

    a mind-blowing discovery…

    • And oh! this also goes for the purported demolition of the planet’s climate, where the entire human race becomes a shady terrorist, like a rogue mutant corona virus, we are all that ultimate vilain, the modern bogey-man, Osama bin Laden, our bodies soon to be unceremoniously swallowed by the watery depths of rising sea levels, just as his was: a simple examination of the measures put forward to allegedly counteract the damage of this consensually unquestioned climatic crime reveal the true nature of the hoax. and its true perpetrators. but

      cognitive bias.

      almost resulted in the controlled demolition of my faith in humanity.

      • OOPS. Shoulda watched Richard Gage’s presentation on the similarities between 9/11 and Covid before ranting and raving on Corbett comment boards. I would’ve spared myself any potential accusations of plagiarism…
        now back to his presentation…

    • NoSoapRadio, There is a “beauty” in how you expressed that first statement…in a sense, it captures elements concerning the “humanity” of it all.

      The final minutes of “The Amazing Parallels Between 9/11 & Covid – RichardGage911 – Red Pill Expo – July 9/10” have some pretty profound stuff.

      EXCERPT from the video description:
      …but then I had to put on a mad rush to get to the dramatic conclusion – “Revelation of the Method”:

      From Dustin Broadbery of the “Michael Hoffman suggests that the ruling elite are giving notice of their supremacy—declaring themselves virtuoso criminal masterminds, above the law and beyond reproach.

      But most of all, they are telling you, in no uncertain terms, that you are without recourse, these events are beyond your control, as is your own destiny for that matter. Eventually a sense of apathy and abulia (absence of will-power) engulfs humanity, demoralizing us to the point of conceding defeat to a system we are powerless to change. [Let’s prove them wrong!]

      Buried deep within their rule of law, is a hidden constitution that states: nothing happens without your consent. In this version of contract law, once the truth is hidden in plain sight, you have agreed to it. There exists someplace an unsigned contract with your unsworn oath on it. [And let’s take it back.]…

      • and yet, something strikes me as incongruous about this technician evoking Revelation of the Method.

      • Mkey,
        I missed ya!

        • Thanks, I was resetting a bit. I trust the vaccination rates haven’t been going up around these parts.

    • “No need to debate the technical intricacies of thermite or nuclear blasts or holograms or exosomes or prions or terrain theory to see the hoax.”

      But what about muh disinfo agents? Huh? They gotta be worth gettin distracted by!

  9. Its that special time of year again when we remember the coup launched by the CIA in … Oh, sorry, 3 high rise towers were destroyed, involving the deaths of around 3000 people, in New York. And the deaths of many more afterwards due to poisoned air and a few wars.

    9/11 is a hallmark event. It certainly was my gateway into a deeper understanding of the world.

    Hats off to you, JC, for remaining with the cause and re-interviewing Mr. Gage. The success of the FOIA case is welcome news.


  10. Loft,

    Your caution is well understood. Its a choice of platform. Raising controversial topics with neighbours can be destablilizing. Thus, an internet based publication in which some degree of anonymity can be maintained may serve as a better method of expressing controversial ideas.

    Then one does not need to wait for some “critical mass”. One can speak when one finds one’s conviction.

    Peace be with you,


  11. 21 unsuccessful years Gage has floated along, now about to move onto his next 21 unsuccessful years tying his unsuccessful past attempts to his next, future unsuccessful attempts. Send him your money. (Not) Because now; he is no longer on a leash.(????) Wtf that means I don’t know.

    So, just as victims of 9/11 were interfered with by an absolute liar/imposter who claimed her hunny was killed in the other building and she was in the other; they finally disgustingly realized she had infiltrated them, destroyed their agendas and ruined potentials for justice. I fully believe this dude is the same mechanism, orchestrating and misleading the greatest ones with potential to blow the entire case out of the water. Gage; is a liar and a faker.

    I searched for proof of my gut feeling. It came as listened to liar extraordinary, Ricki DeSantis, wildly presenting his in fucking believable story, 21 freaking years later. His extraordinary, never heard of before testimony, being the “seer of an airplane” (that never existed) hero who caught an arabic woman (with beautiful brown eyes) who let the cat out of the bag to him, and him alone, that the buildings were coming down. They had to get out of there. OMG what a hero this man is!!! (Not) He says. I am disgusted seeing ad hearing this crisis actor present his script. And…who presents it to the world?! The “unleashed”, Richard Gage. Oh, my, God.

    So, Gage is a liar, a fake, controlled opposition. Along with his shill, Ricki DeSantis. (The Treasury head man who talks like a sewer worker)

    This, then must question our favorite presenter of fact, who has been flattered more than anyone could handle, by flowery Gage. It James Corbett willing to accept DeSantis’ “story” as fact? We will see. Because if he does, I will have to stop believing James.

    Why, oh why, if buildings were planned to be demolished; would any fool or brilliant individuals attempt to fly airplanes into them? Answer: they would NOT. There were NO AIRPLANES. None were needed, nor was a “miss” allowable in the plan.

    Dr. Judy Woods(?) Presents a scenario that has one undeniable, non-ignorable issue; the convergence of cold and warm fronts on that day at that time, converging at that exact place. It MUST be part of the picture. Cannot be ignored…if true.( Apparently there was a hurricane in the ocean at that time.)

    Having said all this, my job at 21, was to direct bomb drops, accurately, from hundreds of miles away. That was then.. imagine what can be done now. And 21 years ago, what weapons were available.

    It was USA by the way. With Israeli Gelatin artists. Not Arabs. Look at who gained. Israel gained. Not Arabs.

    Gage smiles. He should not be smiling. He misdirected the energies and hopes and dedication of our best, engineers and architects. He did what he was supposed to do, for those that put him wherr he is. Shame on him. Leash him. Unleashed?! Lol. Really?! Think about it.

Submit a Comment


Become a Corbett Report member