Ghostwriters on the Storm: How Big Pharma (and everyone else) Ghostwrites Articles

by | Sep 12, 2017 | Videos | 33 comments

Did you ever read an “article” on a “reputable news site” that was so much like an advertisement that you had to double-check you weren’t reading a press release? Well guess what? You probably were! Today James goes over a couple of examples of how Big Pharma and Big Agra ghostwrite articles to disguise PR as news.

CLICK HERE to watch this video on BitChute

CLICK HERE to watch this video on Dtube

CLICK HERE to watch this video on YouTube

How pharma sales reps help me be a more up-to-date doctor (archived original)

‘A blow to [STAT’s] credibility’: MD listed as author of op-ed praising drug reps didn’t write it. Ghostwriting/PR influence

How pharma sales reps help me be a more up-to-date doctor (retracted)

Stat (website)

Séralini’s Revenge: Monsanto Rocked by New Court Documents

Monsanto Emails Raise Issue of Influencing Research on Roundup Weed Killer

Monsanto Ghostwrote for Henry I. Miller


  1. We shouldn’t forget also from the internet archive and wayback machine (though still in very small numbers) articles etc. get deleted.
    And a further point: The printing press is on decline. Papers will vanish. Their websites and as such their “archives” will vanish as well.
    So important articles we should screenshot/copy onto our hardware.
    Or just buy James Data DVDs :D.

  2. I should mention this…
    Virtually all U.S. wheat is sprayed with glyphosate (Roundup) AT HARVEST TIME

    I did not realize this until I watched GMOs Revealed.
    It is worth knowing about, because a huge number of grocery products contain wheat.

    The short story…
    Evidently, glyphosate ‘kills’ the wheat and dries it out, making it easier to harvest. Wheat needs to be dried out in order to harvest. This normally becomes tricky when farmers cut the wheat, because they have to be sure the wheat is dried out in the field…so glyphosate is the solution of Big Agriculture.

    • Hola Amigo Pablo!

      Yes, I’ve seen many 911 vids and probably have seen this one too, but it’s been too long and so many of them, it makes my head spin from so much data.

      Might I recommend this to you as well (or maybe you’ve already come across this)

      Fetzer has many books – 911 being one of them as well as many involving false flag terrorism within the evil US Empire and it’s evil NATO allies.



      • MultiVitamin,
        Just so you know…
        There is a sordid history tied to Fetzer which became a liability for the 9/11 Truth movement.

        I remember when Fetzer came on the scene about 9/11, and how he caused all kinds of hell, became allies with government infiltrators like Morgan Reynolds, and caused grief for Professor Steven Jones. You can research some of the earlier incidents by going to 911blogger.

        Perhaps Fetzer knows something about JFK, his original specialty. But in my opinion, he is trouble with a loud ‘T’.

        • Thank you HRS for the heads up. I’m aware of the riff between the 911 members, but will look into the 911 blogger. I’ve been following Fetzer for about a year now and read most all of his books below. Have you read his “America Nuked on 9/11”?

          Murder in Delay Plaza
          Chronicles of False Flag Terror (mostly Nicholas Kolerstrom)
          From Orlando to Dallas and Beyond
          America Nuked on 9/11
          Nobody Died at Sandy Hook
          And Nobody Died in Boston either
          And I suppose we didn’t go to the Moon, either

          FUTURE READS for me
          White Rose Booms in Wisconsin
          JFK: Whoe, How, and Why

          I’ve watched many of his episodes and have correlated what he’s exposing in the books with others. He exposes false flag terrorism, zionist motives, JFK cover-up (as you also noted). He presents the evidence, in my opinion, quite well. He somewhat pushes today’s narrative in a way it makes it look like Trump has the possibility to clean this mess up. But, I know that’s false. I know it doesn’t matter who’s in charge.

          In one of his most recent articles, which I sited above, he covers the issue a bit and I’ll quote it here: “There are three major groups in 9/11 research–A&E911, which supports the use of nanothermite and focuses on Building 7; Judy Wood and DEWs, which promotes Directed Energy Weapons and no planes theory; and Scholars for 9/11 Truth, which advances the use of mini or micro nukes to blow apart the Twin Towers and likewise contends that none of the official 9/11 aircraft actually crashed on 9/11. The contributors explain why A&E911 is right about Building 7 but wrong about nanothermite and why Judy Wood and DEWs is right about no planes but wrong about DEWs. Here is my latest video summary:”

          To me, and I agree with Fetzer, that the A&E911 members haven’t moved beyond nano-thermite when we all know that nano-thermite or thermite doesn’t have enough energy to turn steel into dust. With also the findings on nuclear material at ground zero, I’m leaning towards Fetzer’s theory.

          Why do you believe he is (T)rouble specifically? I see that he presents evidence that hasn’t been refuted. Or maybe you have something I’m unaware of that refutes what he’s been presenting for some time now. If so, I would like to know.

          In the meantime, I’ll search the 911blogger and Morgan Reynolds.



          • MultiVitamin, Thanks for your feedback.

            Just so you know, when you read the published Peer Reviewed Scientific literature and analysis of the dust, air particulates, and rubble; the Nano-composite military grade thermitic material does explain ALL the phenomena observed on 9/11 regarding the demolition of the 3 towers. All. Despite what anyone might say, the facts are there.

            I followed daily the 9/11 news and research coming out since 2005. So I remember these characters and the morphing.

            Without a doubt, just like government online trolls, there has been infiltration into the 9/11 Truth movement.

            I am fine with whatever a person wants to believe.
            I know where I stand.

            One important question that should be asked by us all…
            When disseminating 9/11 Truth to a new person, what types of “theories” would make 9/11 Truth look nutty?


            • Thank HRS for you input as well.

              If you follow Fetzer, as I have, he doesn’t dispute the presence of Nano-thermite or thermite alone. He pushes the theory that mini/micro nukes were used in conjunction with more conventional explosives and incendiaries.

              Posting pictures of small particles of iron spheres and flakes of thermite and their composition is great, which I have already seen does’t account for the gross vaporization of steel (basically, the 110 story buildings are completely gone, even below ground level in some sections). I would disagree that Nano-thermite accounts for all the phenomena observed that day. Specifically, nano-thermite doesn’t account for the projection of several tons of steel into adjacent buildings several hundred yards away. It’s not a powerful explosive. Looking at the building explode top down, you can see ejection of large pieces of steel at almost 45 degree angles upwards and outwards.

              But, you didn’t answer my original questions, so I’ll repost them here:
              1) Have you read his “America Nuked on 9/11”? If so, please explain what you don’t agree with. If not, why?
              2) Why do you believe he is (T)rouble specifically?

              I agree with your statement
              “Without a doubt, just like government online trolls, there has been infiltration into the 9/11 Truth movement.”

              Are you proposing that Fetzer is nutty?
              “One important question that should be asked by us all…
              When disseminating 9/11 Truth to a new person, what types of “theories” would make 9/11 Truth look nutty?”

              If so, like I’ve stated, I haven’t detected that he is “nutty” [if you suggest this] in the evidence he’s offered to date.

              I’m simply following the evidence.



            • HRS,

              Additionally, if you read “Extreme Prejudice” by CIA asset and whistleblower, Susan Lindauer, she reveals the expected use of a miniature thermal nuclear device.




            • MV,
              To answer your questions about me reading any of Fetzer’s books. No, I haven’t.

              Your 2nd question…
              My personal take…and that is what it is (my personal take)… is that James Fetzer has an obsession with being in the limelight, of being spotlighted as a “guru/authority of different conspiracy theories”. He clamors for attention and staggers his prose with “shocking revelations”.

              Plus, James Fetzer strained pretty hard to diss James Corbett in a video-cast. It was very strained. I have no respect for Fetzer.

              And yes…
              definitely “YES”…
              talking to a “normie” (the average individual on the street) about 9/11 and mentioning mini-nukes or no-planes or energy-beam weapons comes across as nutty.
              This is way outside the reality of most people on the street…and I know, because I have spoken one-on-one to way more than 10,000 people about 9/11.
              It does tremendous harm to the 9/11 Movement to speak outside the reality of the average person. Infiltrators do this intentionally.

              I wouldn’t talk to a 4 year old with topics, language, and terms which are deliberately/intentionally way beyond their understanding.
              I would slap someone who did, because they did that action NOT with the motive to benefit the 4 year old.

            • MV,
              A correction for you about nano-composite thermitic material…it easily can be formulated to be very highly explosive! In a major big way! Throwing tons of beams way out hundreds of yards with thermitic explosives…no problem. Notice also the polymers in the blend…Kevin Ryan and Gourley noted this even from the EPA air samples, but this is mentioned in other published reports as well.

            • John O,
              That last line was almost poetic. What a phrasing!

            • Hi john.o

              I would have to disagree with your comment
              “I will admit, amidst the shenanigans and disinfo he drops some tantalizing research, but it’s caveat lector on every fact and every inference every time, and half the time it’s baloney.”

              What part is baloney and disinfo? What shenanigans? These are merely ad hominem attacks.

              For your other comment
              “Whatever his motivation, Fetzer’s effect, is always the same: enmire obvious large unquestionable truths in obscure doubtful and endless disputes.”

              Based on what I’ve seen and read, he does a decent job presenting his theory and backs it up with evidence and seems pretty straight forward.

              Seems you and HRS are a bit too critical (if you’ve never read his books). If you have [I know HRS has not], please site what you refute.

              Simply look at the evidence around you for each Psy-op. It’s there for all to see.



          • Thanks for the input HRS.

            Do you have the link for the Corbett/Fetzer video?
            Can you site information regarding turning thermite into a high explosive, one that would also vaporize steel?

            Your judgment seems pretty harsh for not reading any of his books. I would expect, all of us here to have an open mind.

            For now, i’ll take your input under consideration, but if someone were to filter the truth to keep a four year hold happy, we have problems. Truth isn’t for the faint of heart. It hurts. So, yes, some people will not like the truth. I’m not for sugar-coating reality. Because someone proposes a theory, however out-of-the-box it might seem, should be considered and debated.

            I’m hoping this isn’t a limited hang-out, but I’m starting to get that feeling.

            I’ll end with a few quotes I found useful over the past few years:
            “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” – Voltaire
            “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” – William J. Casey (CIA Director 1981-1987) Feb. 1981, first staff meeting when asked by newly elected President Reagan what his goal was for the CIA.



          • MultiVitamin,
            I want to mention that I enjoy you being on this board and reading your comments. I like you.
            Just because you like Fetzer, doesn’t mean that I am ruffled. You and I differ in opinion on Fetzer, that’s all.

            And you and I also differ in how to approach new people in an effective manner.
            I hold that that one should communicate within the reality of the receiver while maintaining an empathetic affinity for the receiver and what the receiver can actually digest.

            In our Dallas 9/11 Truth Group, there currently are over 200 members. Probably, there were more than a 1,000 members within the last decade as some have faded away while living their lives. Joe is the Founder of the group back in 2006. I joined soon afterwards. Joe and I are buddies and we daily followed the 9/11 Truth news since 2005. So, we have seen the evolution and events as they occurred.
            We followed the data and the 9/11 Truth Movement. Through the decade, Joe and I together have spent more than $50,000 of our personal money doing local actions about 9/11. The quantity of actions and events is a list so long, that it consumes pages & pages (which translates to thousands of hours of our time).

            I mention Joe, because we are on the same page about 9/11. But we have members who believe all sorts of things about 9/11 and other stuff. There are Fetzer fans, Judy Wood fans, Richard Gage fans, etc. Like any group, there is a mix which sometimes includes… assholes, power-hungry folks, conmen, high IQ and low IQ folks, gorgeous women and ugly old men, the activists and the “only-talkers-but-not-doers”, etc.

            It is no problem having folks with different opinions about 9/11 or life in our group. However, when we disseminate to new, raw people, we usually use basics like Building 7 and such. We have given our more than 70,000 DVDs and literally tons of brochures over the decade.

            So my point…I have no problem with you having different perspectives than I.

            And so you know…
            …there are other Corbett Report members who subscribe to “no planes” or Judy Wood or whatever. I have had similar conversations with some of them.

          • MV,
            On the “Fetzer disses Corbett” video link: I won’t give you that. I don’t want to validate it with video views.

            On the nanothermitic material, there is lots of source material with links to the scientific papers or essays, some tremendous video interviews, etc.
            Do some homework.

            The following names may help with a “StartPage” search (which really is a Google search, but masks your ID).
            Niels H. Harrit
            Jeffrey Farrer
            Steven E. Jones
            Kevin R. Ryan
            James R. Gourley

            Also, there are some Ae911Truth video interviews with many professionals (such as materials scientists) which are fascinating.

            • Here I’d like to reiterate my stance on “what brought buildings on 9/11 down” issue:

              I don’t fucking care. There could have been planes and there could have been no planes. There could have been actual planes involved, but only to a certain degree. Missiles could have hit the buildings and the videos could have been edited to show planes. Or simply plane shaped missiles have been used. Or, instead of editing videos, holograms could have been used to make the missile or a plane of a different model look like something else to witnesses and those who made the videos. I of course haven’t taken into account another dozen or so of possible variations.

              When it comes to actual demolishing of the buildings, “normal” explosives may have been used or nukes or a single nuke or space era weapons or thermite or nano thermite or any combination of these. Of course, I don’t provide any confirmation for any of these because that’s exactly my point – no further time and resources should be poured into this topic.

              What I personally find “impossible” is to have inexperienced or flyers with no experience at all, fly two big ass planes over their high altitude cruising speed and hit two bulls eyes in the row, penetrate the buildings and leave no debris. To that extent, any “conspiracy theorist” whom ignores this simple “fact” and builds their story around it raises a certain number of red flags for me.

              Investigating this aspect of 9/11 would be a life long search with the slightest of chances you’d find anything definitive. Even if you did, you’d need to present that information in an arena full of misdirection. All of that misdirection is by design, of course. As asinine as the official story was, people who built this from the ground up aren’t idiots.

              Don’t take any of this as proof of disgusts or wonder on my part over the actions and interests of the 9/11 general public. The falling buildings imagery is something most of us have been programmed with, it’s something that has been incorporated into or psyche. It’s an incredibly potent conundrum and the inquisitive minds strives to solve it. But just as a singular mind hasn’t been employed to engineer it all, a singular mind will have problems figuring it all out. To realize a lie does not require to know the truth.

              I agree with you on the baby steps thing. One needs to focus on the most easily provable point of the story and destroy it. Breaking the weakest link of chain will suffice. Some people will react well to an odd way a building fell, some will like the money trail aspect or the inherent lack of logic in the entire story. All encompassing theories, on the other hand, will attract all kinds of attention.

              Energy should be focused on disseminating the fact that the official story is a goddamn lie, thus precipitating the destabilization and fall of the pyramid of power.

            • mkey,
              Goddamn man! That is a very good write-up.

              To realize a lie does not require to know the truth.

              Energy should be focused on disseminating the fact that the official story is a goddamn lie, thus precipitating the destabilization and fall of the pyramid of power.

              And you are spot on about different “theories”.
              All the dissention about different theories within the 9/11 Truth Movement has torn it to shreds.

            • All the dissention about different theories within the 9/11 Truth Movement has torn it to shreds.
              That was the point all along, I’d wager. Just for laughs, I would like to know how many in the truth community are part of controlled opposition.

    • The old bag is completely insane. Not exactly new information, is it?

      But I am left speechless over this insight of hers.

  3. Pablo , when and where do you come up with this information? Thank you! So much! when do you find the time there are so many ! Gotzsche is an individual we do not, nor will we here in USA ever get to meet. Integrity is unheard of in the medical fields around here. Incredible amount of info.

  4. Not just possible to live a life without prescription drugs; it is best lived without them. I don’t even take aspirin. All of my medication can bee found in my kitchen. It’s always funny how someone much younger than me, I’m 57, who is in far worse physical condition than I am, will try to lecture me on how I need to see a doctor. As you can probably imagine, those conversations never go quite the way they thought it would. Like I’m anybody’s b$tch. 🙂

    • I’m with you on that. The only thing I take is the occasional 200mg ibuprofen pill for the quarterly occurring headache. I used to just ride them out before, but it usually pops out right before bedtime and messes my rest completely, so I cave in and take the pill. Most of the males I know are somewhere on the lines of this, they’ll maybe take something for the odd pain and that’s about it. Many women, however, seem to tend to self medicate up the wazoo.

      While I understand the immense anatomy differences between the sexes, getting hooked up on bullshit to steer through natural processes doesn’t seem like the way to go, at least to this subscriber.

      • I used to take ibuprofen for my arthritis. But then it not only didn’t work anymore, it made my arthritis worse. I then used horsetail to cure it (it was an accidental discovery on my part as I was using it to heal some broken bone issues). Ibuprofen is a fairly toxic drug that doesn’t work as well as many natural elements. But that is merely my opinion; I try not to lecture anyone on how to live their life. We definitely agree on women and drugs. They seem to forget their ancestors didn’t need all those meds. But they can keep that apple; I ain’t biting it!

    • Hermine in 2016 did a full 360 😛

      • Hola Pablo! High Impact Flix on youboob just did a couple of videos on hurricanes that were pretty good. Better than his usual, I thought it represented a break-through for him anyway. There has also been a lot of speculation on Harvey and weather modification on Activist Post site. I have no judgement on it all. I can tell you that Irma was a pain in the butt, lost power for six days, lost some food, made some friends, learned again that in hard times people stick together more than they fight each other, and so on. But that’s just me. And the neighborhood’s wild chickens which have us all trained to feed them!

      • Satellites are used to track these hurricanes, Pablo. I’m not aware of any crowd funded, independently operated satellites out there.

        • I’d like to close with this: 911 is enough of a cluster fuck without a hurricane thrown in there. Lets leave that sleeping dog lie 😛

Submit a Comment


Become a Corbett Report member