Hillary Clinton Is A Threat To All Of Humanity

by | Jul 25, 2016 | Videos | 41 comments

by James Corbett
July 24, 2016

Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Wall Street-backed warmonger whose potential election as President of the United States this November poses an existential threat not just to Americans but to all of humanity.

As First Lady and then as Senator, she actively supported the US’ illegal wars of aggression abroad:

BILL CLINTON: “Today, our Armed Forces joined our NATO allies in airstrikes against Serbian forces ,esponsible for the brutality in Kosovo.”

HILLARY CLINTON: “You know I voted for the Iraqi resolution.”

CLINTON: “The President understands this. He’s fully aware that it’s going to take a lot of patience and pain-staking planning and we’re gonna support him!”

CLINTON: “…including thousands of chemical weapons. Large volumes of chemical and biological stocks. A number of missiles and warheads. A major lab equipped to produce Anthrax.”

She not only admitted the US role in creating Al Qaeda:

CLINTON: “When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, we had this brilliant idea there we were going to come to Pakistan and create a force of Mujahideen, equip them with Stinger missiles and everything else, to go after the Soviets inside Afghanistan.”

But then, despite this admission, as Secretary of State her support of the war on Libya and the jihadis in Syria directly led to the rise of ISIS and the migrant crisis in Europe:

CLINTON: “The transition to democracy in Syria has begun and it’s time for Assad to get out of the way.”

“President Assad is not indispensable and we have absolutely nothing invested in him remaining in power.”

“I think based on definitions of war-criminal and crimes against humanity, there would be an argument to be made that he (Assad) would fit into that category.”

CLINTON: “Libya was a different kind of calculation and we didn’t lose a single person.”

CLINTON: “We came. We saw. He died! (laughter)”

She was the one who announced the US’ so-called “Asia-Pacific Pivot” that has seen more US forces being placed in the Asia-Pacific as a direct military threat to China:

CLINTON: “…and we look to the Asia-Pacific region, as we have for many decades, as an area where the United States in uniquely positioned to play a major role.”

CLINTON: “The United States is not seeding the Pacific to anyone.”

And she has stated in no uncertain terms that Russia and Iran will be militarily targeted in a Clinton presidency, and that the “nuclear option” is, as always, “on the table”:

CLINTON: “And we will make sure the Iranians and the world understand, that the United States will act decisively if necessary including taking military action.”

“There will have to be consequences for any violation by Iran and that the nuclear option should not at all be taken of the table. That has been my position consistently.”

CLINTON: “And Russia has to support the international community’s efforts sincerely or be held to account.”

CLINTON: “That Russia and China will pay a price. Because they are holding up progress, blockading it. That is no longer tolerable.”

And unlike her many, many political statements of convenience that are merely a reflection of what is most politically acceptable at the moment:

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Do you think New York State should recognize gay marriage?”



CLINTON: “I support marriage for lesbian and gay couples.”

CLINTON: “I represented Wall Street as a Senator from New York and I went to Wall Street and in December of 2007 before the big crash that we had. And I basically said ‘cut it out, quit foreclosing on homes. Quit engaging in these kinds of speculative behaviors.'”

“Now who’s exactly the blame for the housing crisis? Now I think there’s plenty of blame to go around. Home-buyers who paid extra fees to avoid documenting their income, should of known that they were getting in over their heads.”

“I take a back-seat to no one when you look at my record on standing up and fighting for progressive values.”

“I get accused of being kind of moderate and center. I plead guilty.”

HILLARY CLINTON: “We went through a thorough process to identify all of my work-related emails.”

JAMES COMEY: “Lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her emails.”

CLINTON: “So that the emails were immediately captured and preserved.”

COMEY: “There was no archiving at all of her emails.”

…we can be assured that these threats of potential nuclear world war by Clinton are not idle threats. A future Clinton president would be assured of a like mind in the new Prime Minister in the UK, who has stated in no uncertain terms that she is willing to launch a nuclear strike that would kill hundreds of thousands:

GEORGE KEREVAN: “Let me congratulate the Prime Minster on her new rule, but can we cut to the chase? Is she personally prepared to authorize a nuclear-strike that could kill 100,000 innocent men, women and children?”

THERESA MAY: “Yes. And I have to say to the honourable gentleman, the whole point of a deterrent is that our enemies need to know that we would be prepared to use it.”

Hillary Clinton is a neocon, a war hawk, a liar, an unindicted criminal and a Wall Street puppet. Why is it, then, that those on the so-called “progressive” left who would be warning against her if she had an “R” next to her name are instead lecturing other leftists that it is now their duty to fall in line and help her get elected?

NOAM CHOMSKY: “If Clinton is nominated and it comes to a choice between Clinton and Trump, in a swing state, a state where it’s going to matter which way you vote, I would vote against Trump, and by elementary arithmetic, that means you hold your nose and you vote Democrat. I don’t think there’s any other rational choice. Abstaining from voting or, say, voting for, say, a candidate you prefer, a minority candidate, just amounts to a vote for Donald Trump, which I think is a devastating prospect, for reasons I’ve already mentioned.”

JUAN GONZALES: “We in SDS refused to vote. We wouldn’t support McCarthy. We wouldn’t support Humphrey. Our slogan was “Vote with your feet, vote in the street.” I’m—I’m here to tell you that the slogan was right, the tactic was wrong. And I think that the country, in retrospect, there would not have been a substantive change, there would have been a positive change, if Nixon had not been elected. But you learn from your mistakes. Hopefully, other generations learn from the mistakes of those who came before them.”

ELIZABETH WARREN: We’re all here today because we’re with her. And we’re going to work our hearts out to make Hillary Clinton the next president of the United States.

BERNIE SANDERS: “She will be the Democratic nominee for president, and I intend to do everything I can to make certain she will be the next president of the United States.”

The message here is as clear as it is predictable and disappointing. Once again those with the influence to shape these events and ignite a genuine protest movement against Hillary’s coronation at the Democratic National Convention are falling back into their roles as partisan ideologues, advocating for “their” candidate over the “other side,” taking the two-party system as a fait accomplis and complicity with that system as the only way forward.

But as Michel Chossudovsky of GlobalResearch.ca points out, this election is fundamentally different. This time, the fate of the world hangs in the balance.

MICHEL CHOSSUDOVSKY: “In so many words Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy stance is ‘to blow up the planet.’ She has made statements to the effect that a first-strike nuclear attack against Russia or Iran is on the table. So that if she is in the White House she could in fact unleash the unspoken, which is World War 3. I think this is something we have to address both in terms of analysis and also political choice. That anyone who wants to blow up the planet is not ‘progressive.’

“Secondly, she has a criminal record. Not only in regards to the email scandal but also in relation to The Clinton Foundation, which is involved in fraud, money laundering, political cronyism, etc. It is amply documented.

“So that, in effect, the choice for the American people is to elect a war-criminal.”

Too many people become attached to the personality of these political personas or fixated on the “D” or the “R” after their name. This clouds their judgement and stops them from seeing their policies and agenda for what they really are.

As Diana Johnstone, author of Queen of Chaos: The Misadventures of Hillary Clinton points out, Hillary is best understood not as a person, but as the instrument for the think tanks, Wall Street financiers and other connected insiders who want to embroil the United States in more illegal wars and plunder the country and its people even further.

DIANA JOHNSTONE: “I mean Hillary to me is not even an interesting person. She is simply a shallow, ambitious woman. Who has decided to make herself the instrument of the Washington think-tank persuasion and is using that too pose as a great expert on world affairs to be elected as President. She simply is the embodiment of all that is terrible in American foreign-policy that has developed over the past decades.”

It is no hyperbole to say that the election of Hillary Rodham Clinton as president this November would be one of the greatest tragedies in the history of the United States, and perhaps the world. It is incumbent on people of all stripes–American and non-American, Republican and Democrat, progressive and libertarian, anarchists, and those who have never thought about politics a day in their life–to protest her nomination at the Democratic National Convention, work against her campaign for President, and avert the nuclear nightmare that is now coming into view.


  1. A big THANKS to James and all his co-workers for making this video and transcription.

  2. Very enlightening indeed!
    To me it seems paradoxical, that you have to be informed to see, what kind of person Hillary Clinton is. But you seem to be uninformed if you vote for Trump.
    (I hope you understand my comment. I not a native speaker)

  3. Corbett:
    “…It is no hyperbole to say that the election of Hillary Rodham Clinton as president this November would be one of the greatest tragedies in the history of the United States, and perhaps the world….”

  4. …and to believe Donald Trump is not backed by Wall street is naive.

    By the way, Trump said, if elected President he’d rip up the P5+1 Iranian agreement, in other words, Trump wants war with Iran.

    So, basically Americans have two choices come November…

    a vote for Hillary, meaning the US “MIGHT” go to war if the Iranians break the P5+1 agreement and start refining weapons grade Uranium.

    or, vote for Trump, meaning the US “WILL” go to war with Iran after he rips up the P5+1 agreement.

    • It may sound cynical and not very comforting, when I say “we will see”.

      • I’m still trying to figure out if James is by defacto Pro-Trump or not.

        I’m still waiting for him to do a video about Trump’s many faults, and how Trump and Hillary are basically the same peas in the pod, you know, in order to really smash the left/right paradigm.

        Until then, I have no other choice but to assume James is Pro-Trump, and if that’s the case…and knowing what I know about Trump, well then, that changes everything.

        • I think you would be hard pressed to find a more openly vocal apolitical anarchist than James would you not? I think what you are reading into is just the fact that Clinton is a life long politician with a provable track record in the field as James shows here. I think it rough to assume he is pro trump just cause he is not doing a video for one whenever he posts one for the other. Still….. a good question for #QFC… James, are you a trump supporter?!

        • I’ve been following James for a few years now, but since this is an election year, and since we now know who the Democratic and Republican nominee’s are, and since we know Trump was Pro-Brexit, and James was Pro-Brexit as well…wouldn’t it be nice to ACTUALLY KNOW.

            • So I’m a troll for asking questions, but rltmlt can voice his/her support for Trump on this thread, and he/she isn’t a troll? What kind of mental gymnastics is that? What happened to the whole left/right paradigm shtick?

  5. Hi James,
    yes we all know the folly of the Clinton tidal wave and that there will be more death and destruction to follow (either candidate). In discussing this with friends and family, I have been getting nothing but grief from all angles regarding the abstention and demonstration option. This two party program and the only option being the “evil of two lessor’s” is a maddening thought but we are so thoroughly indoctrinated within this program that I am beginning to feel that there is no way out. I know you were trying for a shock factor with the “bomb” imagery and hyperbole but can’t we also recognize that those who will say anything to get elected are doing just that?

  6. I’m not sure James but I think this piece just became a serious contender for top spot against Dinesh D’Souza’s movie “Hillary’s America” just released this past weekend !
    Hillary’s candidacy finally drove me over to the Republicans from a Democrat Party that I supported for the past fifty years ! Though I have to admit that Trump’s history as a total Washington outsider had a lot to do with it. I also have to admit that my wife and I met Trump in his former Atlantic City Casino about twenty years ago and his winning personality and ability to openly discuss a wide range of issues with us made him an instant winner in our book !

      • Your obviously content drinking the Liberal Cool Aid, a group that’s always happy as long as they are spending somebody else’s money. Obama = 19 Trillion in debt, up from 2 Trillion fifteen years earlier, and he’s ready and willing to sign the T.P.P. after the election, an act that will officially make us a 3rd World Economy!

        • The only one between me and you drinkin any cool aid is you Trump lover!

          I’ll bet you a million dollars that regardless who becomes President come November, he’she will increase the National Debt.

          Learn something… Google “Executive Order 6102” and “Bretton Woods” and “Nixon Shock”

  7. The fact that this government has not responded to the numerous requests to release the 28 redacted pages of the report generated by the 911 commission should increasingly bother us all !

    • Like how, if those pages would not have been redacted, at Cheney’s request, the Bush administration could not have easily invaded Iraq, the American people would have asked them to invade their friend and ally Saudi Arabia instead?

      • You just answered your own question ! Just because I expressed a preference for Trump in this election doesn’t mean I’m content with a system that only allows two choices for the top leadership position in a country this large with a population of over 321 million citizens ! An open invitation to rule by special interest !

        • First of all, the Obama administration DID release the 28 redacted pages of the report generated by the 911 commission.

          Secondly, the fact you support Trump proves to me that you are confused.

          Please YouTube “Donald Trump Endorsement for Prime Minister Netanyahu” and wake the f… up!

          • Just learned that Trump asked Putin to Hack US government servers to find the 30 000 missing emails.

            What kind of Presidential nominee would ask another country, in this case a not so friendly country, to hack government servers in order to influence out come of the election?

  8. James,
    I would also like to know more about Trump’s past personally. The fact he met behind closed doors with Kissinger according to MSM and that he is a billionaire makes me believe there will be other ties to NWO believers. Also, I would like to know if Alex Jones is a proponent of the Republican party or if his hatred of the Clinton’s has blinded him to Trump’s faults. It seems to me there was a time when you both were of the same opinion andd now that has shifted?

  9. Best case scenario is an electoral college tie, 269-269, forcing the House to select a compromise president. Such a person would be an insider, but would have an extremely weak mandate, which would be a recipe for gridlock.

  10. It’s clear beyond the reasonable doubt who is Chomsky.
    Look at James’ video ‘Meet Noam Chomsky, Academic Gatekeeper’.

    There is also very interesting Chomsky’s lecture from Island:

    He is selling strange idea that first 9/11 (Chile coup) is more important than the second one.
    Look at 8:50, 20:00, 26:00

  11. I agree 100%.

    I think James made this video for some other audience (maybe Newsbud). Usually there isn’t that much fear-mongering present in his work.

    Interesting take on presidential selections by Truthstreammedia

    • The thing with Newsbud is my speculation.

      “So that’s the audience he’s supposed to consciously mislead…”

      Aren’t you a bit malicious? I see no misleading. For my taste he is not saying enough, but this could be maximum someone else is able to chew. There are a lot of people who truly believe in elections, present rotten system… For those people you have to tune your massage, you cannot speak about (s)elections as meaningless charade. That would be outside their domain, they wouldn’t understand you, they would switch off immediately.

      I see the message: Killary is really bad candidate. And it’s true. A lot more people can understand James’ video then the video I proposed above. Looks to me that this time he decided for more simplistic approach and spice it with more fear.

      • Are you proposing that children should learn calculus? That’s no go, because they are not capable of that level of abstraction.
        In a way, I’m interested how are you explaining to ordinary people the concept of Deep state.

        Regarding fear-mongering, Who said it’s a good thing? In previous commentaries I haven’t been precise enough. Usually, I find James as total opposite of fear-mongering, but not in this video. However, I don’t think that overall he made a mistake or something bad. This video won’t be in my favorites and that’s it.

        • Obviously, I’m not native speaker so I’m not sure that ‘tune’ is the best word.
          What I want to say is, whenever you communicate you have to take into account to whom you are speaking. You might not be saying everything, but you will get through something. On the other hand, you might want to say everything and get misunderstanding or even worse.

          I think you are not talking much with ordinary people about deep state. Approach you described usually ends up been labeled as conspiracy nut. Maybe they won’t tell you but you can see it in their eyes.
          Yes, the problem is in beliefs.

    • Talking about nuclear Armageddon if killary will be elected is fear-mongering to me. Every president or prime minister who gets nuk-button have to say that he/she is prepared to push it. Otherwise they would find someone else.
      Also as far as I know, the latest US nuclear doctrine where first strike possibility is conceived, is not written by killary.
      Killary just helped that we came to the point, where nuks flying around looks like something possible.
      I believe that even talking about nuclear war makes it more possible.

    • I agree that deep state is not in total control because this is not possible. In my opinion it’s more monolithic.
      I think candidates brings almost nothing with them and it’s like question: would you like spaghetti or macaroni?

  12. Hi VoiceOfArabi

    What you say about Vietnam may be true: “The average man or woman (Majority) is aware and have “good” instinctive moral code, and will not stand for wrong doing.”
    But I think, that the reason why the United States did lose the Vietnam War was not just because of the resistance of the people of Vietnam (“they defeated United States”). An other reason for theyr defeat was due to the fact, that journalism was functioning in a completely different way. Since the first Gulf War (25 years ago) we are supposed to consume the reports of the so called embedded journalism.
    Anyway, that is no contradiction to your statement that “citizens are dumped down”. 😉

  13. Wow!
    Thanks for re-running that “The Last Word on Voting”.
    Your way with words communicates well.

  14. New member. I had been a dumbed down American till 40 days ago. At 64 years I decided to learn about secret societies. Needless to say I have read over a thousand articles on Zionism, Black Nobility, committee of 300, etc.. in just 40 days. Switching off the TVs would be a good start to rebelling. And they can’t kill 80% of us. I remember the anti-Vietnam protests reaching 300,000+ on one March to Washington that I was involved in. The youth in America has been dummied down even worse than our adult population. Universities have helped make sure of that. The Zionist’s etc… have ensured we cannot start even an Anti-Zionist movement in the USA because of instant cries of Anti-Semetism. I was hoping we could start an Anti-Middle East protest (ala Anti-Vietnam) to get all military and financial support to the entire region, including and especially Israel, withdrawn. It seems there is a still developing plan to start a “World War 3” between Arabs & Israel and that the rest of their respective allies will be drawn into it. If the USA had the balls to withdrawal EVERYTHING from the Middle East – then they would have to find another way to draw us into said War.

    • “but it is amazing how the richest country in the world does not have free medicine, or free education…”

      I agree … but that would be socialism, that’s non-american, half way to communism, apage satanas….?

      • I was kidding. So many times I’ve heard/read socialism type ranting when it comes to universal and basically free health care.

        Even in socialism things were not free. People were paying taxes.
        In my opinion, universal (free) health care should be based on the principle of Solidarity.
        You never know whether you will got sick or not and also how severe sickness will be. Solidarity would be the best for everyone.

        But nowadays as far as I know american health system is suited to the wealthy. In fact, like everything else.

  15. You must be doing something right James, you are picking up trolls. Paying ones too! 🙂

  16. This thread is bizarre. The creeps who run the west do it off shore. They’re not Deep State, they’re people. Deep State attempts to describe interlocking organizations which serve the offshore rulers. Gangster, drug dealer, mass murderer + all round psychopath Clinton is a species of people too, albeit a very tired , sick and rapidly ageing subhuman. The older and sicker she gets the more likely she is to act independently of the handlers and controllers who raised her up, since there’s a risk she might perceive that there’s not much time or life left to her for enjoying offshore rewards and punishments. Some of her rulers may be planning a nuclear world war and general depopulation, and some may be diametrically opposed, preferring to rule ever above ground to cowering in bunker towns for a century or two. Who really knows the workings and evolutions of the internal factions offshore ? But still they rule by remote control while its the official leaders of the nation state nuclear powers with the direct power to launch nuclear war.

    James’ argument is logical enough, it’s encapsulated in the title, and fleshed out in straightforward manner on the basis of the personal history and psychology of the Clinton individual subhuman who will have the direct power to launch nuclear war if elected. Since you’re in struggle street grasping his meaning it amounts to this ; Clinton will unleash nuclear war, Trump might not. This difference might not matter much to Americans but it makes ALL the difference to the rest of the world.

  17. In Donetsk Republic the western financiers who came and saw to conquer the (significant) local resources and industrial infrastructure were politely told to fuck off. Local bankers were arrested and the private funds of their banks were seized and used to pay local pensions. Donetsk is also receiving a lot of sympathy and support from Russian govt and intellectuals. Doesn’t sound to me like ALL the strings everywhere fits these facts.

  18. Well, she is certainly a threat to anyone around her…

    Clinton Body Count +5 in Just 6 Weeks

    “Hillary will stop at nothing to claw her way into the White House; unfortunately, people are dropping dead left and right in her path and, in the case of the last two found dead earlier this week, the mainstream media is pretending not to even notice they are gone…” – From Truthstream media

Submit a Comment


Become a Corbett Report member