Interview 1475 – The News on Declare Your Independence

by | Sep 5, 2019 | Interviews | 6 comments

via Ernest Hancock interviews James Corbett on a variety of world news headlines. Topics include 9/11 news, media manipulation, Dave Chappelle, the Plunge Protection Team, etc…

VIDEO COURTESY: Declare Your Independence

When is the News Not the News? – #PropagandaWatch

Episode 319 – Psychographics 101

Another Conspiracy Confirmed: How the Plunge Protection Team Rigs the Markets

In Unprecedented, Shocking Proposal, BOE’s Mark Carney Urges Replacing Dollar With Libra-Like Reserve Currency

Dave Chappelle’s Impressions Are Insanely Accurate

UPDATE – Dr. Tim Ball wins @MichaelEMann lawsuit – Mann “hides the decline” AGAIN

The Great Global Warming Swindle

At Hong Kong Swearing-In, Some Lawmakers Pepper Their Oath With Jabs


  1. Ooops!
    I guess Corbett and Hancock and the University of Alaska and thousands of architects, engineers and professionals are wrong about World Trade Center Building 7.

    ASSOCIATED PRESS – June 13 2017
    AP FACT CHECK: Fire, not demolition, brought down WTC towers
    Blah blah blah blah… …This story is part of an ongoing Associated Press effort to fact-check claims in suspected false news stories.

  2. “very” soon Corbett will release his 9/11 video.

  3. I want to mention that I don’t care what opinion a person has on this “pull it” issue. It does not make me think more, nor less, about that individual’s integrity.

    Larry Silverstein and “Pull It”
    This has long been a controversial issue in the 9/11 Truth Community.

    Some of my buddies swear “‘pull it’ means “demolition”.

    I once had the opinion that “pull it” inferred that Larry Silverstein was talking about demolition.

    But it was “inference”, a conjecture, a speculation.

    For me, it is not a hardcore fact that Larry’s statement “We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse.” meant “we decided to take the building down in a demolition”.
    Here are just a few of my reasons, besides “inference” of the phrase…

    ~~ With PBS or any film crew, we don’t know the full context and emotions nor surrounding conversations, nor edited clips. We just don’t have all the data.

    ~~ In my opinion, if an interviewer caught wind of Larry admitting that Building 7 was a controlled demolition based on Larry’s decision, then right then and there the interviewer would query Larry further. It would be a big scoop. A huge story in 2004. And even if, PBS cut out ‘Larry’s admission’ from the tape, likely a film crew member might leak the info. It would be a big story.

    ~~ Logistically, it does not make sense that Larry Silverstein would have any control or say about “when to bring down Building 7”.
    Planning of the 9/11 Event probably had the building slated to come down in the morning. Barry Jennings’s testimony corroborates the explosions and damage in the morning. But the perpetrators flubbed the morning demolition when the Building would have been shielded by the smoke from the Twin Towers.

    In short, most 9/11 Researchers, believe that Building 7 came down at 5:20pm because the perpetrators flubbed the first go at it in the morning. The perps were probably scrambling to get that thing down. I doubt that Larry had the final say of “when” in the perpetrator chain of authority.

    All in all, we just don’t know. Not for sure for sure.

    Anyway, that is my take.

    • Here is Ae911Truth’s…
      FAQ #11: Did WTC 7 owner Larry Silverstein admit to ordering the controlled demolition of the building?

      …In the end, whether or not Silverstein admitted to personally authorizing the controlled demolition of WTC 7 has no bearing on the evidence presented by AE911Truth. The scientific, forensic, and eyewitness evidence surrounding the building’s destruction proves beyond any reasonable doubt that it was intentionally demolished. While Silverstein’s actions as the leaseholder of the Twin Towers and the owner of Building 7 should be thoroughly examined with suspicion, only an unimpeachable, independent criminal investigation can determine who was responsible for destroying the WTC skyscrapers.

Submit a Comment


Become a Corbett Report member