Interview 1851 – New World Dis-Order on CHD TV

by | Nov 21, 2023 | Interviews, Videos | 16 comments

James Corbett and Dr. Meryl Nass return to “Good Morning CHD” to chronicle the latest Oct. 30 draft of the WHO Pandemic Treaty — now pegged the pandemic ‘agreement’. As the clock counts down until the May 2024 World Health Assembly, the time has come for free and sovereign individuals of the world to reclaim their sovereignty, and fast. James and Meryl elucidate what a “complete reimagination” of the world’s power structure looks like, walking us through the game plan of the opponent’s multi-angled attack to bring about their “New World Dis-Order,” and provide us with inspirational solutions to fight back. Learn their strategies and get a grasp of the bigger picture in this episode of “Good Morning CHD.”


The Corbett Report – Open Source Intelligence News

Door To Freedom

Oct. 16 Pandemic Treaty Draft

Oct 30. Latest WHO “Agreement”

Conference Of The Parties (COP) | UNFCCC

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus – Twitter

Missouri V. Holland 252 U.S. 416 (1920) Justia US Supreme Court Center

United States V. Belmont 301 U.S. 324 (1937) Justia US Supreme Court Center

United States V. Pink 315 U.S. 203 (1942) Justia US Supreme Court Center

The Great Taking

“The Great Taking”: How They Can Own It All

Sen. Ron Johnson, Advocates Brief On WHO’s Transformation ‘From Health Advisor To Dictator’

New World Dis-Order: Meryl Nass On Substack

The Build Back Better Framework | The White House


  1. Great interview. I am glad to see that James is collaborating with Meryl Nass and CHD to gather more interest and resistance to a Fascist New World Order.
    Perhaps, more graphics would make the interview even more interesting, but there is a lot here for those who are willing to go through the Show Notes.
    What is it going to take to incite massive protests calling for No World Government?
    People are being deliberately confused and many are looking for answers.

  2. The Bankers and the Corporations that have grown up around them are using their Corporate Law and Corporate Courts to take control of everything. At one time Common Law Courts did exist in the United States, but they have been pushed aside by a Network of Oligarchs with plans of taking control of everything.
    The original 13th Amendment to the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION did declare that no one with a title of Nobility could hold a public office. Thus, a member of the BAR could not be a Judge. The War of 1812 soon followed and British Troops burned the Capital to the ground. The Treaty to end that war allowed British Corporate Courts to exist in America which was the foot in the door the Oligarchs needed to remain above the law. It is interesting to note that the original 13th Amendment was forgotten, and then papered over in 1865 by another 13th Amendment, and that the proper ratification of all subsequent Amendments is questionable.
    That said, I think it is long past time that States and/or Counties declare their Independence from the Central Government that has enslaved them, and is now involved in killing (culling) the population. This Empire may be too big to fail, but it does not serve it’s own people nor does it do good in the world.

  3. When is Bobby Kennedy going to have a convo with Jimmy C.?

    • There was an interview a while back; do check the search bar on this site.

    At work today:
    UN Agenda 21&2030; UN Wildlife Project; The New World Order Agenda, and others.

    ALL of them part of the planned reduction of the population under 24/7 track, trace, and data basing living in 5G SMART cities, no private vehicles, no access to the country side, most living on the Government dole and forced to obey any laws or regulations put out by the Government to maintain the dole.
    – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
    “If you want to see your future, look at China today”
    – David Icke
    – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

    Zbigniew Brzezinski (Morning Joe’s father in law)
    Between Two Ages:
    America’s Role in the Technetronic Era (written 50 years ago)

    “People, governments and economies of all nations must serve the needs of multinational banks and corporations.”

    “The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values.

    A min of brilliance by the late John Trudel from 40+ years ago:

  5. I think you leave out one of the worst offenders of the globalist control matrix: entertainment, principally Hollywood. The level of mind control is immeasurable. They build our world view, from the “one god” myth, to Americans “love war”, consumerism, “Israel is our greatest ally”, to the idea “America is
    racist”…pure Zionist Communist propaganda.

    What is interesting now is we see them deconstructing Hollywood, purposely destroying it from within (as we saw with Epstein and Pedo Island, when they no longer need the system of control). Just like with the Transgender Bud light commercial, which purposely undermined the American beer company, which was the top selling beer until that commercial. These communists control these companies and undermine them from within. They are destroying Hollywood in the same manner, making garbage “woke”(see: Marxist) movies all to divide and anger the population, while simultaneously driving people away from movies. They also run the writer’s union and the actor’s union, putting them on strike, further undermining the movie industry. On-line they make it out to be Hollywood is “incompetent”, or pandering to go-woke, that is nonsense, these are billion dollar companies with the best and brightest governing them, if they are doing something, it is because they want it that way.

    They are removing all support from America, so it falls apart, particularly the western states, maybe because that is where the Chinese will be invading, who knows.

    • @Rexleo
      Indeed, all part and parcel of the gift…

      A few of the 45 Communist Goals from 60 years ago (searchable) put into the Congressional Record…

      Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963

      15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

      17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

      20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

      21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

      24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

      25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

      26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

      32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture–education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

      35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

  6. Well said, Mr. Corbett, these are just pieces of paper, and those who rule us, abide the rules of those “pieces of paper” ONLY when it serves them, otherwise they totally ignore them, so should we.

  7. Syncromysticism?
    This is a plague or a gift? The tap on the conscious is un- nerving. Dr.Nass makes the statement ” the universe pulled it out of me.”
    Tony Edwards took this picture and I bought it when I had no money,why? I knew it meant more than the sum of its parts.

      • Continued… From 11-20-2023 I had a long discussion with the professional uniforms. Got their tongues wagging on this very subject Dr. Nass discussed at 34:40 about Spains uniforms refusing to enforce unjust proclamations.
        The uniforms I talked to where aware of this contradiction, but I don’t know outside the room what the consensus is…but it gave me a surprise and very hopeful sign. Not to mention a bad hangover.
        That’s what I like about James Corbett, he messes with the universe and jumps the shark of timelines. I can ignore it but, it seems like a nudge. Message or propaganda?

        generalbottlewasher says:
        11/20/2023 at 1:43 am
        The rock is hard as the propaganda that has encased the minds of normal,upper economic mortals. They are not about to risk getting that wet. So now what? Yelling in their ear hoping their perception changes to ” what was that you where saying?”
        I had that experience in OKC recently. Drinking with military men. The liquor these [sic] drank did soften their hard think. I think it helped loosen up the layer upon layer of propaganda these uniformed professionals mistake as obedience for discipline.
        I found the black guys to be more open minded, aware of the propaganda tool and seemed more aware to their predicament. The others less so. All in all they agreed things had changed in their profession from when they enlisted. All we’re waiting to cash out.
        It seems the UN crowd has neither obedience or discipline. Maybe when push comes to shove the uniforms may break with the diplomatic suits and free up the upper economic proles to think,
        ” what was that you were saying?

        I think we got a chance.

        • I agree with your assessment. Lack of discipline and weak cowardice in some of the “order following” suits. Many of these “order followers” actually believe that what they do is ethical or they want to believe it. Those are the people who can be reached. Many of these people are young folks with flexible minds which is why they are easy to enlist.

          If they can understand where we are headed may decide to defect, IMO. There is very little morale in the US military and very low enlistment of “qualified” people. The people who are enlisting are many “undesirables” or less desirable than past formidable soldiers.

          I also think we have a chance, in fact a very good one.

  8. Part 1 of 4
    “Interview 1851 – New World Dis-Order on CHD TV” is reported upon in the Alberta Press.

    Sunday Nov 26, 2023 by Lee Harding – The Western Standard
    Analysts call latest WHO pandemic accord draft a globalist ‘grab bag’

    FULL ARTICLE (but without links)
    Analysts are sounding alarm bells about the latest draft of the WHO pandemic accord, warning its wide scope could reach still farther through amendments after ratification.

    The Pandemic prevention, preparedness and response accord was initiated December 2021 at the World Health Assembly of 194 countries with the idea of ensuring better preparedness for future pandemics, including more equity in access to vaccines and health care. The latest draft was released October 30.

    Canadian researcher James Corbett and Meryl Nass, M.D., offered their take in a one-hour analysis November 21.

    In the segment, available online on Children’s Health Defence TV and the Corbett Report, Nass suggested the negotiators had “taken out some of the really, really bad looking stuff and tried to tone down the language.” Corbett partially agreed.
    “All of those creepy fill-in-the-blank later definitions that we got in some of the earlier draft seems to have been filled in with well, more gobbledygook,” Corbett said.
    Terms such as “the highest attainable standard of health” and “whole of government and whole of society approaches at country and community levels…for achieving sustainable improvements” struck Corbett as high-sounding phrases in need of clarity.
    Corbett also wondered what “monstrosities they might come up with” for the stated goal of “early safe, transparent and rapid sharing of samples and genetic sequence data of pathogens with pandemic potential, as well as the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising there from.”

    The document also called for “predictable, sustainable and sufficient financial, human logistic and technical technical resources” to fight pandemics, but warned “that unequal development across countries is a danger to us all.”
    The draft also warned about an “infodemic,” defined as “too much information, false or misleading information in digital and physical environments during a disease outbreak. It causes confusion and risk-taking behaviors that can harm health. It also leads to mistrust in health authorities and undermines public health and social measures.”

    • Part 2 of 4
      Corbett said such “intentionally confusing” wording gave the authors “wiggle room” yet raised important questions.
      “Who gets to decide what is false or misleading information? Well, of course, it is the very health authorities whose trust is undermined by the false information that they’re giving out, right?” he said.
      “That’s the snake eating its own tail.”

      The document identified a pandemic as “the global spread of a pathogen or variant that infects human populations with limited or no immunity through sustained and high transmissibility from person to person, overwhelming health systems, with severe morbidity and high mortality, and causing social and economic disruptions, all of which requires effective national and global collaborations and coordination for its control.”

      Corbett noted massive death was being restored to WHO’s definition of a pandemic, but added, “when they say pandemic, they mean something that requires and necessitates global government.”
      The document also called for an integrated, unifying “One Health approach” to “sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems…closely linked and interdependent”– language that suggested the treaty could encompass an extremely broad approach to global health.

      The agreement also mandated countries to have genomics labs to collect and share dangerous pathogens with each other under WHO’s auspices. Ness thought this arrangement could lead to the breakout of pandemics and hinder anyone being called to account for them.

      “One Health gives them the ability to collect lots of potential pandemic pathogens and have an excuse for when they get leaked from labs or deliberately spread,” she suggested.
      “You have the right to do all these very big things in society to prevent or reduce the effect of a pandemic, which could involve moving people around, locking them down, closing schools, who knows, forced vaccines, forced drugs, forced foods; we just don’t know what they want to do. But One Health provides that without actually saying so in the treaty.”

      The draft calls for amendments and actions to be made by “consensus” after the agreement was reached, which also concerns Ness.
      “They’re going to develop a new secretariat, a new big bureaucracy at the WHO to manage all this pandemic preparedness stuff. But once they have the Conference of the Parties, they want them to make their decisions, particularly when they’re adding annexes or protocols, by consensus,” she explained.

    • Part 3 of 4
      “To me, that means the diplomats are being given a pass…their vote will not be recorded. Nobody will know which side of the fence they were on, right? And nations, like the United States can just …[say] you can’t really go against consensus.”
      Ness said some commentators have noted the unusual amount of secrecy surrounding negotiations. She said the agreement requires two-thirds of countries to be ratified. Thereafter, amendments will require only 50% approval.
      “They’re likely to do a consensus procedure on them,” she theorized.
      “Just throw it all into the amendments, so the amendments do it all. And they can seal the treaty and call it good.”

      Corbett warned the agreement could evolve into a “grab bag…[a] giant, ongoing blank cheque that they can write themselves anything they want at any time in the future. All they have to do is secure this agreement.”
      WHO has May 2024 as the target date for a final agreement, Ness explained.
      “If nations do not reject last year’s amendments, the new amendments from 2024 will go into effect in 12 months and nations will have ten months to opt out of those amendments, if they so choose. But the treaty will, if that goes forward, only require that 40 nations ratify it, which can be done very quickly.”

      Ness asked what citizens can do before “their governments basically sell them down the river” and cede their sovereignty. Corbett replied the best option would be for governments to withdraw from being a WHO member state, though the lack of an enforcement mechanism could empower a leader to walk away.
      “Fundamentally, this comes down to some major political leader of some important state, the United States, or another country perhaps, putting their foot down and saying, ‘Nope, done, we’re out and do whatever you think you’re going to do, but you can’t come in and enforce it.’”

      Article 3.1, which had been crossed out in February, and restored in June, continued to affirm “full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons.”

    • Part 4 of 4
      Corbett said, “Take it for what it’s worth, which is not much.” He pointed out the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights has a giant “escape clause” in Article 29, which says, “These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.”
      In March, WHO Director-General Tedros said “No country will cede any sovereignty to WHO” and warned against “misinformation on social media and in the mainstream media.” He said, if “anyone at all is confused about what the pandemic accord is and isn’t, we would be more than happy to discuss it and explain it.”

      But Corbett said the accord’s architects are feeling the heat and treading carefully.
      “They are aware that just how deeply unpopular and how carefully they have to move on these types of things in order to secure their agreement. Once they have it in place, as I say, it’s the blank cheque that can write anything they want it for in perpetuity.”
      “That’s why they’re very carefully trying to inch up to it and trying to calm people, [saying], ‘Don’t worry. You still have your sovereignty, you still have your individual freedom.’”
      Corbett said the powers that be were trying to coax people into lazy lives of convenience and distraction instead of joining the “struggle.”
      “When people actually start taking action they can find meaning in their life. The reason you are unhappy is because you are not on the path you are meant to be on,” he said.
      “I think we are here to to make our mark on this world. And that’s why I’m so glad to be around people like yourself and others who are fighting for what is right. And let’s continue doing it. Let’s continue working and growing together.”
      ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~
      The Western Standard is an independent source of news and commentary fighting for a strong and free Western Canada,
      committed to the truth even when it hurts, and opposed to any government funding, regulation or intervention of the press.

Submit a Comment


Become a Corbett Report member