mRNA Vaccines for Livestock? – Questions For Corbett #097

by | Mar 2, 2023 | Questions For Corbett, Videos | 27 comments

Are mRNA vaccines being developed for livestock? You bet they are! So what does this mean? As usual, it depends who you ask. Find out the bad, the worse and the putrid of third generation vaccines and the future of food in this week’s edition of Questions For Corbett.

Watch on Archive / BitChute / Odysee / Rokfin / Rumble / Substack / Download the mp4


Bill Gates Vows To Pump mRNA Into Food Supply To ‘Force-Jab’ the Unvaccinated

Original video: Bill Gates and Penny Mordaunt launch the Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Security

Instagram post: someone’s friend’s neighbour’s cows died from mRNA vaccines

Report: mRNA vaccines may be injected into livestock

Healthfeedback funded by Meta/TikTok/Google Misrepresented 2018 clip of Bill Gates trigger inaccurate claims that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines for livestock could transfer to people through diet

Gates/Omidyar/US State Department-funding of International Fact-Checking Network

USA Today Fact check is an IFCN partner

USA Today Fact check: False claim about mandatory mRNA vaccines, deaths in Australian cattle

About AFP Fact Check

AFP Fact Check: Australian farmers not ‘forced to inject livestock with deadly mRNA vaccines’

AFP Fact Check: mRNA vaccine cannot transfer through meat consumption

NSW fast-tracks mRNA FMD and Lumpy Skin Disease vaccines

Novel Vaccine Technologies in Veterinary Medicine: A Herald to Human Medicine Vaccines


The Future of Livestock Vaccines

Big Pharma pushes to get farm animals off antibiotics and on vaccines

Bayer Partners with BioNTech to Develop mRNA Vaccines, Drugs for Animal Health

mRNA Vaccines in Livestock and Companion Animals are here now.


DNA vaccines in veterinary use

Veterinary biologics licensed in Canada

Paul Offitt: Can mRNA vaccines alter a person’s DNA?

The Future of Vaccines

mRNA Vaccines: Disruptive Innovation in Vaccination



  1. Anyone who says mRNA cannot be integrated into DNA has not taken a biology class since about 1992. Yes, when the HIV retrovirus mechanisms were being worked out, it was thought that the RNA virus itself needed to have the reverse transcriptase, but we have since learned that ALL cells in your body have the ENTIRE mechanism ( including reverse transcriptase ) for getting the RNA into the DNA – the only question is how much. For example, infants have a lot of the various mechanisms. So all the children we are injecting with various RNA technologies are the ones who will have their DNA the most affected. In adults it is the gonads cells and immune generation areas like bone marrow that have most of these mechanisms.

    And, all these arguments kind of miss the point, because our “genetics” is so much more than our DNA, and all these new technologies are affecting various parts of our huge genetic machinery. All these new technologies are gene therapies.

    • Well done, Shep. Now I don’t have to answer the Offitt pack of lies or ignorant baloney, whichever it is. Thanks. 😉

  2. Study published in PubMed, February 25, 2022:

    Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line

    From abstract:

    Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. […] Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.

  3. You might find this IBV vaccine for chickens looks a bit familiar:
    2nd furin cleavage sars
    Recombinant IBV vaccine
    Vaccine mutation

    Can the mRNA get integrated into your DNA?
    Well this study shows it takes a whopping 6hrs after injection for it to get reverse transcribed into DNA at least in liver cells:
    But there is no way that is going to get integrated into the chromosomes.
    Oh wait a 2021 study in the national academy of science showing the SARs-Cov2 RNA can be integrated integrated into the genome and expressed? So why would anyone suspect that the mRNA from the vaccine possibly could?

    • I was just about to look this study up. I have heard on podcasts several times over the past couple years Drs Peter McCullough, Robert Malone and several others talk about the “Swedish study” that showed mRNA reverse transcribing into DNA.

      Thank you for doing the heavy lifting xzbd.

  4. And if you are not a meat eater and you feel left out on all the genome contaminating, fertility annihilating, heart crippling, cancer encouraging mRNA fun, don’t worry they are working on lacing your food with synthetic mRNA too!

    “Plants as mRNA Factories for Edible Vaccines”

    “University of California-Riverside (UCR) researchers say they are studying whether they can turn edible plants like lettuce into mRNA vaccine factories.”


    This only serves to drive home the imperative of taking action to break from depending on the industrial food system and hyper-localizing your food production/purchasing so you can know exactly what is in the food you are putting in your body.

    One of the most valuable choices any of us can make right now is to consciously decide to discard all the excuses we have collected and take action to cultivate some food at home.

  5. Just how evil and involved with the evolutionary progress of humans is Gates??

    SCoPEx (Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment)

    Recently his Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (to depopulate the world) partnered up with Oxitec. They are working on a project called SCoPEx.

    Essentially the cover story is to create, through the use of genetically altered male mosquitoes, a “Planned Parenthood” effect. Releasing large amounts of male mosquitos into Florida swamps to create a genocide on the insects using a chemical in the males that works as a “day after” pill in humans. No testing to see if humans will be sterile after a mosquito bite.

    The males DNA or RNA, not sure which, will cause an abortive process in all female mosquitoes that get impregnated. They are to be or already have been released in Florida Everglades.

    The dark side to this is of course, when mosquitoes “bite” humans they are actually interacting with our blood supply not chomping on flesh. So the question here is will the genetically modified mosquito do a “Planned Parenthood” effect on humans, thus endangering our ability to birth??

    How does the son of eugenics advocate father, and the owner of a computer company, an unelected technocrat with no medical degree get ANY say in how to run global health policy? Dictating to the world the potential no mobility without a vaccine and proof of inoculation. Why isn’t this being questioned by anyone?
    – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
    Who the hell is Bill Gates??

    For a free pdf download or just watch a short video of mine on 2 years of research on the scamdemic…the fact that COVID NEVER existed, who set it up, the deadly “vaccination” etc.


  6. James is absolutely right about “The One Health Initiative” through USA Funding from the American Rescue Plan Act our livestock and wildlife are being targeted. The CDC, and FDA had No Problem Jabbing our children, does anyone think that they and the USDA care about the future of our food chain. We have to wake people up and stand against this evil empire for the sake of humanity and mother earth.

    • I agree.
      “The One Health Initiative” narrative will probably only become more widespread.
      It is lunacy such as this type of thing which concerns me.

  7. I’m new to James Corbett’s research journalism. I’ve been learning so much about what’s happening behind the “curtain”, it’s been mind boggling, I’ve already covered a lot of ground watching James documentaries, etc. I’m thankful to God to find such a trustworthy source as James Corbett!
    I’m also following another journalist, George Webb, who seems trustworthy. But today he spoke of major concerns regarding Robert Malone’s involvement with the production of virus-like particles which can be found in the air, food, drinking water and anywhere they deem necessary to make it appear a test positive for whichever virus they choose (link below).
    I’d be interested if anyone knows of this journalist George Webb and if he is a trustworthy source? And if others have concerns with Robert Malone’s credibility and if he is just playing the “good” guy?

    • Many have concerns. He has won major govt contracts over the years and been very close to govt as a result whatever that is worth. One chap JJ Couey ( I think he is an associate of Webb) has some pointed opinions. Says he was in line for govt contracts for therapeutics early on in the scamdemic and is basically making noise now because he missed out on his slice of the pie. Personally, I would question him merely on the basis that he has sued the Breggins for 10s of millions of dollars for defamation because ridiculous lawsuits to silence people in the same health freedom movement as you is what you do if you are after the truth. I find it ironic he is kinda famous for the line about truth being a lion, ripped off from many before him. In truth, from his own perspective, he should have said truth is like a lion, but a lame one that’s not very good at defending itself, and you may need to sue over it so it can stand up against any other animals that have different opinions. OK, I lost the metaphor there but you get the point.

    • Personally, with all “pundits”, I think that it is important to evaluate the message more than the messenger.
      “Intent” often is embedded within the messages one puts out.

  8. so i know this has been discussed several times among the community but James’ silence on the issue of virus existence really is deafening.
    James I would love to hear even a peep out of you. Ever. All your favored guests are likewise silent on the issue. Even those like Ryan who dived into it 2 years ago, found the arguments of Dr Kauffman compelling, and now does his best impression of crickets at night. Again, no discussion of why he changed his mind.
    I gave the benefit of the doubt rationalizing that you may claim that this simply isn’t in your lane, but let’s face it.. you do deep dives into vaccines and big pharma, and you have spoken of science being your first love at tertiary level. If the cornerstone underlying science that begets vaccines and a huge part of the biosecurity state narrative is false, then SURELY this is something you must have AN OPINION on. Even enough to simply have someone like Mark Bailey on for a show??
    I know I am just one voice in your community, but I have put this to you as a potential #QFC and I have also mentioned to you by email, where you responded to my first email, and then ignored the subsequent reply where I put the issue of virus existence to you.
    Personally, I find the logical fallacies used in virus isolation to tell a compelling story about where the truth lies. I would love to hear a counterargument to what team ‘no virus’ has to say.
    If I presume too much I apologize and can only say I am at least frustrated with your lack of interest in this, again, foundational issue. I would welcome you ripping me to shreds for my naivety as you have done recently with the odd Corbett community member if this was to come with some sharing of your opinion – whatever that may be.

    • I think JC is more of a generalist who examines paradigm stuff rather than minutia which I think is a good strategy for preventing division. Humans tend to think in binary patterns and if someone doesn’t believe as they believe can tune out and see the other as an enemy when it’s completely normal for people to think and believe differently.

      I’m glad he keeps some things to himself, including his personal beliefs and other topics that may be considered divisive by audiences. He has a right to not share everything in his mind, IMO.

      Maybe he’s waiting to hear a debate or discussion between knowledgeable people in the field of genetics and molecular biology who discuss first principals and debate point by point using research studies virus by virus (or alleged virus). I’d pay to go to such a seminar or debate but it’s not happened yet, so I have not formalized an opinion one way or the other only to say both sides have valid points.

      • cu,h.j

        Hey, as a medical type do you have any opinion of THIS, Dr John Campbell reading a Danish study that shows 9% of people had RNA in their blood 28 days after vaccination.

        Apparently the discovery was a bi-product of another study.

        • Interesting, I was listening to him discuss this and will have to read the study and let you know. It’s pretty alarming if it’s true that something in the injection can hang around that long.

          I’ll check it out and get back to you.

        • I found the study referenced and here’s a brief synopsis:

          It was a small sample size, so it’s hard to make generalizations. However, I’ve seen many people with weird side effects after getting the jab and if this stuff hangs around, could affect the body in negative ways. The risk of genetic vaccines which as far as I know has not been done on a massive scale far outweighs the potential benefits. Which is one of the reasons why I have not been jabbed and won’t be jabbed.

          I have seen people with really weird side effects like strange heart rhythm abnormalities, increased frequency of illnesses, autoimmune issues (low platelet counts related to new onset autoimmune disorder), and other strange neurological symptoms like numbness and weakness in limbs and this would make sense if stuff in this vaccine stay in the body long enough to cause problems. So, it seems to make sense to me, that if this toxic stuff is lingering in the body could cause problems for people.

          Dr. Campbell mentions injection technique and I think that it may be pertinant to increase in side effects. If the injected material is injected into a blood vessel, this can cause systemic effects and cause spike protein in places it would not ordinarily be located like the brain and blood vessels.

  9. Is that their Q and A for subscribers? I haven’t checked it out. Worth the investment?

  10. Here is a moving conversation between Sucharit Bhakti and Pascal Najadi about the criminal charges being brought against government and Pfizer. At around 35 minutes, Prof. Bhakti talks about how they are rolling out mRNA jabs for livestock to replace older treatments, which means that even if they stop using them for people, the manufacturers will still enjoy great profits. He cites sources that show that mRNA and spike proteins aside, the lipid nanoparticles themselves have been shown to be deadly, and that therefore no product using this toxic ‘packaging’ will ever be safe. He also talks about how proper trials are now admitted never to have been done before the rollout. Meanwhile Najadi has it in writing from the horse’s mouth that it is not possible to measure the dose of the jabs, and as the adage goes, the dose makes the poison.

  11. Seems like a waste of time, viruses don’t exist. Why keep chasing their lies? We need to get the word out to the masses so people start to learn the truth, so people stop accepting their lies upon lies upon lies.

    Also if you need someone to explain the research documents, Dr. Mark Bailey, Dr. Andrew Kaufman or Dr Tom Cowan are just some of the people who could explain it for everyone, And they are all solution oriented for health. They would be good to have on solutions watch for people not relying on the government for their healthcare.

  12. First rule…

    W.W.T.F.C.S. Mantra
    W.W.T.F.C.S. Mantra
    W.W.T.F.C.S. Mantra
    …with gregorian chant harmony.

  13. Great QFC James. I like the way you wrapped things up too, showing how the ‘quacks’ and the fact checkers cancel each other out.

    Change that to:
    “Additionally, this vaccine platform allows Big Pharma to make tons of money.”

    Am I the only one who sees a common thread forming here?
    “You veel eat zee bugs because you veel be too scared sheetless to eat zee cows. And you veel be happy! Hehehe”

    At the end of the day…
    as James says “Is it dangerous”?

    Speaking about bugs…
    As of today, I would be more concerned about getting bitten by a mosquito who just bit my neighbour who is quadruple boosted than by eating mRNA jabbed cattle.

Submit a Comment


Become a Corbett Report member