Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
via RealityCheckRadio: Award-winning investigative journalist James Corbett from The Corbett Report beams in from Japan to talk about COP28 (Conference of the Parties) which was recently held in Dubai. James and Paul discuss the globalist influencers there who are driving policy and events.
Watch on Archive / BitChute / Odysee / Rokfin / Rumble / Substack / Download
SHOW NOTES:
Paul Brennan Breakfast
“…And Then There Were None” – FLNWO #41
“Global warming” search on The Corbett Report
“America’s Biggest Owner Of Farmland Is Now Bill Gates” from New World Next Week
Meet Maurice Strong: Globalist, Oiligarch, “Environmentalist”
“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.” – The First Global Revolution (Club of Rome)
Exploding the Malthusian, Anti-Human One Health Myth on CHD TV
“The software of life. That’s how Stephane Bancel, the chief executive officer of Moderna, described messenger RNA (mRNA), which is at the core of Moderna’s drug development process.” – From “Moderna Partners with AWS to Explore the ‘Software of Life’”
Are There Limits to Growth? – Questions For Corbett #077
The Ultimate Resource by Julian Simon
Humans Could Face Reproductive Crisis As Sperm Count Declines, Study Finds
Stupid Conspiracy Theorists! Chemicals Aren’t Turning The Frogs GAY!!
Information on “Conference of the Parties”: THIS is How Global Government is Run (and What’s Coming Next…)
Episode 106 – Meet Henry Kissinger
Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making by David Rothkopf
Whitney Webb regularly mentions that Eric Schmidt was named by Kissinger as his “heir”, but I’m not sure where she sources that from.
It is important to understand no matter what “new” spin is put on things, the truth is still:
Humanity is at war for survival of the species as we know it.
The DEEP STATE is just a re-naming of the Illuminati who have been around since the inception of our nation (Skull&Bones, etc.)
At work today: UN Agenda 21&2030; UN Wildlife Project; The New World Order Agenda, and other nefarious agendas.
ALL part of the planned reduction of the population under 24/7 track, trace, and data basing living in 5G SMART cities, no private vehicles, no access to the country side, most on the Government dole, forced to obey any laws or regulations put out by the Government to maintain the dole.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – –
A few of the 45 Communist Goals from nearly 60 years ago that are quite successful in their goal of taking down our Republic (searchable):
Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963 EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments,editorial writing, policy-making positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.” 40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
Also…
Zbigniew Brzezinski Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era (written 50 years ago)
“People, governments and economies of all nations must serve the needs of multinational banks and corporations.”
“The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values.
“Shortly, the public will be unable to reason or think for themselves. They’ll only be able to parrot the information they’ve been given on the previous night’s news.”
– – – – – – – – – – – – – -
A video I had on the web 17 years ago, a bit naive now but still the truth…
SOMETHING HAPPENING
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZzKZ04YstjTx/
ej
Those 45 goals that you refer to go much further back than 60 years.
There are so many today who you would think should know what is going on, but
instead, ones like T. Carlson, P.C. Roberts, Rockwell and many others continually
ask; “What’s really going on?” or something to that effect. And they claim to be Christians. They will use words like Demonic, Satanic, Diabolic along with many others of the like and throw in the words good, (God), and evil, (Devil) somewhere along the way. But wouldn’t Christians know what their God Christ has told them?
Don’t they read His Word and with His Spirit to guide them, understand what He is telling them? Wouldn’t they believe what He says?
You said; “Humanity is at war for survival as a species”. I think you should have put the period after the word survival and left off “as a species.” because God’s word clearly says that “unless those days were shortened there should no flesh be saved.” No Flesh. Notta. None.
You are absolutely right about the War. But it is absolutely NOT about CONTROL. It about total annihilation. The war is between God Christ and that Dragon, the old Serpent which is the Devil and Satan.
Christs’ warning to His people was about the Devil and his works. His works are his lies and his murder done by his children. And if his works are not stopped there would no flesh be saved. It’s not about control except to accomplish the main goal of murdering every human being on the planet because Satan knows that he has but a short time.
Even (science so called) says that eventually the world will be consumed by the sun. So much for control.
But words and comments like mine will not be welcomed or agreed with by most because most do not want to believe what is staring them in the face. I doubt if you and I could ever list all the excuses and alternatives that are come up with by those who “think” they know the truth and honestly believe that the world can be saved and brought back to peace and tranquility.
The first lie was, “Ye shal not surly die.” The first murder was when Cain murdered Able. That was the first battle of the War you spoke of. It has been going on ever since and will continue until Satan is destroyed along with all of his.
We are all involved, like it or not. There is no neutral zone. No gray area. It’s either Light/Truth, or Dark/False.
There is so much more that could be said, but I guess this would not be the proper place.
I really like all the work that James, James and the others do here and much of their info is helpful and enlightening, but unless one knows what is truly going on, it’s of little use to them in the long run.
Of all the things you listed in your comments this one, ““Shortly, the public will be unable to reason or think for themselves.”, is already all but fully accomplished. And I think you know that in your heart of hearts.
joebear
ej
Very impressive video.
joebear
Thank you.
“Democracy” if and when it actually exists is Mob Rule, or as Ben Franklin is said to have put it: Democracy is three (or more) wolves and less Sheep Voting to decide what’s for dinner.
In a properly formed Republic, Local Government has priority and the State is only delegated those powers that Local governments allow them to have.
Every County (there are 83 in Michigan) in the united States as we know it, has a County Government that has locally elected Commissioners, Sheriff, County Prosecutor, an a number of other locally elected “Representatives”.
When created, the Original Unincorporated United States government was only deleted 28 powers which included doing only those things that local governments could not do for themselves. The Central Government was created by the Free and Independent States as a means to combine resources so as to be able to repel European invasion, and it worked well for a while.
If we go back to “The War of 1812” whereby, after Britain defeated Neapolitan and the Original 13the Amendment to the United States Constitution was Ratified, British troops invaded the United States Capital and Burned it to the ground. It is thought by many, including myself, that the Original 13th Amendment which excluded Lawyers (BAR) members from holding any public Office was the reason for the invasion. ( Can you imagine No Lawyers acting as Judges, or as Representatives of the People?) Anyway, in the Treaty of 1815 which ended the “War of 1812” in the States with Britain, it was agreed that British Corporate Courts could exist along side the Natural Law Courts and effectively nullified the 13th Amendment. By signing this Treaty before Andrew Jackson defeated the British at the mouth of the Mississippi River, they left the door open for the British Oligarchs to take control because they could remain above the Law in their Corporate Court System.
If only they had waited a few days till Andrew Jackson had won the Battle of New Orleans there would have been no need for any concessions to the British. But then, who would have thought that a rag-tag army of 2500 men with only 1300 guns could defeat 10,000 of the best trained military in the world? My guess is that they signed that Treaty in 1815 because they feared 10,000 British Troops were on their way up the Mississippi.
Anyway, If one was to look up the 12th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (ratified June 15,1804), one would see that there was no such thing as a “National Clown Show”. The People voted for House Representatives based on Congressional Districts (as the do now) however, U.S. Senators were Chosen by State Legislatures, then the Senate would vote for a President and V.P. with the President getting the most votes and the V.P. getting the second most votes. (none of this “pick your partner in crime” that goes on today. Add the Original 13th Amendment (papered over in 1865) and you have pretty damn good system of government. However without that Amendment the Oligarchs were able to get their “people” (sleaze bags) into positions of power whereby they Pretended to Represent the People of Districts in a State while actually selling them out. This is how they were able to create the conflicts that created the War Between the States in 1860. It worked for the Oligarchs then, and if nothing else they do study history and are likely following the same MO of Divide and Concur.
I hope we can unite against them as we make the power of Government Local.
Sorry to just be getting back to you. New email app issues.
1st of all, for me your comment is difficult to read because of the lack of paragraphs. The small type turns into a block of black text.
2nd, I don’t engage in any conversation that uses Christian speak as I do not believe in any of those myths about evil, devil, heaven, etc.
BLUES IN THE PULPIT (song)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/q8ZG6femxLgj/
I appreciate simple words and comments that children can understand rather then long ramblings 🙂
Thanks
IMO it is about gaining control over Nature, while, of course, making some fat profits. Conquering Nature mean conquering Time — the zillionaires are in mortal fear of leaving behind all their amassed loot and delighted at getting to play God.
Tha abolition of Time, Nature and Woman. Artificial consciousness, artificial food, artificial wombs,..
My bet on the mechanism for positive change is STARLINK, an unregulated, uncontrollable worldwide communciation system of peer-peer. People will begin to realize that they have more in common with each other than those who pretend to protect and provide for them by use of the initiation of deadly force, threats, fraud, e.g., politicians, bureaucrats, law enforcers, courts. I predict we will see the slow decline in “The Most Dangerous Superstition” (Larken Rose) and the rise of individualism, voluntarism.
J.C.: Next time you talk to someone “down under” ask about the adoption of PV/battery energy plants.
@Voluntaryist
Optimistic, however…
Considering he has put up 15,000 satellites already and wants to double that number, I would question just how much “positive change” can be predicted when the controllers of our world are seeking 24/7 track, trace, and data basing of a highly reduced population??
I don’t trust Musk. His big agenda in buying X was to free it of the nanny state censorship yet it continues?? Corporate Kabuki at work.
“If you want to see what is planned for you, look to China today.”
David Icke
@Voluntaryist
Do you share Musk’s enthusiasm for transhumanism, genetic modification of humans and synthetic mRNA injections?
I have noticed a trend where many people have begun putting Elon Musk on some pedestal (championing him as a sort of “savior archetype”) because he bought twitter, he says he is gonna take people to Mars, launches lots of rockets into orbit and claims to value ‘free speech’.
Personally, I do not know the man, so I can only go by what Musk says, and how he spends his money (publicly), but just from that what I see, he appears to be a man full of fear, ego and hubris.
Elon Musk is a proponent of transhumanism, he spends billions in an effort to find a way to make brain machine interface tech work by implanting microchips in mammal’s brains to allow for an interface between smart devices, the internet, AI and the human brain. He also spends billions creating big messy controlled petroleum explosions to get rich people and microwave emitting 5G satellites into space, which are detrimental to the well being of many organisms on Earth (while also aspiring to use that same archaic rocket tech to colonize Mars). We are talking about dilapidated rocket tech is basically a smoothed out version of 100 year old technology (that was invented by Wernher von Braun). If Musk is such a genius, why is he using that type of archaic tech when military contractors and active covert military operations have been using electrogravitic propulsion systems for decades now?
But I digress…
Another concern I have about Musk (and pretty much every other billionaire that is a vocal transhumanist) is that he has openly stated he champions synthetic mRNA products stating these pharmaceutical products are capable of “Turning Someone Into a Butterfly or Reversing Aging”. He has also stated “Synthetic mRNA Is Like a Computer Program” and he thinks that is a good thing (which should be expanded upon). He has described how he feel that some kind of mRNA (and/or some kind of DNA based/gene editing) injections and transhumanist brain machine interface tech (see: Neuralink) can allow him to cheat death and make artificially augmented ‘super humans’.
Let us for a moment assume that he (or any of his oligarch peers like Peter Thiel, Jeff Bezos and/or Larry Fink) can actually succeed in the deluded ambitions they espouse (some of which I described above). Are these really the types of aspirations you want for your children? Is a world filled with cyborgs building space ships to abandon our Mother Earth when she needs us most the type of future you want to contribute towards making a reality?
For me personally, that is definitely not the vision I aspire to co-create as our shared future on the Earth (nor beyond it).
(continued in another comment..)
(..continued from the comment above)
I do not have anything against Elon as a person. We are all imperfect beings, I do not claim my way or my path is better or more deserving than the path he has chosen, but I certainly do not see him (not any other politician or billionaire) as some kind of brave or wise leader figure that is worthy of my admiration. While in the context of billionaires, according to some, he appears to be “the lesser of two (or rather dozens) of ‘evils’ ” that does not mean I would invest my time, energy, hope nor faith in him or his endeavors.
Elon is one among a number of dominant individuals and institutions in the human world that have created systems around us that are nudging us to look outward for purpose, guidance and fulfillment. These entities promise us an ‘easy’ high tech utopian life with less (mental and physical) effort, all we have to do is give up our humanity and conform to ‘the new normal’. They promise us that the centralization of food, energy, education, pharmaceuticals, taxation, communication and enforcement systems will keep us ‘safe’ and ‘happy’.
It is my opinion that these are the promises of deluded, ignorant and fearful humans, as well as promises being offered by a smaller number of malicious predators and apathetic parasites. From what I sense of the current trajectory of dominant institutions it appears that the cost one will pay for buying what they are selling will be their autonomy, their Humanity and their individual uniqueness. They will pay this toll slowly, spanning a lifetime of mental, digital, biological and financial slavery. The substance that makes up their shackles in this new form of slavery will be made up of their physical dependency, their infantilized minds, their access to their bank accounts and their always leaning into the false hope that someone else (in some high up position of influence/finance/strength) will do the hard work for them/us to create a better future.
We have all been conditioned to latch onto the comforting (and infantilizing) idea that someone other than themselves is going to solve their/our problems for them/us.
Elon Musk is but one of several transhumanist figures that are being offered (and/or offering themselves) to fill the void left by that conditioned psychological dependency at this present time. These are just humans beings that have capitulated to an irrational fear of death and conceded to the wants and motivations of the ego.
Starlink is just a collection of human technology that is being controlled by a specific human (or group of humans) and while it may be semi-unregulated / peer to peer for some at this point, that could change very quickly. It is also a means for the militarization of space, which is, in my opinion, a horrible idea all around.
@Voluntaryist
Could you elaborate on the part about “PV/battery energy plants.” please?
Do those plants depend on lithium based battery tech?
Is there ever any example of spontaneous order not creating some form of rank and leadership to maintain order?
I am of the opinion that we need just laws and just enforcement of those laws to maintain civil society. Men are basically evil and when sentence upon an unjust work is not executed speedily, men become fully set to do greater evil and evil men will band together to organize a force to take the produce of peaceful men that have no organized force.
No, men are not basically evil. It’s a preposterous idea in it’s own right.
Great Paul and James. Partic Ozzie Brock, amazing how much, much more interesting and appealing g to wathch with vision. Cheers
Thanks for calling out the seed cartels (and their role in hyper-consolidating control of our food supply) James.
As I have said before, I consider saving (sharing and growing out) heirloom seeds as an act of sabotage as it throws a monkey wrench into the machinery of the global corporatocracy (that wants to own all seed, buying out and shut down the small family owned companies, patent what they can and perpetually profit from their false claims of owning intellectual rights to the genetic fabric of life).
For a cross section of data showing what the corporate seed take over looked like as of 2020:
https://web.archive.org/web/20221109004520/https://farmersfootprint.us/2020/04/07/seeds/?fbclid=IwAR1uubdE4Isg-IOkzAr6aCuyDbkYDG2QZthz6ZbfrQ8WPfxZok18cyj-L2E
In the interview Paul asked something like “what is the problem with agriculture?”
First of all there is a difference between industrial monocultures and responsible farming and there is a huge difference between modern GMO farming and Food Forest farming.
Thus, if you want to talk about farming with polycultures and mixed grazing animals or Food Forest farming as “agriculture”, I say there is no problem with it and it can theoretically even benefit the environment/ecosystems and not degrade them.
However, if we are talking about “Agriculture” as in plowing the land to plant a monoculture. Here is one response to that question that I do feel warrants serious consideration.
The following is an excerpt from “Bright Green Lies : How The Environmental Movement Lost It’s Way and What We Can Do About It” ( 2021) by Derrick Jensen, Lierre Keith and Max Wilbert
“Twelve thousand years ago, the war against the earth began. In nine places,2 people started to destroy the world by taking up agriculture. Understand what agriculture is: In blunt terms, you take a piece of land, clear every living thing off it—ultimately, down to the bacteria— and then plant it for human use. Make no mistake: agriculture is biotic cleansing.
That’s not agriculture on a bad day, or agriculture done poorly.
That’s what agriculture actually is: the extirpation of living communities for a monocrop of humans. As geologist David R.
Montgomery points out, agricultural societies “last 800 to 2,000
years … until the soil gives out.”
The name for this diminishment is drawdown, and agriculture is in
essence a slow bleed-out of soil, species, biomes, and ultimately the process of life itself. Vertebrate evolution has come to a halt for lack of habitat. With habitat taken by force and kept by force, Iowa alone uses the energy equivalent of 4,000 Nagasaki bombs every year.
Agriculture is the original scorched-earth policy, which is why permaculturist Toby Hemenway and environmental writer Richard Manning have written the same sentence: “Sustainable agriculture is an oxymoron.” To quote Manning at length: “No biologist, or anyone else for that matter, could design a system of regulations that would make agriculture sustainable. Sustainable agriculture is an oxymoron. It mostly relies on an unnatural system of annual grasses grown in a monoculture, a system that nature does not sustain or even recognize as a natural system. We sustain it with plows, petrochemicals, fences, and subsidies, because there is no other way to sustain it.”
(continued in another comment..)
(..continued from the comment above)
Agriculture is what creates the human pattern called civilization.
Civilization is not the same as culture—all humans create culture. A
culture is, broadly, the set of customs, traditions, and values
particular to a group of people. Civilization is the word for one
specific way of life: people living in cities. Most definitions of city
reference permanence, population density, and division of labor as a city’s salient features. Rarely stated is the reality of people living in numbers large enough to require the importation of resources: city dwellers need more than the land can give. Food, water, and energy have to come from somewhere else.
From that point forward, it doesn’t matter what lovely, peaceful values people hold in their hearts. The society is dependent on imperialism and genocide because no one willingly gives up their land, their water, their trees. But since the city has used up its own, it has to go out and get those from somewhere else. That’s the last 10,000 years in a few sentences.
Over and over and over, the pattern is the same. There’s a bloated
power center surrounded by conquered colonies, from which the
center extracts what it wants, until eventually it collapses. The conjoined horrors of militarism and slavery begin with agriculture. Agricultural societies end up militarized—and they always do—for three reasons. First, agriculture creates a surplus, and if it can be stored, it can be stolen. So the surplus needs to be protected. The people who do that are called soldiers.”
————————————
Now it is worth noting that the authors of that book I just shared an excerpt from are “global warming” and conventional “climate change” model believers and they also espouse other beliefs which I do not share. That being said, they make some solid points and I try not to throw the baby out with the bath water, so I shared that here to spark meaningful discussion (despite their misguided, misinformed and deluded ideas about carbon emissions which are expressed elsewhere in that book).
They are describing the act of waging war against nature. Being waged by lunatics with only bare bones short term survival in mind.
@mkey
In all fairness, I doubt that the people living a few millennia ago (who for the most part were surrounded in dense ancient forests) could have imagined that their choice to begin chopping down little areas of that forest, plowing/tilling the land and planting one species of plant could have resulted in a runaway chain reaction of greed and shortsightedness leading to our present day situation (a situation where most soil specialists agree that we have about 50 harvests left worth of soil in our main agricultural zones).
However, now we have metrics to measure the soil erosion, the desertification, the decimation of the essential soil life, the consecutive annual decreases in crops nutrition grown in dead soil using synthetic fertilizers. We know what we are doing, we have no excuse.
The choice to stay the path of our industrialized chemical dependent monoculture farming is essentially a choice to sacrifice the lives of our great grandchildren so we can have it a bit easier today.
Short term survival and long term survival can be achieved through emulating a functioning ecosystem in how we design food cultivation systems. It is a time tested method that has served ancient cultures all over the world well for millennia.
The cold hard truth is this, those that make excuses for our current way of producing food and go with the momentum of the quick fix high tech utopia propaganda (lining up at the grocery store to get “food” that has passed between five middlemen in-between them and the farmer by swiping little pieces of plastic and moving around data on the computer, aka “money”) will learn the hard way what it takes to feed oneself when this whole system implodes (and/or the digital social credit/CBDC gulag comes online).
Thanks for the comment.
For some historical data on what “agriculture” has done for soils all over the world and how the decision to mine soil and extract from it (via tilling) rather than give back to it through reciprocity led to the fall of some of the greatest empires on Earth:
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations – David R. Montgomery
https://content.ucpress.edu/pages/10599/10599.ch01.pdf
Well, I didn’t really imply going back that far in my assessment, but you know what they say about best intentions. I am very often reminded of that saying. Its meaning used to be very cryptic to me, but not any longer, no sir. The consequences can be clearly seen every day.
For example, my late granma was making terrific jam with 40% added sugar. She would not even consider the notion of poisoning her grandkids, of course not, but that is what she was de fact doong. She had the best intentions, of course.
The lunatics I referred to are obiquitous in our day and age. People completely stuck in “gotta eat something” mode. Their minds are completely mired in survival/consumption mode. The stupider and more obdurate they get, their propensity to question will grow less and less. After decades they will exhaust themselves and get weak and miserable and will seek pills to help them extend the misery.
People have a knack for sticking with something that has been done a certain way for a while without questioning fittness for a particular application. It might have something to do with the “do as I say” upbringing.
You know that story about daughter asking her mother why does she cut off the ends of the ham before baking?
@mkey
Yes true, I was just tryna give those ancient mule driving field plowers that were likely just tryna feed their family in many cases the benefit of the doubt (as I do not think it is helpful to demonize people that had used degenerative farming methods). Rather my intent with sharing info (such as is expressed in the quote above) is to shine a light onto the dead end of one potential pathway, so those who are motived can realize the need to choose a different path.
What you say about “the best intentions” is very true. Well said.
Thanks for clarifying regarding the “lunatics”.
“minds completely mired in survival/consumption mode” Indeed.
Here in Canada the people in that mode are now being literally corralled like livestock in the big grocery stores now. It all started in the name of being “safe and effective” with the scamdemic of course, but now has been made a permanent aspect of the shopping experience.
They have these big metal re-inforced cattle corralling style fences (some with smash-proof re-inforced Plexiglas doubled layered and 8 feet high so you can’t jump through the slots or overtop) as you walk into the store (and as you leave) with about 27 cameras positioned on all angles so that they will definitely be able to get a facial recognition lock as you walk through the little remote controlled door thing that opens as you enter.
They cannot see where the corralled life they are choosing is headed, with their heads always looking down at little glowing screens, they can’t see the writing on the wall.
All it will take is bringing a social credit score system online with some kind of CBDC and that gate will be able to keep out those ‘undesirable dissident types’ and ‘dangerous anti-vaxxers’.
The nutrition levels and flavor in the mass produced food keeps descreasing and the stranglehold of the plutocrats on the central food system tightens. People who have never taken the time to grow or preserve their own food are so much like the frog in the water slowly heating. I do what I can to educate and empower those willing to get their hands dirty, but a sizable chunk of the population are determined to remain passive consumers of mass produced food. Nothing I can do for such people except pray.
I do not know that story about daughter asking her mother why does she cut off the ends of the ham before baking. Could you elaborate on it please.
Thanks for the comment.