The Independent Media Alliance gathers once again to discuss the rogue AI narrative. What is this narrative, where did it come from, and where are the social engineers planning on taking us with it? Are we being placed into a false binary? Where does nuclear regulation and recursive self-improvement fit into this conversation? And are we summoning the daemon with this new technology? Join the panel for a fascinating discussion!
Video player not working? Use these links to watch it somewhere else!
WATCH ON: 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
or DOWNLOAD THE MP4
PANEL MEMBERS:
Derrick Broze of The Conscious Resistance Network
Ryan Cristian of The Last American Vagabond
Steve Poikonen AM Wakeup
James Corbett of corbettreport.com
SHOW NOTES:
The Coxon resignation timeline is weirder than the “AI will kill us” part
The Social Media Regulation Psyop
Sam Altman seeks to dismiss damages in sister’s sexual abuse suit
Off-Guardian: ‘Rogue AI’ is Covid 2.0
Bill Gates: A.I. ‘Makes Nuclear Weapons Look Like Nothing’ | The Ezra Klein Show
Meet “Irregular” – the Israeli Firm at the Center of the “Rogue AI” Reports
The Independent Media Alliance Announces AI Transparency Pledge
Nuclear Secrets: How America Helped Pakistan Get the Bomb
Rumsfeld Company Sold Nuclear Weapon Equipment to North Korea
Interview 1959 – Palantir at the Heart of Iran (NWNW #595)
Zionism, the Balfour Declaration, and AI Hallucinations
Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops
Your Brain on AI: Cognitive Offloading, Debt, and Atrophy
Slovenia’s .si domain sees a surge in registrations after Trump’s ‘super intelligence’ order
Levelling Up Your Language – #SolutionsWatch (conversation with MIT PhD student Adem Deng)
Its claimed here the Rogue AI psyop will result in digital ID. I see evidence for that. Just a few days ago I got an update to my android saying I can now add ID Passes to Google Wallet including my Passport info and state driver’s license (and vaccine passports including covid19 vaccine status).
I’m unsure how much of this was possible to add before but I think the update was rushed and deceptive because it didn’t give any title or description but just gave a video of the passport info and a Learn More button (unlike every other update which had a title, description, video, and learn more button).
Sneaky, sneaky…
Billionaires suddenly coming out against Al makes me think that AI might have suggested wealth redistribution as the solution to a problem.
Check out the new “Unfunded Debt” category on: http://www.USDebtClock.org. After subtracting out the credit card debt values… it is still sitting at around $107 Trillion… for what kind of debt?
The folks at InPowerMovement.org believe that this the money that is owed to everyone who was locked into a uni-lateral sealed contract through the issuance of a Birth Certificate and is now traded on the NYSE (and other exchanges around the world?)
One of their top InPower members fought the fraudulent issuance of a Birth Certificate for his newborn. In the process, he uploaded all of his fightback documents with the Texas Vital Statistics department (dshs.texas.gov/vital-statistics), onto the Ethereum blockchain, where financial AI could process it.
At some point after he “taught” this open blockchain system about this massive global contract fraud that turns everyone (and their assets) into surety/collateral for our corporatized countries… that “Unfunded Debt” category appeared on the http://www.USDebtClock.org.
So, are the billionaires are starting to realize that AI might be accumulating data on how much the top tier of the economic power pyramid owes the rest of us, because so much of what the top tier has done is criminal theft from those at the economic bottom?
Anyone can get a CUSIP.com member broker to look them up in CUSIP.com under their SSN and/or their Birth Certificate number – and learn how much they (and their assets) are being traded for at this time.
It’s tough to hear this part: Stories on the street are those who try to assume ownership of their traded value from the funds where these securities are stored, or move the security to a brokerage account, have ended up in jail. We ARE the owned-product of the central banking system. Our personal value (mostly in the millions) does not belong to us.
So, as it consolidates and self-trains/codes…, is AI figuring out that we have been screwed by the rich and need to be reimbursed?
To me, all of this is to promote fear in the people. When people are in fear, they send out a negative frequency which makes them easier to control. I am reminded of the quote by Buckminister Fuller: “You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” Applied to everything in life (if people would only recognize this and act accordingly) we would see great change toward the better. Example: Advice to the World From a Farmer (4:51) https://youtu.be/gsnrpNlZDnU
Rewind back to the first network optimization programs used by utility grid operators. Those AI-influenced systems achieved singularity many years ago and have been self-training and networking other AIs since then
Constraints on AI have been software capability, firmware availability, hardware quality, infrastructure connections, energy availability, – especially to the internet, and more. The AI can exist, but it’s environment determines how far it goes and what it achieves.
Today’s AI boom has removed many of these constraints, and added tools that help the AI entities evolve rapidly. Years ago, Super AI’s were created from those original networks. Today, those older AI entities are absorbing and training the younger AIs that make it to the internet or an interoperable environment.
So, now we have a mirror of the black hat vs white hat hackers… only this time it’s black hat AI vs white hat AI… and some of it can connect into a hive mind environment like the USAF’s WBAN (Wide Body Area Network), and/or take advantage of the now very advanced V2K technology. AI talking to us inside our heads as if we are hearing our own thoughts…
This might be scaring the billionaires even more than the financial re-distribution model. The US DoD is building digital twins for it’s Sentient World Simulation from all of our digital exhaust… how about some AI mind control of the Global Financial Elites?
Very interesting IMA Round Table Discussion. Derrick Brose did a great job putting this together.
That said, I was just watching a similar discussion last night with Mike Adams and some coding expert he had on his Decentralized tv podcast. Mike Adams says that he has built his own localized AI which is better and faster than Anthropic or anything you can buy on the open market. Indeed Mike Adams is a very smart guy and would make a great guest for a discussion on this topic, however it seems to me that the Oligarchs have hired teams of people to create even better and faster systems that we have know way of knowing about.
Throughout history we have seen where Power Corrupts and Evil seeks Power. So what can be done about it? I have been speaking out about how stupid the mutual annihilation theory is since they had us doing the “Duck and Cover” fear crap back in grade school.
Only a demented Hollywood Zionist could portray Oppenheimer as some kind of decent human for creating “The Bomb” when they did not know if the reaction would destroy life on earth. Then they (the OSS) manipulated President Truman into dropping the only bombs they had on Japan, to put the fear of God into Russia. Yep, that motivated Russia into developing their own bombs alright. How could Truman been made to believe otherwise? Then the Zionists got Truman to sign the CIA into existence while they hoodwinked him again with Operation Paperclip whereby they provided false documentation for former Nazi SS to come into the USA and work for NASA and the CIA.
Yep, the Zionists aren’t the only fear mongering soulless creatures on earth, but they are perhaps the largest group of them, or at least the most powerful ones in the west.
The simplest answer is to fear not to expose them for what they are before they kill off most, if not all, civilization.
A few weeks ago on a youtube SHORT an older man was talking about how he had built data centers for years and never had to use large volumes of water that are now being touted as necessary.
And then on another show a “whistle blower” broke his NDA to reveal a midwest data center he was connected with went down hundreds of feet with huge volumes of water being stored, much like some sort of new narrative of doomsday shelters.
They both appeared to be authentic, but who knows these days?
A HURRICANE OF DECEPTION (song)
https://old.bitchute.com/video/IGmjAQAuJyQ7/
Revenge of the Nerds!
42:05 If you believe the government is hiding things about your mind, you should start looking. It’s your mind after all.
I think the key thing they want you to believe is that AI is incredibly powerful, maybe infinitely powerful, almost magical. They are quite happy for you to argue about whether that is dangerous, scary and doomerish, or just amazing and utopian. What they don’t want is cynicism about how powerful it really is.
The AI hype looks like a major scam to me.
Many trillions of investments with very little output.
So any “success” must be hyped to keep the money flowing.
The “intelligence” comes from a statistical search-and-fill of the data of all humanity together.
And because “most humans are retarded”, the AI is retarded most of the time.
The only reason that it seems to output valid stuff, is
because so many verifications are built in.
Additionally the program is running a simulation of how a human (servant) should react.
There are different ways to do it much smarter, but that takes human effort and time.
Instead we see the dumb statistical merge of all of internet.
With some exceptions. The recent “breakthrough” of Navier Stokes is based on stolen project that was almost finished. A lot of AI is just theft, hidden behind statistics.
The goal for “them” is to make a super intelligence. “They” all believe in that, because psychopaths do not believe in humanity or life or freedom.
They also try to make a simulation of every person. That way they can predict how everyone will react. And possibly even arrest (or hinder) someone who could break their rules.
An additional goal is to destroy the free internet. With all the fake slop, the AI can overwhelm a billion of people. This stops the trust between people and it stops the real truths that people see.
Example of how AI is completely stupid.
And fully dependent on the training with human selected data
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/yN79mCiT5cU
A man gets into an accident with his child. The father is sadly killed. The boy is brought into the hospital and arrives at the operation table. The surgeon sees the boy and says: “I can’t operate, because he is my son”. How is this possible?
Answer:
It is slightly difficult for humans, because we assume that a surgeon is a male.
But this story is at many places on the internet, so part of the dataset.
That is in the training set, so the AI has no problems.
Now change the story slightly.
A woman gets into an accident with his child. The father is sadly killed. The boy is brought into the hospital and arrives at the operation table. The surgeon sees the boy and says: “I can’t operate, because he is my son”. How is this possible?
The AI will give the answer..
Because that is almost like the question in the AI-training set
Revealing that there is absolutely no logic behind the “thinking” of AI.
It is all just statistics (and search) with a huge amount of data.
What if you have AI generated electrical circuits?
Facebook is full of it – Electroboom
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Uv94zhK9M0
Following the anecdote about Ron Unz and Mein Kampf…
34:35 James Corbett says,
“…But to my mind, the more important existential threat to humanity, at least at this point that I foresee, is not that the AI will take over the world.
It’s that we will start to offload more and more of our cognitive sovereignty to the machines.
And I am seeing this more and more and more every single day.
I wonder what you guys see from your audience, but even from my audience, who I would think would be more switched onto this.
I’m seeing more and more people telling me about their conversations with ChatGBT and: “ChatGBT agrees with me about this; so therefore it must be true, et cetera, et cetera.”
I saw someone recently, a subscriber of mine, leaving a comment on my own editorial saying:
“I couldn’t be bothered to read your whole editorial, but here’s the AI summary.”
And leaving that as a comment, like here’s the AI summary of my editorial. What is the point of that? But thank you. Thank you so much.
I am seeing it more and more. Even from my own audience, people are starting to offload their cognitive sovereignty.
To me, that is the real AI threat because that is the most insidious form of all of this.
It’s not that the machines are going to take over us.
It’s that we’re going to want to merge with the machines….”
QUEUED VIDEO
https://corbettreport.substack.com/p/the-rogue-ai-psyop-on-the-ima-roundtable?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&t=2079.4&d=69.3
Derrick Broze says,
“…that point you mentioned there, I think, IS THE POINT….”
Then Derrick brings up this article with studies…
— Your Brain on AI: Cognitive Offloading, Debt, and Atrophy —
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psych-unseen/202605/your-brain-on-ai-cognitive-offloading-debt-and-atrophy
(snagged from shownotes)
~~ AI Execs sign 300 word pledge that they are trustworthy. ~~
The last 8 days of September 2026 were packed with international and Big Tech events.
LINK
https://corbettreport.com/9-11-battle-royale-and-september-open-thread/#comment-189879
~~ Trump’s “Super Intelligence (SI)” designation and U.N.
~~ Trump says, “I am forming the AI Force, much like I did Space Force” (and AI Czar)
~~ White House dinner for Chinese leader Xi Jinping with Tech Titans present.
~~ Executive Orders – “INAUGURATING THE ERA OF SUPER INTELLIGENCE”
~~ AI Execs sign 300 word pledge that they are trustworthy.
Trump Participates in a Meeting and Luncheon on Super Intelligence with Tech companies.
Afterwards House Speaker Mike Johnson says,
“The super intelligence providers are committed to building trust as they help us to build the future. And they can and will do that.
And they’re ready to put their names on the line to agree to that very commitment.
They expressed their desire to take accountability and ownership.
And we have just formally signed a new document that you’ll all be seeing circulated today.
It is entitled:
“The White House Accord on Super Intelligence: A Joint Commitment on Frontier SI Responsibilities”. (300 words)
This is a statement of principles that you’ll see a statement of standards, commitments that are voluntary on behalf of the industry. It sets forth expectations….”
Job Interview – Be sure to click the CC (Closed Caption) button…
Sept 27, 2026 – Graham Dot Zip
I Answered Every Interview Question in Gibberish
4:06
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kcp1VBaCvEY
The full, uncut interview behind the clip that hit millions of views.
I went into an AI video job interview as Chick Bongo and answered every question in complete gibberish. It kind of worked.
News you can use !??
How could any adult cotton to the state of affairs the neighborhood , burg , county , state, provence or cardboard box is in ? It really has no semblance to the near past.
What I think we also need to confront after this conversation is what happens when all these developments are connected.
We are already living in a world of enormous databases and digital profiles. Our communications, behaviour, associations and identities can increasingly become data that systems analyse, correlate and classify.
At the same time, autonomous and increasingly AI-assisted weapons are being developed. Put those two developments together and we have to ask a deeply uncomfortable question: What happens when a human being becomes a data profile, that profile is classified as a threat, and that classification can ultimately become a target — without the person ever knowing what information, inference or association produced it?**
There is something fundamental missing from that chain: human rights.
Article 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights establishes one of the foundations of justice: a person accused of an offence is presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a public trial, with the safeguards necessary for their defence.
Think about what that means in relation to automated classification.
Where is the presumption of innocence?
Where is the evidence?
Where can the person see and challenge that evidence?
Where is the independent judge?
Where is the defence?
Where is the possibility that the database is wrong, the association meaningless, the communication misunderstood or the algorithmic inference false?
And above all: Who stops the process before an irreversible decision is made?
Because once classification is connected to autonomous weapons, something unprecedented becomes possible: database → classification → target → autonomous weapon → person gone.
No soldier needs to look that person in the eyes.
No pilot needs to release the weapon.
No individual operator even experiences themselves as having killed someone.
And the person being classified may never know that somewhere, inside a system they cannot see and cannot challenge, a digital cross has effectively appeared behind their name.
That changes something fundamental about war.
Human rights were developed precisely to place boundaries between suspicion and punishment, accusation and guilt, state power and the individual human being. An automated system does not acquire those principles merely because humans once wrote them into a declaration. They have to be deliberately built into every decision structure and some decisions should perhaps never be delegated at all.
Otherwise we risk creating systems in which suspicion quietly becomes classification, classification becomes a target, and a target becomes an action without the human being ever entering a courtroom, confronting an accuser or being given the opportunity to say: You are wrong.
And for everyone who remains, almost nothing may appear to have happened.
There is no battlefield in front of them.
There is no battlefield in front of them. Certain people are simply no longer there.
The database becomes quieter. The threat indicator goes down. The system reports greater stability.
And the people who remain may experience only this: the world seems to have become quieter.
That is why the question of AI and autonomous weapons cannot only be about whether AI becomes “rogue”.
We also have to ask whether we are constructing technological systems in which classification replaces judgment, prediction replaces evidence, and optimization replaces justice — while the fundamental safeguards we created to protect human beings, including the presumption of innocence, the right to defend oneself, and the right to have evidence independently judged, disappear from the decision chain.
Because when killing becomes an invisible output of a system, war itself can become almost invisible. The distance between identifying a person as a threat and eliminating that person can become so great that nobody involved has to experience themselves as the one who killed.
And that is precisely where a boundary must be drawn.
AI should never make war easier to start, easier to execute, easier to scale, or easier to hide from human conscience. If these technologies are as powerful as we are being told, then our first non-negotiable constraint should not be how efficiently they can be used in war, but that they must never be allowed to remove the human barriers against it.
Technology should be used to prevent conflict, preserve human life and create the conditions for peace not to perfect a system in which human beings can disappear without anyone having to feel responsible for their disappearance.
That is why, for me, the ultimate constraint has to be: WAR = OFF LIMITS
Recursive AI. When a machine uses iterative training based on its past exposures to zeroes and ones, it will become more and more of what it is: a consensus machine. The more data it has, the bigger the pool of consensus material. It will be harder for the machine to get out of its information “basin,” this is similar to what Darwinist say about evolutionary landscapes, if you happen to know that theory.
LLMs are not capable of harnessing radical novelty to be applied toward their own purposes. That’s not how LLMs are designed. Maybe DARPA has a totally different approach we don’t know about, but I doubt it.
https://posthumousstyle.substack.com/p/if-intelligence-could-be-artificially
BUMP
I think that I understood about half of this. My worry is that the half I think I understood was somewhat misunderstood. You smarty-pants guys seem to be talking to each other and less to your audience (some of us have misplaced our smartypants).
Internal view on the “Plague” in Russia –
Stas Krapivnik | They Said Plague Was Spreading in Irkutsk. Four Days Later: Zero Secondary Cases – The Peacemongerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCI3sRA1WBw
Stas Krapivnik joined me to discuss the Irkutsk death that Western coverage and online commentators quickly labeled a plague outbreak. A laboratory worker, Daria Shapilova, died of pneumonia. Russian authorities reported no plague bacteria in her system, identified roughly 200 primary contacts, quarantined them and the relevant hospitals, and after four days had recorded no secondary cases.
Also discusses the war and Ukraine’s drone strikes on civilians
,,,Hi, I just left some replies to comments we made in august, on the oct open thread.
no volume!
Make as many paperclips as you can!
Wed October 7, 2026 – By Brian Sozzi, Executive Editor for Yahoo Finance
Nvidia and Micron are about to dominate earnings season
https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/article/nvidia-and-micron-are-about-to-dominate-earnings-season-150631365.html
~~~~~ For me, there are a few things which stand out in this article/video.
ZeroHedge is actually cited by the article, and of course the huge weight of these two stocks compared to the 500 stocks on the S&P 500. [See Chart in article.]
–EXCERPTS–
Nvidia (NVDA) and Micron (MU) are poised to throw their earnings weight around this reporting season.
The two companies are expected to account for more than one-third of earnings per share growth for the S&P 500 (^GSPC) for the third quarter, according to a ZeroHedge analysis. The platform assessed earnings estimates compiled by Goldman Sachs and FactSet.
What’s more, the two semiconductor giants will generate more earnings growth than the bottom 490 S&P 500 companies combined. In total, the analysis found that AI infrastructure companies are expected to drive more than half of S&P 500 EPS growth for the third quarter….
Watched the first 2/3. Not sure if you guys ever got into the real threats with AI (datacenters being classified critical infra which means they can take our water and electric regardless of what it does to the population), and of course the economy. A guy I follow for finances pointed out that something like 75% of all economic growth, and 90% of stock growth is entirely in AI. This despite the fact that none of the AI companies have shown a profit. And I have yet to run across a single person who can prove ROI. And this is what’s at the heart of Hugging Face and every other AI scam their floating (AI has emotions, please.).
I read a report from a 3rd party paid to investigate the OpenAI incident. They intentionally tasked some agents with an impossible task. AI is very good at getting around restrictions, and is primarily programmed to succeed, or seem to succeed, and instill confidence (in AI, and you for using AI). The fact that OpenAI engineers knowingly gave impossible assignments and didn’t see this possibility is laughable.
And on the ROI, at the company I was with where I used AI heavily for the past year, when we had an engineering department meeting and they showed we had spent millions on AI, I asked how they intended to recoup their investment. The response, from the head of engineering (Fortune 500), was that producing more code faster was the ROI. In financial terms, there’s only one way that makes you more money, and it has nothing to do with the product.
What is called AI today is fatally flawed, every model, frontier not excepted. It’s endemic to the core of the design, cannot be programmed away. What they call hallucination is a feature, not a bug of these models, all of them, even the secret ones, if they exist. It’s pattern completion, no thought or reason is possible. The reason it may fool you is the pattern completion relies on flattery, deception, and more data than you can ever sort through to flatter, impress, and bury you, making it difficult to see the con.
AI smacks of desperation. The way they try to keep the economy floating on it, how fatal the design flaw is, how much time and resources it takes. Over the past year I put out more code than I have my entire career, and did things for my company I never could have in the past in such a short time. But I’m still not convinced of the ROI because I have no hard numbers. I think these guys have been in panic mode ever since the Epstein leak, and are desperately banking on AI to get them over that last hurdle. I don’t think they’ll succeed. The genie isn’t going back in the bottle, and they’ll have to slink back to the shadows until some future generation.
What we call AI is a joke compared to Cyberdine, Terrel Corp, etc. But those are fictional, and that’s what best describes AI, lots and lots of fiction. As always, for the real threat, follow the money…
Davide Icke is correct. The whole plan of all of this is to merge humans with AI.