Interview 1832 – Ted Walter on Peace, War and 9/11

by | Sep 6, 2023 | Interviews, Videos | 53 comments

Shortly before he passed away earlier this year, Dr. Graeme MacQueen sat down for one last project: a documentary film summarizing his life, his work, his activism for peace and his insights into the events of 9/11. That documentary, Peace, War and 9/11, is about to be premiered online and in real life. Joining us to discuss the documentary, how it came about and how people can watch it is producer/director Ted Walter of the International Center for 9/11 Justice.

Watch on Archive / BitChute Odysee / Rokfin Rumble / Substack / Download the mp4


‘Peace, War and 9/11’ honours late Hamilton peace activist Graeme MacQueen

Beyond Misinformation (pdf)

FLASHBACK: Graeme MacQueen Reveals The Anthrax Deception (2014)

Online Premiere – ‘Peace, War and 9/11’

The 9/11 Toronto Hearings Report (2011) – Geoff Campbell Inquest


  1. Barbara Honegger – The Pentagon and 9/11

    Behind the Smoke Curtain – 2nd Edition (2015)

    Behind The Smoke Curtain: What Happened at the Pentagon on 9/11, and What Didn’t, and Why it Matters

    PNAC Wanted a New Pearl Harbor:

    9/11 Files: Dancing Israelis

    I found this video showing the only two camera angles with video of what is supposed to be a 757 American Airlines FLT 77 going into the Pentagon.

    The “aircraft” appears for a split second at 0:05/2:56 in the first camera and at 1:31/2:56 in the second camera.

    What appears in both videos is much smaller than a 757 jetliner. Possibly a Global Hawk drone like Barbara shows.

    Was WTC 1 & 2 & 7 taken down with a combination of Thermate and nuclear bombs?

    Nuclear 9/11 – The Pommer Report:

    • Thanks James for this piece with Ted Walter. It’s very moving.

      “Was WTC 1 & 2 & 7 taken down with a combination of Thermate and nuclear bombs?”

      Very much so!
      I will be posting a series here on 9/11 starting in a few days and will cover much of the physical evidence in New York.

    • Bill Pritting,
      You have posted a lot of good links of which, the first one ” Behind the Smoke Curtain” (over 5 hours long) in which Barbara Honegger speaks at the Seattle Town Hall in 2013 is prof positive that an evil coup took place on 9/11/01.
      The evidence of this coup was presented 10 years ago and yet these evil bastards continue to rule over us.
      What we lack is a plan to bring these bastards to justice.
      I believe Zionists (Fake Jews) working with the Nazi Bush’s with control of the White House deceived Americans to stand down and watch as America was turned into an Evil Empire.
      Richard Nixon was a pawn of Nazi supporter Prescott Bush who was expected to be become president in 1960, but he lost to JFK. The Bush cronies did all they could to discredit and smear the reputation of JFK, yet when it become clear that he would be reelected in 1964, they killed him. LBJ served as a short term pawn who was easy to manipulate because he was dirty, yet they got Nixon in the White House in 1968. In 1974 when Nixon was Impeached Congress gave him a list of four people he could chose as his successor and he chose Ford who likely thought that putting the Nixon scandal behind us was a good way to go forward, then President Ford appointed George Bush Sr. as Director of the CIA. I think Ford was easy deceived into believing that these decisions were best for keeping the Government/Country together. Carter was also easily deceived, as was Reagan who took George Bush Sr. as his VP, and he took us to War. Clinton was working with the CIA to bring Drugs into this country when he was Governor of Arkansas, so he likely had some blackmail material on Bush Sr., then, we got Bush Jr., the New American Century, and the Events of 9/11/01 which have led to the rise of the Evil Empire and a world that has been turned up-side down.

      • I wouldn’t automatically assume that Gerald Ford was clean; after all, he was on the Warren Commission.

    • Is the same as youtube? when I type it into my Fox Browser I get youtube. In any case I am surprised to see that “Behind the Smoke Curtain” is available on Youtube. Perhaps, because it is show as being over 5 hours they figure that is censorship enough.

  2. From you, Nineveh, has one come forth who plots evil against the LORD and devises wicked plans.
    Nahum 1:11

    “The fact that he tried to kill my father and my wife shows the nature of the man,” Bush told interviewers in March 2003 regarding Saddam Hussein. “And he not only tried to kill my father and wife, he’s killed thousands of his own citizens.” But he denied a vendetta. “Nah, no,” he said. “I’m doing my job as the President, based upon the threats that face this country.”

    W. movie the “Why Iraq?” scene

    • Skull & Bones are Devil worshipers and the Bush’s are multi-generational members. The Bush’s needed to cover-up for the Savings and Loan scam they profited from, and Building 7 had files they wanted destroyed. Prescott Bush funded the Nazi’s to overthrow the German Government in the 1930’s. Bush Senior was photographed at the Dallas Library on 11/22/63 and was involved in the killing of JFK. In the mid 1970’s a Congressional Investigation concluded that “there was most likely a Conspiracy” to kill JFK (after about 8 people in a row were killed before they could testify before the Committee). The Committee also conclude that they could not get to the bottom of the conspiracy at that time and thus ordered that all the books on the JFK investigation be open to the public in so many years, which came to be during Trump’s Administration. This was a Congressional Order that this info would become public, which is not something that a President can Constitutionally overrule, yet that is what Trump did when asked to do so by the CIA. I think that former CIA Director Bush and his sons has something to hide 60 years after the fact.
      These evil basters have got to be exposed, and brought to Justice.

      • Truthseeker,
        I agree whole heartedly. However, there are numerous justices to be dissected and brought to light. It’d be a miracle in our present system, with the OKC bombing neo-cons man Merrick Garland blocking every move. F.B.I. completely captured so let’s go with exposed.
        As far as exposed, it can be a kind of justice. Exposure won’t return the lives or treasure to make whole but exposer will get us farther down the road. Who knows the brakes may fail and the cart becomes a runaway lynching should a mob form with blood in their eyes. One can only hope we are not driven to acts of war while acting like warriors. Civilian mobs don’t act like neo-cons when aroused. Mobs kill from anger not profit. Justice has no ruling for a mob. Look at South Central LA Rodney King. That was anger,we could learn things from that.

        • Interesting you mention that riot in LA 1992. I was a teenager when it happened.

          I watched an interesting documentary about it, including the aftermath that included the beating of a trucker that just happened to be driving in south central LA. Then there was the looting of Korea Town after a shop keeper got away with shooting a teenager in her store. People had to protect their own stores with guns because the police left the scene.

          Very scary stuff for people living in cities that they should keep in mind because one doesn’t want to get caught in an angry mob.

          Here’s the documentary on archive:

  3. I was thrilled to see an interview with Ted Walter. He has long been a mainstay in the 9/11 Truth Movement. I can’t wait to watch ‘Peace, War and 9/11’

    In the spring of 2006, James Gourley and Joe Stokes founded this Meetup Group: “North Texans for 9/11 Truth”.

    — Year 2011 —
    During the hot summer of 2011, an Associated Press reporter, Tamara Lush, flew from Florida to Dallas in order to interview members of “North Texans for 9/11 Truth” and James Gourley. When her story was published in September, it was picked up by publications all around the world (e.g. Japan, New Zealand, Europe, across the U.S., and
    From JFK To 9/11, Conspiracy Theories Thrive
    A conference on alternate 9/11 theories is being held in Toronto on Sept. 11.
    The conference is headed by the International Center for 9/11 Studies, which was founded by James Gourley, a 31-year-old Dallas-area attorney who began to question the events of Sept. 11 during law school, while watching an activist make his argument on C-Span.
    Gourley is aware of the theories about how skeptics are simply trying to justify and explain a random, horrific event.
    “It’s basically a backwards way of saying we’re psychologically deranged,” he said. “It’s questioning the psychology of the people instead of questioning the facts.”

    During September 2011, in The Dallas Observer, our “North Texans for 9/11 Truth” group ran a series of hardcopy display ads which promoted “The Toronto Hearings” and other related 9/11 related events and links.
    The Dallas Observer 9/11 Display Ad
    …and online in The Dallas Observer Backpage ads…
    [NOTE: The FBI, the DOJ, the IRS, the Postal Service, and the Joint Regional Intelligence Center seized that] See their stamps at the link below…
    If you are aware of the 9/11 COVER-UP…

    I guess that since our group spent some money with The Dallas Observer, Anna Merlan ran a story on our group that September 2011. (Anna Merlan has had some national stories in recent years, and she’s not your friend.)
    North Texans For 9/11 Truth: Still Running Around in “Rabbit Hole” After All These Years

    Late August 2011 –
    The Importance of The Toronto Hearings
    (Video – Graeme MacQueen is interviewed by the news)

  4. “The Project for a New American Century” could well be called “The American Empire going Evil by way of the Bush’s”. Whether it was good Government gone bad, or bad Government gone Evil, the new Century put a Bush in the White House and things really got bad. Bush one did a lot of damage as VP under Regan and then got us into a War with Iraq, but his Son was far worse. Treason is too good a word for these Bush Bastards. Perhaps that is why they will run us into Nuclear War before they will allow the truth about them to be exposed.

  5. Even just the trailer tugs at the heart-strings…

    I hope this reaches young new audiences who did not experience the traumatic terror as it was unfolding on live TV. Not because I want for them to re-live that day, but that they may offer their fresh perspectives and analysis to help reveal the treachery.

    Conspiracies are real.

  6. Thanks so much for this episode…in it you asked what is it that keeps people going back to 9/11 even though it’s so long ago? People want to know the truth about great events, especially if it appears there was real chicanery at work…as with President Kennedys killing…I was only nineteen at the time and was devastated by his murder as according to what I had read about him (in the MSM) he was the only politician not out to go to war against Russia and bring about the much hyped (and believed by me) cold war menace of a Nuclear Armageddon. I questioned the official versions of what happened to Kennedy up until, only a few years ago, I saw a video which gave the death shots as coming from a drain in the pavement, which put to rest my final question…there has never been any doubt in my mind that strings were pulled by those who controlled politics in the US at the time. I believe in Justice and it saddens me that the perpetrators were never publicly shamed and shown in their true colours, as should always be the case once the truth emerges. Maybe this is never to be, but what is to be, is the end to monstrous mentalities guiding the path humanity treads.

  7. Just finished watching Peace,War,and 9/11 on Redacted. I think that an additional angle needs to be added to the anti-war movement. As noble as it’s aims are, there are many who equate pacifism with weakness. We have to impress on people (especially young men) that they are being tricked into going to war; they are being played for fools. Mr. MacQueen called these manufactured events like 9/11 war triggers, which they of course are. Having been young and in the military, I can attest that ideas about manhood and careerism were foremost in the minds of most of my comrades. It was just assumed that we were the “good guys” and thus any operation that we were sent on was justified and necessary. If we can expose the lies and deceptions to those whose patriotism is be taken advantage of, perhaps we can get them to see it as weakness to be a pawn, and brave to resist the lies. On the other hand, the only antidote to careerism is to shrink the war budget.

  8. James,

    Its been a while. I’ve been a little absorbed in changing continents. But, while putting together my little geopolitical podcast I noticed the date, included reference to both 9/11’s (Chile ’73 and US ’01) and thought you’d have been producing something.

    Thank you for another of your wonderful interviews. I very much look forward to watching War, Peace and 9/11. McQueen is sorely missed. I keenly anticipate the reverie which the film will bring.

    I stuck a reference to this CR episode in the podcast page and hope a few people wander by to enjoy the interview and perhaps explore your work or that of

    Warm regards,

    2.D / YesXorNo

    PS: Now that I’m in both the country and timezone I should drop a line to Mr. West. September is such a lovely time in the southern hemisphere.

    PPS: The podcast is here:

  9. 22 is a very unlucky number. JFK was killed on November (11) 22, 1963. I fell and broke my hip last November (11/22/22).

    When I was 22 I wrecked my truck and damn near died.

    So the 22nd Anniversary of 9/11 (there’s that 11 number again) is bad news.

    • Cool story.
      The guy’s story could have been true but he certainly wasn’t Moshe Dyan another
      former soldier (famous) who lost an eye.

      • Fawlty Towers: The Israeli Pilot’s story was true. He knew all the details and my fellow mechanic was with the pilot the night before. My friend did no participate in the orgy.

      • Fawlty Towers; I never claimed that Moshe the pilot was Moshe Dayan. The pilot didn’t look anything like Moshe Dayan.

  10. WATCH…
    Redacted Presents: Peace, War and 9/11

    Co-hosted by Clayton and Natali Morris, Redacted has over two million followers on YouTube and nearly 400,000 followers on Rumble. Having the film on Redacted will ensure that it reaches a massive audience well beyond the 9/11 truth movement.

    The film’s original version will be released on Friday, Sept. 8, at 4:00 PM Eastern on Redacted’s Rumble channel, where it will be introduced by Clayton Morris. Then, on Monday, Sept. 11, a less graphic version for younger age groups will be released on Redacted’s YouTube channel.

  11. INTRO:

    Given the membership here I think it’s safe to say that most/all Corbetteers have reached the same conclusion about 9/11; that it was a false flag operation.        

    I have often said and still maintain that this is really the most important matter when it comes to the subject. There were so many ‘moving parts’ to the operation it is very unlikely to find two people in a group who agree on everything that transpired that day.         

    While the vast majority of Corbetteers are convinced that 9/11 was a false flag operation, there are some (including James) who are still willing to at least entertain the possibility that the official story is in fact true (hijackers, building collapses etc.).           
     “What you would need to know to change your mind?”           
    I will be killing several birds with one stone with this series, but the main goal is to put to rest any lingering doubts people may have about whether or not the WTC towers were deliberately demolished using explosives. I will also explain why there couldn’t have been hijackers flying the planes that hit the towers.         

    The following is my personal take on 9/11. It’s a summary of my years of research on the subject.

    My goal is to lead you to the truth. I can’t make you believe it however. 🙂

    • Part 1 – Official story

        9/11 was planned years in advance, some posit even decades.         

         There was a lot riding on the 9/11 tires; trillions of dollars at stake (mostly ear-marked for the military industrial complex) Middle East wars waiting to be waged as outlined in detail in the PNAC documents, a renewal of Afghanistan’s opium production, a new ‘war on terror’ to last decades complete with new governmental security agencies (Department of Homeland Security etc.) all financed at taxpayers’ expense of course.         

         The importance of insuring the operation’s success cannot be over-stated. Failure was simply not an option.         

         So let’s start with the official government narrative; a team of 19 Islamic terrorists hijacked four planes, flew two of them into WTC towers 1 and 2, one into the Pentagon and a fourth crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania before it could reach its target. WTC towers 1 and 2 allegedly collapsed due to the structural damage from the planes and the fires that ensued after the crashes.         
         Within an hour of the plane crashes, Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda were already being blamed for orchestrating the terror.          

         Pretty simple storyline.          

         What did the public see on 9/11? 
         They saw a plane fly into WTC2 and watched towers WTC1 and WTC2 burn for around an hour or so before they were completely destroyed. Most people did not see and still have not seen WTC7 come down. They saw a hole on the side of the Pentagon and smoke billowing out in front of the building. At Shanksville they saw a small hole in the ground. That was basically it.

      • “The importance of insuring the operation’s success cannot be over-stated.”
        Sorry about that.

         The importance of ensuring the operation’s success cannot be over-stated.

    • Part 2 – Towers must be totally destroyed

      The heart and soul of the entire operation was the destruction of the towers (WTC1 and WTC2). The two towers had to be completely destroyed. That was key for the success of the mission.         

       From this simple fact we can work backwards and figure out most of what happened that day.         

       The towers had to be destroyed for a number of reasons. First and foremost, they would act as the main catalyst to enrage the general public (loss of lives, visual destruction) and garner their support for revenge against the ‘perpetrators’ (War on Terror).         

       Secondly, Larry Silverstein stood to reap $ billions in insurance claims for the towers he was leasing.         

       Thirdly, it would be an excellent way to take care of the ‘asbestos problem’. The towers were laden with asbestos which had to be removed at great cost to Silverstein Properties.         

       Partial destruction would not be good enough. The entire towers needed to come down.         
       But they also had to come down in a controlled fashion so that nearby buildings (hotels, offices etc.) were not affected.         
       This was also paramount. It was no small feat to bring down some of the tallest buildings in the world without harming nearby structures.

      • With a normal demolition using exposives, you need to destroy (demolish)
        the floor just before the above floor falls on it.

        If the floor would still give some resistance, the resistance shall
        destabilize the fall. Because the resistance would break at slightly
        different strengths at different places. This instability increases
        with each floor after that. (Probably exponentially).
        So this can even stop the demolition.
        But I think that with the steel central column, the most likely outcome would be a collapse into nearby buildings.

        For some reason the people who demolished the buildings were caring
        a lot about the surroundings. But not about any people that were
        The firemen were blown into pieces that landed on top of other buildings.

        And the dust was very corrosive due to the overuse of oxidizers.
        Oxidizers makes stuff burn by giving oxygen.
        It was affecting cars and buildings that got covered by the dust.
        And the fires of WTC1 and 2 were still burning after 12 weeks.

      • Fawlty Towers, very nice summery.
        I got to thinking about the insurers. In a broad and general accesment of who paid out what. Where there Zionist, Protestant, Catholic or some other groupings of insurers that took the hit? That was an Exxon/BP size hit to the pool.
        Was there anyone highlighting that groups makeup and losses?
        I never heard about that side of the story.

        • Hey GBW! So grateful you aren’t generalwasherbottle.
          That would wreak havoc with your initials. 🙂

          It’s not a summary really, I’m just getting warmed up.
          The series should last about a week or so.

          Good questions about the insurers!
          That’s one area that I never got into, but it sure would be nice to get a definitive breakdown of which were the exact insurance companies who took the greatest hits and what amounts of dollars are we talking about?

    • Part 3a – Remote control of planes

      In order for the towers to be destroyed, they first had to be hit by airplanes (the official plan).

      The reasoning for this should be obvious. If the perps simply blew up the buildings, without any warning, yes they would inflict the greatest numbers of casualties this way, but the government would have a very difficult time explaining how the terrorists could have accomplished the feat! That is they would have to explain how they could have planted the explosives, undetected, and accomplished such a masterpiece of demolition never seen before in history.

      The plane strikes would allow the perps to come up with an explanation for their subsequent destruction.

      The towers had to be hit at specific spots and the planes had to bury themselves completely in the buildings. There was no room for error. A plane simply clipping a tower or making a partial entry would ruin the plans completely.

      A partial plane entry would result in much less damage to the tower.
      Also if part of the plane hit the ground their operation would be immediately exposed. The plane parts wouldn’t match the commercial aircraft’s and no bodies would be found.

      Veteran jet pilots with 20+ years of flying experience have admitted they couldn’t hit the towers as we saw on 9/11. They even tried to do it on flight simulators and failed each time. The speeds the planes were traveling at and the last minute maneuvers required to make perfect hits were just too much for the experts.

    • Part 3b – Remote control of planes

      So how could the perps guarantee perfect planes strikes into not just one, but both towers?

      Well they certainly wouldn’t count on amateurs who hadn’t flown jets before and could barely fly cessnas! Again this was a mission that COULD NOT FAIL. Nothing could be left to chance with the operation.

      Would you trust amateur pilots who first had to successfully hijack four planes, with a critical mission that had no room for error and could not fail?

      One small slip would ruin the entire operation! Just the alleged hijackings alone could have failed, due to any number of reasons. It could have been literally a slip by an alleged hijacker, passengers overtaking the ‘hijackers’ or simply a locking out of the ‘hijackers’ from the cockpit. And then of course would come the almost impossible mission of taking over the plane’s controls, navigating the plane to its destination, manually, and then making perfect strikes that even experts couldn’t achieve.

      For this reason, the planes that struck the towers had to have been flown by autopilot/remote control. This was the only way to guarantee perfect strikes into the towers at the desired floors.

      And just by total coincidence, Dov Zakheim (the comptroller of the Pentagon at the time) happened to manage a company called SPC Tridata Corp. whose international division Radar Physics Group, did Top Secret work on a technology that could take remote control of airplanes.

    • Part 4a- WTC1

      Here are some quotes from three well-known 9/11 commentators, in an attempt to absolve them from taking a position on how the towers were destroyed. Can you guess who said these?         

      1. “I’m not an architect and I’m not a scientist…”         
      2. “… I’m not a physicist, I don’t claim to be one, I’m not a scientific, uh I’m not an engineer, I’m not an architect”         
      3. “… should I take off the time, years in fact, to learn the technical background and study the structural characteristics of the buildings, so that I can make some evaluation … ”         

      Well fortunately it is not necessary to be a scientist, an architect, an engineer nor a physicist to understand that the towers had to have been destroyed by explosives.         
      Nor is it necessary to take off years to acquire the technical background to make such an assessment.         

      In the next three parts I will explain what happened to each tower (WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7).         

      I will start with WTC1 and use one of the simplest methods I could think of to demonstrate to almost anyone (an adolescent or older) that the tower had to have been demolished.         

      The beauty of this exercise is that no knowledge of physics, science, engineering etc. is necessary. I showed this method here a few years ago but without any visual aids. This time I will add graphics to help visualize the concept.         

      After going through the simple exercise I will be getting into more detail of how WTC1 was destroyed.

    • Part 4b –  WTC1

      Floor by floor:

      During 9/11 the news media cameras were focused on the top half or top third of the towers most of the time. From that perspective one couldn’t get a sense of how much tower was left untouched below the crash zones.

      I will start with a photo taken shortly after the towers were built where you can see the entire structure, 110 floors.

      For the next photo I have placed the plane gash at floors 93-99, the floors where the plane struck.         
      Now you can see, in a picture, just how high the crash actually was.         

      Next I will show a photo with the plane gash between floors 103-109, leaving only the top floor undamaged. Just imagine that the plane struck the tower between these floors instead of between floors 93-99. Let approximately 1.5 hours go by with the fires and then let’s have the ‘collapse’ initiation, as we saw on 9/11.         

      Look at the photo carefully. How much damage do you think the falling top floor (110) would have on the rest of the building, assuming it fell?         

      Most people will say there wouldn’t be a global collapse of the building. In fact most would say there would be little damage to the floors below the top floor, if at all.               
      Once they have said this you/they will have unwittingly declared that 9/11 was an inside job. I will explain why shortly.

    • Part 4c –  WTC1

      Next we will look at a series of photos looking at the plane gash with different scenarios.         

      102-108 shows the plane having struck between floors 102-108 instead of 93-99.         
      101-107 shows the plane having struck between floors 101-107.         
      97-103 shows the plane having struck between floors 97-103.         

      For each of the above scenarios, think of what you would expect to happen to the building if the highest floors fell on the floors below. As with the first example, most people will still say very little damage would ensue to the lower floors.         

      Why is this? Simple.          

      Just as there was no ‘magic bullet’ in JFK’s assassination, there was no ‘magic floor’ in WTC1.         
      A magic floor beyond which all the other floors below would collapse.         

      This is a simple, elegant way to show that a global collapse of WTC1 was physically impossible. There is no need to get into the physics to explain it.         

      Just for fun, you might ask yourself or the person you are showing this to, the following question: “Why do you think the top floor (two floors etc.) wouldn’t crush the whole building below?”         
      Listen closely to their explanation.         

      Once it is understood that WTC1 could not have collapsed on its own, the tower’s destruction needs to be explained. There is only one explanation: explosives.
      But the use of explosives is incompatible with the official story.         
      Therefore the official story for how the towers were destroyed must be a lie.

    • Part 4d – WTC1

      Next we’ll take a peek under the hood and see exactly what happened to WTC1.         

      WTC1 was struck by the first plane but was destroyed after WTC2. Its late destruction was not intentional though.         

      The stills that will be shown have been taken from a video showing the destruction of WTC1.         
      All of this evidence has been readily available and staring us right in the face for more than 20 years, but sometimes the obvious still needs to be pointed out.         

      In this series of photos, the top white line indicates where the top of WTC1 stood initially.         
      The bottom white line indicates the top of the plane gash at floor 99. According to the official story it is the section in between these two lines (the top section) that is supposed to have acted as a pile driver and crushed the entire building below it.
      As we go through this exercise, always be aware of those two white lines (top section), they are key.         

      In 1 Top full.png we can see the plane strike section at floors 93-99, just above the bottom two arrows.         

      In 1 Almost half.png we can see almost half of the top section has ‘disappeared’. That’s around four floors that have gone ‘poof’. The bottom two arrows are still there, with the outer structure still intact. What has happened?         

      Instead of crushing the floors below it, almost half of the top section has SLID INTO the core of the building! How can that be?         

      The 47 core columns of solid steel have begun to be vaporized by nuclear plasma shooting up the building, allowing the steel columns from the top section to slide into the new vacuum area in the bottom section.         

      In 1 More than half.png we see more than half of the top section has ‘disappeared’ (7 of 11 floors).         
      The top blue arrow shows where the roof of the tower is now. And once again the bottom two arrows remain where they always have been, showing that the outer part of the tower is still intact there.         

      The top section continues to slide into and be swallowed up by the bottom section. There is no longer anything to support the interior steel columns of the top section, since the steel columns of the bottom section are no longer there! Only the outer columns still remain at that point in time.         

      The disappearing (vaporized) 47 interior steel core columns occurred just before the visible explosions started.

    • Part 5a – WTC2

      Next let’s analyze the destruction of WTC2.         

      Its destruction was very similar to WTC1’s with a slight twist (and tilt).         
      Although WTC2 was hit by a plane after WTC1, it was destroyed first.         
      Several things went wrong with WTC2. They were hoping it would be destroyed before WTC1 but that didn’t pan out. And they certainly didn’t foresee it tilting over to the extreme way it did.         

      The nuclear devices in the basements of the towers were triggered around the same time the planes struck the towers. Likely WTC1’s device was triggered first, but once they were triggered there was no controlling the exact time they would ‘fire’ and the plasma would shoot up the towers. WTC2’s device just happened to work faster than WTC1’s.         

      WTC2 full.png shows the top section of WTC2, from the north side of the building. The top white line indicates where the top of WTC2 stood initially. The bottom white line is close to the bottom of the plane gash. The middle white line is halfway between the top and bottom lines.         

      WTC2a.png shows the top section of WTC2 tilting over to the side and dropping down slightly. The pivot point is just above the bottom white line.         

      WTC2b.png shows the top section of WTC2 continuing its tilt to the side and dropping down even more. Like WTC1, instead of crushing the bottom section (as we were told occurred) it is sliding into and being swallowed up by the bottom section! The bottom line proves this. The bottom section’s outer walls remains intact, untouched.         

      In WTC2c.png the top section of WTC2 continues to tilt to the side and is also twisting slightly. Had the core columns not been vaporized at this point, the top section would have continued to tilt over and fall off to the side. But like we saw with WTC1, the top section continues to be ‘eaten up’ by the bottom section. The core columns of the bottom section are being vaporized. The outer walls of the bottom section remain intact still as you can see.

    • Part 5b – WTC2

      WTC2 50%.png shows half of the top section has disappeared! As with WTC1, it hasn’t crushed the bottom section at all. It simply has been swallowed up by it. The top section was supposed to have crushed the bottom section of the tower according to the official story. But the bottom section looks fine from the outside and half of the top has disappeared! How can the top section at one and the same time disappear and also crush the rest of the tower?       

      In WTC2d.png the bottom section is beginning to be covered up with the clouds of dust that have started in earnest at the juncture between the two sections. More than half of the top section has disappeared at this point but the outside walls of the bottom section are holding firm as you can still see.         

      WTC2e.png is the last still of the WTC2 in this part. The top section continues to be devoured by the bottom section. We can no longer see the bottom section. It has likely begun to be pulverized not just on the inside but outside as well, finally.         

      Here are the main steps that took place with the mini-nukes placed under the towers:         

      1. The nuclear device process was initiated.         
      2. The bedrock begins to heat up and slowly liquifies.         
      3. 1 – 1.5 hours later plasma at base of towers breaks through (vents) and shoots up through the elevator shafts (steel core).         
      4. The steel core is vaporized in seconds.         
      5. The top section starts to drop into the vacuum created by the vaporized steel (seconds).         
      6. The explosions start and the entire building is turned to dust (seconds).         

      When you look at videos and photos of the towers’ demolition you will always see two colors of dust. The black dust is the vaporized core steel. The white dust is the pulverized outer facade and concrete floors.

    • Part 6 –  WTC7

      Most here consider WTC7 to be the smoking gun for 9/11’s false flag attack.         
      It was the first (and last) steel and concrete building in history to have allegedly collapsed due to fires alone.        

      It didn’t simply collapse haphazardly. It collapsed uniformly in free fall into its own footprint for more than 4 seconds. The only way that could have occurred, is for all of the supports to have been taken out on one floor at the exact same time. Only explosives/thermite could have accomplished that.          

      The perps could have told the public that the building was pre-rigged with explosives in case of an emergency like this, and they simply decided to pull the building because it was too dangerous for the fireflighters and they didn’t want to risk any more lives.          
      A more believable version of the ‘pull it’ story Larry Silverstein made up a couple of years after 9/11.         

      But they didn’t. The perps stuck with their story that it was the fires that brought the building down.         

      Although explosives were used (and possibly thermite) to start WTC7’s collapse, a mini-nuke was also used (the same type used with the other two towers).         
      It is likely that the mini-nuke had malfunctioned, and the kick start with the more conventional explosives allowed the nuke to vent and take over the destruction.         

      WTC7 bears all the same hallmarks of a mini-nuke explosion that towers WTC1 and WTC2 had.         

      I’ll go over them in Part 7

    • Part 7a – Miniature Thermonuclear Device Signatures

      The mini-nukes that were used on 9/11 all bore the same characteristics (signature) of a typical nuke plus some additional identifiers.

      Here are just a few examples.

      Nuke cloud formations:

      Notice any similarities between the WTC1 nuke and the Storax Sedan nuke of 1962?
      Gnd Zero – Storax.png
      Hmmm… now that you mention it.

      The vertical columns and complex cauliflower dust clouds are the dead giveaways
      in this photo comparison. GZ- Storax2.png        
      No conventional demolition or thermite demolition would leave a column of dust taller than the building, let alone more than twice the height of the building!

    • Part 7c – Miniature Thermonuclear Device Signatures

      Hot spots in basements:

      Thermal imaging in the days and weeks following 9/11 showed hot spots in the basements
      where each tower stood (WTC1/2/7). This is where the rock turned into a liquid ‘soup mix’.


      White steam clouds:

      All eyes were focused on the top of the towers as they were burning
      as this is what was being shown on TV. People nearby the towers also had
      their view of the base of the towers obstructed by low buildings.

      Fortunately white steam clouds/gases escaping the foundation of towers prior to collapse was captured in a video taken from across the Hudson river. This is an additional identifier of the nuclear device.


    • Part 7d – Miniature Thermonuclear Device Signatures

      Photos of smoke/gases rising from GROUND. This lasted for months!

      Volcanoes emit volcanic gases through the ground (magma chamber underground) very similar to the ground zero nuke gases that surfaced from the ground for months.
      Office fires won’t do this.
      Thermite won’t do this.
      DEW’s won’t do this.

      vol gases.jpg  
      vol gases1.jpg  
      vol gases2.jpg  
      vol gases3.jpg  

      tower gases.jpg  
      tower gases1.jpg 
      tower gases2.jpg 
      tower gases3.jpg 

    • Part 8 – Checklist:  Nukes vs. Thermite vs. DEW

      I mentioned at the start what the main goal for this series was.

      I should also mention where the inspiration came from. Over the past several months and years a few members here have made posts regarding the method used to destroy the towers. I decided to wait until an appropriate time (the anniversary) to address their positions specifically.      

      I am going to provide a link now that has a checklist comparing the three main theories for the towers’ destruction. I think the checklist speaks for itself.

    • Part 9a – It’s A Very Small World!

      And now for the conspiracy theorists here who are bored to tears with all of this physical stuff, and are craving a little circumstantial evidence, I have a treat just for you. 🙂 

      For years James has lamented multiple times in interviews and episodes that no one in the media, government, or law enforcement has gone after Robert Baer (one of James’ ‘9/11 Suspects’) to get him to clarify the following statements he made in 2008 to a team of L.A. citizen journalists:

      Baer: ” I know the guy that went into his broker in San Diego and said ‘cash me out, it’s going down tomorrow.         
      Howe: “That tells us something.”         
      Baer: “Well his brother worked at the White House.”

      No one has asked Baer who this person was, who went to his broker.

      Well we have a 9/11 whistleblower who not only knew someone who told them a terror attack was imminent in New York, but they know his name and have already revealed it to all !

      Susan Lindauer was the chief CIA asset covering the Iraqi embassy, the Libya House, Syria, Egypt, Yemen and Malaysia in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s. Iraq and Libya were her primary countries. She was a ‘back channel’.

      Susan was initially introduced to her CIA handler Richard Fuisz in 1994, and continued to meet weekly with him to discuss her diplomatic contacts in the Middle East, specifically her work related to the lifting of U.S. sanctions against Libya and Iraq.

      In April 2001 Fuisz summoned her to deliver the following message to Iraq (as told by Susan):

      “We are looking for information on a conspiracy to hijack airplanes. We expect the target to be the World Trade Center. We think they’re going to fly the airplanes into the World Trade Center. We want you to provide any actionable intelligence.”

      ‘Actionable intelligence’, meaning a name, an airport hub, a flight number, something that’s going to help identify who they are, where they’re meeting, what their nationalities are etc..

    • Part 9b –  It’s a Very Small World!

      Susan reported back that Iraq was willing to let in counter-terrorism experts to inspect the country and they were willing to give the U.S. lucrative business contracts lasting a decade and beyond. They were willing to cooperate with all U.S. demands, but also said they had no knowledge of any upcoming terrorist attacks.         

      Fuisz also warned Susan several times in the months leading up to 9/11, beginning in April 2001, that planes would be flown into the WTC towers and a miniature thermonuclear device would be used in New York city.         

      These warnings by Fuisz are extremely significant as it provides damning evidence not only of an upcoming attack in N.Y. using nuclear weapons, but it singles out the exact type. Not simply a nuclear bomb; but a “miniature thermonuclear device”.         

      On Aug 2, 2001 Fuisz told Susan the 9/11 attacks would occur in the next couple of weeks.         
      She offered to go back to N.Y. to contact the Iraqis again (by phone) to see if they had any information, but Fuisz told Susan “Oh, my God, Susan, don’t go back to, do not go back to New York City. It’s too dangerous. We are expecting the use of a miniature thermonuclear device.”         

      We have the extreme good fortune that Susan is on record to have told a confidant of hers all about these attacks in N.Y. before they happened.         

      During 2000 and the lead-up to 9/11 Susan spoke with her good friend Dr. Parke Godfrey, a tenured associate professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at York University in Toronto, Canada.         

      In an affidavit delivered on June 17, 2008 in N.Y.C. Dr. Godfrey testified under oath that Lindauer told him of her specific concerns about an attack in New York involving hijacked airplanes. She warned him of these attacks in 2000, in the spring of 2001 and then finally in August 2001.         

      But Susan didn’t simply alert her friend to the upcoming attacks. She also contacted the Attorney General’s office and the Office of Counter-Terrorism in early August 2001 and alerted them!

    • Part 9c – It’s a Very Small World!

      Robert Baer vs. Richard Carl Fuisz

      There are some interesting parallels/similarities between Baer and Fuisz, the most obvious
      being they were both long-time CIA employees and both have been portrayed in movies.

      Robert Booker Baer is a 71 year old American author and a former CIA field officer who was primarily assigned to the Middle East for 21 years. He was the real-life inspiration for the character portrayed by George Clooney in “Syriana.”

      When all is said and done though, the only thing Baer brings to the 9/11 table are his “Cash me out it’s going down tomorrow” and “Well his brother worked at the White House” quotes while being interviewed by Stuart Howe.

      While Baer does say that 9/11 could have been an inside job, he’s actually leaning towards Iran as having been the chief culprit!

      Richard Carl Fuisz is an 83 year old multi-millionaire physician, inventor, entrepreneur, businessman and former CIA agent. He holds more than two hundred patents worldwide, in such diverse fields as drug delivery, interactive media, and cryptography. Fuisz has been involved in numerous scandals and lawsuits involving his company Fuisz Technologies Ltd., too many to mention.

      He has made claims that he can identify who orchestrated and executed the 1988 Lockerbie bombing (not Libya) !
      The New York Times published an article in 1992 by journalist Seymour Hersh alleging that U.S. intelligence had helped to arm the Iraqi military during the Gulf War. Fuisz was named as its primary source.

      And now for some of the ‘small world’ connections.

      Fuisz had an interesting relationship with the blood testing company Theranos’ CEO Elizabeth Holmes.
      In 2011 Theranos and CEO Elizabeth Holmes sued Fuisz and his sons, alleging that Fuisz had misappropriated a Theranos patent and used that information to file his own medical analyzer patent.

      Karma hit back at Holmes when she was found guilty on January 3, 2022 on four counts of defrauding investors – three counts of wire fraud, and one of conspiracy to commit wire fraud.
      The sensational story was all over the MSM for months.

      On November 18, 2022, U.S. District Judge Edward Davila sentenced Holmes to 11 years in prison. She and the COO Ramesh Balwani were also ordered to pay $452 million to the victims of the fraud.

      Joseph Fuisz, attorney, inventor, entrepreneur (and son of and business partner with Richard Fuisz) also just happened to be a family friend of Elizabeth Holmes!  🙂

      Not to be outdone by Baer, Fuisz was was portrayed by William H. Macy in the 2022 Hulu streaming miniseries ‘The Dropout’.

      Unfortunately the MSM never picked up the story about Fuisz and his warnings of hijackings and mini-nuke attacks pre-9/11 and ran with it. I will leave you to speculate why they didn’t.
      It is my contention that the MSM would be similarly mum if someone were to ever reveal Baer’s ‘inside guy’.

    • Part 9d – It’s a Very Small World!

      Andrew Card

      And in an even smaller world, we had Susan’s second cousin, Andrew Card appointed White House Chief of Staff on November 26, 2000 by President-elect George W. Bush upon his inauguration. Card had previously served as Deputy Chief of Staff and Secretary of Transportation for George H. W. Bush, and had been selected by George W. Bush to run the 2000 Republican National Convention.

      Yes this is the same Andrew Card who infamously delivered the message to Bush that America was under attack while he was reading ‘The Pet Goat’ to the young school children.         

      How much of a coinkydink was that? We’ve linked a nuke whistleblower indirectly to President Bush!

      Over approximately two years, Lindauer wrote Card a total of eleven letters leaving them on the doorstep of his home in Northern Virginia. In her letters, she urged Card to intercede with President George W. Bush not to invade Iraq, and offered to act as a back channel in negotiations. The last letter was left on January 6, 2003, two months before the invasion of Iraq. But of course they turned out to be all in vain. The U.S. was not interested in peace with Iraq. Lindauer was naive in many ways.

      Susan’s hellish story about her arrest under the Patriot Act, being indicted for five years with no hearing and imprisoned for a year are all told in her book Extreme Prejudice.

      Long story short, they succeeded in keeping her silent for five years before relenting and allowing her to speak and tell the world what she knew about the foreknowledge and coverup of 9/11.

      Though she was never taken to trial she was assigned a couple of judges to deal with her case. The first was Michael B. Mukasey who later became Attorney General of the U.S.. How’s that for a small world!

      Or how about this one, even better. Mukasey was friends with Larry Silverstein and they attended the same synagogue!

      Or how about this one. Mukasey just happened to be the judge for Silverstein’s $4.1 billion 9/11 insurance claim settlement!

      Small world, huh?

    • Part 9e –  It’s a Very Small World!

      Benjamin Netanyahu

      And finally we come to Benjamin Netanyahu, now in his record sixth term as PM of Israel.

      Larry Silverstein, one of James’ prime suspects for 9/11 just happened to be good buddies with Netanyahu. They would talk to each other at least once a week before 9/11. What a small world!

      James did an episode back in 2012 discussing the secret Israeli espionage program that smuggled nuclear materials out of the U.S. to help start Israel’s nuclear program in the 1960s. Declassified documents tied Netanyahu to the smuggling ring. (Corbett Report Radio 214 – Israel’s Nuclear Smuggling with Grant F. Smith)

      Netanyahu was a self-declared expert on nuclear weapons. So much so that a U.S. House of Representatives Committee requested that he testify on Sep. 12, 2002 regarding the nuclear threat posed by the Iraqi régime. Here is what he said to them:

      “There is no question whatsoever that Saddam is seeking and is working and is advancing towards the development of nuclear weapons – no question whatsoever”.
      “And there is no question that once he acquires it, history shifts immediately.” In his testimony, Netanyahu also said, “If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region.”

      What are the chances that Netanyahu, who was an expert in terrorism and obsessed with nuclear weapons for decades, just happened to be pals with the guy (Silverstein) who was going to reap billions of dollars when the WTC towers were nuked on 9/11?

      The following is a salient quote from Netanyahu’s book “Fighting Terrorism” published in 1995:

      “Further, Iran might be tempted to actually use nuclear weapons against Israel or a neighboring Arab state, and then avoid the consequences of Western reaction by threatening to activate its pre-armed militants in the West. Such groups nullify in large measure the need to have air power or intercontinental missiles as delivery systems for an Islamic nuclear payload. They will be the delivery system. In the worst of such scenarios, the consequences could be not a car bomb but a nuclear bomb in the basement of the World Trade Center.”

    • Part 9f –  It’s a Very Small World! 

      And last but not least, let’s never forget Netanyahu’s outrageous response to the media on the evening of 9/11 when he put his foot in his mouth:

      Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, “It’s very good. Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.” The attack will “strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we’ve experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror.”

      The two countries who stood to gain the most from the newly declared War on Terror were the U.S. and Israel. The never-ending Middle East wars are big business for the U.S. M.I.C. and Israel does not have to worry about attacks from its neighbors as they are too busy fighting for their survival.         

      Given all the evidence:         
      – that nukes were used on 9/11          
      – Netanyahu’s connections with Silverstein         
      – the ‘dancing Israelis’ who had the nerve to admit on an Israeli TV talk show in Nov. 2001 “Our purpose was to document the event.” (as they waited in a New Jersey apartment parking lot for the planes to strike the towers).

      If I were putting pieces of a 9/11 puzzle together I’d place Netanyahu’s piece right in the center of the puzzle! He had the means, motive, opportunity and chutzpah to pull off the job.

    • Part 10 – Final Words

      They blew their minds out in the tower,       
      They didn’t notice that the nukes were set.         
      A crowd of people stood and stared…         
      I would urge James to invite James Perloff back as a guest. But instead of talking about the War of Independence, the Spanish-American War, the Korean War, the Lusitania False Flag, the CFR Agenda, or Pearl Harbor, invite him to discuss what he thinks happened on 9/11. I’m sure it would be an eye-opener to most Corbetteers.         

      In addition it would be great to have Heinz Pommer interviewed for one of your episodes to get his take on 9/11.         

      The first quarter of the 21st century has almost passed and the Project for the New American Century’s (PNAC) goals are right on target.

Submit a Comment


Become a Corbett Report member