Episode 422 – What Hath God Wrought (The Media Matrix — Part 2)

by | Jul 25, 2022 | Podcasts, Videos | 74 comments

It’s difficult for us to appreciate just how incredible it was for those who first witnessed communication from a distance with a disembodied electric ghost. In fact, it was almost impossible for people to understand this type of communication in anything but spiritual terms. Even the word “medium” evokes the specter of contact with the spirit world. . . .

Watch on Archive / BitChute / Odysee or Download the video or audio

For those with limited bandwidth, CLICK HERE to download a smaller, lower file size version of this episode.

For those interested in audio quality, CLICK HERE for the highest-quality version of this episode (WARNING: very large download).


Hi, I’m James Corbett of The Corbett Report, and I’m not here right now. . . . I mean, there. With you.

Confused? Well, take a look at this . . .

[Steps aside to reveal James in screen] See? But, in truth, I’m not here either. What you are watching are the ghostly reflections of someone far away. I am not in the room with you, but you can see me. You can hear me. You might not think much about this, but . . . [Snaps fingers, revealing green screen set in studio] . . . it is one of the wonders of our era, and it has shaped the world in ways we can barely comprehend.

VOICEOVER: Media. It surrounds us. We live our lives in it and through it. We structure our lives around it. But it wasn’t always this way. So how did we get here? And where is the media technology that increasingly governs our lives taking us? This is the story of The Media Matrix.


There’s a story about the famous Battle of Waterloo in 1815 that is not usually included in the history textbooks.

The story is that John Roworth—a trusted employee of Nathan Rothschild, the English heir of the infamous Rothschild banking family—was at the battlefield that day and, when the battle was decided and it was apparent that Napoleon had been defeated, he raced off on horseback, bearing the news across the English channel. The messenger arrived at his employers’s London office a full 24 hours before the official government courier and Rothschild, always looking for a way to turn a profit, decided to use the news to his advantage. He made a show of selling his shares at the London Stock Exchange and the public, believing the famed stockbroker had received word that Napoleon had won the battle, began selling as well. The stock market plummeted and Rothschild secretly bought up the shares at rock-bottom prices. By the time the news finally reached Londoners that Wellington—not Napoleon—was the victor at Waterloo, the coup was complete: Nathan Rothschild was the richest man in the realm.

This story, like so many historical adventure yarns, has been much decorated in the retelling: John Roworth was not at Waterloo, for one thing, and there was no great market sell-off in the hours before the official news of the battle reached London. But the central part of the tale is true: Nathan Rothschild did receive early news of Napoleon’s defeat and he did “do well” by that information, as Roworth admitted in a letter the month after the incident.

But whatever this story tells us about the world of finance, it tells us something more fundamental about something far more important: power. Knowledge is power, and, as we saw in Part 1 of this series, Gutenberg had brought that power to the masses. With the printing press, knowledge could be copied and spread to the far corners of the globe faster and easier and cheaper than it ever had before . . .

. . . but it still had to be carried. On horseback, on foot, by train, by carrier pigeon. Information was still a physical thing and even the news of Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo had to be physically transported from one place to another. But did it have to be this way? What if information could be communicated directly by electric current and sent across wires or through the air at the speed of light?

Enter Samuel Morse.

Morse was not a scientist or an experimenter, but a painter. He claimed that the idea for sending messages through electrical wires came to him in a flash of genius on a lengthy ship journey from Europe to America in 1832, and thus that he deserved credit as the sole inventor of the telegraph.

In reality, research along these lines had been going on for nearly a century. The idea of sending electrical messages through wires was first proposed in Scots Magazine in 1753 and it was demonstrated numerous times over the years—most memorably by Francisco Salvá, who in 1795 connected wires to human test subjects, assigned each of them a letter, and instructed them to shout their letter out when they received a shock.

Ignorant of this history, Morse had to rely on real scientists and inventors for his important breakthroughs. Like Professor Leonard Gale, who helped develop the technique of using relays to help the messages travel further than a few hundred yards. And Alfred Vail, a bright young machinist whose improvements to Morse’s crude prototype brought the idea into reality. Many even contend that it was Vail, not Morse, who invented the system of dots and dashes that we know as Morse Code.

Nonetheless, history is written by the winners, and Morse proved to be the winner. Getting the credit, the glory and, more to the point, the patent for the telegraph, Morse received a congressional appropriation of $30,000 to build the first telegraph line from Washington to Baltimore in 1844. He sent the first official telegraph message from the US Capitol to Alfred Vail at a railroad station in Baltimore. The message had been selected by Anne Ellsworth, the daughter of the Patent Commissioner with whom Morse was lodging while he was stationed in Washington. She chose a passage from the Bible fitting of the momentous occasion: “What hath God wrought!”

The passage, from the book of Numbers, is one of praise—rejoicing at the wonders that God had wrought for Israel—and ends with an exclamation mark. But the telegraph message didn’t contain punctuation, and so the press misreported the phrase with a question mark at the end: “What hath God wrought?” The medium had already begun to change the message.

It’s difficult for us to appreciate just how incredible it was for those who first witnessed communication from a distance with a disembodied electric ghost. In fact, it was almost impossible for people to understand this type of communication in anything but spiritual terms. Even the word “medium” evokes the specter of contact with the spirit world.

When the radio was introduced to Saudi Arabia, the country’s conservative Islamic clerics declared it “the devil hiding in a box” and demanded that King Abdulaziz ban the infernal contraption. The king saw the potential use of the radio for the development of the country, but, relying on the clerics for support, he couldn’t outright reject their council.

Instead, the crafty monarch proposed a test: the radio would be brought before him the next day and he would listen to it himself. If what the clerics said was true, then he would ban the devil’s device and behead those responsible for bringing it into the country.

The next day, the radio was brought before the king at the appointed time. But the king had secretly arranged with the radio engineers to make sure the Quran was being read at the hour of the test. Sure enough, when he switched it on and passages from the Quran were heard.

“Can it be that the devil is saying the Quran?” he asked. “Or is it perhaps true that this is not an evil box?” The clerics conceded defeat and the radio was allowed into Saudi Arabia.

We may laugh, but the Saudis were not the first or the last to mistake media technology for devilry. In 1449, Johann Fust—the scion of a wealthy and powerful family in Mainz—lent Gutenberg an enormous sum of money to start producing his famed Bible and confiscated the books from the printer when he couldn’t afford to repay the loan. When Fust later appeared on the streets of Paris, selling multiple copies of Gutenberg’s Bible, the bewildered Parisians—who had never seen printed books before and so couldn’t imagine how so many strangely identical copies of a manuscript could be produced so quickly—arrested him for witchcraft.

The essence of the mass media—its ability to project the voices of people who aren’t there using electronic gadgets and wireless networks—is the essence of magic, bringing to life the scrying mirrors and palantirs of lore. But is this media technology a dark art, or can its powers be used for good?

As the new medium of commercial radio rose in the early decades of the 20th century, listeners had cause to side with the Saudi clerics in their determination that it was, in fact, a devil in a box. Listeners like those who tuned into a strange news report on the Columbia Broadcasting System on the evening of Sunday, October 30, 1938.

ANNOUNCER: Ladies and gentlemen, here is the latest bulletin from the Intercontinental Radio News. Toronto, Canada: Professor Morse of McGill University reports observing a total of three explosions on the planet Mars, between the hours of 7:45 P.M. and 9:20 P.M., eastern standard time. This confirms earlier reports received from American observatories. Now, nearer home, comes a special announcement from Trenton, New Jersey. It is reported that at 8:50 P.M. a huge, flaming object, believed to be a meteorite, fell on a farm in the neighborhood of Grovers Mill, New Jersey, twenty-two miles from Trenton. The flash in the sky was visible within a radius of several hundred miles and the noise of the impact was heard as far north as Elizabeth. We have dispatched a special mobile unit to the scene, and will have our commentator, Carl Phillips, give you a word picture of the scene as soon as he can reach there from Princeton. In the meantime, we take you to the Hotel Martinet in Brooklyn, where Bobby Millette and his orchestra are offering a program of dance music.

SOURCE: Orson Welles War Of The Worlds 10/30/1938

Of course, this wasn’t a news broadcast at all. It was the infamous “Halloween Scare,” Orson Wells’ radio adaptation of The War of the Worlds, which infamously caused panic among some members of the listening audience who were flipping through the dial and mistook the dramatized news “interruptions” for actual reports of a Martian invasion.

It’s become fashionable in recent years to downplay the incident as a myth. There was no real scare, only a few dimwits who got frightened. The newspapers—looking for any excuse to belittle radio, its fast-rising competition for the public’s attention and corporate advertising dollars—ginned up the story and sold the public on a panic that never was.

But there was something to the Halloween Scare. The City Manager of Trenton, New Jersey—mentioned by name in the broadcast—even wrote to the Federal Communications Commission to demand an immediate investigation into the stunt. In response, a team of researchers fanned out, collecting information, conducting interviews and studying reports about the panic to better understand what had happened and what could be learned about this new medium’s ability to influence the public.

The team was from the Princeton Radio Project—a research group founded with a two-year, $67,000 grant from the Rockefeller Foundation to study the effect of radio through the lens of social psychology. The team was led by Hadley Cantril, the old Dartmouth College roommate of Nelson Rockefeller who had written in 1935 that “[r]adio is an altogether novel medium of communication, preeminent as a means of social control and epochal in its influence upon the mental horizons of men.”

Cantril’s report on Wells’ Halloween broadcast, The Invasion from Mars, concluded that such a large-scale media-induced frenzy could happen again “and even on a much more extensive scale.” This was important information for the funders of the Princeton Radio Project; their next major research project was a study of how radio could be used for spreading war propaganda, an increasingly important subject as the world slipped into the maw of World War II.

The question of electronic media’s ability to influence the public became even more important as the radio revolution of the early twentieth century flowed into the television revolution of the mid-twentieth century. Television had actually been ready to roll out as a commercial medium in the 1930s, but the Depression and then the war delayed the mass production of television sets. The first mass-produced commercial television hit the market in 1946, and it soon became one of the most quickly adopted technologies in history to that point, finding its way into the majority of American homes within a decade.

Strangely, as sociologist Robert Putnam documented in his 2000 bestseller, Bowling Alone, the era of television adoption precisely coincides with a severe drop-off in civic engagement among the American public. Could there be a relation? If so, what could it be?

One intriguing possibility comes from research conducted by Herbert Krugman in 1969. Krugman—who would go on to become manager of public opinion research at General Electric in the 1970s—was interested to discover what happens physiologically in the brain of a person watching TV. He taped a single electrode to the back of his test subject’s head and ran the wire to a Grass Model 7 Polygraph, which in turn interfaced with a Honeywell 7600 computer and a CAT 400B computer. He turned on the TV and began monitoring the brain waves of his subject. He found through repeated testing that “within about thirty seconds, the brain-waves switched from predominantly beta waves, indicating alert and conscious attention, to predominantly alpha waves, indicating an unfocused, receptive lack of attention: the state of aimless fantasy and daydreaming below the threshold of consciousness.”

Krugman’s initial findings were confirmed by more extensive and accurate testing: TV rapidly induces an alpha-state consciousness in its viewers, putting them in a daydream state that leaves them less actively focused on their activities and more receptive to suggestion. This dream state combines with the nature of the medium itself to create a perfect tool for disengaging the viewers intellectually, removing them from active participation in their environment and substituting real experience with the simulacrum of experience.

In a word, TV hypnotizes its viewers.

NEIL POSTMAN: To begin with, television is essentially non-linguistic. It presents information mostly in visual images. Although human speech is heard on television and sometimes assumes importance, people mostly watch television. And what they watch are rapidly changing visual images, as many as 1200 different shots every hour. The average length of a shot on network television is 3.5 seconds. The average in a commercial is 2.5 seconds.

Now, this requires very little analytic decoding. In America, television watching is almost wholly a matter of what we would call pattern recognition. What I’m saying here is that the symbolic form of television—its form—does not require any special instruction or learning.

In America, television viewing begins at about the age of 18 months and by 36 months, children begin to understand and respond to television’s imagery. They have favorite characters, sing jingles they hear and ask for products they see advertised.

There’s no need for any preparation or prerequisite training for watching television. It needs no analog to the McGuffey Reader. Watching television requires no skills and develops no skills and that is why there is no such thing as remedial television watching.

SOURCE: 2001 | Fredonia Alum Neil Postman On Childhood

As we have seen, it was only a matter of years from the advent of commercial radio as a medium of communication until monopolistic financial interests were funding studies to determine how best to use it to mould the public consciousness. And, it seems, the television—with its brain wave-altering, hypnosis-inducing, cognitive impairment abilities—was designed from the very get-go to be a weapon of control deployed against the viewing public.

But if these media are weapons, if they are being used to direct and shape the public’s attention and, ultimately, their thoughts, it begs some questions: Who is wielding these weapons? And for what purpose?

This is no secret conspiracy. The answer is not difficult to find. TimeWarner and Disney and Comcast NBC Universal and News Corp and Sony and Universal Music Group and the handful of other companies that have consolidated control over the “mediaopoly” of the electronic media are the ones wielding the media weapon. Their boards of directors are public information. Their major shareholders are well known. A tight-knit network of wealthy and powerful people control what is broadcast by the corporate media, and, by extension, wield the media weapon to shape society in their interest.

In Part 1 of this series, we noted how technological advancements in the printing press and the development of new business models for the publishing industry had taken Gutenberg’s revolutionary technology out of the hands of the public and put it into the hands of the few rich industrialists with the capital to afford their own newspaper or book publisher. The Gutenberg conspiracy had led, seemingly inevitably, to the Morgan conspiracy. But that process didn’t end with the electrification of the media; it accelerated.

By the end of the twentieth century, a handful of media companies controlled the vast majority of what Americans read, saw and heard. That this situation was used to control what the public thought about important topics is, by now, obvious to all.

NEWSCASTERS: The sharing of biased and false news has become all too common on social media. More alarming, some media outlets publish these same fake stories — stories that simply aren’t true — without checking facts first. Unfortunately, some members of the media use their platforms to push their own personal bias and agenda to control exactly what people think. This is extremely dangerous to a democracy.

SOURCE: Sinclair Broadcasting Under Fire for “Fake News” Script

At the dawn of the twenty-first century, this media oligopoly had cemented its control over the public mind. Combined, newspapers, television, movies and radio had the ability to direct people’s thoughts on any given topic, or even what they thought about. The zenith of that era was reached on September 11, 2001, when billions across the globe watched the dramatic events of 9/11 play out on their television screens like a big-budget Hollywood production.

But the media was not done evolving. Technologies were already being rolled out that would once again change the public’s relationship to the media. Technologies that would once again leave people questioning whether the media was a devil hiding in a box, wondering whether this new media was a tool of empowerment or control, and asking the question: What hath God wrought?

The Media Matrix

Part 2: What Hath God Wrought

Transcript and links: corbettreport.com/media

Next week: Into the Metaverse


  1. Very well done. The extra screen with the green screen behind James was a nice touch, a gentle reminder it is.

    Congratulations Mr. Corbett, a fine refined person you have become. Many thanks for your work over all the years.

    Very excited for Part 3.

    Good job Broc West too :thumbs up:

  2. I can’t convince my friends that Tucker is one of them, even though he covers subjects that others dont. He is ALLOWED for a reason. Just as the politicians that get the most media face time (both good and bad) are the chosen players. Remember how invisible Ron Paul was in the media, even though he had lines for blocks to see him speak?

    • Tucker Carlsson is controlled opposition (and very specific biographical and substantial things show this) and Limited hangout (just like Alex Jones); https://odysee.com/@Slammdcrxx:8/TUCKER-CARLSON-EXPOSED:3

      Before the truth movements became more infiltrated ie. mid-0s and before many newly awakened saw what preceded the major inevitable awakenings (approx. 2010-2015, 2015-2020, and 2020-2022): Tucker Carlson’s dirty little PNAC war against 9/11 Truth

      Not only was Tucker a hitman against the 9/11 movements, but he comes from a Deep State family, applied to join the CIA, etc. – look at the deeds + biography and your illusions evaporate instantly.

      A controlled opposition says everything the opposition wants to hear, and therefore has to give lots of real truth, but omits and distorts the most important.

      The most essential thing about limited hangout is that they will have to represent the truths that are already growing in public awareness so much that it doesn’t make sense to deny them (they datamine such talking points from the public). Instead, you tell what many already know, so you appear as the people’s watchdog (even if this is a lie) and leave the next president puppet ready while no real change is happening.. With Divide and Rule with 2 mutually opposed controlled oppositions that appear real. The house always wins.

      CNN and Fox are just 2 wings of the same Deep State vulture.
      Fox News is Rupert Murdoch, supported in the shadows by the Rothschild dynasty. It was also Roy Cohn, Trump’s mentor, the pedophile-Honey-trap agent, who convinced Reagan that Rupert Murduch could buy a shitload of media in the United States at the time.

      The idea that Tucker Carlsson is a free rebel on Fox News who is allowed to say whatever he wants is completely and utterly ridiculous.

      They always have 2 controlled oppositions

      Very good article July 2022: Intelligence agencies controlling the media: How Spooks and the Establishment Media Are Circling the Wagons

        • That’s a great documentary.

          As far as Tucker is concerned, I still remember that reaction by Ron Paul to the possibility of 9/11 being an inside job. These guys know what’s the name of the game and they are playing it. Otherwise they might ruffle the TV watches.

    • Carlson’s history demonstrates his System stooge background. Anyone who refuses to see cannot be forced to see.

      If someone is on “mainstream” television, broadcast or cable, they are allowed by our rulers to be there, for purposes contrary to yours.

      “Reality,” for most people befuddled by the controlled (lies)media, is now whatever our rulers want them to believe. That includes the idiocy of “the right” in trusting the faux “opposition” like Carlson or Trump.

    • Ksmen
      Tucker is fighting for HIS side of the elite against the other elite. They do not really walk in lockstep anymore then criminals or warlords…. We would be eating bigs in pods if they were.

      I think that Tuckrs masters are going to be getting into a hot gangfight with Bidens masters pretty soon

  3. I am embarrassed to make the following announcement: TV makes people stupid, more stupid than need be. It is as simple as that. And I have always known it and shied away from the box since I was a child.
    But I love your presentation James. You are a BRICK. Bricks are all we need. It would be an insult to offer you the Noble Prize.

    • Is that a joke or a typo?

  4. It would be interesting to measure the brain waves of someone who is analyzing the subversive intent of the media as they are watching; someone “reading the code” of the matrix in real time. Analyzing a dream is a profoundly different experience than having the dream. It requires a great deal of effort as the content is first remembered, then brought across the threshold of the unconscious, written down, and finally translated from a felt image to an understood blueprint of what is truly happening in one’s psyche. At that point one can chose to be in Red Pill or Blue Pill mode. A 007 movie can be enjoyed as entertainment while realizing the subliminal message is — the government has the authority to deputize secret agents to kill you; and those people get the girls and the fancy cars as they jetset from Monte Carlo to the Bahamas.

  5. Excellent!!
    Thanks, James.

  6. This is an extremely well done series. I didn’t think that I would be interested but I have found myself wowed at how interesting the content is. And,bravo to Broc on the visuals, very well done!

    • Very few things JC produces are not top-quality.

    • Same here!

      The shorter format of about 20 minutes is a good call for a variety of reasons.

  7. Excellent, superb documentary, James, and such great production values, Broc. This series can and should be in all our schools as a primary learning tool. Thank you so much. Job well done to both of you!

    As for television as a hypnotic tool,Truthstream Media has a very good documentary:
    The Media Experimented with Television Hypnosis Back in 1946
    June 24, 2022, 34 minutes

  8. For students of the history of mass media, I highly recommend:
    “’Modify the standards of the in-group’: On Jews and Mass Communications”
    By Andrew Joyce, January 14, 2020

    The article is unquestionably one of the most revealing, informative reports on mass communications ever documented.

    Who knew the extent(!) to which Jews would comprise “. . . what was effectively a series of interlinked battalions of Jewish psychologists and sociologists operating with a kind of religious fervour in the fields of ‘prejudice studies,’ opinion-shaping, and mass communications between the 1930s and 1950s, all with the goal of ‘unlocking’ the White mind and opening it to ‘tolerance.’”

    The Jewish academics and social scientists below, along with their thousands of graduate students, were extremely influential in shaping how Americans think today. Why is so little known about the historiography of mass communications?

    Samuel H. Flowerman, Herbert Greenberg, Paul Lazarsfeld, Kurt Lewin, Milton Rosenberg, Robert Abelson, Jay Blumler, Joseph Klapper, Bernard Berelson, Fritz Heider, Leo Bogart, Elihu Katz, Marie Jahoda, Joseph Gittler, Morris Rosenberg, Ernest Dichter, Walter Weiss, Nathan Glazer, Bernard J. Fine, Bruno Bettelheim, Wallace Mandell, Hertha Hertzog, Dororthy Blumenstock, Stanley Schachter, David Caplovitz, Walter Lippmann, Sol Ginsburg, Harry Alpert, Leon Festinger, Michael Gurevitch, Edward Shils, Eugene Gaier, Joseph Goldsen, Julius Schreiber, Daniel Levinson, Herbert Blumer, I. M. A. Myers, Irving Janis, Miriam Reimann, Edward Sapir, Solomon Asch, Gerald Wieder, and more.

    • The entire world knows who owns/controls the world’s major mass media, but “thought leadership” has made it so only the most daring and/or reckless will speak it. We all know the shrieks if anyone even implies a certain group runs the media. You don’t have to name the perps, just suggest there is a coordinated media agenda for purposes not noble.

      If this group were not who and what they are, but, instead, say, Muslims or Chinese, all of the regimes of “the West” would be discussing legislation to expropriate media networks as “threats to national security.”

      • “….The entire world knows who owns/controls the world’s major mass media, but “thought leadership” has made it so only the most daring and/or reckless will speak it. …”

        Dr Jones book “the Jewish revolutionary spirit” goes into how a small group of people weild such enormous power…but they don’t have magic power. All we need to do is stop buying their filth and stop taking their arguments as anything but an attempt to hurt us

        • A Romanian patriot once said, “A country has the Jews it deserves. Just as mosquitos can thrive and settle only in swamps, likewise the former can only survive in the swamps of our sins.”

          I do believe they have supernatural “leadership,” but it is, indeed, our sins that have allowed them to achieve what they have. The love of money, the love of pleasure, and on. Usury was once a mortal sin (per the Bible) within Christendom, and when Christians compromised on the Truth they knew, the bankster tribe started their long road of conquest.

          • Usury is a mortal sin for gentiles not for the Jew.

            Deuteronomy 23:19-20
            19 (A)“You shall not charge interest on loans to your brother, (B)interest on money, interest on food, interest on anything that is lent for interest. 20 (C)You may charge a foreigner interest, but you may not charge your brother interest, (D)that the Lord your God may bless you in all that you undertake in the land that you are entering to take possession of it.

            Christendom in of itself is a religious, ethnic/racial and ideological compromise for the European people. You compromised on truth when you accepted a crucified Rabbi in substitution for truth.

            A country has the Jews it deserves. No country or people deserve Jews. The European is not allowed to act collectively in their own interest and simultaneously indoctrinated through psychological projection from organized Jewry that they are inherent oppressors and should be systemically oppressed in favor of elevating all other races and sexual minorities.

            The last effort from a people that collectively stood up to world Jewish influence and power had the entire world declare war on them and then followed the most pervasive post war propaganda campaign conceivable. Even going as far to create a secular religion around the victor’s alleged victimhood.

            • #1) the Old Covenant and “the law” was “fulfilled,” superseded by the New Covenant, regardless of what “Jews” claim:

              “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.”

              I John 2:22-23

              #2) even if it were still in effect, the “Jews” “forgot” this part:

              “At the end of every seven years you must cancel debts. This is how it is to be done: Every creditor shall cancel the loan he has made to his neighbor. He shall not require payment from his neighbor or brother, because Yahweh’s time for canceling debts has been proclaimed.”

              Deuteronomy 15:1-2

              (note that jubilee applies to NON-Hebrews, too)

              #3) you sound like a “Jew” yourself, when you deny Christ. Jesus Christ IS the Way, the Truth, and the Life, regardless of whether you like it or not.


            • #4) there is no real difference between the ANCIENT Hebrews and “European peoples.” We share the same genetics, the same alphabet origin, and most of the same heathen traditions. Most people are shocked to see how much Paleo-Hebrew and Runic look alike. The stupidity of the modern mind, thinking that the current inhabitants of “Israel” are the same as those who lived, 2000, 3000 years ago, is pathetic. David was a redhead, and legend is that his descendant, Jesus Christ, was, as well.

              #5) Real Judean, St. Paul, warned us: “the love of money is the root of all evil.” Europeans CHOSE subjugation to the “Jews.” “Jews” got the upper hand when Europeans, most of them claiming to be “Christian,” accepted Jewish bankster loans. That’s true for individuals, and it’s true for the Catholic church.

              #6) that last attempt to free humanity from the “Jews” was led by a man who wrote, “My feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God’s truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was his fight against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross.”

              One is welcome to argue that he was faking it, or that the Soviet Agent “Werther” aka Martin Bormann’s claims showed the leader of that movement was “anti-Christian.” Nonetheless, Germany was thoroughly a Christian nation during its effort against “Jews” and their ideological tools of Stalinism & Capitalism, as the overwhelming decency and nobility of its people in the midst of deadly combat shows. Also remember, the humanity of that leader led him to refuse to use a weapon that might have won Germany the war, nerve gas.

              • 1.) Matthew 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

                Have heaven and earth passed? It just seems like this doctrine of “fulfillment” is erroneous and based on flimsy scriptural justification. Nonetheless, it’s not my religion why should I entertain how you rationalize contradiction?

                2.) Where I can surmise that “neighbor” and “brother” are in reference to fellow Hebrews, especially in the alleged Deuteronomy period. If I go one verse down. Looks like you forgot this part.

                Deuteronomy 15:3 Of a foreigner thou mayest exact it again….

                WOAH! Didn’t have to go very far for that nugget. If that wasn’t elucidating enough lets pair that with
                Deuteronomy 15:6-11:

                “You shall lend money to many nations, and you yourselves shall borrow in return from no one. You shall rule over very many nations, and no one shall rule over you.”

                That’s pretty clear, isn’t it? Is there really any deviation from what the Jews were commanded 2500 years ago to what they are “fulfilling” today?

                How about Isaiah 49:23 Kings will be your foster fathers, and their queens your nursing mothers. They will bow down before you with their faces to the ground; they will lick the dust at your feet. Then you will know that I am the LORD; those who hope in me will not be disappointed.”

                This is quite edifying in the trajectory of European history.

                …(To be continued)

              • 3/4.) So you’re the true Jew but I’m a Jew as well because I deny “your” messiah and Jews say they are Jews now stole your identity as Jews but are actually Khazarians and Anglo Saxons or British Identity adherents somehow lost their identity even though the Jews of the Bible obsess of over ream after ream of genealogical history.

                Did I leave anything out? I just want to make sure I hit all the nonsense theories. So the Royal Hebrew bloodlines had red hair. Many Jews have European phenotypes, the Saxe Coburg Gotha family has red hair. Hey, they probably are descendants of the Royal Davidic line, I have no problem accepting that. But they are awful vile, perverse criminal abusers much like the actual Davidic family full of sexual deviants like Solomon with 700 concubines/wives. Absolutely disgusting.

                A lot of this stuff seems to be coming from E. Michael Jones, reflexively calling people who reject Rabbi Yeshua and all forms of the Abrahamic Mind virus “Jews” and pushing the Khazar conspiracy theory. Much like Jordan Peterson, he is either consciously or unconsciously attempting to head off a broad reactionary movement of the European peoples. Saying the “white race” does not exist. You must accept the universal authority of the Catholic Church, his mother drunk or sober. And unconditionally love the Jew. This is the unholy trinity of how the European is not surviving the 21st century. E Michael Jones is every bit as dangerous as Jordan Peterson and his wonderful Communist mural.

                5.) To quote Germar Rudolph the Jews are such a small minority they could never control and rule what were doing but they’re able to do it because we let them. We need to understand Christianity is a Jewish sect. When we talk about there being 13 million(15 million) I say no there are 1.5 billion. Every Christians a Jew… So when you talk about the Jews you need to understand that every other religion that defines itself by ethnicity has basically been wiped off the Earth.

                I squarely blame Christians and their religion for Jewish power. As Christianity should be blamed for atheism which prides itself in yet greater degrees of philosemitism, universalism, and altruism and self hate that are destroying the European people. Atheists paradoxically strive to be more Christian than Christians. Because this is the dialectic established.

                6.) Lastly, I’ll just say the relationship between the NSDAP and Christianity was complicated and the situation complex. What the leader’s true views were and what was lip service is difficult to discern. I can say Pagan symbology and occultism flourished. With positive Christianity being an attempt to sanitize the religion of it’s Jewish roots. But I do agree he was quite noble in his repeated attempts at peace with Britain in allowing the “Dunkirk Miracle”. His disdain for total war and attacking civilian targets.

              • ethanms:

                One of the things I find most amusing is when a committed anti-Christian pretends he is in a position to tell me what Christianity is all about. Usually, it’s the Dunning-Kruger Effect in action.

                What is also funny is how you actually don’t understand “Judaism” any better than Christianity. The passages you cite were for their specific place and time, and, are NOT the “justification” for today’s Jews doing their “thing.” That, actually, is in the so-called “Oral Torah,” or the Babylonian Talmud. The written Torah (the first Five Books of the Old Testament) and the writings and the prophets are mere window-dressing for Goyim within “Judaism.”

                Christ called the Jews of His time out on this, very clearly: “the traditions of the elders” He called them. The epitome of satanic double-think and hypocrisy.

                You might try reading CHRIST’S definition of “neighbor” to understand the context of that term in the usage I cited.

              • ethanms:

                I am NOT an adherent of Christian Identity.

                I am not a follower of E. Michael Jones. Nor am I Catholic. I, especially, do not follow the con-man Peterson. I’m surprised how many did and do. Definitely not a guy to admire or follow.

                I figure you are a Race Idolator, and are approaching this from the common ideological position of what is now termed, often falsely, as “neo-Nazi.”

                Is there a White Race? Yes. It is a composite of many ethnic groups, and two “biological races,” the Northern (or Aryan) and Mediterranean. These are identical to the peoples of Genesis, the descendants of Noah, along with largely-extinct Hamitic White people in Northern Africa (we see remnants in the Atlas Mountains and the Canary Islands).

                The Adamic Race has accomplished the mission God ordained for us: bring the Gospel to the entire world, including creating the technologies to achieve that. We have almost fully-achieved that, and Christians are aiming for 2033 to finalize it to the last oral-only tribes. Does that mean we should now just die out? Of course not! But, neither should we idolize an identity that is material, though organic.

              • ethanms:

                We have seen perfectly clearly how “Aryan Race” idolators have aligned themselves with fanatic Jewish anti-humans in Ukraine. It is bizarre to some observers, but not to myself, knowing that both these Race Idolators and Jews operate on a “by any means necessary” imperative. Zelensky and the Azov thugs share a common goal, so they work together. It’s morally bankrupt, whether using Christian or Asatru morals and ethics. But it’s the nature of the ideologies involved.

                We concur on one thing: Christians – or, more accurately, “Christians” are responsible for the Jewish hegemony over the planet and humanity. Jesus Christ and His Apostles warned us PERFECTLY CLEARLY that ideological forebears of today’s “Jews” are “of the Devil,” and proscribing them and their influence was perpetually necessary. “Christians” CHOSE to ignore Christ, and, as Codreanu pointed out, created the sick environment for Jewish opportunists to thrive.

                The claim that Christianity is a “Jewish sect” would be laughable if not so pathetic. It’s always easy to identify those who have learned FROM Jewish sources about “Christianity.” “Judaism” did not exist until after Christ’s Resurrection – it was a hateful response TO Christianity. The Old Testament describes things that seem to “outrage” you, in the same manner as any “woke” kook. That’s sad. In reality, the Old Testament, WITHIN ITS TIME, was much more noble than the cultures surrounding it. Whereas the Old Testament prescribes something that is “offensive” to modern “sensibilities,” the competing culture usually prescribed something objectively atrocious instead.

                I cannot help you understand. You don’t seem to WANT to understand. I will leave it to the Almighty to reach your mind and heart. Proceeding with the idiocy of “Christianity is Jewish” is complying with the relatively recent Kosher agenda to “Judaize” Christianity. Never mind the teachings within the New Testament, the Early Church Fathers, or Dr. Martin Luther who wrote things that rival or exceed the writings and speeches of the painter from Braunau.

              • Dunning-Kruger? Resorting to ad hominem? I don’t find that amusing or effective lines of argumentation.

                “… you actually don’t understand “Judaism” any better than Christianity.”

                “…are NOT the “justification” for today’s Jews doing their “thing.”

                This is just argumentum ad lapidem or appeal to the stone fallacy, simply dismissing my arguments without addressing them substantively. The problem is these Biblical passages do support my line of argumentation and the fact of the matter is that the Talmud and Zohar could not exist without the foundational books of the Torah.

                Deuteronomy 15:6-11 establishes the precedent of framework of the Hebrews utilizing the monetary system of lending and usury to control and rule other nations. It’s quite explicit.

                The story of Joseph in Egypt creates the quintessential archetype of the Jewish oligarch behind the power of the governing body providing “wise council” in how to exploit a crisis, being a famine. Aggregating the product of the peoples surplus food supply and selling it back to them in exchange for their most precious resources, property and freedom. Effectively enslaving the Egyptians so Joseph’s incorrigible ilk could move in. Could any archetype be more in line with Raum Emmanuel’s “never let a crisis go to waste”?

                Much of the tropes and archetypes of perfidious Jewish exploitation, genocide and despotism are preserved perfectly within the first five books of the Bible.

                The only resource necessary to debate Christians is their own Bible.

                (…To be continued)

              • “You might try reading CHRIST’S definition of “neighbor”

                Why should I when we’re discussing Deuteronomy? The levying of usury to foreigner, which you conveniently omitted is the subject of my contention. Also Leviticus 19:18 defines neighbor as “children of thy people”.

                In Matthew 15:21-28 Jesus makes it very clear how he thinks of gentiles. He ONLY came for the lost sheep of the Israel and calls the gentile woman a dog and only when she groveled sufficiently did he perform his “miracle” giving the little dog crumbs from the masters table.

                “….Christ called (out) the Jews of His time”

                Yeah, he called them gods.

                John 10:34-35

                34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods?

                35 If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken;

                Jews are gods, gentiles are dogs.

                To just top off what Jesus thought of “the Jews”

                John 4:22 Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.

                Salvation is of the Jews. You better grovel before your precious Rabbi Yeshua.

                Look, I’m not going to try to untangle the gordion knot of your racial theory. You’re not CI but you think the Hebrews are Europeans and heathens. I’m stupid if I think modern Jews are Jews. It’s Adamic man’s destiny to spread the gospel! This is such unproductive gobbledygook.

                ….Whatever man (Continued)

              • Race Idolator? I simply think if the European people are unable to collectivize in their own interests they will be eradicated and mixed out per the Jewish Kalergi plan. This is the demographic trajectory.

                It’s simply part of who I am and gives me meaning and a place in something greater than myself. Something real and observable.

                There are many Christian “Nationalists” who have stated to my face they would genocide the entire White race if that was YHWH plan. I’m quite comfortable with not being “that”. If that makes me a race idolator so be it, far better than a race traitor.

                What’s happening in the Ukraine is such a tragedy. It’s tip to stern a Jewish operation from Soros, Nuland, Blinken and Zelensky. I can’t think of anything more senseless than the Ukrainians killing their ethnic brethren in Russia. These people are so similar with a shared history murdering each other for Jews. All the so-called alt media can do is scream about Nazis and how powerful the Azov battalion is, how they’re holding a gun to Zelensky!

                It’s all bullshit, they’re proudly fighting for Jewish globohomo, murdering more White people. Sending more Ukrainian women to sex slavery all over the world, terrorizing their own damn people. I don’t support anything about that war.

                Let’s just dispense with the semantical arguments. Jews wrote the Bible, Jews wrote the Old Testament. Jews Wrote the New Testament. The first Christians were Jews. Enough said.

                You know, your situation is like saying I hate Aleister Crowley, he was a vile despicable man… But I love Thelema! Do what thou wilst. It’s the only true way to God! Thelema is the only true religion, but I hate Aleister Crowley and his original followers. The oral Thelema is bad but mines holy!

              • ethanms:

                We’re really not “debating” anything. You and I talk a very different language. I recognize yours. Yes, I’ve read the idiocy of “Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin.” Intensely laughable that Eckart tried to drive a wedge between the Old and New Testaments, because he was, literally, an ignorant fool, who failed to understand the actual history and core ideology of Talmudism/”Judaism.” Likewise his worship of the failed gods of the ancient Germans.

                “The European Peoples” were recognized as a unified entity under a different name for over a thousand years: Christendom. Its heights of culture were marked by the ethos of following Jesus Christ while also strictly applying what He and His apostles warned about, regarding the Talmudists (Jews and “Jews”). Martin Luther’s The Jews and Their Lies is probably the most notable “anti-Semitic” (sic – LOL) work of that age. Jews were known universally in Christendom as “Christ-killers” during that period.

                The rise of the Talmud Jew is inversely correlated with the cultural decline of authentic Christianity. Europeans didn’t destroy themselves BECAUSE of Christianity, but quite the opposite: because they stopped believing in the overt and undeniable tenets of Biblical Christianity, and set themselves on the path to “Judeo-Christianity,” which is now synonymous with what this modern world claims IS “Christianity.”

                You believe what you want to believe. The Nordicism that is typical of Race Idolators is very laughable in the face of genuine physical and cultural anthropology. The ancient Germans would neither recognize the painter from Braunau, and almost assuredly neither you, as well, as “one of their own.” European unity never came about UNTIL Christianity gave Europeans a vision of unified purpose and destiny. Outside of Christianity, it was exploiting and killing other Europeans, including the Vikings capturing and selling blonde women to sell to what you regard as “untermenschen,” or sacrificing the best youth to failed gods in Wicker Men.

                As for what you think you know about the Old Testament, whatever. Disparaging Joseph as an alleged “huckster” concocting a crisis for his own benefit, is identical in nature to those today who refuse to prepare for emergencies, and then whine and shriek when their “friends” won’t share their limited provisions in an actual crisis. “He’s not being ‘fair’.” Such an attitude is usually found commonly among “urban” types.

              • beaconterraone

                “You and I talk a very different language.”

                Really? Pretty much all I’m doing is quoting the Bible. Making every concession to appeal to your internal ideological framework.

                It’s not much of a debate is it? I seem to be the only party making any attempt at refutation. Everything seems to be ” Intensely laughable” to you.

                “he was, literally, an ignorant fool, who failed to understand the actual history and core”

                And I suppose you do? You’re unbelievably haughty and arrogant. As much as I appreciate your biased interpretation of Christendom Europe were just going to have to move on. I don’t have the interest in correcting the record so you can “laugh intensely”. I pulled these from your Bible so you can work on your humility.

                2 Chronicles 7:14. 11 For all those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.”

                Proverbs 11:2. 2 When pride comes, then comes disgrace, but with humility comes wisdom. 15 The way of fools seems right to them, but the wise listen to advice.

                You talk about Dunning Kruger, yet you seem to think the story of Joseph in Egypt is analogous to the Squirrel and the Grasshopper? This is the epitome of Christian victim blaming and typical Christian proliferation of the most erroneous of interpretation. There’s also some historical evidence to suggest the Nile was deliberately dammed around this point in time. Alluding to a manufactured crisis.

                It says in Gen 41:48 (Joseph)he gathered up all the food of the seven years, which were in the land of Egypt, and laid up the food in the cities: the food of the field, which was round about every city, laid he up in the same.

                That’s food from the farmers of Egypt, it belonged to them but it was confiscated under Joseph’s edict into city food stores. This wouldn’t be such a bad thing if it was prudently distributed back to the “people” of Egypt so they could survive NOT enslave them. The trust the people put into their governing body was completely abused and exploited.

                If their food was meant to be stored, then why was it confiscated? How are people living in the city supposed to practically store food for 7 years of famine. These arguments are illogical with zero consideration for logistical reality.

                Joseph was squarely charged with ALL food distribution of the land and the people begged the Pharoah for a distribution of “THEIR” emergency stores.

                55 And when all the land of Egypt was famished, the people cried to Pharaoh for bread: and Pharaoh said unto all the Egyptians, Go unto Joseph; what he saith to you, do.

              • (….Continued)

                Joseph CHARGED it back to them.

                56 And the famine was over all the face of the earth: and Joseph opened all the storehouses, and sold unto the Egyptians

                Then when Joseph’s brethren and the son’s of Israel arrived in typical Jewish nepotism and conflicts of interest. He not only fills their sacks and asses with the Egyptian people’s corn and provision but gives their money back to them. Keep in mind he’s taking everything from everyone else.

                Gen 42:25 Then Joseph commanded to fill their sacks with corn, and to restore every man’s money into his sack, and to give them provision for the way: and thus did he unto them.

                Then a second time.

                Gen 43:21 And it came to pass, when we came to the inn, that we opened our sacks, and, behold, every man’s money was in the mouth of his sack, our money in full weight: and we have brought it again in our hand.

                Then Joseph and his tribe are given the “fat of the land of Egypt” and adorned with riches, along with the best of the land for the next 5 years of famine. While the Egyptians pay.

                Gen 45:18 And take your father and your households, and come unto me: and I will give you the good of the land of Egypt, and ye shall eat the fat of the land.

                Gen 45:22 To all of them he gave each man changes of raiment; but to Benjamin he gave three hundred pieces of silver, and five changes of raiment.

                Gen 47:11 And Joseph placed his father and his brethren, and gave them a possession in the land of Egypt, in the best of the land, in the land of Rameses

                Then Joseph confiscates all the money and collapses the currency. The monetary systems failed.

                47:14 And Joseph gathered up all the money that was found in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, for the corn which they bought: and Joseph brought the money into Pharaoh’s house.

                47:15 And when money failed in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came unto Joseph, and said, Give us bread: for why should we die in thy presence? for the money faileth.

                Then Joseph exploits this monetary collapse and buys all the land’s livestock and property redistributing the population into the cities.

                17 And they brought their cattle unto Joseph: and Joseph gave them bread in exchange for horses, and for the flocks, and for the cattle of the herds, and for the asses: and he fed them with bread for all their cattle for that year.

                20 And Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh; for the Egyptians sold every man his field, because the famine prevailed over them: so the land became Pharaoh’s.

                21 And as for the people, he removed them to cities from one end of the borders of Egypt even to the other end thereof.

                [SNIP – Please keep comments to 500 words or less. Longer comments can be split into multiple posts. -JC]

            • Ethanms
              “….Let’s just dispense with the semantical arguments. Jews wrote the Bible,…”

              No, GOD wrote the Bible, Jews rejected the Truth which is why Christians who were full of ‘Jewish DNA’ referred to them as “the Jews”

              Plenty of blond blue eyed “aryans” are as jewish in their outlook and behavior as any grabbler.. DR EM Jones is 100% correct that the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit (with its associated desire to become ones own messiah) is a spiritual sickness not a genetic one

              • “No, GOD wrote the Bible”

                How do we know this? Let’s use the same critical analysis that JC has been teaching us for the past 15 years. If we do so, we must analyze the Bible critically.

                The Bible had human authors, not God.

                And look at how the God in the Bible treats people, killing women, children and animals. Who would justify that type of thing?

                Would people on here justify it? Say if God says it’s okay to murder and kill than it’s okay? I certainly hope not.

              • Having said that I think that you have a right to your beliefs and I mean no offense. It’s my views and interpretation.

                If this was a rude comment, I am sorry.

              • Duck, these are claims that rely on an article of faith that are unsupported and illogical outside the circular reasoning of the Bible. It’s simply a belief, one which I don’t take seriously. As men have logically wrote all books and we have no reason to suspect otherwise, outside of delusional claims of divine penmanship that have zero substantiation, I am well within the logical confines to deduce that men wrote the Bible. Incredibly perverted and perfidious men who imbued all their psychopathic traits onto a schizophrenic deity.

                “Plenty of blond(e) blue eyed “aryans” are as jewish in their outlook and behavior as any grabbler”

                Yes, we call those Christians and I have diagnosed them as the enablers of Jewish influence and power.

                It’s no secret that Jews have a bevy of genetic mental disorders. You should probably consider that when you internalize their schizophrenic neural degeneration as the infallible word of God. What do you think that’s doing to your brain, mental state and capacity toward reason?

                You and bea sincerely believe that crucified sky jew is going to ride down from the clouds at the “end of times” to redeem the world! This is pure disconnect from anything resembling reality, it’s fantasy. This has always been the modus operandi of Jews to the gentile mind, it robs you of agency to the point where you see it as a “spiritual sickness”.

              • cu.h.j

                You did nothing wrong. Your insight is accurate and appreciated.

                “And look at how the God in the Bible treats people, killing women, children and animals. ”

                They do justify it. I’ve asked Christians if they would murder their children if YHWH commanded, which there is precedent for such a thing.

                They all say YES. With the refrain of “God would never ask anything immoral” or “God would stop me”.

                He didn’t with Jephthah and anything God commands is by default moral according to circular reasoning and the ad verecundiam of Biblical logic.

  9. I’ve heard the Rothschild correspondent at Waterloo story before. “Trading Places” is a better comedy rendition of such insider trading.
    I am rapidly running out of patience, time, and energy to watch any more conspiracy theories (which are no doubt true). Which makes me even want to watch them less.
    It’s all old news to me.
    Good luck Corbetters. Good luck going after your “betters”.
    Good luck on your way to the Dirt Nap.
    Good luck making any sense of it all.
    Good luck removing your fetters.
    Good luck finding happiness ASAP.
    Good luck with all the folderol.
    I’m off for a long winter’s nap.

    • I’m on the Right Team. The Team that will win over all opposition, human and superhuman.

      “Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell.”

      I can’t defeat the devils, literal and those in human form, who run this planet. But the One can. And will.

      The expiration date for this planet is approaching quickly. Tell this world to go to Hell, and seek the One who overcomes all.

    • Timmy Taes >>another day another weak worthless zombie > wear your mask and go to sleep Timmy

    • Timmy, I hope that I am misinterpreting what you wrote here. Please tell me that I am wrong and that you’re not thinking about harming yourself. Please tell me that you’re not thinking to pull an Arby/Robert.

      • Steve Smith: I suffer from afflictions of the aged. I will die soon enough. No need to hurry the process. My long winter nap, is of course a reference to the Christmas poem and my tendency to lake long naps in my elderly years.
        I am suffering from the old affliction of ennui. Life, perhaps as a reflection of myself, has become boring.

        • Color me relieved. Thanks.
          Hope that you find something to help you reinvigorate your sense of wonder.

          • Steve Smith: Thanks for your concern. At least the climate and soil here in Sonoma County are excellent. My wife and I get some solace and wonder from gardening. I also make my own beer and sometimes salsa from the peppers we grow. Unfortunately, the 90% double or more jabbed and masked locals are no fun to be around. It’s like living in Santa Mira with the Pod People.
            Take care.

            • Gardening is a very big part of my life. Trying to grow stuff in the subtropics is a process of experimentation and a constant source of pleasure and frustration.

              Do you have any animals? My life would be much less fulfilling without the critters.
              But I suppose living in the wine country, the government restrictions are prohibitive. My sister lives in Lodi and she’s not even allowed to use her fireplace.

              Anyway, I’m glad that my imagination is the only real problem. Take care and try to make it to Florida!

        • I think the Covid scam really traumatized a lot of people which has affected our lives in significant ways, such as exacerbating depression and sadness. I’m sorry this has been your experience and I can relate to this because it has also negatively impacted me too. On top of that, when a person has health concerns adds to the stress.

          I also understand “ennui” as one gets older. I’m in my 40s and already started to feel it.

          I’m starting to think that perhaps my hormones are off. I know that hormones decline in men too and have spoken with some very active people in their 60s who have supplemented with bio identical hormones. Perhaps this is something you’d consider. It’s something I am exploring because I know people who don’t have “ennui” and such and are even aware of all the psyops and such. I hate using the term “awake” now, but you know what I mean.

          Sometimes people just need a new perspective and I think this can be assisted by medicines and other physical interventions (meditation, exercise, travel, etc…). But chemical intervention is sometimes helpful, stuff that won’t hurt you I mean.

          Lastly, I have realize that life is much more about quality than quantity and that each moment is precious.

          • cu.h.j. Thanks so much for your excellent comment and caring advice. I’ve watched your comments over the years and you always say something pertinent and thoughtful.
            In My forties, I took up with a 26-year-old buxom blonde who looked like a Playmate. That just about killed me, but I wasn’t bored.
            I’m sure if our small town of Healdsburg, CA hadn’t been one of the most Pod Person places in America (90% of the people here are at least double jabbed according to Sonoma County website), my wife and I wouldn’t be so depressed.
            We both look at the locals now with disgust. If we were healthy we’d move.
            As for hormones; I knew two men about my age here in town 15 years ago. One took human growth hormone and the other took testosterone.
            The HGH guy was so wired and muscular I couldn’t stand being around him. I think he wore his girlfriend out like Jeff Goldblum in “The Fly”.
            The Testosterone guy developed such a pronounced forehead that he looked like a neanderthal.
            I continue to read non-fiction books for stimulation. This summer I have read “The Unspeakable” by James Douglass about JFK (excellent), “They Were Soldiers” by Ann Jones (excellent, but upsetting), and am now reading “The Seven Storey Mountain” by Thomas Merton. (I needed something uplifting.)
            I wish you all the best on your life journey.

  10. St. Paul used a description of the Devil that seems quite odd, until the 20th Century:

    The Prince of the Power of the Air (Ephesians 2.2)

    Media technology, like most technology, is not inherently evil. It becomes evil only when the individuals in control of the microphone, camera, and/or related equipment, use an evil-intended script for “programming.” Always consider that last term literal, applied to the recipient of such media.

    What did St. Paul mean by that phrase? There is much debate. But it sure fits our era, where wireless communications far more often than not serve the Devil and anti-human aims.

  11. One of the poisons or gifts (*) of beginning to write is that one becomes more attuned to other writers choices of words. JC’s use of the following phrase caught my attention:

    … as the world slipped into the maw of World War II

    ‘slipped into the maw’ is such a simple phrase, but contains within it so much of the horror of war. Not jealous of Mr Corbett’s word-smithery, I smile in appreciation.

    Mr West deserves much credit for the video presentation of this episode. The repeated use of green screen and image within an image serve very well to emphasize the theme of the episode. It all gets quite self referential.

    Tra la lee!

    NB: The danish word for poison is ‘gift’. The other meaning for ‘gift’ (or poison) is marriage.

    • We had Netflix for a while but then I grew to hate their owners so much that I’d randomly go full Alex Jones whenever I saw the start screen.

      You can totally steal any of their filth off the internet these days… For free 🙂

      I actually don’t since I really really hate them

    • 2d chess dweller
      Yes… “GiftGas” always did make me snigger when I heard the word as i imagined a wrapped box with a bow.

  12. Well done, James. And your audience has made some fine comments as well.

  13. It would be an interesting study to see how much of your audience doesn’t watch much TV.
    I’ve been too busy to watch TV since the early 00s. The things I watch now are all alternative media with occasional children’s movies (Minions and such) once a month or so.
    Back when MTV was music videos, I was glued to the screen as a child, but most shows didn’t keep my attention.
    Interesting side note – every time I’ve volunteered to get hypnotized at a show, I’ve been rejected lol. I don’t know if that has anything to do with it or not but may be useful information on how to wake up our families by hiding the remote or our own social engineering of keeping our loved ones too busy to notice the glowing rectangle.
    Just my rambling thoughts as always. Thank you James and Broc.

    • Yeah, would be interesting. I don’t watch any TV anymore, but do watch some netflix videos and some movies. Maybe it’s similar to TV, but no overt commercials. Commercials and cost of TV deterred me from continuing it, but the internet can be similar to TV I think.

      I read a lot on line on various topics and note that it is much different from reading physical books.

      • I enjoy true crime shows and sci fi like Black Mirror and similar shows. Nothing woke though, like the awful Star Trek Discovery. That was terrible.

        I just re watched some Michael Mann movies too. I’m an action flick junkie too. These are mainly distractions for me when I get home from work and want to decompress and zone out.

        Living in CA still, can’t move till beginning of next year due to delays in getting stuff completed for move, so kind of been escaping lately. Getting my mind of things and worries and doing it in a way that’s relatively benign. That’s what TV type entertainment is, an escape that has little benefit. Reading books that uses one’s imagination is much better.

        But I’m no saint or trying to perfect myself to such an extent that I have no more human failings. I also like to drink alcohol on occasion, eat sugar, and do psychedelic drugs from time to time and have no shame in doing so.

      • We had Netflix for a while but then I grew to hate their owners so much that I’d randomly go full Alex Jones whenever I saw the start screen.

        You can totally steal any of their filth off the internet these days… For free 🙂

    • I haven’t watched an actual television for many years but I do use my iPad for videos and this sort of stuff.
      For years I have avoided movies and entertainment shows for the most part. I suppose because after becoming somewhat aware of the truth of this world I was captivated by catching up. I watched tons of documentaries and Mises videos and then got into podcasts.
      More recently I have become kinda weary of the never ending flood of incomprehensible news and have discovered that some nice folks have uploaded all sorts of movies to Bitchute and Odyssey. Most of which I have never heard of and some that I had. I’ve even watched a series called Better Call Saul that was a spin-off of one of the last shows I watched on TV.
      I enjoyed that.

      • I forgot. I watch the Tucker Carlson show from Fox on Bitchute every morning too. The uploader removes all the commercials.
        I enjoy that and the Suspicious 0bservers space weather with my coffee.

      • “Better Call Saul” – I enjoyed that also back in the day. But I don’t want to try to catch up on the series now.

        As a kid, I really liked “Leave it to Beaver”. The overly wholesome aspect of it made for easy entertainment.

        Tuesday July 26, 2022
        Tony Dow, Who Played Wally Cleaver on ‘Leave It to Beaver,’ Dies at 77
        Tony Dow, the actor and director best known for playing the stalwart older brother Wally Cleaver to Jerry Mathers’ Beaver in the iconic series “Leave It to Beaver,” has died.
        He was 77…

        …Dow and his wife Lauren announced in May that his cancer, which he had been diagnosed with years before, had returned…

        …didn’t have much showbiz experience when he tagged along with a friend and ended up auditioning for and winning the role of Wally. “Leave it to Beaver” began airing in 1957 and ran until 1963. [Re-runs came in later years.]
        The popular black-and-white sitcom, centered around the typical idealized family of the time, followed the adventures of mischievous young Beaver, his practical brother Wally, their devious friend Eddie Haskell, and their long-suffering but understanding parents played by Barbara Billingsley and Hugh Beaumont.

        The show’s writers, Bob Mosher and Joe Connelly, based the characters on their own children, incorporating such details as Wally’s constant hair-combing they observed in their own teenagers. As the show came to an end, Wally was about to start college while Beaver was ready for high school.
        Dow returned in the 1980s for the TV movie “Still the Beaver” and series “The New Leave It to Beaver,” for which he also directed five episodes and wrote one….

        • MISINFORMATION on the date of death…
          In May 2022, Dow was diagnosed with cancer.
          On July 26, 2022, after a premature report of Dow’s death, his family announced that he was at his home in Topanga, California.
          However, it was reported he was in his “last hours”, and under hospice care.
          Dow died the following day, on Wednesday July 27, at the age of 77.

          Details of the misreporting in this article…

          • Yea, this story featured in this morning’s French msn Bing lineup (or should I say my customized msn Bing lineup): the fact that his wife had misreported her husband’s death. That was the “narrative shaping” of that event: that she had mistakenly reported him dead prior to his death. Just weird. Just as weird as the cancer that suddenly reappeared to claim him. but definitely no connection to any weird experimental mass-forced vaccines I’m certain of that, I’m no weird conspiracy nut, you know.

            • 🙂
              I’m laughing.

    • Kelly

      I never watched much TV and stopped almost totally around the turn of the century…. I do however have a massive collection of movies and TV shows ripped from DVDs on my media PC…. Folks should buy those cheep 2nd hand DVDs while they cost nothing because if we have internet entertainment will grow more expensive and folks will thank you for the having the files to lend them free.

      Still don’t watch much TV but occasionally I will hear about something off of Jay Dyer or Blackpilled and have a desire to see what they were talking about.
      Watched the sopranos first season for the first time ever and actually thought it was pretty good and I only did an epp a week…my main interest in tv comes off of the YouTube channels ABOUT tv.

      I still nostalgicly like BTVS and ashes to ashes but honestly when you learn to see the propaganda and know how it was shaping the next generation a bit at a time TV kinda leaves a bit of a sour aftertaste….I can not bear to watch any modern TV show or even the adverts Anymore which shows the class of propagandist has dropped along with the IQ and resistance of the watchers.

      All in all maybe two or three hours a week on movies and or old TV shows

  14. just an inconsequential story that I woke up to this morning that just struck me as somewhat odd for some reason… Particularly the last photo at the end of the article… dunno why… nothing “tell-all” or wildly earthshaking. Just… slightly… unusual… just a minor morcel of mundane media. Maybe just very human.


    • From article above:

      Ms Truss exclaimed, “Oh my God!”, left her podium and rushed towards where Ms McCann had been standing.

      Eyewitnesses told The Sun how Mr Sunak raced to Kate’s side.

      Ms Truss also went to check on the presenter and both candidates were seen kneeling down checking she was OK.


      Does Ms Truss appear to “rush” anywhere in the above twitter clip? Maybe just after the clip was clipped?

      Just highlights how it’s not what happens that forms the perception of the masses but how an event is reported on by the media driven and dictated by specific interests.
      Furthermore the event suggests that more than actual campaign promises and programs, it’s the reported human reaction of a candidate during such a completely unrelated and unexpected event as the mediator fainting in mid-debate that might really determine the success of a candidate’s political career.

      The reporting in the following link makes no mention of Sunak holding Mccann’s hand for example which would certainly influence viewers’ perception of the event and more importantly of its players.


      anhow. brief but interesting interlude. now time to churn the hamsterwheel.

      ps: Oh and the real story, tacitly present in every viewers mind to a greater or lesser degree is

      Why did Kate McCann collapse anyway??

      • NSR aka MBP says:
        “Does Ms Truss appear to “rush”…?
        Just highlights how it’s not what happens that forms the perception of the masses but how an event is reported on by the media driven and dictated by specific interests.
        Furthermore the event suggests that more than actual campaign promises and programs, it’s the reported human reaction of a candidate during such a completely unrelated and unexpected event as the mediator fainting in mid-debate that might really determine the success of a candidate’s political career.

        The reporting in the following link makes no mention of Sunak holding Mccann’s hand for example which would certainly influence viewers’ perception of the event and more importantly of its players.”

        You give a fantastic short assessment of the ‘narrative shaping’!

        The “last photo” is odd. An angelic smiling face with eyes up and to the distance…an image of a loving, caring ruler who promises a bright happy future…(where you will own nothing).

        • Oh! Ok! Narrative shaping! Thanks! I have so much to learn about mass media communication which is embarassing as I was in charge of helping students learn and speak about it for so many years. I loved it. Wag the Dog was the highlight of all those semesters. And at the end, sales (or compliance) techniques (foot in the door, door in the face, reciprocity, low ball etc etc.) I learned more than any of my students. Still do.

  15. Just wanted to say, I’ve really enjoyed the musical selections for this series, especially the title music. Very Pink Floyd-ish!

  16. [No bare urls in the comments section, please. Please repost the links with titles and explanations of why people should be clicking on them. -JC]

Submit a Comment


Become a Corbett Report member