Why Aren’t Insurers 9/11 Truthers? – Questions For Corbett #067

by | Sep 8, 2020 | Questions For Corbett | 26 comments

As we approach the 19th anniversary of the 9/11 false flag, Leonard writes in to ask about the insurers who paid Silverstein and his cohorts over four and a half billion dollars as a result of those attacks. Why did the insurers never investigate the possibility of controlled demolition? Why did they pay out billions of dollars without calling the official 9/11 narrative into question? James investigates.

Watch on Archive / BitChute / LBRY / Minds.com / YouTube or Download the mp4


9/11 Trillions: Follow the Money

Insurers Agree to Pay Billions at Ground Zero

Double Indemnity

Shapiro admits Silverstein phoned insurers about demolishing WTC7

Silverstein says WTC7 redesign ready in April of 2000

World Trade Center owner suing airlines for billions for 9/11 attacks

World Trade Center owners’ bid to sue airlines for 9/11 attacks blocked

Airline defendants to pay $95 million in 9/11 settlement

Con Ed and Insurers Sue Port Authority Over 7 World Trade

Con Ed suit against Silverstein and Citigroup at 7 WTC dismissed

Silverstein cleared of blame for 7 World Trade’s fall on 9/11

10 Major Shareholders in Swiss Re (is actually one)

Meet The Billionaire Developer Who Rebuilt The World Trade Center To Heal New York After 9/11

The Bonds of August: Refinancing the Twin Towers on the eve of destruction

Insurers scramble to avoid 9/11-style coronavirus backlash


  1. Fossick, hey? As fossick as one may, they won’t find any nuggets of truth in the official story, the true conspiracy theory.

  2. Oh cool! I just noticed that the embedded video stream above is an Archive platform and that you have a vast CR library over there! Good to know! Am I just now noticing something that has always been included as a viewing option (the story of my life), or is this new (assure me I’m not losing it)?

    Richard Gage side-interview by James Corbett in this “Questions For Corbett”

    September 2, 2020 Interview 1573 – Richard Gage Delivers Updates on 9/11 Truth

    Richard Gage of AE911Truth.org joins us to discuss the various actions, inquests, studies, documentaries and conferences that are happening around the 19th anniversary of 9/11.
    (James Corbett will play a role in this coming event.)

  4. Silverstein claims (16:52) that plans to rebuild WTC7 began in April 2000. Like his September 2002 PBS claim to have had WTC7 “pulled” before its collapse, methinks he hasn’t mispoken, as James suggests (16:58).

    I remember watching a Youtube video circa 2006 made by a former, official WTC7 photographer. He stated that in the mid to late 1990’s a series of meetings was called to address the WTC7’s asbestos problem. The final meeting was held in 1999, I think, wherein the only feasible solution was to raze the entire building at a cost of $25 billion. Upon hearing that, Silverstein dismissed the architectural consultants. Everyone, including the photographer, received severence pay before they were told to never step foot on the premises again. It’s reasonable to assume Silverstein had assembled another team to come up with his post-9.11 Plan B, as he clearly said, by April 2000.

    The official WTC7 photographer (I can’t remember his name) who put this video up in the “early” years of 9.11 awareness did so as a public record. Needless to say, Google/Youtube has taken it down or somehow made it unaccessible now. You might find it in the Way Back Machine somehow as another cookie crumb to follow.

  5. The Southern District of NY, may be viewed as a financially independent political body or LLC with a dual Israel – US identity. NYC is the seat of the global banking power in charge of management of military & police operations. 9-11 may be counted as a psyop in “advanced theatrical military demolition operations”. Pearl Harbor was a similar single day theatrical event. The Japs came, they bombed, they left.
    $25 billion to remove the asbestos does seem a bit steep.
    So you have a $25 billion technical problem? Let the Cabal & it’s Mossad techno-troopers solve it for you in a most creative way.

    • That’s $25 billion to raze the entire building and dispose of the asbestos. Perhaps a lot of money to do legally… or perhaps even more to do illegally, especially when it’s farmed out to the underworld. Either way, it must have been too steep for Silverstein to pay. So, as he says, he came up with Plan B in April 2000, more than a year before 9.11.

      • Come to think of it, that figure may have been $2.5 billion. I only remember the number “25”. That was 15 years ago.

  6. What happened to all the precious metals stored under the towers? I know “they” sold some gold melted and made into trinkets, alleged to be from under the towers. I doubt that! More likely the metals were removed ahead of the demolition. Was the precious metal returned to the owners, or was it stolen and the banks(for example)that owned the metals, made insurance claims? The Bank of Nova Scotia, I read, was one that had metals stored there. I have never heard any evidence of claims paid. If no insurance claims were made for the precious metals, it would be very suspicious.

  7. I’ve never thought of that before.

    Would 9/11 have happened if Bush was not President. I have always thought of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfewitz as the prime movers on that with the New World Order and their plans for the New Century.

    Is that why the 2000 election had to be fixed?

    Has anyone else ever given this much thought? I’d love to hear.

    • There was 1 more member of that “inner circle” of Bush, Cheney and Cheney. He doesn’t get mentioned hardly ever. His name is L Paul Bremer. He ended up with a plum job in the reconstruction of Iraq in 2003.

  8. I’ve never thought of that before.

    Would 9/11 have happened if Bush was not President. I have always thought of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfewitz as the prime movers on that with the New World Order and their plans for the New Century.

    Is that why the 2000 election had to be fixed?

    Has anyone else ever given this much thought? I’d love to hear.

    • To think that the destruction of towers wouldn’t have happened under Gore, is silly IMHO.

  9. I’d say the difference is due to the building size and construction. WTC7 was a standard steel reinforced concrete building so it was brought down like a standard steel reinforced concrete building.

    On the other hand, who knows what was used to bring down the towers.

  10. Yea, though I walk
    through the Valley of
    Shadow of Corona Virus,
    I shall fear no Evil.

    For I have
    Green Tea
    Gin and
    Tonic Water.

    …AND the Corbett Report, OF COURSE!

  11. “Note that every evil player could have been paid from this $2.3 Trillion, and it’s discovery likely moved up the date for making it happen.”

    Yes that’s the first thing that came to my mind a long time ago, when considering the ‘expenses’ of 9/11 and where the funds would come to pay them off.

    After the expenses were paid off, the rest was likely divvied up amongst
    the key players.

    That’s why I always laugh when the MSM spends so much time trying to incriminate the Saudi’s as one of the key funders of the operation.

    Like a few million here and there really made any difference? 🙂

  12. This whole question about what would have happened if this or that guy was the puppet de jour seems to imply that there is not a global entity with an agenda that is attempting to implement its plans.
    911 was a world changing event. An international milestone that took a lot of planning. Would it all have been scrapped if the Florida chad count had come up in Al’s favor?
    Or is it just that they would have been forced to use different tactics? I don’t get it. Is it being suggested that Gore would not have reacted the same way as Bush? Would not have followed the script? Why wouldn’t he have? Wasn’t it a powerful Democrat who quoted something about not letting a good crisis go to waste around that time?
    I am surprised that the American left right political stuff is taken so seriously around here. What am I missing?

    • “ Taking any aspect of the BS at face value is perilous: Left-Right fake, but hanging chads real?”

      Trust me, even though I was a statist back in 2000 I knew that the election wasn’t decided by hanging chads or even by Florida.
      My point was that it would have made zero difference to the globalist plan if Gore were elected. Just as it makes no difference who gets elected in Nov. in the big scheme of things.
      But thats just my opinion.

  13. That is indeed a great and interesting question. I never thought about the insurance companies point of vue. And the answer is as interesting as the question…

  14. Very interesting. When getting business insurance for myself I had to waive terrorist coverage because my business was unlikely to be affected by an attack. So insurance companies are profiting handsomely from the false narrative by all the duped people who are afraid that a terrorist is going to fly a jumbo jet into their used book store in Timbuktu USA.

    • I don’t know if anyone has already mentioned this but after looking through my insurance policy and found that there was a “ Terrorism Risk Insurance Act”. For me the annual premium was $10. Obviously, we know this is a policy that would NEVER have a claim and would never pay out because there will never be a need for it. Just money in the bank for insurance companies.

  15. Hi James,

    With respect to the question you raise as to why the insurers of the Twin Towers would not bring up the issue of explosive demolition of the buildings, I have a theory. Even if they proved that the towers were destroyed with explosives, this is just a different form of terrorist attack, and they would presumably still be liable to Silverstein under his terrorist coverage policy. In order for the insurers to escape liability, they would need to prove that Silverstein was part of the plot to destroy the buildings. They probably looked into this and decided there was insufficient evidence to prove that Silverstein had a role in the plot. Thoughts?

Submit a Comment


Become a Corbett Report member