To YouTube or not to YouTube, that is the question. And it’s no longer a hypothetical question! That’s right, the YouTube overlords have decided to allow The Corbett Report once again. Whoopie? So, what should be done? I have my own thoughts, but I want to hear yours. Let it rip in the comment section (registered members only).
Video player not working? Use these links to watch it somewhere else!
WATCH ON:ย 
ย /ย 
ย /ย 
ย /ย 
ย /ย 
/ 
ย orย DOWNLOAD THE MP4
SHOW NOTES
Mission Accomplished: The Corbett Report Removed From YouTube
The Cultural Conditioning Conspiracy | James Corbett | Ripple Effect Podcast #544
Dan Dicks gets his YouTube channel back
False Flags: The Secret History of Al Qaeda
Your Guide to 5th Generation Warfare
How BlackRock Conquered the World
The 8th Annual Fake News Awards
REPORTAGE: Essays on the New World Order by James Corbett
Episode 477 โ REPORTAGE Book Launch
The Corbett Report is NOT on YouTube
So, what do YOU think I should do with this channel? Corbett Report members are invited to log in and leave their vote for one of these five options in the comments below:
Option #4.
Option #4 AGREE! ๐
Make an catchy annoying jingle for corbettreport.com and just upload it 10 times a day until you get banned from jewtube…
Imagine finding solo cat here. LOL I say four with a mixture of one. Highlights and tidbit teasers from missed episodes.
I want to say get some cash out of the system before they shut you down again but your conscience is all you can live with I apologize I’m a lazy clown and struggled to find out what the last episode on tube was now I know I’ve signed up to membership have the book and have a few years of post to catch up with on your website gonna be a fun ride seeing your post come true thanks james as much info as you can get out the better.
I think if your goal is to reach as much people as possible than you should pick option 2. As much as we all hate YouTube we all have to recognize that it is a powerful tool and we cannot just scoff at it like that will solve something.
I think you can salt your videos with corbettreport.com adverts. Make em tacky and silly.
Anyways this is just an opinion.
Option 3. To lure people in with the most important, hardest punching stories, to teach them the big picture, as an entrance point, upon which they can expand elsewhere. I feel the full catalogue is so vast, that it could distract from the bigger picture, which is THE message to get across first.
I seem to be in the minority here, but I go with Option #5 โ Post up the โIโm never ever ever posting here againโ video and have done with it.
I use YouTube daily but suddenly seeing you back there after swapping exclusively to this website for the past several years seems to cheapen the experience somehow. If maximum viewership is a high priority, I get it. But if you’re doing alright as-is since The Big Scam, I say keep it rolling exclusively on Corbettreport.com (with uploads to Bitchute etc.).
#2 is the best way to grow this community.
The videos youโve made over the past four years could help a lot of people navigate life in the 21st century.
They sure have helped me!
I agree with avalanche.i
#2 would help a lot of people
(though I suppose one could say I am a little biased as I am featured in a couple of the videos ๐ )
But seriously, uploading all the content from the last 4 years may trigger Alphabet Corp’s Algocracy to censor you again, however, those videos that do make it through could be that seed that helps many thousands embark down a path to co-create a better future for themselves (and future generations).
Perhaps some youtube admins are fans of yours and they are taking in the role of “white hats” (to use hacker slang) in re-activating your channel (despite the fact it may piss off their bosses’ bosses’) and whether or not that is the case this “glitch in the matrix” could offer a great opportunity for helping people that are busy chowing down on matrix steaks and chasing the woman in the red dress.
Whatever course you choose I hope it results in many more people holding a physical copy of your book in their hands so that the truth and knowledge you have gathered will have a high likelihood of persisting into the awareness of future generations.
agree with avalanche. Don’t look just at the past (I get you’re quite annoyed on old members who just stuck with the CensorTube). People come of age constantly (there are always new, young people to reach). The query box in CT is a strong tool and gateway. You want a young person that is querying for the first time an issue where you’ve videographed about, to fall on your content in some way. The path you’ve chosen is unfortunately very similar to the ordeal that Sisyphus had to go through.
Would you take my virtual hug into consideration (if it would make you feel better)?
Agree, #2
I would lean towards this with a mix of option 4. Maybe don’t upload everything but the most important stuff to bring in people to the website more. Since it should be the ultimate goal of the youtube channel.
Indoors I watch most stuff on my telly, usually through a firestick. I’ve had to sideload Bitchute which doesn’t really work properly. I need a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse to navigate it and a VPN to access it as I’m in the UK. So much hassle. YouTube on the other hand just works. Most people make decisions based on convenience, hence why people eat shite.
So #2 because everything comes with YouTube already installed.
I stumbled upon you via your video about the food pyramid of all things. On YouTube.
#2 – use this channel like all the other ones, don’t censor or hold back or redact any episodes for YT (let’s see how long the channel persists). Maybe as an add-on specifically for youtube: record a little 30sec intro to be put at the beginning of each youtube-uploaded episode prompting people to watch any of other or upcoming episodes on your official website, but still I think it makes sense to put them out there!
+1 to Option #2, as I am one of those idiots who usually just queue up YouTube videos on a separate display while working on my main one. I agree with others in these comments who have pointed out you’re most likely to get the boot again if you do Option #2. Yes, I make the effort to absorb your content elsewhere when I can, which is usually via podcast in odd hours of the day and night, and I’ve watched most all of your content on corbettreport.com at some point, some multiple times. If I could queue it up on YT while I work my day job, it would be immensely more convenient, but not required. I’m still a devoted follower and supporter no matter what you decide.
If you prefer to lower your risk of getting the boot again, try Option #4 for a while. I assume your priority is to get more people to come to corbettreport.com
Post on youtube your best highlights but underneath it make sure to write down your website and tell your viewers to leave youtube or visit your website instead.
Option 2, as much as it sucks to give in. It’s a good opportunity to reach more people and direct new traffic to your website. They have no problems canceling you at their convenience, and it is very likely that you will be canceled again, so you should have no problem using their “truck lines” as someone else so rightfully wrote. Anyway, the truth is not for everyone.
It’s not giving in.
It’s just using a tool. #2
If James feels it’s not damaging his soul.
Option #5 James. Why would you waste time on Goo tube.
Love your book by the way.
Well, Iโve read so many comments that basically amount to: go back on YouTube to grow the community. My question is: What type of community do you have if itโs occupied by people who havenโt done a basic search to find you? Or will only watch because they pay for this or that service? Are they the folks who would watch your documentaries in such a long format?
I use YouTube only for music because Iโve been too cheap to subscribe to Spotify. That, too, will draw to a close as the advertisements are nauseating. Reminds me of Banksy, the street artist, who reminds us that the advertisers bully you and laugh at you with their ads and leering billboards every day. They donโt ask for your permission. But you have to ask for their permission by explaining yourself for content violations.
Thus, Iโd go with 5, but if youโre feeling charitable I wouldnโt invest more energy than 4. People who care and are curious donโt need shorts.
What? You donโt want The Corbett Tick Tok show??
9/11 explained in 30 seconds?
lol ๐ you do make a good point
Corbett’s 9/11 in 5 minutes video was what opened my eyes to Corbett’s work, one of the best videos ever.
There is a whole new generation on Youtube who have never heard of James and would never know to look for him.
#4.. YouTube will let you reach more people with shorts. Then you can draw them to the website.
Mostly agree with Option #4. I will continue listen/watch “direct”, but see little harm in directing traffic to the Corbettreport on James’ own terms, in that if the channel is nuked again, so be it. At least while it’s live, it gets infront of more people and knowing it could disappear again, at least some proportion of viewers who would otherwise not likely have discovered the main site will be encouraged over there… here!
I admit that I watched him on YouTube mainly until the accounts were taken down. Technically I watched on NewPipe, so add free and Google doesn’t get that data from me. And I still normally won’t know a new video is posted until I see it uploaded to the Corbett Report (UNOFFICIAL) account on my feed. I always watch on the website when I want to follow links, or like this time I will get on to comment; but I’m guilty of still watching on NewPipe if I’m just trying to throw it in my ear real quick.
Option #1 – to possibly catch genuine people who are only now ready to listen to what you have been saying.
Option 2 is the way to go but continue to encourage people to follow you elsewhere…
if spreading the word to as many people as possible is the goal this is the only option. If you’re censored again, no big deal, everything is already in place.
Your audience is already here, following along, joining the conversation and putting their own work in… Converting ‘normies’ seems important enough to me to warrant putting everything you can, in full on YouTube but maybe I’m wrong?
Make some shorts as well?
Option #2!
Option #2.
Option #3 with a special disclaimer at the beginning/end of all the videos. A quick blurb about getting the hell off of YouTube.
Your content is tremendous but in my opinion the most potent aspect of your work is converting new people to see the light. People who are asleep or just becoming old enough to actually doubt the standard narrative aren’t on rumble or Odyssey. They’re on YouTube. A small intro outlining how you’ve been banned before and will likely be banned again when the cultural pendulum swings back that encourages people to embrace alternate platform or better yet, your personal site shoehorned before your standard into seems ideal.
If option #2 is selected, what are the chances that people who are currently listening to and viewing content on corbettreport.com will now, for the sake of convenience, begin to use YouTube instead? Is there a chance that hard-earned corbettreport.com traffic will be lost to YouTube? Is this not the intention of YouTube, to offer content that can be found elsewhere on the web just as easily, but to essentially brand it as their own, and thus steal the web traffic?
Yes, I agree that option #2 is a pretty good idea because 544K subscribers are nothing to turn your nose up at. Those were hard earned subscribers, and now they’re back. Corbett paid membership is very important, but getting the message out into the world is even more important. Anyway, the more people on YouTube watch Corbett videos, the more likely it is that some of them will remember how good the content was 4 years ago. Some of them will not want to lose touch a second time, and so they will make their way over to corbettreport.com and perhaps they will even become paying members.
I honestly do not recall where I first heard of Corbett. Maybe someone linked to a video on Telegram.app (it might even have been a YouTube video!) I seem to recall the warnings of account cancellation due to censorship, and that’s why I started using corbettreport.com.
Anyway, it’s not important how I found The Corbett Report website. What matters is that it has changed my life. I’ve watched the important documentaries, and for some years now I have not missed a single episode. Yes, I also offer a monthly donation. The work is highly valuable to me, and I do share it with others on a regular basis.
By the way, if you haven’t already, check out Media Monarchy with James Evan Pilato. Morning Monarchy is a blast.
Cheers ~
We first heard of Corbett while watching Sibella Edmonds and Boiling Frogs. We dumped her, but stayed with James! What a disappointment she turned out to be!
I would go with# 5.
Option # 2 &&& Continue with your main channel http://www.corbettreport.com. Many people prefer the ease and convenience of access to their favorite podcast hosts (James Corbett, Glen Greenwald, Kim Iversen, Tucker Carlson) with the convenience of staying on the same channel (YouTube or Rumble) particularly those of us that may be driving and don’t want to risk an accident by changing channels while driving.
Option #2
#3, hook people with the best videos to get normies interested and drive them to your site for the deep dives and full deprogramming.
Agree with #3- we wonโt be waking anybody up by rejecting them for not being here already.
Agreed as well. Caveat, delayed release of videos on YouTube. Utilize paywall mentality, except itโs free everywhere else and with access to complete library everywhere else. YouTube only gets limited/normy-friendly content with appeals to free access of all content immediately everywhere else!
Option 4, most definitely!
Give them nothing, take from them everything โโโ. Spread the word and tease them with content on your site.
For those who can’t be bothered to look further than YouTube, wtf! I pity them, but it just proves that ignorance is bliss.
What I really want to know is how long until you’re invited on Rogan? And if offered would you consider a similar pole?
Agree, 3 is a good hook ๐
Imagine finding solo cat here. LOL I say four with a mixture of one. Highlights and tidbit teasers from missed episodes.
Option #4. Just post teasers and link to your other platforms in the notes. Don’t give your ad dollars to the YT censorious bastards.
I tend to lean more toward the 2nd option. While it is true that many people or at least it seems that way, mainly consume your content as infotainment, it is still better than denying people who rely on YouTube access only to your valuable information.
What matters most is that you and your team are able to benefit financially from your work, so that you can continue creating and improving high-quality content. Your efforts absolutely deserve fair compensation.
If YouTube however decides to withhold all payments from you, then I believe the 5th option would be the best course of action. In that case, I would stop publishing content on that platform altogether.
Option #2.
Option 2
May as well use the platform to highlight it’s downsides . As much as I would love you to stick two fingers up at the establishment platform. It’s a great opportunity to gain a greater following . It will educate many who are beginning to question many things .
Option 2, 544k subscribers is a massive reach, more and more people are waking up now, YT is not the best I agree but your work is too important, we have to appeal to the lowest common denominator sometimes, it’s ok for us in the know who have always loved / followed your work, but the reach of YT is too wide to ignore.
option #2
option #4 because I discovered CorbettReport.com from another podcast which had a clip which led me to your website. I am extremely grateful for that, otherwise who knows how long it might have been before I found this site.
Option #2
Option #4 even though you dont need to proof to any one that you had been and still doing an amazing job with deep diving into the deceptions while unfolding the truths and that is why the teasers will give a sense to the sheeps that they can become wolves only if they listen to the common sense and act against the endless lies…!
Be aware of the traps that they may drag you into by them pretending that they are now becoming the nice guy without any appology and without any compensation to valuable podcaster contents wich they had censored and blocked for over 4 years and without giving any undertaking for not repeating such illigal acts…!!
I like option (3). Just add a quick addendum only to your gootube posted videos and show notes or what ever gt calls there OP show notes that you expect the channel to be censored and deleted shortly and that you highly recommend that one should prompty make a habit of getting your CorbettReport.com content directly from that address.
I would recommend against uploading all of the missing four years because it would just tie up your time with little real advantage. When the time comes to censure you again, I would simply follow their appeals process with one liners as you have in the past.
Option #2. Get the information out any way possible.
Option #2 is the best choice to raise overall awareness.
#4
Option #4.
Or, do whatever you think is appropriate… it’s your show and you’ve been doing great for a long time!
On one hand more people seeing your stuff is IMHO a good thing which would lead me to support #1.
On the other hand when I have a choice I watch content anywhere but youtube as I tired of not only their censorship but their GUI, their fight against downloads, their poor transcribes, etc. Particularly for meaty content downloads and ability to do my own transcribes make the content MUCH more useful and convenient to digest.
So overall I like Option #3 and pointing people to better alternatives.
Option 2. I’m canadian and have been donating a paltry three dollars u s a month for many years, but after you were no longer on youtube I rarely went to your website even though I greatly appreciated your content. I’ve been a YouTube premium subscriber, 4 or 5 or 6 years now and love the service.
In the last couple of years, there seems to be very little perceptible censoring of the content..
I haven’t been able to keep up with all of the great content on youtube that I want to consume.
I doubt that they will censor your content going forward.But, of course, it is always possible.
I want you back on youtube for my convenience but also because I think it will greatly increase the reach of your great content
If you come back on youtube, I am sure that I will from time to time share particularly good videos that you produce with friends
I am sorry, I have missed the great. Documentaries that I think you have produced in recent years when I only visited your website every several months or longer.
All the best to you whatever you decide
Option 3, even though YouTube is not an ideal platform. #2 seems like too much work. The more your content is out there, the better…
Hi James,
I totally get the urge to โScrew YouTube,โ completely but I think Option #4 is the best way forward. Since all your content is already available on your website, uploading everything to YouTube again seems like unnecessary workโespecially for a platform thatโs already censored you and will do so again.
Thanks for including us in the decision!
I canโt help but wonder if thereโs an ulterior motive behind YouTube suddenly restoring your channel. My theory is that itโs about data gathering and surveillance. By bringing youโand your followersโback onto their platform, they can more easily monitor who is engaging with your content, analyze viewing habits using AI, and potentially flag or profile users. Itโs much easier for them to โlisten inโ and keep people contained within their ecosystem than to have everyone scattered across independent platforms.
Just something to consider as you weigh your options.
Thanks for all you do.
โโฆ.By bringing youโand your followersโback onto their platform, they can more easily monitor who is engaging with your content, analyze viewing habits using AI, and potentially flag or profile userโฆ.โ
Iโm pretty sure everyone who does anything on the net is monitored.
Unless you signed up by sending cash in the mail and only sign in via TOR, at a coffee shop, on a Laptop you do nothing else except Corbett Report onโฆ.. they know who you are.
If you sign into YT on the same computer as you watch CR on your cookies or whatever are probably report back to a database alreadyโฆ..people should be more secure in their web activity but also not let the psyop of being โwatchedโ all the time scare them.
Youโre right that online activity is widely tracked these days, but thereโs a big difference in how easy it is to monitor and profile users depending on the platform. When youโre logged into YouTube with a Google account, your identity, viewing habits, and interactions are directly tied to your personal profile, making it much simpler for Google to link everything together and analyze it using their powerful AI and data tools. On an independent site like CorbettReport.com, tracking is far less direct and more anonymous.
So while total privacy is hard to guarantee anywhere online, being on YouTube while connected to their ecosystem, does make it much easier for Big Tech to monitor, flag, and profile you compared to just browsing an independent site. You will be highlighted as a follower of James Corbett, after which MI5 will open a file on you.๐
Don’t for a moment assume that you have to login into any google services for google to recognize you. Give it a bit of time, use the service as you would normally and they will know who you are.
Even if youโre using a VPN, Google can still track and identify users so, youโre rightโitโs tough to be truly anonymous online. My original point, though, is that it becomes much easier for them to monitor and profile us if everyone is using YouTube, where most people are logged in and not using privacy tools. So, you’re basically handing your data to them on a silver platter. On Big Tech platforms, tracking is far more direct and centralized compared to scattered, independent sites.
I agree.
yes, Option 4. Just give Them a taste and they will come
Option 4.2
Teasers and a โhuman decidedโ random episode to tweak the algorithm. I bought 3 of your books and am sharing.
Enjoy your day, your family and your life and the great outdoors and thank you for being a counterpoint to the doomsday policy makers and media!
The comments you read are so disheartening. Lazy and wriiten by people IMO who don’t really want to be informed and should be embarrassed. Why would James Corbett who has opened do many peoples eyes put his research on hold waiting to be invited back to a platform who worked to silence do many truth tellers. I am so grateful for what you do. What is so difficult about going to your website?
Optioneel 5# James
Never again on a controlled platform.
Waste of time
Option #4
Yes just teasers to get people going to your great WEB site !!
Maybe I’ve become too cynical, but I am wondering WHY the powers-that shouldn’t-be are allowing the Corbett Report back on YouTube…….will watch this development with interest.
Miriam.b
It’s a honey pot for identifying bears, misanthropes and social misfits to self identify with their written opinions.
Wrong-thinkers. It’s been a valuable asset in collecting intelligence metrics. Optical character readers and Ai can gather large amounts of data in minutes if not seconds .
We live in a security state world. Macro to micro in seconds.
Having worked in the courts I saw it only is used against you , not available to you if you need that Intel for some defence of an issue.
Gbw
Thatโs true but there is no need to get you in YT to do that.
Unless you take super paranoia level of being anonymous on line you are in no way hidden from the Intel agenciesโฆ..you can certainly make yourself harder to profile pretty easily but if your opinions are ones that actually matter in the big picture your activity online is transparent to intel (but not always advertisers)
For example in doubt that the NSA cares what websites I visited this week, but they probably have Mr Corbettโs online history. On the flip side the NSA probably DOES Have very comment you have made on a public Internet forum saved in one of their data centers which probably mirror the whole internetโฆ..but again how probable is it they are gonna care enough to collate for YOU or ME?
Even AI canโt think of everything at the same time.
Hey Duck
You seem to suggest a false since of security. It’s not done at the same time . It’s a data collection center for future use. You tube is easy, it’s a honey pot .
It will be of interest only if you do something. Like buy a gun in a parking lot . Then brag about it in anyway. It’s a self incriminating system. It won’t be accessed for your defence in anyway, shape or form. It’s addictive and it can program you. To buy in on every conceivable angle, or anything or everything… It’s there to tighten the legal noose and remove obstacles or any objections to their way of thinking. Like the Molotov throwing guy in Colorado. It’s automated ,no one cares to stop whatever it is you are planning to do, cause that serves their purpose also. They can track you down later , which is fun for some of these militaristic nutjobs hired here in this county. They hunt and it’s a game. People don’t realize the monster they helped create.
https://datacenters.google/locations/mayes-county-oklahoma/
This Google center has doubled in size since 2019. It use to be a quarter mile wide and a half mile in length. It’s now 1/2 mile wide X 1 mile long. No public tours . This is Stazi Central secret police headquarters All for your internet safety.
Meta is working on making face book more than YouTube. More everything.
I am not sure that itโs a mega sneaky plan as much as a slow grinding system with a dolop of AI mixed in.
The scenery is changing as the boomers die off and the economic and demographic situation changes so their probably working on creating a new normal worldview and itโs pretty clear that allowing some dissent is part of that process
Mr Corbett is certainly important, but how much personal attention does he warrant from the Global elite?
Option #6 – Tell CommieTube to eat your balls.
That’s what I’d do.
Donโt tell them thatโฆ.considering the kind of people in power they might take it literally. ๐
Option #4
My first thought was 5 because why bother with you tube. My daughter had a you tube channel that kept getting strikes for nothing and she won’t go back to you tube ever but her videos weren’t what you have James. I think you should go for the gusto #2 but if it happens again then back to 5 this time for good!!
Option 1. As much as I hate YouTube, I feel like now, there are more people who are looking for truth more than ever, that will probably never know about CorbettReport because they donโt leave YouTube. The more people James can reach, the better. I feel like the โRebuilding Trustโ initiative by the Globalists is in full swing, and the independent media landscape is flooded with limited hangout charlatans. At least Corbett being there to counter the narratives or be the unlimited hangout open source, could help more people out of Platoโs cave. I donโt want James to be a gatekeeper, we already have plenty of those. And yeah I get there are a lot of lazy people who like James but never left YouTube. But there is also a whole generation of younger people who are more open minded to the truth who have never been exposed to any of James work. Maybe reaching them isnโt worth it to the mass of CorbettReport subscribers, but I think it is. Itโs at least worth a shot. James will probably get banned again, for telling too much truth, so might as well go out with a Bang!
Option # 3
Option #3
The best of both worlds. Loads of new people is waking up.
Nothing wrong using YT to promote your work while you can.
Option 4
Hearing the poo toob comments. Sounding very bottish. So if there are any real people, give them a taste of real journalism. Let them give back in gratitude.
P s. What about doing some comedy material there. Like your incredible Klaus and get Ryan Christian to do a version of Alex Jones.
Well at least when I asked chat gpt, that’s what it told me to say…..
Hi James. I started a podcast called “RB Ham : Beyond The Pale a year or so ago. I consciously decided to NOT upload to YouTube. I made it Rumble exclusive (although I do post it on a dedicated FB page and on X). Maybe I’ll try YouTube now?
Anyway, thank you from a fellow Canadian and a persecuted freedom trucker!
Keep up the good work!
My Fight Against Covid Tyranny
No Good Deed Goes Unpunished
https://open.substack.com/pub/rbhambeyondthepale/p/rb-ham-my-fight-against-covid-tyranny?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=kzvjj
Hello James. I would be so grateful to have you as a guest on my podcast to promote your book. I also want to buy the book but I want you to sign it. Please get back to me when you can.
Sincerely;
Richard Brent Wintringham
[SNIP – No email addresses in the comments. Please send interview requests via the Contact form. -JC]
Here’s a link to my podcast if you’d like to scout me out.
https://rumble.com/c/c-6312452
My story :
My Fight Against Covid Tyranny
No Good Deed Goes Unpunished
https://open.substack.com/pub/rbhambeyondthepale/p/rb-ham-my-fight-against-covid-tyranny?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=kzvjj
#2 plus #3 and #4 on secondary channels including Shorts. 3 chances to get new viewers and reviews of your “greatest hits for longtime members.
If you are monetized on YouTube, go to #2!
Yep Option 4 Jimmy. The only way to get people to check out the website and the massive archive, is if they “actually” want to know/hear more.
I remain unsure. One thing for sure don’t bother posting any of the last 4 years NWNW, they are irrelevant now due to their topics.
Agree option 4
Option #1, make it easy on yourself. Past content can be found as you say in so many other places.
Option #2.
Hi Corbert,
I think option 2 is best, and deservering. Not everyone is fully awake it’s upto us to give them the information and let them decide the path they want to follow. Love your work. Thanks ๐ H
Option #5
Being deleted from a platform during one of the biggest scams in history (what was obviously one of the reasons) is more than enough reason to go NEVER BACK AGAIN.
I think you should make use of YouTube as a way to reach as many people as possible! Don’t be self-defeating like some people on here want you to be, although they probably wouldn’t think of it that way but nonetheless it is self defeating. My first choice is option number two. Put all of your content on here. Otherwise option number three, highlights. But if you do option number three I suggest lots of highlights! But like I said preferably option number two. Let’s reach as many people as we can as quickly as possible! Thank you James!
I want more normies to find James, but I cannot pick the first option.
Option 4 gets my vote.
I would not engage with YouTube at this point because, even if it is a small presence in my brain and consciousness, it does take up space, taunting me from time to time. I would not want to be bothered with that.
Agreed, Option 4
Option #2
Option 4. Only way to make youtube not so dominant in the video space is to stop using it. Those who are unwilling to go elsewhere for the quality and type of information you provide are not all that important anyway in the great scheme of things, especially since you didn’t just disappear but gave warnings and they didn’t listen.
#2! ALL THE WAY!
Agree on no. 4. Everyone should train themselves away from letting YouTube serve up their news and info.
Option#4
#4
Option 3 or 4
I think you should go option 1. Only because it will be done at the same time as your other platforms.
Stuff ’em if they can’t be bothered finding you, it’s not as though it’s hard.
Don’t waste your time putting everything from the last four years up because it’s highly likely that it will ALL be taken down again.
I think Option #4, with a direct link to relevent corbettreport.com page.
Option #2 could get you nuked again immediately, what a waste of time that would be.
Option 2 – Your work needs to reach as many people as possible.
Option 4 – I totally agree!
Imagine you’re on a game show hosted by the Universe. The prize? Evolving as a decent human. The challenge? Choosing your way of responding to chaos. Here are your 5 sparkling options:
Option 1: โThe Spiritual Ostrichโ
Stick your head in the sand, breathe deeply like you’re meditating, and just keep walking like nothing happened. Super zen, super blind. No change, no growth, just vibes.
๐งโโ๏ธ + ๐ = โ๏ธ “Namaste and no lessons today.”
Option 2: โThe Overfunctioning Servantโ
Now youโre in the trenches doing more for less. The others? Still sleeping. You? Still serving โ with a smile. This is empathy in toxic mode.
๐ซ โYes sir, Iโll fix your neglect and shine your shoes.โ
Option 3: โThe Lost Messengerโ
You’re doing bonus tasks to awaken the people… except we donโt even know who you’re trying to awaken or why. Itโs like sending postcards into space with no return address.
๐ โEffort without aim: a spiritual cardio session.โ
Option 4: โThe Sacred Teaseโ
Now weโre talking! Teasers! Baits! Breadcrumbs for the curious souls! Those who have just enough life force to crawl out of apathy might just follow the trail.
๐ง “Move an inch? You win. Stay stuck? Enjoy the teaser, honey.”
Option 5: โThe Ego Fortressโ
Hereโs the opposite of awakening. This oneโs all fire, no warmth. Angry, prideful, and allergic to cooperation. Zero effort, zero curiosity, and definitely zero growth.
๐งฑ โIf I donโt benefit, let the world burn.โ
๐ฅ “Compassion is for the weak โ now hold my grudge.”
Option 4.
It allows new or existing subscribers there to find your work there and give them an extra reason to find your website. If people are not teased by it, well then them watching the full content on YouTube won’t do anything but waste their time.
Just upload teasers and shorts to YouTube to remind people Iโm not dead.
#4 will save some people
Option 2: the world needs to have access to good quality info and the popularity of YT unfortunately necessitates it’s use in the information war โ this is not about Google โ it’s about the people.
P.S. I would also suggest making some sort of effect even if it us automated to delete the antisemetic comments on all your comments sections across all platforms left by spooks to discredit your work โ your regulars listeners know what’s going on, but inexoerienced newbies might be deterred away from your content by fear of association.
Tough decision but I lean toward option #3 followed #4.
#4 – I Agree – but I would add the odd full-length episode too….
A mix of 2 and 4. I say post old content and lure people to your site with new stuff. most important is to grow and spread your message. As much as YT sux its great you’re back on it. and it is a sign that perhaps they realized they fuked up.
#1 is the best onption provided yu keep reminding viewers what youtube will do and where else they can go.
#4 is also an option. Encourage these fair-weather members to do whgat the rest of us did.
Option #1 or #4
Option #4
1) Taking advantage of this opportunity
2) People who do not follow the teaser will probably never look for you the next time your channel is removed.
At least option #4, as many casual social media users find channels by watching shorts these days. Though, I dislike the format and would prefer option #3 and #1, which should help reach the right people that will listen to and learn from your content.
Hi James,
This feels like the carrot before the final stick moment or Faustian forgiveness scenario.
These platforms, the resources behind them, the people who supported censorship should never be given legitimacy or undeserved street credit.
My suggestion would be to make entirely sure you have all videos pulled from YT, archived (which we all know you do) and then only in the form of Option 4 – Post a type of Short summary with clear links to the full video via other platforms of preference.
This way you can continue to coral and slowly move over those unaware and extremely slow adopters of alternative platforms.
Option #2, I follow you on lots of different platforms and with many devices. If I’m at my desk I go to the website and/or Odysee. But using my TiVo I can only use YouTube. Of course I originally found your YouTube channel during the scamdemic, and from there found you in the other places, so I think others in the future might find you the same way. The more content you have in more places the better the chances people will find you, so option #2.
Option #2 – I’ve been following you on other platforms, but I think you should leverage the reach of YouTube to get your work in front of these sad people who can’t work out how to find other channels.
Option #2 – 1 The more that hear you and James (MM) the better. TubeYou has more people that need your insights and investigations than any other platform. Please be kind to them, do not let them succumb to the machine without having a chance to see through the cracks in the curtain.
Good luck James, you are a beacon for those that are lost in the electronic media (propaganda) age.
True! They need it the most.
Option 2 – particularly upload your big documentaries as they may go viral. You don’t have to respect youtube to realise pragmatically it can be very useful for getting the message out and attracting more fans.
Option 2 – I agree with the reasoning of the last four comments. Your number one priority is to get your valuable informative out there to as many people as possible while you can.
Some folk may struggle with the simplest of technology but that does not necessarily make them idiots. Instinctively they know we are being lied to by governments, media, health authorities, etc, more than some people who have all manner of advanced technological skills. (I have a few friends like this โ technologically challenged for sure, but whose strengths lay elsewhere and who seek the truth.)
Make it as simple for them as you can. And use this opportunity to keep trying to direct them to your website. Iโm regularly telling people in the community about your work and give them the website address, but no doubt they go home and try to YouTube it.
James, you have more wisdom and integrity than sticking to your Option 5 guns through stubbornness and pride just to make your point.
Iโm interested to knowโฆ it is a huge job to implement Option 2?
Exactly!
Number 2 for sure.
I agree fully on every argument for number 2.
I would deactivate reactions, as trolls and bots are always active on sites like Youtube and cause a possible distraction.
Maybe at the end, or at the beginning of each episode, you can place standard lines like:
โData can be censored.
For uncensured broadcast, please visit http://www.Corbett.com,
where you can read and post commentsโ.
Option #4
Your are far away from supporting the agenda agents again
Option 3
YouTube, The return of the prodigal son.
1/2 million viewerโs potentially canโt be sneezed at.
The censorship reversal tipping point has arrived l, hopefully to stay.
I followed you on the website but often had to remind myself, to โI wonder what James is sayingโ and then log on.
There are these technologies called RSS and email subscription. Not very advanced, but robust and simple for use. They will prompt you with with new content, there’s no need for you to remind yourself. As long as you use email on a regular basis.
#2 there are people new to the truth, get that information on there brother!
Option #4, for each video you would upload, instead upload a video with links to other platforms, stating how Youtube censors videos, and promotes climate change agendas, bioweapon injections, etc. I could automate the whole thing for you, even building the videos, just have a powertool where you just run it and it does all the dirty work. Clearly they are trying to suck people back into Youtube, clearly this means you are a success. So many YT channels with multi millions of followers are so blatantly propaganda, the people behind them usually don’t have any type of screen presence or delivery, it makes one wonder (not me) how they got so popular, but then you see them spewing the climate change propaganda (as “science”) etc.
SlaveSpeak – I agree that they’re trying to suck people back into YT (and other platforms).
However, I believe they’re doing it because we working people are clearly getting decentrally organized and they canNOT track us in their AI surveillance loop. They’re “concerned”.
I say we give them nothing – #5.
I continue telling people about CorbettReport, as I’m sure you & many of his readers/listeners do, and word-of-mouth can be much more effective long term as James will get people whose eyes & minds are already opened.
Hi James!
When we went to de-google our phones, the guys said, beat them with their own weapons. He used google to google how to de-google a specific Motorola type phone.
So I would say, go for it! I think Option 1 and Option 3, then maybe go for Option 4 as well if the overlords decide to let you stay.
And if you decide to monetise on YouTube, you can use it to build the greatest video platform ever? Or send it to me and I will build you a nice cottage on our permaculture farm in Kenya ๐
Take care,
Caroline
Caroline,
Great to hear you are on a permaculture farm in Kenya. Thatโs probably my dream after living there for a couple of years in the past ๐
I have a variety of close friends living around Kenya but doubt they are that โawakeโ. But you never know. I think many people donโt even want to broach certain subjects as havenโt got the energy anymore to try and share info on real life stuff. I am certainly one of those these days.
Good luck with it all and have a Tusker baridi sana for me.
Option #5. Why on earth would you ever again want to patronize an organization that failed the integrity test of the past five years. Does not seem like such a move would be in alignment with your core values.
Agree Option #5
YT overlords only want you back SO THAT they can track people. Many have already disconnected and they’re “concerned”. They need to herd us back into their disgusting low-life loop.
Agree! As others have said, it’s all about devious motives, the cancelling the truth, centralization of powers with AI. No way Facecrack is doing this for a positive reason. Ignore the money, ignore the lure. Stay the course.
Option #6. Fuck’em.
I agree. Option #6. Donโt post anything new to Youtube. Your time is extremely precious. I would say, donโt spend any more time thinking about this. Here are a couple of reasons why:
First of all, you see 500K+ subscribers you want to reconnect with. This number is not real. This like so many other things on Youtube is generated. It is a lever, a manipulated data point. It could be 5 million subscribers, it could be 50. You donโt know, you will never know.
Second, Youtube is a black hole of AI entrainment. What videos are people being directed to AFTER they watch one of your videos? I rarely go on Youtube anymore, but when I do, Iโm horrified by the โcontentโ that I see. Most of it is computer generated, mind numbing, mind altering crap. Do you want to help to draw viewers into that? When you show up in a Google search, that will direct viewers to a search results page on Youtube that is populated by lots of other videos. How many of these videos are specifically there to divert people from your message(s) or to taint your message โ guilt by association โ they control the associations.
Third, you are not the only content producer who has sworn off of Youtube. Iโm not the only content consumer who avoids Youtube. Youtube, Google, government, or really, our wannabe slave masters, need numbers โ REAL numbers. Most of the viewers and consumers on Youtube are not real, they are computers. AI needs real content. It feeds on real humans interacting with it. I can say with absolute certainty that I will not be looking at any of your content on Youtube.
Thank you James for all your hard work. As someone said earlier in this thread, you are a beacon. Shine on. Donโt willingly step back under the Youtube basket.
I was pondering this same point regarding the actual number of subscribers. There are three subscription options and the vast majority of YouBoob users are completely unaware of them. With all banning and shadow banning going on, it is likely impossible to determine one’s reach on that contrived platform.
Based on what I have seen here in these comment sections, there are two (2) confirmed CR subscribers who have been prompted by the new video being uploaded to YouBoob. Myself and another subscriber, kalih I believe is the screen name. I did not get a notification, but the CR video dropped on the home page.
When I search for “corbett report” on YouBoob, I get the extras CR channel and the unofficial CR channel, but the “deleted” channel is not there. I guess it was not relevant for a long while and was thus completely deranked, if not still shadow banned from the search, as it was for a while before the channel was “deleted”.
My experience with YouBoob is that it somewhat tailors the recommendations based on your viewing history. I am not at all surprised that people who do not use it on a regular basis will find themselves under a deluge of mind rotting content in the feed.
Similar results here. I’m not logged in or subscribed to anything on Youtube (never will be again), when searching from a private page, I don’t see the deleted account. I see the extras CR page and the unofficial channel. The header image for the unofficial channel says “Piratestreams” – 29.9K subscribers apparently – arrr matey – James’ potential revenue ends up in Davey Jones locker.
I believe James never took one single cent from that beast.
I’m sure you’re absolutely correct.
However, there have been many thousands of views of the videos on that channel, and no doubt, many thousands of ads have been pushed through that channel. Somebody (Google) is making money with James’ content.
It looks like that channel was created Mar 18, 2022 and has been allowed(sigh) to post the same videos that James was not permitted to show. The same content.
So, I’d like to come back to how you started this thread – Fuck’em.
There’s no arguing against evil, it has to be extinguished.
Well said !
Hahahaaaa, good one!
Yes, I’m onboard with Option 5 or 6!!
They’re just trying to track us & suck more info from us for their AI bs.
Lol this one for sure!!!
Option #7: Start a YouTube cooking show called โHow to Roast Big Tech,โ featuring a tasting menu of banned keywords served with a side of spicy demonetization sauce. ๐ฝ๏ธ๐ฅ
Dear lord, this is fantastic idea for a spin off show.
Glad you like it! And the best part? James already has the perfect theme songโโScrew YouTubeโโso all we need is Chef Corbett in the kitchen, rocking a snarky chef hat and serving up truth with a side of sass, with that anthem blasting in the background. ๐ณ๐ฅ๐ถ๐
https://youtu.be/rmWDIzEocpc?si=oeA-kZ1wcM8ZmUfq
You said you would NEVER,EVER,EVER, post again on YOU TUBE. It seems to me you already answered the question.
Agreed!
I agree with mkey. Option #5 & 6. Have nothing to do with them. Maybe they are losing too many views to other channels and are so sorry for losing viewers. (I’m Sorry! Not really. HA HA. Jokes on you.) Plus of course Google tracking data. “Dear, YouTube. #6 You.”
I’d be happy with a combination of options #3 & #4.
I catch you on all platforms and occasionally here.
Though, a broader audience that includes the YouTube only numpties can only be beneficial to the messages you have to tell.
Kindest regards,
A surfer of light and sound.
Option 3. Reach the wider audience while you have the chance, but only upload the big docos that are missing. Leave the four year gap as a monument. Btw I never knew who you were before you got kicked off YouTube. Possibly would never have found you or any of the other alt media I now follow and support if I hadnโt been forced to look on alternate platforms for the truth by all the censorship, so it really backfired in my case.
Option 4. YouTube still has reach, but it is a monster. It is best not to feed the beast. Iโve been watching James Corbett for years and while I may have watched a video or two on YouTube, I have never sought them. I always accessed James Corbett videos through The Corbett Report and could not fathom that YouTube was preferable. I also found it astonishing people had difficulty accessing Jameโs videos when YouTube was down. I am not and never has been a YouTube member, which means I cannot like or subscribe, I am happy with this because YouTube cannot profile me. Why anyone would watch YouTube in favour of the plethora of better experiences is beyond me.
Let people know you are on The Corbett Report, where they can see your complete corpus and even become a subscriber. Other wise they can see you on a host of streaming services. You should help people break with a dirty habit. If quality content moves away from YouTube, they might eventually up their game. YouTube is a filthy censorship monster and a hideous watching experience with nasty advertising blitzing. Let people know you live and your voice has never gone quiet. People too lazy to shift are too far gone to help.
I didn’t shift right away watching. And there is a wider audience that can be reached through FB and other social media platforms. You would be surprised at how little people know.
Look, the conservatives think Trump, Vance and Musk are American heros and Thomas Massie and Rand Paul are crackpots.
Ksmen
To be fair Ron Paul IS a crackpotโฆthe fact that he was right doesnโt change that.
Crackpots are the extreme version that drives people towards an achievable goal. Stallman is a crackpot too, but without him weโd never have open source software even as good as it is.
Option #2 but just the highlights. So people still have to go elsewhere to see the full thing
Keep up the fight
I canโt help thinking that there has to be an ulterior motive behind the reinstatement of your channel and others. Dragging the increasing numbers of โalternative mediaโ consumers back to a more controllable centralised platform seems to me not beyond the realms of fantasy.
Personally, I have never used anything else but Corbettreport.com to access your content and genuinely canโt see why others would not choose to do so also. I believe any of the first 3 options would ultimately be counterproductive. However, I do understand that disseminating the important topics you cover to an ever-wider audience has significant merit.
With those thoughts in mind I would therefore probably suggest option 4. Only brief introductory clips with closed comments, leading people to the full content on your own platform. That said, I would be very tempted by option 5 and tell them to go **** themselves!
ATB
Who cares? Youtube is not a person and you don’t have a relationship with that non-person, so no need for feelings. It’s a means to an end, if you can use that means to reach more people with an important message, you should obviously use it. It’s a no-brainer. Holier than thou brings nothing to nobody, it’s as if you stop talking to statists coz they voted. So anything except option 5, and if you can get some of the people to transfer to odysee, that’s a nice bonus. (I said “bonus” hehe)
I agree with Hughsername
James, as an English teacher you must be aware of the 18th century English phrase โDonโt cut off your nose to spite your faceโ. It describes a self-destructive act done in pigheadedness that will harm the person more than their intended target.
We all make judgments based on our current set of circumstancesโฆ as ’twas the case with โI will NEVER EVER post on YouTube againโ back in 2021. But those circumstances have changed. As such, it is time to reconsider and reevaluate that statement, which is exactly what you are doing now and asking for opinions. “In a multitude of counsellors there is safety”.
The vast number of people are suggesting Options 1 to 4. All of which have merits that have been expressed with insight.
This is not about winning a battle against YouTube when you would have nothing to gain and heaps to lose.
If I thought you were an inflexible person who would ‘Throw the baby out with the bathwaterโ or โShoot yourself in the footโ in the mistaken belief that you had to ‘hunker downโ to maintain your previous position, I would not be a Corbett Report subscriber.
As such, I am confident you will not choose Option 5. Rather, as I see it, any other Option must fit in with what is feasibly possible, time wise, in your already busy schedule.
Hi James. I just subscribed to your webpage for the first time after following you for the last four years. So far the only money I’ve given you for all your work was whatever meagre percentage you get from a copy of your book.
I didn’t know about your channel until I got pissed off with all the Covid censorship and started using Odyssey. I swore never to use Youtube again and, but for a couple of music videos someone has been sending to me, I’ve stuck to my promise. I would like to thank you. People like you saved me from a profound depression at the height of the Covid nightmare.
Despite that, I would chose Option #2 in the poll. Why? Because nobody gives a fuck about Odyssey. 99% of the people I know don’t even know it exists. Many know about Bitchute and the other platforms but, since they have been told they are all far right, they will never venture into that territory. Not everyone is an “initiated”, everyone has to start with something and, for some, it takes years, if not decades, to understand the truth about the world. Not many years ago I, an old time admirer of Epstein-friendly Noam Chomsky, was convinced that all 9-11 truthers were crazy conspiranoics…
People like that –millions– are not going to find you outside Youtube. Not to mention the vast number of completely indoctrinated teenagers who could some day, by pure chance, find any of your old videos on a topic they happen to find interesting and –who knows, that may change their lives and the lives of those around them forever.
Take the chance, swallow your pride –which, I admit, would be very difficult for me, if I were in your position. This is more important than any of us. We cannot miss any opportunity to reach as many people as possible. The important thing is that your remain true to your principles in the content of your videos.
And, anyway, if you end up uploading all those old videos you may very well get your channel shut again, so you won’t have to do any more thinking on whether you chose to remain on the platform…
Hi
Option #4 seems like the best option to me as youtube can go eff themselves
For anyone who didnt try to find your work on another platform or here at corbettreport.com imo are not really worthy of your in-depth research. having teasers on utube hopefully kicks them in the u-no-what to actually find info elsewhere. Thanks for all u do
GooTube provides higher visibility, a better opportunity to reach normies & puts extra bucks in your pocket. Go on take the money & run James. Option #2 – Option #1 + I upload all 4 years of back content.
I shamely agree here, but I did like my jingle idea ๐
Option 4 James.
Option #2
The censorship hasn’t stopped, just shifted, imo, to user content; ofc, an army of chatbots can now be expected to muddy the waters.
Most of my comments on YT get shadow banned, they aren’t visible outside my IP address, but do often get a solitary thumbs up. Some of the content creators that I emailed with a screen shot of the hidden posts seemed genuinely surprised about the censorship.
It may be interesting to suggest to those who post comments on your YT uploads, to post the same comment on the corresponding corbettreport.com page. It’s probably a case of Willy Wonka courting Alice in Wonderland.
A wee aside to end here, James, that you might find interesting, if you haven’t encountered it already.
https://poms.ac.uk/search/?index_type=person&q=corbet&min_date=1093&max_date=1371
Perhaps ancestors of yours? Some heavy hitters there!
If so young Raven, Corbet, singular of Corbi (I believe), were your ancestors originally of the Logan family? I’m intrigued, being a Logan on my mum’s side, and given that ‘Logan’ appears to me, from my own research, to be the most banned/erased name in written history.
Big claim, I know; however, this rabbit hole just keeps going, and imho will blow even your socks off into another dimension.
Cheers!
Martin
Option #2 โ Option #1 + I upload all 4 years of back content
With the proviso you put a smart ass disclaimer at the end of every video saying something like “This content could be compromised or removed at any time, it is also posted on Odysee, Bitchute etc. YouTube itself is a tool of the deep state and should never be trusted”. Cheers James you rock
Option #4:
It’s pragmatics vs principle.
Use them pragmatically to advertise teasers for your stuff; but on principle do not upload full content.
Maybe the occasional complementary video to please the lazy.
Infinite respect for your work.
take an option (3 ? ) with a clear banner at the start of the video that this one was banned in the past due to cencorship by Youtube, not because the content was false but because it was true
Option #5. Stick to your guns James! GooTube will take your channel down again once the next scam/hoax calamity occurs that the ruling oligarchs create. Don’t give the technocrats what they want by having your intelligence and intellect back on their controlled platform. Some people simply can’t be reached, assuming those YouTube comments are even real people. See “Dead Internet Theory”. Thank you for all the excellent work SINCE being deleted from ThemTube!
Yes!
Iโm hoping for Option #2. YouTube is a tool I see no reason not to use. A larger audience is always better, especially when your work is too important not to be shared through every available channel. If they strike it again – so be it. Just treat it as another platform to help the information reach as many people as possible.
Option #5. Don’t feed the beast.
Option #2. Why wouldnโt you take the opportunity to put your information in front of potentially hundreds of thousands of new people? The internet itself as well as Bitchute, Rumble etc are all tools belonging to someone else anyway where a switch could be flipped at any second. So why not make the most of every facet of communication while you can?
Iโm for #3. YouTube still has many listeners who could learn. And some of the bigger items, especially documentaries, would be good. For me, thereโs also several times when I can refer hormones to YouTube.
Option #3 Although your book event filled all seats, how ironic that so few people were there. (Mindless celebs fill stadiums.) The awoken are as few as the righteous in Sodom. Thus, we must do everything possible to save souls, even if it means using the Beast Platform. (Frank the bassist)
Option #1
As another channel to stream, it makes sense if the added work is minimal โ as Option #4 would involve a lot of unmerited extra work chopping up those teasers.
The will to tell YouTube to go f*** itself is high. But the wider the reach, the more people could at most have the option.
Yes, maybe the YouTube audience isnโt the most willing to change, or at least question things, but it will still put a glaring hole in the fabric of consent that YouTube claims to champion!
Have mercy for the normies!
Option #4
Option 2+1 Many older people are not very tech savvy, not that you really need to be, and what they know how to do is where it stays. The thought I come back to is this, I have gained so much from all your work and have probably watched most of it and putting it all back out there gives the timid, the people who go no farther than YouTube a chance to see what they missed. Maybe some new people will search the topics you cover too. So what if they take it down again? In this day and age getting as much true information out there and is easy to find is critical. You can’t even google for info anymore. I say get it out there while it is an option. Thanks for all you do.
It’s got to be Option #5 – The self respecting Corbett Report would not under any circumstances partake in waggy tail dogging back to the censors.
I also feel it should be option 5. I am of the opinion that the people who are meant to listen to you will find you. Going to your website is really not that hard and whoever won’t do that, well, too bad. Yes, as mentioned above, self-respect.
Hello iris ,
I just wanted to say that I found James on you tube .
That was the only way I saw it . I did figure it out when no new videos were uploaded and it was made to look like nothing happened. Also that the website was clearly visibleโฆ. Idk , it could be good to show there are other places to go .
option #4
keep up the great work!
Option #2. Knowledge is power. Make it available to the greatest number of people.
Option #2!
Option #3
No harm to make it available to the wider audience โ and always the chance that others will discover the truth.
Option #2. YouTube is one of the best ways to spread information if that is what is important to you.
I want to say Option 1, but I vote for Option 4. That way it minimizes the chances of censorship as much as possible, people still get access to your content on YouTube, and a lot of people get their info from shorts and clips. Plus, it’s still a good way for you to advertise that your work is elsewhere
I understand your frustration with YouTube and the people who will only follow you on there, but this is a war we are in, and you and your work are major assets to the freedom movement, and I think I can remember you saying a couple of years ago, “now is the time to push any button you think might slow the NWO down.”
If I were you, James, I’d nuke them back and drop every truth bomb I could on them.
I think it’s principled to choose option #4 or #5 but wise to do #3 or #1. I think the demographics shift in political views and consensus, as dumbed down most normies’ takes still are, will be more receptive to your content. And it still remains important to keep campaigning” on the platforms where your voice is most likely to remain heard. Either way, don’t put too much effort into managing different platforms in a different way. #2 leads to an explosion of content that would tune out most people from your channel. Remember that the average Corbett report subscriber is going to be very different from your average youtube viewer which don’t leave behind comments.
Option #5, but not before erasing youtube’s restored inventory of your videos. YT doesn’t deserve your valuable content.
Where’s the “like” button? ๐
Completely agree. Maybe leave a single video excoriating YT and directing those interested to your many other locations on teh interwebz.
Alex
I disagree with the idea of deleting it- even with the algorithm directing people away from it why make it impossible (rather then just let it be difficult) to stumble across?
YouTube basically pays money bro store every videoโฆ. It people hate YouTube they ought to get a thousand people to upload a hundred hours each of boring video no one will watch so Google has to pay money to store it for no gain.
Taking it down doesnโt hurt YT , nor does leaving it up help them
Since this is 5th Generation Warfare, there are more minds to be won over. Your non-self-censored thoughts are needed out there, though I’m not going to hold my breath that “the algorithm” is going to send your stuff viral. It’s already evident that comments are filtered and ordered according to statist standards on some topics. For now, I vote #3. Works like Media Matrix are worth sending out to the sunshine patriots as well as young minds out there. But if you choose #5, I wouldn’t be surprised one bit.
Considering Danโs advise I wanted to suggest #4.
However since posting to yt is getting to be the same as feeding AI, I vote #5 instead.
Pretty sure AI is already eating EVERYTHING you post on the web.
Google is killing websites by sucking up their data and serving it as AI summaries – destroying the add click revenue of thise sites. I donโt doubt that AI has eaten up the internet archive, Google books (inc the ones they keep offline because of copyright issues) and if they feed it YT they probably feed it odysee and bitchute too. Maybe they feed it podcasts these days, the auto transcription is good enough to do that now.
The days of free content are probably coming to an end soon for that reason- websites that depend on add click revenue wonโt make articles and how toโs and the web will be nothing but AI slop. They will have to feed AI synthetic data, which hopefully kills it.
I was playing with SUNO ai music, getting it to write about web people like Richard Grove, jay dayer and Mr Corbett and itโs songs showed it knew at least whi they were and what they did. Iโd bet money Google feeds it better stuff then SUNO does, whoever runs that one I donโt know TBH
#2, maybe #3
Option #2
YouTube, or the world, is going to act however it does and to take it personally and refuse even a temporary opportunity to get the truth in front of more people doesn’t seem completely reasonable. What you do is, I believe, very important. I found your work on YouTube and am now a paid subscriber.
Thanks for everything
Option 2 or 3. Choose the option that is the least labor intensive for you. I suspect the overlords will still shadow ban, throttle, demonetize and whatever shenanigans they are so good at. The overlords get the turbo cancers so maybe they are softening up a bit.
Hi James,
Option 3 for me.
Take care !
Option 4
Option #4 or #5 – Integrity matters. Even if it helps build your reach or helps your family financially, would you really ever be comfortable aligning yourself and your work with Alphabet again? If yes, then use YT as a means to an end. However, I don’t think that you would deep down. Plus, you’ve curated a core audience & business model that seems to match your core values. The YT audience, on average, is obviously in some level of tension with that.
Dear James!
With option #1 to #3 you give Youtube AI a very convenient way to learn from your work. Maybe that’s the main reason why you (and other people) got back your (their) channel. But for sure that occurred to your mind already.
I have a harsh opinion on the people who where not able (or willing) to follow you to your homepage (or other platforms): They are not the ones who will make a change in this world. So they are not worthy of your efforts at enlightenment.
Confucius says: Advanced knowledge can be transmitted to those who are above the average, but never to those who are below the average.
So in my opinion there are only the options #4 and #5 left.
Thank you for your great work!
What about people who have never been exposed to Jamesโs work? Itโs just leave them behind because some people who knew about him before, didnโt follow him to the website? That seems so judgmental and vindictive. We get enough gatekeeping from the globalist blob, really think itโs a disservice to emulate their behavior and deprive people of knowledge because or assume they are too lazy/stupid to part of the โmovementโ based on what platform they are using for information.
Hi Iris.L
YouTube and other platforms like it are Dangerous. They are Not on our side, and if they are letting James and others back on suddenly, there is a nefarious reason for it. Why give them all of James’ information to feed AI and to keep tabs on people like us and what we are interested in? I wonder how many awake/smart people still use YouTube as their main source of info… I don’t know that James would touch a lot of lives of the ones that still hang out there. Just my opinion though.
Please note that there is still option #4 for the people you refer to.
Option #3โ๐พโ๐พโ๐พโ๐พโ๐พ
Option 4#, because it’s important to expose as many people as possible to your content. OTOH, it’s also important to not fall into the same trap again a few years (or months?) later.
I’m convinced this recent “unban wave” has a lot to do with the anti-trust case against Google as well as the FTC taking a closer look at de-platforming from previous years.
I believe that this ‘reprieve’ is entirely temporary as you point out and that at some point in the near future it will all begin again. The new paradigm definitely seems to be “speech not reach”, and those who can’t handle visiting a different website are arguably quite culpable for this.
It’s possible that YouTube itself may not even survive the long term impacts of the anti-trust case, what will all the GooTube viewers do then?
My guess is that they’ll just move to “Green YouTube” (Rumble) or X.
I’m biased towards 3/4
Option 1. Dan is right, you donโt get many second chances. There is big audience out there that has never been exposed to you. This is an opportunity to a wider audience. Iโve been with you for many years, long before the YouTube ban, but I found you on YouTube.
Who wants or needs a second chance from the censorship overlords? You act like it is some sort of privilege. They were the ones who were privileged to have you as a creator, and it would be a better argued not to give THEM a second chance
Option #4. That way you will constantly be redirecting people to your website, and your YT channel will (probably) not be taken down (depending upon the content of the teasers, of course).
I would say a combination of #3 and #4. Load up to YT the most important videos that you have made over the past four years so that the ‘normies’ can see them. Then, post teasers and the beginnings of your new videos with the links in the description on where viewers can watch the entire video. Many ‘content creators’ are doing this in order to still reach those who use YT by default but still promote alternative, less censorious platforms.
Option3. Maybe some of the normies will come to Corbettreport.com to watch full documentaries, interviews and posts. There is a good chance many of them will become supporting subscribers.
Option #2
What negative effect can come of having the lazy get these important messages, even if only temporary?
Why not give as many people as possible the means of finding you, the same way many of us found you all those years ago?
What real effect can come from the “preaching to the choir” method that is effectively what has been forced on you for the past few years?
Dear James, I am always happy to report that I deprogrammed with you 10 years ago. I began supporting you the minute you and Pilato made off line support possible. In March 2020, the instant they launched Operation “Covid”, I became your most avid promoter. It was my daily mission to spread your name EVERYWHERE on them-tube, advertising The Corbett Report as a sanctuary for Truth. 10 years ago, I began wishing that you would write it all down, and at last “Reportage” (of which I am a proud owner). I am a fan, advocate and supporter.
I am so grateful for your work. But now I must ask you to focus your brilliant spotlight on the plight of the political prisoner Dr. Reiner Fuellmich. It appears that so many in OUR media have remained silent on his persecution. I can NOT understand this.
Oh James! Please help!
Option 5 I see this move across a number of platforms as similar to Twitter to X. Just another way to get access to data on freedom loving people. I have not gone to Youtube either as a quest or signed in for many years now and see that platform as one of the many viruses in the media world. Thanks James for all the work you have done!
Welcome back James!
I opt for #2 BUT I wouldnโt just dump all the old programs youโve made at once. Time them appropriately to match current events if possible.
I have followed you in your website from time to time and always go back to obtain links to suitable programs when in a discussion but I do not catch all the programs you produce. Here I must confess that Iโm among the lazy ones who watch mostly YouTube.
Hereโs the reason: the amazing variety of subjects available, from tutorials about gardening, 3D printing, car repair, etc. programs on history, philosophy, news from all sides, audio books, films and so much more which I donโt find in other platforms, BUT the MAIN reason is that itโs the only platform I know that has a feature to make a queue to view/listen to the programs. I can make my queue in my iPad, place my earbuds and go out in the field to work without having to stop and search for the next program every time the end of one is reached. If Rumble or BitChute had this feature I would watch/listen there.
Iโm not familiar with the RSS technology. Iโll be checking your site for that info.
But for now, thanks for coming back to YouTube and hopefully will help to broadcast your very vital thoughts far and wide.
https://corbettreport.com/really-simple-syndication-solutionswatch/
I think this is what you want?
RSS works great for podcatchers too and the RSS feeds on this site grabbed almost all the podcasts on here when fed into gpodder, even ones from waaaay back
Option #2 i agree with dan and i hope you bring Pilato too
Option #2 – people will come around eventually!
Hi James, option #5.
Maybe I am a loony but this sudden switch in their decision smells like a slide of hands to me, especially in the era of AI explosion. Who knows really why they do it and how they can play with that information? When I go to corbettreport.com I put all my trust in truthfulness of the content, unlike with anything on YouTube. Which is a reason I do not go there looking for truth. Besides never means never in my world.
So #5 supported by lovely #6.
Thank you for all your lovely work.
What does James Corbett really want.!
You drew a line in the sand back then and I respect that.
I don’t see going back has anything to add to what you have now created.
GOOD LUCK with whatever you decide.
You have our support ….. onwards
F & M (Melb, Aust)
I lean toward Option #3, but:
(1) It doesn’t matter to me personally, and I don’t imagine it does to many Corbett Report members either. So in my opinion you can do whatever you think is best, regardless of what anyone says (though of course you’ll take their opinions into consideration). And:
(2) This may be an original proposal, I don’t know. Option #2 using volunteers to do the uploading. It’s a big job and I’m sure some people would be happy to help you with it using a temporary password or passwords. In order for you not to have to send them the files (which would be as much work as uploading them to YouTube), they’d need access to your Substack and/or corbettreport.com website as well as to your YouTube account.
SolutionsWatch suggestion given this video’s topic: don’t forget about bookmarking
You know, all these people talk about subscribing to the channel, and then they complain that people are not getting informed that they’ve uploaded new videos. Personally, I like the fact that apparently everyone just forgot that you can bookmark someone’s home page. You don’t have to rely on a site like YouTube (or any other site) to keep a list of places you want to check, you can just cycle through things in your browser! What an invention. Man, I wish I knew about this before sites like YouTube existed.
And you know what else? If you don’t trust your browser, you can save those bookmarks to your desktop! You can even put them all in a little folder on your desktop! Man… the things people come up with…
By the way, you can even bookmark sites by their IP addresses in case their URLs get nuked.
Hi James,
I vote for option #2. Anyway you can get the info out is good. I have been following you on your channel and love the work you do,
Thanks
Options 2 and keep posting. Spread info far and wide. Hopefully you can score income as a result. Iโm a pod cast listener mostly cause rss feeds and I love being able to get your content in audio and as I need visit/watch video via your website but I found you on YouTube and many people use it. The more reality checks the better. They donโt get shadow banning still! lol
The answer to your question, James, is based on the following questions:
– Who do you want your audience to be?
– What attention do you want?
– What needs would be met?
You know, for me, I guess calling myself an author now, I don’t want to be famous and rich and all that. So, when it comes to telling people about my books, I tend to occasionally tell people about how I specifically don’t want to be rich and famous, and ask them to consider that should they like the books and want to tell others about the them. At the same time, I recognize and utilize that I am a small voice in a sea of noise and have times where I will freely tell people about my books with the goal of being drowned out with the other noise.
This is all to say that, when it comes with what to do with your YouTube channel, weigh the odds and place your bet, because that’s all you really can do.
#3 Vote for option 3 in short term, and then maybe after 1 year of not being canceled again, slowly start uploading the rest.
IMO there is no reason for uploading all that was made, for example few people will retroactively watch NWNW
but I think its good to use YouTube to reach as many people as possible, while it works.
#2 Get info out anywhere and everywhere.
A vote? Haha, good one James. Let’s all vote harder guys to push our idea on someone else!
BTW, have you considered youtube might be auto-generating those comments?
Option #4 is my choice.
Btw, this box should be on top of the comments, not all the way below 1000000
Comments! lol
If you click the “comments” link under the article title at the very top of the page, it’s going to take you to the comment box, that is to the bottom of the page.
Lol ๐
I would encourage option #5. They are not letting you back on for your benefit or to help the cause in any way.
Well, don’t post anything, not even a “goodbye” video.
#2. Literally for the exact reason that Dan gave is what I thought yesterday when I saw that you were back on YouTube with the main Channel. Most of us commenting here have never stopped watching you anyway and a lot of us have been watching you since damn near the beginning. You can keep swimming in your own pond or you can try to bring new people into this space which is beneficial for not only the Corbett report Channel but for society as a whole.
Do the opposite of what the authoritarians want.
#1-#4 are all great.
#5 was good to make a statement at the time, but now is a time for a different one
Option #2. This seems like tmost exposure for your work with the least amount of effort. As you make new videos, continue to tell people to subscribe through your website or RSS feed.
Option #3 works best for me
Option #3 works best for me.
I only go to YouTube because they have CC and I’m sorely hard of hearing. Substack has CC and that’s where I listen to the CR. I like what Dan Dicks says. It’s an open, all-inclusive remedy for this situation. That being said, I opt for #4. It gives people insight into the work you’ve been doing off YouTube and might help steer them to a wider range of platforms rather than allow them to remain in their comfort zone of incuriosity.
Option #2 or #3:
First, I think Dan is dead-on. Yes, there were very good reasons for you to decide not to upload on YT any longer although your Corbett Report Specials channel had suddenly reappeared. But now the situation is a little different: Back when your channels got deleted, I was sure that many people wouldn’t want to deal with the “inconvenience” of following your work at other Video-platforms or at your website directly – at least not as regularly.
So, frankly, I was shocked how many people in the YT-comments apparently had no idea that you have even produced any content in the last 4 years. I mean, you had talked about the possibility of a channel-ban more and more frequently; you refer to your website in your standard greeting-phrase which is heard in almost every single video, for God’s sake! Still, although those well-meaning people apparently did watch your work on YT on a to some extent regular basis, given that they were still subscribed and quick with their “welcome back”-remarks, they never even bothered to look up your name with some search engine – even Google might have sufficed.
It seems that while it is definitely not redundant to try bringing those points across (there are “Corbetteers” who did get the message and followed you to other websites), there are still many people who might at least watch your videos and even share some ideas or gain some knowledge but who are still too hung up in their “convenient” ways and habits – that is not to say that those people can never become more aware and ready to explore new decentralised sources of information or at least realise the dangers of a too centralised information grid.
Those are the people who could benefit if your videos would again be accessible through YT (in addition to those who have never seen a Corbett Report Video in their lives who can be reached there much better as well). The channel has more than half a million subscribers – that is still a very big potential – who would see your new videos in their subscription-feeds. Some of those would click, some of those would watch your channel regularly and some of those would at some point decide to use your website (e.g. for browsing through the thematic categories etc.).
I think it would be a realistic as well as beneficial choice for the purpose of your work (as I see it: sharing important, often little-noticed information) to upload to the YT-channel again – just the way you upload to those other platforms (BitChute, Odysee, etc.). Uploading at least the highlights from the last view years in addition to that could also draw some people to the website to follow up on those topics.
โโฆ.So, frankly, I was shocked how many people in the YT-comments apparently had no idea that you have even produced any content in the last 4 yearsโฆ.โ
Would bet a lot of those are autobots (or decepticons? lol) that YT runs ti make comments on videos. They probably have a script to run thru of things to say depending on what the video description says or other stuff
It’s got be Option #5 or Option #6 (Ignore them / do nothing). Why would you consider going back to a platform that shat on you in the first place? Anyway, I would think it’s unlikely that hordes of new Corbetteers are lurking on Yuktube just waiting for the tip-off that you exist. Anyone who is interested in conspiracy-realist content will know about you already or find you via one of your co-conspirators.
Agree Analog Man. Plus, the overlords are clearly distressed trying to corral us all back into their centralized AI surveillance system. Why take the bait? We’re all more intelligent than that.
We must keep building & strengthening our own working people’s movement, decentrally organized.
#2 is my vote. I’ve never had a ‘gootube’ account and only see anything on that channel if it is from someone else sharing or posting it. I did not find you 15 years ago on U-tube…but a friend sent your own link and I was hooked from then on! It is normal for me to see and clink my email everyday when I see it. I am active on ‘fascist book’ and post many of your shows there….and have actually had 8 people that I personally know that began following you…..and many many more I’ve heard about. Spreading the word is what we as Activist do…and you’ve made your valid opinion loud and clear about gootube! GREAT!…Now send it out to MILLIONS! Can’t wait!…and LOVE your book, btw!
Hi James . I like #2 . Years ago i found you on you tube. And you changed my life . So if you can take the blindfold off of just one more person with youtube the that is one more broskie ?
Love you man.
Seems a lot of work to do loads of teasers, I don’t think that would work as they might watch that one video but then just revert back to YT for the rest.
As you say though it is a shame that they won’t have viewed your documentaries so perhaps do some adverts for those – people are always looking for longer content and documentaries, audio books, etc.
I would say also that I’d be more inclined to push subscribers and setting out the benefits of that.
Wonder if they’re putting banned platforms back up because alternative platforms are being used more….just a thought.
I think they’re putting banned platforms back up because too many of us go directly to the source now, and they canNOT track us. They’re trying to centralize us again to feed their AI surveillance system so they get better at dragging people back in or keeping them there.
Technically, it would not be such a big deal, not as big as it sounds.
I haven’t watched the above video yet, but upon just reading your question, I recommend option #3.
There is still a very large audience on YouTube that *never ventures out onto those other platforms* (I am one of them), and I see more people wising up to the fact that MSM cannot be trusted.
One would think that all those who ought to know the above fact would have already figured this out before now, but I’ve been following several YouTube channels that focus on pop culture justice who care about truth & justice and are either losing or have already lost faith in Hollywood, legacy media, and the legal/court system and they are turning to independent content creators on social media (particularly YouTube for longer form content) for their information.
I highly recommend tapping into that market.
But then also, don’t dwell there (or bother putting *every*thing on that platform). Instead, drive traffic from there back to your website. Use that platform as a “lead magnet” to lead those from the masses who are looking for truth & sound wisdom and authenticity that comes through real human beings (as opposed to all the AI generated cr@p) into your domain here at CorbettReport.com.
But I’d put more than just teaser videos out because I think there will be those who prefer to stay/dwell on YouTube (rather than venture off of it let alone continually check in with a website).
I think it’s worthwhile to at least house some of your content on that platform since YouTube has made it very easy to share its content.
YouTube will never be a bastion of truth. Do yourself a favor, get out of the echo chamber, and take the time to look elsewhere. For your sake, for humanity’s sake
YouTube is a free open channel for the average person to express themselves and disseminate information.
While there may be a lot of fluff, nonsense or falsehood being spewed on that platform & a lot of self-serving hacks and fake personas on display, there is also some good content on there — being put out by good people — independent people whose sole interest is to somehow make the world a better place.
And the fact of the matter is, people from all walks of life and levels of understanding continue to go there to watch & listen to what interests them.
Of course, I fully recognize the powers behind that platform are controlling, and it’s continually getting harder to get truthful messages out through it, but nonetheless I do see a certain level of value in that tool.
I wouldn’t suggest investing a whole lot of attention, time & energy on putting content out there on it, but I do recommend investing some of it — and be highly strategic about it, because like I said, I think there are positive aspects to it (such as the convenience & ease in sharing its content across a variety of platforms) and positive returns to be had through its use (such as getting this info in front of more sets of eyeballs and potentially gleaning more recipients of James’ highly valuable work).
Maybe, on second thought, option #4 would be the better choice.
OBVIOUSLY, option #5. Why is that NOT the consensus among your subscribers here? Don’t waste your time with the dingbats that expect their uncensored information to arrive from that despicable platform. Unless uploading to that “platform” is little effort VS the income you could earn from the views, I would surely respect that decision but Youtube is just a junkyard for mindless drones. Much better platforms, especially your actual website.
Not everyone who watches YouTube is a dingbat. However, I can see that it’s not worth James’ time to put all of his precious pearls on that platform. But depositing a few gems here and there with a link back to this goldmine of a site might not be such a bad idea.
Option #2 without a doubt. You don’t want your assistant to run out of things to do now, do you!
For a more serious reason – 550k subscribers is a hell of a lot of people, and they can learn something from every single one of your videos.
That’s what I’d do, anyway.
#3
Ride any horse to get you to heaven, even Satan himself
Total content dumps eg. Ricky V’s stuff, are overwhelming and easier to ignore
#4! This is a sign of propaganda machine malfunction. Youtube wants credible material as bait to reel people into their propaganda net. Just post a teaser video each day, followed by “Hi, I’m James Corbett from corbettreport.com. I post videos about (teaser vid subject) and many other topics, and I link to my resources and source documents, so you can check them out for yourself. Please find my work on corbettreport.com.”
Solves the problem of censorship, weeds out the empty-headed scrollers, draws people to your work, and denies youtube any more bait than absolutely necessary for your purposes.
Agree Isja! except even a teaser video gives them credible material to reel or keep people in their AI surveilled propaganda net.
Option #5 is the one that keeps THEM OUT.
Right on: for James’ purposes, not Gootube’s.
James, this is a dilemma. I totally understand and agree of washing your hands of YouTube. You donโt want to support the Beast, but there are untold millions of people who are waking up and who have woken up these last five years that may never have heard of you and your honest reporting, content and point of view. There are very few like you.
I am a firm believer in โYou donโt know what you donโt knowโ. For instance, I might’ve believed in this worldwide lie had I not been sent โEvent 2O1โ. I thank God for courageous people like you.
For humanity’s sake, I vote option #2
I would say for humanity’s sake we need to keep everyone from searching for information on YouTube, just like Google. As long as people are going to places like YouTube and Google for “facts”, we will never live in a world of TRUTH
James, what kind of people “listened” to you on YouTube, yet made no attempt to “actually listen” to you on YouTube? Those people remind me of these people:
“And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? He answered and said unto them,…because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive: For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart…”
The people Jesus is referring to actually took the effort and time to go and listen to Jesus. Just like those YouTubers who actually subscribed to your YouTube channel.
No, James, I do not consider you to be like Jesus. However, I do consider the YouTubers who didn’t understand that they should follow you over at corbettreport.com to be just like the people that Jesus described above.
Perhaps, you should start a corbettreport “parables” channel instead. In fact, you might just have a good time doing it.
W.F.F.
That was well said. Almost French like. How?
Well like this…” The prison was a horrid and squalid place . The gailor cruel in all forms of torture . Daily before the suffering the Warden of Zion would proclaim to the wrecked body ” You but need to close your eyes to this, seal your ears from this blasphemy . And remain silent to this absurdity. For this you can be bathed, cleaned, walk freely and eat cake.”
The ones with strength to stand raised themself, the remaining spoke, whispered , added to the returning roar , unanimous.
” Let them eat cake I’ll have dogfood.”
W.F.F., That is a great suggestion!.
Give a writer a reason to write. A videographer a reason to video. And Bobs your Uncle.
That may have deviated from the direction James was shepherding us too, but it’s a great idea
Now to join the PAYING aristocrats. Lay the mine/
( mind) field for any steers who just wonder around. Like me some 15 years ago .
Option # 2
Option #5.
The overlords are just looking to suck more “online habits” from us so they keep perfecting their AI surveillance system.
I never go to YT anymore, nor FB, etc.
We need to stay “decentrally organized”.
Keep building our own working people’s movement. Period.
Option #4 – During the Scamdemic censorship, I noticed quite a few of the channels I subscribed to just uploaded “watered down” and shortened versions of their videos and then redirecting people to their alternative platforms where they could view the entire video. I think this might be a good way to go. That will at least give you some presence on YouTube and hopefully people will start to follow you on your other platforms (but perhaps not, if the comments on the previous YT video showed us anything). I would disable the comment section on those uploads though. Another way to force people to migrate if they want to participate in discussions.
Or… Option#5. You’ve been getting along just fine without YouTube for the past few years, so screw them. They absolutely are going to censor again when the next big medical tyranny false flag rolls out. I’ve had no problem following your content on your website. I literally type in the letter “c” in my web browser and it pulls up your website address every time. They’ve only conceded now because the controllers realized that forbidden information was still circulating out there via alt platforms, despite their censorship. They would rather have everyone lumped into one place where it’s easier to monitor and have people forget about all the other highways to the same content.
Could it be that the re-enstatement happened because it doesn’t matter if any of the information is out there or not, and that the powers that shouldn’t be are so confident that their end goal will be reached?
I think the FTC is looking into things that took place during the scamdemic. That may be part of the sudden change.