As the 25th anniversary of the false flag events approach, 9/11 truth proponents prepare to gather in New York (and online) for Turning the Tide: 9/11 25 Years Later, a four-day conference amplifying the growing movement for 9/11 truth and accountability. Joining us to discuss that conference, as well as a new documentary feature that will be screened at the event and a forthcoming outline for a new 1,000-page 9/11 Truth and Accountability Report, is Ted Walter, Executive Director of the International Center for 9/11 Justice.
Video player not working? Use these links to watch it somewhere else!
WATCH ON: 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
or DOWNLOAD THE MP4
SHOW NOTES:
Turning the Tide: 9/11 25 Years Later
International Center for 9/11 Justice
The Responders: Breaking the Silence | Trailer | Coming Soon
Inside the upcoming preliminary hearing in the Geoff Campbell 9/11 inquest case
I could only identify 4 of the people. Guess I am further off the grid then I thought 😎
AIN’T IT FUN BEING ALIVE (song)
https://old.bitchute.com/video/hiWFUYcpz8oC/
This foolishness of all you folks trying to be shot caller on the 9/11 issue while thousands of real folks are being slaughtered by the Zionists in Lebanon, Iran, Gaza, etc. Our president is running the military and our country into the ground with his arrogant, narcissistic behavior.
Wait till this winter’s heating and gasoline $$ :-/
Jim Fetzer and others gave a quite clear understanding it WASN’T some guy in a cave who ran the attack…
No plane in Shanksville as the coroner said: “It was just a hole in the ground and no bodies, no plane parts.”
No plane into the Building because no evidence how an aluminum tube and jet fuel could cause that.
Nothing hit building 7 yet it came down as well.
No plane into the Pentagon, no evidence just a few seconds of ‘something’ on camera whizzing by.
3 or 4 of the “planes” were still in flight registration years after the “attack.”
Hasn’t ANY of these events given you a clue that we are under control by sociopath monsters???….
Pulse Night Club; Sandy Hook; Boston Marathon; Denver Theater; Butler, PA; El Paso; Parkland High School; Columbine; 9/11; JFK; RFK; MLK; Viet Nam (The Gulf of Tonkin); Climate Change; Chemtrails; COVID; Cigarettes; Statins; Thalidomide; COVID; Osama Bin Laden (Tim Osman-CIA code name); Hussein’s Weapons of Mass Destruction;
Pearl Harbor; Afghanistan; Mexico had invaded us; Spain sunk the USS Maine; Hiroshima was “an important military base” to bomb; The Pentagon Papers; Reagan’s “weapons for hostages” denial and on and on.
Our history is our foreseeable future, since neither the beliefs and practices, nor the controllers profiting from it have changed.
(just after the 20min mark)
“controlled demolition” which most of the movement agrees on” is propaganda.
Yes it appears controlled demolition was used, but thats not all, because plenty of evidence shows that it wasn’t what did the big job.
I add this comment because many seem still unwilling to face that evidence? If you are in that camp, that may be a clue as to ones propensity for denial.
There’s evidence that controlled demolition could never accomplish. Likely many modalities were used as false trails to hide the truth of the worlds biggest gun. (currently being wielded to cause or augment? wild fires). What kind of “Controlled Demolition” can turn a million tons of steel and concrete mostly to dust, with negligible rubble remaining, in 13 seconds, without having a much bigger seismic signal, when a&e for truth get that question I’ve yet to hear a convincing reply. Has anyone seen a photo of the building 7 remains rubble pile? By engineering standards, rule of thumb, the remaining pile after total volume collapse tends to yield a 12-15% “remains pile”. That would mean two piles 12 to 15 stories high, but there were people in the 4th floor stair well “looking up at the sky where a 110 story building had been Plus: over 1000 toasted cars, a block or more away, where sheetmetal door panels slumped (I’m a steel boat builder, it takes serious specifically focused heat to accomplish what I saw, or maybe thats my limited understanding of the physics of matter like steel?), and yet the interior plastic liner remained un touched-as new., paper and trees not even scorched while trucks and cars were flipped and completely burned out. cookie cutter holes from roof to ground, with adjacent offices undisturbed in buildings 4 & 5. Them is some fancy demo-controls to get results like that?
The slumped steel next to unchanged plastic reminds me of the difference between putting a steel cup vs a plastic cup in a microwave oven: sketched out lightening storm vs nothing, a similar effect to what’s been found in the battery, in paradise, in Lahaina, in LA, in Aus.
Even the hardest working spiritual adepts struggle with the notion that “they dont know”, It doesn’t surprise me that the jury is hung on this yarn because its pointing towards who may be the biggest baddy on, or maybe they’re off planet? who has the biggest gun has the last word, and thus has it ever been. yet we dont know who that is or how the gun works?
I attended the event in DC last year. They spent at least an hour or two attempting to debunk Dr. Judy Wood and the use of energy weapons / space lasers.
They were pushing nano-thermite as the sole cause and sticking to that story.
personally, I’m on the fence.
…maybe.
I thought it was really interesting in Lahaina and in the Palisades fires, that the color blue didn’t seem to burn.
they’re constantly rocketing technology into orbit, the odds are not zero.
10 years ago when Luke Marshall was 16 years old, he was sharp-as-a-tack when it came to the Truth Movement.
He created a very appropriate title for the following recent article/video.
I’m with him.
The Hijacking of 9/11 Truth
52:22
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEGLGMY_NFI
“The 9/11 Truth Movement is dead — and we helped kill it. Endless debates over mini-nukes, directed energy weapons, and “no planes” theories have poisoned the well and distracted from real evidence.
In this 52-minute documentary-style investigation, I break down:
• Why mini-nuke claims (Mark Gaffney & others) violate physics and nuclear history
• The failures of Judy Wood’s Directed Energy Weapon theory
• Why “No Planes” doesn’t hold up against eyewitnesses, debris, DNA, and impact physics
• How these fringe ideas serve as disinformation that protects the actual perpetrators
Drawing from my previous work on Epstein connections to 9/11, this video calls for refocusing the movement on concrete forensic trails: foreknowledge trading, suspicious tenants, Israeli intelligence activity, and powerful networks with means, motive, and opportunity.
It’s time to turn 9/11 Truth into 9/11 Justice.”
—ARTICLE with images
The Hijacking of the 9/11 Truth Movement
Mini-Nukes, Directed Energy Weapons, and “No Planes” Theory
https://sighopscoordinator.substack.com/p/the-hijacking-of-the-911-truth-movement
SUB-THREAD source for Luke Marshall…
https://corbettreport.com/august-open-thread-2026/#comment-189014
Who Really Controls the 9/11 Truth Movement?
A 40+ year suppression timeline exposing cover-ups and planted leaders steering millions away from the evidence.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
The censored 2026 WTC Dust Sample analysis
9/11’s Hidden Physics: Exotic Tech or Controlled Demolition?
LENR researcher Bob Greenyer reveals microspheres, plasmoids, & material anomalies that challenge everything we thought we knew.
Discussion: https://911revision.substack.com/p/2026-wtc-dust-analysis-bombshell
Decoding “Where the Towers Went” by Jonathan Cole, PE
The new film is error filled and a total misrepresentation of the evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/decoding-where-the-towers-went-by
A Breakdown of Jonathan Cole PE’s 9/11 DEW Disinformation
A follow up on his Where the Towers Went
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/a-breakdown-of-jonathan-cole-pes
The censored 2026 WTC Dust Sample analysis
9/11’s Hidden Physics: Exotic Tech or Controlled Demolition?
LENR researcher Bob Greenyer reveals microspheres, plasmoids, & material anomalies that challenge everything we thought we knew.
Discussion: https://911revision.substack.com/p/2026-wtc-dust-analysis-bombshell
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can’t handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by “experts” in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the “truth” movement, but these “experts” spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
90 Minutes that will change the way you look at the destruction at the WTC on 9/11.
Watch it now: https://rumble.com/v4a8ixu-911-the-best-explainer-documentary-youll-ever-see.html
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can’t handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by “experts” in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the “truth” movement, but these “experts” spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
90 Minutes that will change the way you look at the destruction at the WTC on 9/11.
Watch it now: https://rumble.com/v4a8ixu-911-the-best-explainer-documentary-youll-ever-see.html
Wouldn’t it be more effective to ignore these other theories than to spend huge chunks of time at a conference debunking them?
wouldn’t it be better to just focus on what is provable with evidence that has been collected over the last 25 years?
if they only focused on presenting verifiable evidence, that conference could have been two days, instead of three.
this year, it’s scheduled for four. I’m assuming they’re probably going to use one of those whole days to debunk all these other theories.
here’s the thing, if we stop giving energy and attention to already debunked theories from 10 or 15 years ago, people forget about it, and stop talking about it.
what is actually true, tends to survive.
people are still talking about how 9/11 was an inside job, because *that* is true.
9/11 FACTS that hurt people’s feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
Bravo!
This coming Saturday September 5. 2026…FREE
On September 5, 2026, some of the most prominent voices in the 9/11 Truth Movement will come together for Checkpoint 25, a free online conference marking 25 years since September 11, 2001….
[There are many folks lined-up for Checkpoint 25.]
— Checkpoint 25 – Online – Saturday September 5, 2026 —
~~ A free online conference
~~ Saturday, September 5, 2026
~~ 1 p.m. ET / 10 a.m. PT
Details: https://corbettreport.com/august-open-thread-2026/#comment-189271
— LIST of Participants —
Craig McKee
Andy Steele
Cheryl Curtiss
Xander Arena
Jimmy Dore
James Corbett
Massimo Mazzucco (September 11: The New Pearl Harbor- 4 hr 44 min)
Barrie Zwicker
RB Ham
Adam Ruff
Sheila Casey (The Rock Creek Free Press)
Mick Harrison
Raul Angulo
Daniele Ganser
Ryan Christian
Derrick Broze
Eric Rassi
Jessica Coco
Who Really Controls the 9/11 Truth Movement?
A 40+ year suppression timeline exposing cover-ups and planted leaders steering millions away from the evidence.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
The censored 2026 WTC Dust Sample analysis
9/11’s Hidden Physics: Exotic Tech or Controlled Demolition?
LENR researcher Bob Greenyer reveals microspheres, plasmoids, & material anomalies that challenge everything we thought we knew.
Discussion: https://911revision.substack.com/p/2026-wtc-dust-analysis-bombshell
9/11 FACTS that hurt people’s feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
A whole industry has been created – A whole “truth” movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
Dr Reynolds’ 2007 whistle-blower case against NIST, was for the fraudulent WTC plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood’s 2007 whistle-blower case against NIST, was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
Thank-you James for doing this episode! Actually, those of us who are organizing our 22nd Annual 9/11 Truth Film Festival at the Grand Lake Theatre in Oakland, California on September 8, 2026 had hoped that you might make it out this year for our film festival, but we couldn’t confirm getting the theatre until June, and by then, it seemed rather clear that you didn’t really want to come to the US, at this point in time.
I also was invited to be on the Early 9/11 Truth panel, and have been very busy this summer, working on both events. For the longest time, we strived to merge the Truth Movement with the Peace Movement and met a lot of resistance, particularly from the “leadership,” but sadly since these last few years of intense directed genocide against Gaza, people are beginning to wake up, so we will see a convergence of issues, insights, movements, I hope, in NYC at Turning the Tide.
We also want to include your 10/7 A Conspiracy Theory at the Grand Lake and I am glad there will be a presentation on the topic in NYC. We have invited those supporting peace, truth, justice for Palestine to table at both events. I think one of the achievements of the movement is that the term “False Flag” is much more recognized by the general public than it was 25 years ago. Thank-you again for all your efforts…Oh! I should mention that although NYC will be doing the big World Premiere of The Responders: Breaking the Silence with the director and key protagonists in a panel discussion afterwards, along with the producers, the Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance will be holding a “sneak preview” at the Grand Lake Theatre on 9/8/2026. What I have always loved about the 9/11 Truth Movement is that those who care deeply and want the best for their children and all children have always been very generous with their insights, skills, talents, to advance the cause; its truly a labor of love for most of us.
Carol Brouillet, Co-Founder of the Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance https://sf911truth.org/
Wow! Carol! You are a much-admired legend!…a doyenne of 9/11 Truth Activism!
Thanks so much for all that you have done through the decades.
“Deception Dollar”
Some months ago I mailed a stack of Deception Dollars to James Evan Pilato (of CorbettReport’s New World Next Week) along with other 9/11 Truth tidbits so that he could give them away free when people ordered Corbett|Media Monarchy stuff.
As a smooth dissemination tool, I like this 9/11 ANIMATED GIF IMAGE
https://web.archive.org/web/20100107150325im_/http://711911.webs.com/WTC&GIF.gif
Some essential reading regarding the 9/11 spoof movement…
Who Really Controls the 9/11 Truth Movement?
A 40+ year suppression timeline, exposing cover-ups, and planted leaders, steering millions away from the evidence.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Building 7 – the Ted Walter cut.
International Center for 9/11 Justice, suppression.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/building-7-the-ted-walter-cut
2026 Flight Simulator Study: Why This “Automated Plane” Paper Is Fundamentally Flawed
Exposing the critical omissions, simulator limitations, and ignored 2007 evidence that undermine Piers Robinson’s latest 9/11 research
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/2026-flight-simulator-study-why-this
The censorred 2026 WTC Dust Sample analysis
9/11’s Hidden Physics: Exotic Tech or Controlled Demolition?
LENR researcher Bob Greenyer reveals microspheres, plasmoids, & material anomalies that challenge everything we thought we knew
Discussion: https://911revision.substack.com/p/2026-wtc-dust-analysis-bombshell
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can’t handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by “experts” in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the “truth” movement, but these “experts” spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
90 Minutes that will change the way you look at the destruction at the WTC on 9/11.
Watch it now: https://rumble.com/v4a8ixu-911-the-best-explainer-documentary-youll-ever-see.html
911 Revisionist, aka Mr. SPAM
YOUR NAME IS MUD !!!
With your duplicate SPAM posts you have blatantly and knowingly disrespected Corbett Members and the Community!
You refused to make things right! (i.e. any Corbett Member can delete any of his previous comments)
Corbett Report Members do not behave so rudely.
With such disrespect, Mr. SPAM Revisionist, you discredit your name and anything that you say.
On 7/21/2026, 911 Revisionist SPAMMED this webpage and Corbett Members with 5 duplicate entries and one general post. That is 6 total comments of the same ilk on a board with 22 comments at the time of his posting.
Corbett Member Fawlty Towers called out 911 Revisionist in February 2026 “for hijacking umpteen threads at The Corbett Report and blathering on ad nauseam about Dr. Judy Wood and her DEWs.”
911 Revisionist, You know that duplicate-spamming-comments is inappropriate behavior.
You cannot be so stupid as to not recognize it.
It reveals your poor character and lack of empathy for others.
Perhaps it’d be best for James to respond, rather than his remaining silent.
Then your righteous outrage could be directed to acknowledging that 911 Revisionist has points that should be addressed. By James.
SPAM is the issue. It is inappropriate behavior for this community.
It could be duplicate SPAM posts on any topic.
It is not about Judy Wood.
As far as Judy Wood, people can believe what they want…that’s on them.
I remember when Judy Wood came on the scene circa 2005-2006 because I was a hardcore 9/11 Truth activist.
I’ve seen countless Judy Wood posts over the years…it is shame that the public got duped by a psyop.
What I do know is that most proponents of Judy Wood have NEVER fully viewed the evidence that debunks her claims. Thus, their research skills are lacking.
James Corbett discusses Dr. Judy Wood
https://corbettreport.com/ted-walter-helps-turn-the-tide-on-9-11/#comment-189428
There are other places where Corbett has mentioned her.
In previous comments over the years, there is a plethora of information, studies & links which solidly debunks Judy Wood. However, few Judy Wood fans have the fortitude to take a hard, studious look. I can only infer that they really don’t want to know.
9/11 FACTS that hurt people’s feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
9/11 Revisionsit makes it on to Netflix, along with Tucker Carlson & Alex Stein 😳
Pity they blocked out my Twitter handle…
https://x.com/WhatTruthPod/status/2095289684402356384
The Responders Documentary: Heroic Testimonies or Another 9/11 Half-Truth?New films like The Responders risk repeating the pattern of powerful stories that omit the full forensic evidence.Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-responders-documentary-heroic
NO PLANES HIT the TWIN TOWERS. It was done through “Video Compositing”.
See how it was done here:
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/post/sensitive/no-planes-special-effects-expert-completely-destroys-official-9-11-story-video-composites-revealed
Thanks!
James,
I for one would appreciate knowing the reason that you do not address Wood’s ‘Dustification’ reasoning.
Would you do that here please?
Will.
I second that request. But I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting.
Ive challenged James 2x before, on the subject of live and direct recording and streaming his own efforts from his modest apartment vs the use of green screen and ghost writers,, (“everything is an illusion” J. Corbett as the camera pans to show him exiting a green screen studio situation, this was towards the end of a post he did about the very subject of using a studio to fake an image, cant remeber the podcast name sorry) neither he nor anyone in this thread commented on my questions.
I’ve yet to hear anybody demonstrate how the evidence presented in Dr. Wood’s book (where did the towers go?) is fake. If we request a considered challenge and continue to get crickets, its not a good sign, it may mean we’re over the target, but also catching lotsa people Lying (by omission). Its what the msm and politics do all day: narrative manipulation by omission of facts. Its Lying.
The “dustification reasoning” I’ve found is the claim of “lack of debris pile”, + the footage of aluminum and steel shooting trails of dust while falling. If the mass was turned to dust, so quickly, and nobody is arguing about that, then the physics employed can have a seat on the top shelf with the other unexplained mysteries: pyramid design, worldwide immaculate megalithic stone joinery, what even is electricity, quantum entanglement, pre big bangness,, and the like.
I can attest to walking through that dust about a long block east of the tower bases, a few weeks after the event. still looking like a fresh few inches of dirty snow, everywhere.. it had an almost subtle elasticness to it, thickerer than any other dust I’ve known (this can be seen in the footage of the day). There also remained an unfamiliar smell. It was worse than “offensive”. It had an air of dangerous toxicity. a combo of burning plastic & flesh or something unknown & unwelcome?? I was carrying my 1.5yr old on the shoulders and didn’t delay getting out of there
Interesting!
Thank you.
James does not take the best course by remaining silent.
The Corbett Report & Secret Weapons TechnologyThe meaning of 9/11 Truth and evidence that shall not be discussedArticle: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-corbett-report-and-secret-weapons
ejdoyle you forgot to mention the Assassination of Charlie Kirk in your list of Government controlled events listed below. In this case the Government is most likely USrael. I know you said “and on and on”, but I thought I would mention Charlie since the first anniversary is coming right up.
Thanks. I only discovered your reply by coming back here as I am not getting notified by email when someone comments.
Yeah, the Charlie Kirk thing is very strange. On the outside here’s a smart, articulate Christian guy going to college campus’s and engaging in conversations and he gets murdered?? WTH?
Then Candace Owens and others start analyzing facts and it is looking like yet another gov op :-/
On New Years Eve, 2024 I wrote a lyric about activists getting killed and later put music to it for Kirk’s situation.
IT’S THE REAL DEAL (song)
https://old.bitchute.com/video/wGSmETDZot5r/
I’m 84 and when I was in college in CA I met JFK at a rally in Concord. When he was murdered I KNEW it was a lie from the start and became a non-voting social/political activist. When AI came out I asked DuckAI if there was ever a year in my we weren’t killing people. It said no. :-/
Questions for conspiracy theorists.
Has there been any scrutiny of the NY and NJ Port Authority? Those parties who gained the most are scrutinized the least.
The executive director wasn’t told to stay home that day and perished.
• did the executive director Levine and Silverstein have a falling out on the sacrificing innocent life’s for asbestosis remediation? Estimated at $1.5 billion.
The city I worked for had unwritten protocols for the ( A ). Those reports went to the politicians for a political solution without addressing any public health concerns. In real estate nothing is real ; especially in NYC and NJ. { Or any city accepting Rockefeller Foundation grants
It would have been better if it had rained that day.
Being a building inspector for a year I learned how to deal with real estate crooks. You must Have two buckets ready. One for red herring they want you to look at or not look at the other bucket ; Documented facts . The established history. Did any one look through the established history for the crime that was committed?
Opps! Forgot the road map. It doesn’t end at Oak Island but shifts to buried treasure in NYC & NJ.
Budget Information | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey https://share.google/wRebh5SHsbpNUN4K8
Search Results https://share.google/Je3AfBCsjEGRnUz1D
any comments or red herrings ?
Additional information.
World Trade Center asbestos threat unclear – UPI Archives https://share.google/DTiJ9HIsZQYxUluDh
Hey James,
Thanks for interviewing Ted. When you said you understand how huge an undertaking it is to put on a four-day conference, as Ted et al. are doing, you weren’t kidding.
I know, from first-hand experience, that Ted and Richard and Gene and Sandra have been working non-stop for the past six months, if not nine months, to pull together four days of excellent presenters and fascinating, evidence-based topics, each of which will be both timely and timeless. It should be an exciting, memorable event.
I appreciate the fact that people who live in or close to Manhattan can choose to buy single-day tickets rather than the whole package. In a recent Substack post, New Yorker (and brilliant illustrator) Tony Freda wrote that he and his fellow “Truthers” (which should not be a pejorative) would be attending the conference. Presumably they’ll be in attendance all four days (and nights!).
For those who can’t attend in person, it’s good that Redacted hosts Clayton and Natali will have the livestream and the recording on their YouTube channel.
One thing that especially interests me is the 1,000-page (or longer?) report for Sen. Ron Johnson’s subcommittee that Ted and other contributors Mick, Richard, Raul, Piers, and Allan are writing.
Historic is, I think, the operative word for this 25th commemoration of 9/11. I trust the evidence presented will be mind-blowing to newcomers. The speakers, I suspect, will not be mincing their words.
Hi James.
I am quite shocked to see your photo among pictures of some well known figures in the Controlled Opposition. You appear to have placed your faith in the Controlled Opposition bigwigs occupying august positions. That raises a question mark about your own impartiality. May I ask if you have read Dr Judy Wood’s “Where did the towers go?”.
Dr Wood’s book sets out in detail what was actually observed, the EVIDENCE: “Empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic”. Dr Wood is simply saying that scientific knowledge in the public domain cannot explain the entire multitude of phenomena that were witnessed on 11/9/2001. She has offered plausible explanations and theories, and invited scientists to collaborate with her in arriving at definitive answers. The Controlled Opposition of academia, architects and engineers has stood aloof. Instead, Richard Gage and other CO stalwarts have offered frivolous explanations and launched attacks on Dr Wood.
Below are links to two easy-to-follow articles on Dr Wood’s forensic investigation of the full range of observed phenomena following the 9/11 event, and her conclusion that the scientific knowledge currently available in the public domain cannot offer an explanation for those phenomena. We can speculate about the hidden scientific knowledge controlled by the clique that has almost succeeded in laying a web of worldwide government. Have you ever wondered what happened to the scientific discoveries and inventions of Nikola Tesla and John Hutchison?
https://www.unbekoming.com/p/dustification
https://www.unbekoming.com/p/steel-to-powder-on-911
Good contribution, thank you.
What happened to Sibel Edmonds – was she controlled opposition? Remember Corbett interviewing her many times(10 years or so ago) and then the interviews just stopped.
She was a former FBI employee. May have been CO who, having served her purpose, disappeared from the scene. Only James can tell why he interviewed her and why he has stopped doing so.
James Corbett discusses Dr. Judy Wood
https://corbettreport.com/ted-walter-helps-turn-the-tide-on-9-11/#comment-189428
There are other places where Corbett has mentioned her.
James does not “discuss” her. He dismisses her, daydreaming about his own potentially massive knowledge of physics that he sacrificed in favor of journalism. Dr Wood has simply laid out the EVIDENCE of what was observed after the SEVEN buildings had been destroyed and two more damaged. She says that knowledge currently available in the public domain cannot explain the entirety of observed phenomena following the swift destruction – mostly “dustification” – of the tall towers and other multi-storied buildings. She has speculated about scientific theories which would explain EVERYTHING and she has invited the professors and the architects and the engineers to collaborate with her. Instead, they have remained aloof, dispensing disinformation – which James finds convincing – and attacking Dr Wood.
The Corbett Report & Secret Weapons TechnologyThe meaning of 9/11 Truth and evidence that shall not be discussedArticle: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-corbett-report-and-secret-weapons
The Corbett Report & Secret Weapons Technology
The meaning of 9/11 Truth and evidence that shall not be discussed
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-corbett-report-and-secret-weapons
What happened to Sibel Edmonds? Was she controlled opposition? Remember Corbett interviewing her many times(10 years or more ago)
At WTC 7, witnesses report…
Men in black tactical gear wearing ski masks and carrying military-grade firearms.
— Three 9/11 Heroes Expose Suspicious Gunmen at WTC Building 7 —
NYPD and FDNY Whistleblowers to speak at “Turning The Tide 9/11”
https://richardgage911.substack.com/p/three-911-heroes-expose-suspicious
— James Corbett discusses Dr. Judy Wood —
On first going to college, James Corbett’s original intention was to study physics. Fortunately, he shifted towards the humanities for humanity itself.
January 8, 2013
An Arrow Through the Brain – Questions for Corbett #001
https://corbettreport.com/an-arrow-through-the-brain-questions-for-corbett-001/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDK-XDnpuCU&t=1984s
QUEUED VIDEO at 33:04
James Corbett says,
“…This is another question I get quite a lot.
This one reads:
“Have you read Dr Judy Woods book ‘Where Did the Towers Go’?
What caused steel, steel-reinforced concrete, office furniture, filing cabinets,
computers, toilets, basins and people to turn to dust?
Why were so many cars so strangely toasted?”
All right, thank you for that Roger and to the others who have written in on this subject.
Of course, I am familiar with Dr Judy Wood and her work.
I am not a proponent of it or an adherent to it.
I think she’s made basic flip-flaws in physics. For example, with her billiard ball analysis which provided examples of flagrant violations of conservation of energy and momentum which wouldn’t get you past a high school Physics course, let alone anything approaching a resemblance of reality in scientific analysis.
I think that if anyone who watches for example the Dr Greg Jenkins interview with Dr Judy Wood sees that she certainly did not come out the better of the two in that interview, and can’t even really seem to provide a coherent view of what she’s talking about or the physical principles thereof.
And that, for example, Hutchinson Effect has been debunked over and over and over.
So, I absolutely do not think that there’s any valid reason for believing that Dr Judy Wood is right on any of the things that she’s talking about.
And also, I should mention the toasted cars, for example, have been repeatedly shown to have (for example ‘the toasted cars on FDR Drive’) which people have gone to absurd lengths to try to explain away. All of this is by way of background of saying that there’s absolutely nothing convincing that I’ve seen in her arguments…
… I will continue to concentrate on all of the other aspects of 911 which no one else ever talks about anymore for some reason.
No one talks about air defenses. No one talks about the money trail. No one talks about the so-called alleged hijackers, where they came from, their connections, etc. etc. No one talks about all of the background information that makes 9/11 9/11. They only talk about the buildings…
…I will talk about the issues that I’m more interested in and Dr Judy Wood is not one of them….”
“Dr Greg Jenkins interview with Dr Judy Wood” is mentioned by Corbett.
Dr. Greg Jenkins Interviews Dr. Judy Wood (Full)
34:31
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rdmh76KrKPA
The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams to Demolish the World Trade Center Towers
(Updated 4/12/07) 31 pages
Dr. Gregory S. Jenkins, Ph.D. Physics
Co-author: Matt Sullivan
https://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200702/Implausibility-Directed-Energy-Beam-Demolish-WTC-by-Gregory-Jenkins.pdf
Hrs,
thanks for sharing those links. They give good examples of how laborious experts can be, how hard it is for presenters to admit they dont know?
I found James excusing of judy wood from the discussion an act of feigned ignorance. which has a scent of arrogance in it. (gas lit style propaganda). JC, for pretending to not see and even denying legitimate evidence, you get a yellow card.
Nobody , that I’ve heard/read, has been able to recreate the effects. that dont mean the evidence is meaningless? It aint public, yet. This subject conjures a great wobble in the gate of the talking heads who get paid to be the ones with “the scoop”. I was extra disappointed with James’ lack of content to support his denial of evidence submitted by Dr Wood. same for the well mannered Dr Jenkins. The syntax of their back & forths; “yes it is, no it isn’t, dust going down, smoke going up, dust up, dust all the way down the coast,,” that went on for most of that 1/2hr video was worse than tedious.
There is footage showing aluminum façade pieces turning to dust mid air, several stories of a section falling while a trail that appears to be a transforming of solid aluminum into a trail of thick white dust that stayed up while the aluminum fell? I walked around in grey white dust like nothing I’d ever seen. I took materials in engineering at uni. as a boatbuilder I’ve messed around with lotsa different materials, (some exotic) over a life time. this was nasty rubber/plastic dirty snow, still holding its fallen shape a few weeks after falling (extra unusual)?
Of the anomalies discussed in the Jenkins/wood interview, the only practical guess I heard was, “all the debris went in the bath tub” (cue Hilary claiming she “wiped the server with a rag”). If thats true, what’s the evidence look like? I did see claims and photos of “the subbasement levels were untouched”, but the bank vault was empty with door open?
One thing about those two towers. Try to imagine the inertia of the columns that held 500,000 tons skyward. STEEL. 47 steel columns, rectangular hollow section, big enough for an average size man to walk inside (if it was on its side..) they tapered over the 1362ft (415m) lengths from 5″ (125mm) wall thickness down to1/4″ (6mm) at the top. a typical tube section was 45″ x 22″ (1.37m x .56m). get your head around 47 steel tubes 4 soccer fields long (actually if laid with the wide part on the ground they would more than cover the entire surface of 4 fields (ooooh and the queens getting her boots on) big enough to walk in. now go get an army of diggers and dozers and try to budge one tube, at all,,, yeah nah. now stand those tubes up (they were raised in 3-4 story sections). Somewhere north in the 4th soccer field length, smash a jet liner or even a missile in for a bang and some office fire. a 757 (a cornflake box with wings: try to drive a 16penny nail into hardwood with a piece of tissue paper,, lets be generous and say “the explosion severed all 47 columns”,, then an hour later, suddenly they all vanished? nobody understands how to disappear 4 soccer fields of thick steel in 13 seconds. chop it up story by story with thermite, so what? now where does the 90% leftovers go? & we haven’t even mentioned the concrete floors that if stacked while intact would net about 330ft (100m) of height, or lets be generous, all floor trusses disappeared leaving a stack of slabs, 36ft (11m). Did anybody catch a next day news cam flyover? no? how come?
Greg Jenkins had barged into a presentation where Dr Judy Wood was sitting as a spectator. The truth about Jenkins’s fraudulent “interview” :
https://www.drjudywood.com/articles/transcript/Jenkins_transcript.html
I have responded above to this piece by James. This is what I wrote:
James does not “discuss” her. He dismisses her, daydreaming about his own potentially massive knowledge of physics that he sacrificed in favor of journalism. Dr Wood has simply laid out the EVIDENCE of what was observed after the SEVEN buildings had been destroyed and two more damaged. She says that knowledge currently available in the public domain cannot explain the entirety of observed phenomena following the swift destruction – mostly “dustification” – of the tall towers and other multi-storied buildings. She has speculated about scientific theories which would explain EVERYTHING and she has invited the professors and the architects and the engineers to collaborate with her. Instead, they have remained aloof, dispensing disinformation – which James finds convincing – and attacking Dr Wood.
Thank you HRS, and Vadoum and SSA for the links and responses.
I get that the main ‘win’ to get over the line is state recognition that 9/11 was murder.
But the implications of DEW being involved are potentially a much bigger ‘win’.
Ok, James, you have doubts about Woods’ billiard ball-effect’. This doesn’t give more credence to the mainstream controlled demolition issues though. Watching the towers come down and having two terms in mind – ‘controlled demolition’ and ‘molecular disassociation’, my mind has no doubt that the latter term is what I’m seeing.
What say you?
Truth be told James, irony of ironies, the majority of the Turning The Tide On 9/11 Conference participants will be doing exactly what you frown upon here.
They’ve done it year after year after year. Why should this year be any different?
James I will see your 9/11 explosives/physical evidence challenge and raise you a 9/11 circumstantial evidence challenge!
Since you are almost exclusively a circumstantial evidence 9/11 truther,
and pretty much have hung your hat on the so-called ‘PTech story’ as the be all and end all of ‘gotcha evidence’ that 9/11 was an inside job (you’ve referenced the PTech story in countless interviews as the clincher that proves 9/11 was an inside job, and even featured it in your book Reportage), I challenge you to talk about 9/11 evidence that proves 9/11 was an inside job without using any circumstantial evidence!
By agreeing to become a participant in the forthcoming 9/11 circus held over four days, can James still claim to be an independent journalist?
— Corbett Report HISTORICAL RECORD – Sept 6, 2026 —
9/11 BATTLE ROYALE!!! (…and September Open Thread)
https://corbettreport.com/9-11-battle-royale-and-september-open-thread/
EXCERPTS
It’s nearly the 25th anniversary of the false flag events of September 11, 2001, so you know what that means: it’s time for 9/11 Truthers to start fighting! Yes, those who agree with each other about 99% of the 9/11 false flag are clearly the enemy and they must be dealt with!
In this month’s Subscriber Exclusive Video, James comments on this particular aspect of the 9/11 Truth Movement and invites commenters to join the fray.
Corbett Report members are invited to log in to the site and start calling everyone who disagrees with their interpretation of the 9/11 evidence a shill and a gatekeeper who deserves to be excommunicated from the internet! Copy/paste spam replies of the same few links to everyone in the thread are especially encouraged, as that tactic will no doubt persuade people of the veracity of your theory!…
7:31 minute video – 9/11 Battle Royale! – Subscriber Exclusive #143
with shownote link to “9/11 Was an Epstein Job?” by Luke Marshall
A fair point of view!
But, standing on a platform alongside Richard Gage is not cool! He’s a clear example of controlled opposition.
Happy to debate on that point alone.
Hat-tip to Broc West!
Sunday Sept 6, 2026 – RichardGage911
The Corbett Report Interviews ‘Turning The Tide’ Co-Producer, IC911’s Ted Walter
James Corbett Brings the 9/11 Conversation to Life
https://richardgage911.substack.com/p/the-corbett-report-interviews-turning
EXCERPTS
James Corbett has once again demonstrated why The Corbett Report has remained such an important independent media platform for so many years.
His masterful use of graphics and archival material turns an important interview with Ted Walter into something much more than two people talking on a screen…
…another aspect of this interview deserves special recognition: the production itself.
James has taken what could easily have been a conventional remote interview and transformed it into a genuinely engaging visual presentation through an exceptionally effective use of photographs, graphics, documents, headlines, and supporting imagery.
That makes an enormous difference — particularly with a subject as information-dense as 9/11. For those of us working to bring the unanswered questions of 9/11 before a much wider audience, this is particularly important…
…Twenty-five years later, reaching a new generation will require not only strong evidence and courageous voices but also increasingly sophisticated ways of communicating that information.
James Corbett is showing us exactly how effective that can be.
Take a few minutes to watch the interview — and while listening to this very important conversation, pay particular attention to the craftsmanship of the presentation itself. A tremendous amount of work goes into those seemingly effortless graphics….
They just don’t give up ! A story about who you don’t want to rent a space to.
Museum Regrets Renting Space to 9/11 Event That Aired Conspiracy Theories – The New York Times https://share.google/G3DWrdyOhOkJ8Xrw0