Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
Video player not working? Use these links to watch it somewhere else!
WATCH ON: 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
FROM 2018: The Trojan horse was the earliest recorded military psyop. That psyop continues to be deployed on unsuspecting populations and it is just as useful as ever, but today’s tricksters have donned the mantle of philanthropy, and their Trojan horses are not wooden statues but non-governmental organizations offering “aid” to foreign nations. In today’s edition of The Corbett Report, we’ll learn about how NGOs are the deep state’s Trojan horses.
FLASHBACK SHOW NOTES:
USAID To Merge With State Department and Face Cuts
Audit USAID…Then Shut it Down!
Watch: Hornet’s Nest Kicked As Raskin, Omar Throw Public Tantrum Over USAID Hostile Takeover
USAID Panic Mode: Bill Gates Goes On MSM, Bashes Musk’s DOGE, Fear-Mongers About Next Pandemic
Episode 338 – NGOs Are The Deep State’s Trojan Horses
TRANSCRIPT:
Troy, 12th century BC.
The Greeks’ decade-long siege of Troy is drawing to a close. The cunning Odysseus has hit upon a plan to subvert the Trojans’ defenses. The Greeks build a giant wooden horse and then pretend to sail away, leaving the horse at the gates of Troy as an apparent offering to the goddess Athena. The Trojans, believing the gift will make their city impregnable, take it within the city gates.
But it is a trick. Odysseus and his men are hidden inside the hollow horse and they emerge during the night to open the gates and let in the Greek army, who have returned to take the city. The Trojans don’t get a chance to learn from their mistake; the Greeks sack the city and massacre its inhabitants.
The Trojan horse was the earliest recorded military psyop. The lesson of the story, recorded in the counsel to “beware of Greeks bearing gifts,” is that we should not let down our defenses when an erstwhile enemy offers us aid. Today, that counsel is as useful as ever, but today’s tricksters have donned the mantle of philanthropy, and their Trojan horses are not wooden statues but non-governmental organizations offering “aid” to foreign nations.
The bitter truth is that in a surprising number of cases, NGOs are the Deep State’s Trojan Horses.
This is The Corbett Report.
In 2015, Kyrgyzstan made what might seem at first glance to be a surprising move: It canceled a cooperation treaty with the US that had been in place since 1993. The treaty granted tax breaks and customs privileges to organizations like the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and gave their workers diplomatic immunity in the country. All of that came to an end after the US granted a human rights award to Azimjon Askarov, an activist swept up and thrown in jail for life for “creating a threat to civil peace and stability in society” after the Uzbek riots in South Kyrgyzstan in 2010.
Reaction from the usual Western outlets was swift and predictable: Kyrgyzstan has lost its mind. Or, to be more precise: It’s all Putin’s fault. Somehow. But don’t worry, the US will continue aiding Kyrgyzstan anyway, whether they like it or not, because that’s just how they roll. Go, Team America!
But Kyrgyzstan is not the only country to crack down on “aid” from foreign NGOs. In the last few years a series of countries, including Russia, China and India, have passed laws placing stricter controls on the operations of these organizations within their borders.
MARGARET HOWELL: Russia is throwing the smackdown on poor little old NGOs, these charitable organizations that were set up. Their reasoning behind them? That they might be trying to take down the Kremlin.
The Kremlin is moving to ban the US-backed MacArthur Foundation, George Soros’ Open Society Institute and ten of their foreign groups, calling them “unwelcome organizations” by law. They’re also mulling over something called a “patriotic stop list.” Anyone caught collaborating with these groups, they’re facing six years in prison.
SOURCE: Russia Bans Foreign NGOs
ANCHOR: China has passed the country’s first law regulating overseas NGOs, or non-governmental organizations.
HAO YUNHONG (VOICEOVER): The Chinese government always welcomes foreign NGOs to come to China to expand cultural and charity activities, and your achievements are highly spoken of by the Chinese authorities. But there are a few illegal exceptions in which NGOs came to China to harm its national security.
ANCHOR: The law covers activities of NGOs founded outside the Chinese mainland. They must register with public security authorities and declare where their funding is coming from.
REPORTER: India has placed Ford Foundation on a watch list and ordered all funds from the US-based nonprofit organization to be routed to recipients only after the Home Ministry’s approval. Citing national security concerns, the Home Ministry has asked the Reserve Bank of India to ensure funds given by Ford Foundation to Indian recipients be brought to its notice and dispersed only after its clearance. The ministry said in its order that it wanted to ensure funds coming from Ford Foundation were utilized for bona fide welfare activities without compromising on concerns of national interest and security.
REPORTER: An Egyptian Court has convicted 43 Egyptian and 16 American NGO workers for working illegally in Egypt while encouraging unrest. The defendants, who were mostly absent from court, were sentenced to up to five years in jail. The verdict calls for the closing of US nonprofit groups such as the International Republican Institute and the National Democratic Institute and Freedom House, which back in 2012 Egypt accused of receiving illegal funding and operating without licenses.
SOURCE: Egyptian court sentences NGO workers including Americans to up to five years in prison
So what on earth is going on? Why are all of these countries kicking out all of these US-based non-governmental and quasi-governmental entities? Why would they be opposed to charity and aid?
The answer is not difficult to understand. These organizations are Trojan horses: designed to appear as gifts, but containing secret trap doors through which hidden forces can enter the country and covertly undermine the governments in question. This explanation only sounds outlandish to those who look no further than the organizations’ names and have no idea of their history of operations.
Take USAID, for example. Created in 1961 by executive order, it’s a US government agency that seeks “to end extreme poverty and to promote resilient, democratic societies while advancing our security and prosperity.” So why did President Morales kick them out of Bolivia in 2013? Because he’s crazy and irrational? Or because USAID ran a program through its remarkably frankly-named Office of Transition Initiatives that provided $10.5 million of funding for “Strengthening Democratic Institutions” throughout the country, including in opposition stronghold areas? Was it paranoia on Morales’ part, or merely the recognition that mealy-mouthed rhetoric about “Strengthening Democratic Institutions” is a thinly veiled euphemism for “overthrowing the government,” exactly as leaked diplomatic documents proved was the case for USAID’s identically named program in Venezuela?
EVA GOLINGER: USAID was originally an agency created to provide humanitarian aid and disaster relief to countries in need, and throughout the 1980s and the 1990s and more into the 21st century it’s evolved into a political arm and a funding branch of the US government for what they call “promoting democracy.” And it’s actually now a part of US counterinsurgency campaigns that involve the Pentagon [and] the State Department, in terms of diplomacy and obviously war activities. And USAID is the third agency involved in counterinsurgency, and their goal precisely is to provide what they called aid for promoting democracy or stabilizing or helping a country through some kind of political transition or economic transition.
In the case of Venezuela, Venezuela is a country that is oil wealthy so it’s never qualified for any kind of direct USAID help. Therefore, USAID has never had an office here officially, and they didn’t actually come the country and set up an office until 2002, right before the coup d’etat against President Chavez. And the documents—internal documents obtained under Freedom of Information Act—reveal that the sole intention of setting up the office here in Venezuela was to aid opposition forces to eventually ouster Chavez from power.
Should governments trust USAID after it was revealed that the agency secretly created its own social media network in Cuba for the express purpose of undermining the Castro government? Or when it was revealed that USAID had sent a team of agents to Cuba under the guise of “health and civic programs” to incite rebellion amongst youth, including creating a phony HIV-prevention workshop that the agency itself described as the “perfect excuse” to “identify potential social-change actors?” Or when it was revealed that the agency had attempted (and miserably failed) to infiltrate Cuba’s hip-hop scene “to break the information blockade” and spark a youth movement of “social change” in the country?
ANCHOR: A US agency infiltrated the Cuban hip-hop world in an attempt to launch a youth movement against the government there. The secret operation tried to use Cuban rappers to build a network of young people seeking social change. But the Cuban regime caught on and the operation failed. In the process the US Agency for International Development unintentionally compromised a vibrant music culture that produced hard-hitting grassroots criticism of the country. Several artists that the agency tried to promote ended up leaving Cuba or stopped performing after pressure from the government.
In fact, USAID’s black ops programs for undermining foreign governments go all the way back to the founding of the agency itself. Some of the lowlights include USAID’s “Office of Public Safety” and its part in running a CIA front program for training foreign police in torture and terror tactics in Latin America; co-funding (with the CIA) the opium-smuggling Xieng Khouang Air Transport, a private airline for narcotics trafficker (and CIA point man in Laos) General Vang Pao; and co-funding opposition groups in Ukraine (prior to the 2014 coup) with Glenn Greenwald-backer Pierre Omidyar and, of course, George Soros.
FAREED ZAKARIA: George Soros, pleasure to have you on.
GEORGE SOROS: Same here.
ZAKARIA: First, on Ukraine: One of the things that many people recognize about you was that you—during the revolutions of 1989—funded a lot of dissident activity, civil society groups in Eastern Europe and Poland, the Czech Republic. Are you doing similar things in Ukraine?
SOROS: Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia, and the foundation has been functioning ever since and played an important part in events now.
SOURCE: George Soros admits playing an integral part in the Ukraine crisis
But this NGO/Trojan horse problem is by no means confined to USAID and its associated organizations. Take the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) as another example.
The official story is that the NED was created in 1983 by an act of Congress in order to “encourage the establishment and growth of democratic development” in target countries around the world in line with US foreign policy goals.
The actual story is that the NED was created expressly as a front for funding CIA activities inside target countries, a fact that Allen Weinstein, one of the members of the study group that led to NED’s founding, openly bragged about in The Washington Post: “A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA,” he was quoted as saying. Even more blatant is an admission by then-Director of Central Intelligence William Casey, who wrote a memo to the White House advocating for the creation of NED but cautioning that “we here [at the CIA] should not get out front in the development of such an organization, nor do we wish to appear to be a sponsor or advocate.”
The NED’s participation in covert destabilization campaigns rivals that of USAID and, like USAID, involves too many operations to detail them all here. Lowlights include:
- Bankrolling the “Project Democracy” program that became the core of Oliver North’s secret government during the Iran-Contra years.
- Manipulating the elections in Nicaragua in 1990 to oust Ortega and the Sandinistas.
- Overthrowing the governments of Bulgaria in 1990 and Albania in 1991.
- And backing every major color revolution of the modern period, from the Rose Revolution in Georgia to the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan and Orange Revolution in Ukraine a decade ago to the recent unsuccessful “Electric Yerevan” in Armenia, and many others in between….
RON PAUL: What about Ukraine? I understand there are a few organizations that have been involved through this in Ukraine, trying to disturb that government. Of course, we have visited on this subject quite a bit, but I didn’t realize how much the NED is involved over there.
DANIEL MCADAMS: And this is a big issue, because I think the argument could definitely be made that NATO should have ended after the Cold War, but definitely the National Endowment for Democracy should have been ended after the Cold War. Instead, they say, like with every government program, “No, now’s the time we need more!”
But in Ukraine just this past year…Ah, this is an interesting article written by the president of the National Endowment for Democracy—he’s president for life—Carl Gershman. I know this might shock you, but he’s actually a Trotskyite. He was a founding member of a communist breakaway party, the Trotskyite Social Democrats USA. He wrote an editorial in The Washington Post [in] September of ’13, just before the events happened in Ukraine, and he wrote as the president of the National Endowment for Democracy. He said, “Ukraine is the biggest prize.” And he mentioned that “Ukraine’s choice to join Europe will accelerate the demise of the ideology of Russian imperialism that Putin represents,” and “Putin may find himself on the losing end not just in the near abroad but within Russia itself.” So his real goal is regime change. He spelled it out just before all of these events took place.
These types of Trojan horse operations have been used hundreds of times in the past, and there is no sign that the deep state is ready to abandon the trick now. Quite the opposite.
It worked during the “Arab Spring” when even The New York Times blithely admitted that the leaders of the protests had “received training and financing from groups like the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute and Freedom House” and the State Department blithely admitted they had spent $50 million helping activists in the region network, communicate and organize with each other through Trojan horse NGOs like Movements.org.
The deception also worked in Syria, where leaked documents proved the US had been providing millions of dollars of support to opposition groups in the country since 2006 through a variety of Trojan horse NGOs like the Movement for Justice and Development.
And as we saw earlier this year in “The White Helmets Are A Propaganda Construct,” even first responder groups like the “Syria Civil Defense” (founded by an ex-British military intelligence officer) have been used as Trojan horses to spread propaganda and advance the agenda of the US and its allies in their quest to topple President Assad.
Let’s be clear: This is not to say that all NGOs are Trojan horses. It is not the case that every group or program that receives money from USAID or the National Endowment for Democracy or a similar organization is thereby automatically a deep state change agent. That is not how the Trojan horse technique works.
No, what makes these NGOs so effective as disguises for regime change operations is that much of the time, they are doing what they claim to be doing: providing aid, assistance and charity where it is needed. It is for this very reason that the US and its allies can so effectively smear NGO skeptics as crazy.
But consider this: In 1938, the US Congress passed the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). With the notable exception of AIPAC, NGOs, lobby groups and individuals who are representing a foreign agent are required to register under the act and are subjected to greater scrutiny of financial records and other activities. The irony is that FARA is essentially the same type of legislation that has recently been passed in China, but when the Chinese do it, it’s craziness; when the US did it 70 years ago, it was just good common sense. Once again, the hypocrisy is evident for those who wish to see it.
If there is any good to come out of this, it is that the public is increasingly aware of these types of covert activities. Perhaps more to the point, victims of these operations are now more willing to stand up to the US (and suffer its potential diplomatic wrath) by scrutinizing, monitoring, watchlisting, regulating, or even kicking out these agents of chaos.
And now, just like the Trojans thousands of years ago, the world is learning the hard way that sometimes a “gift” is better left unopened.
QUESTION FOR CORBETT
Do you think that the USAID thing indicates that we are having a civil war between competing Elites or do you think there is some other agenda?
In addition do you think this will mark a transition from Soft power to Hard power? And is this a sign of the US becoming weaker or stronger as a global influence?
End question.
Thank you for this report!
People who want to know more about how pretty much ALL the western culture changes of the last nearly hundred years were the result on INorganic top down pressure funded thru NGOs should read “Yrans-industrial complex” by Scott Howard, or his “open society playbook”…..I think Dr EM Jones also does good work t talking thru the history in JRS…. I guess I should throw in “weird scenes from
Laurel canyon” by the late Dave McGowan
👍
Thanks and yes, as I see the NGO’s in the entire Western World and, absolutely not just the American is that they are, – more or less, volunyeerily a huge part of the Western governments but, still try to hide as none Governmental.
They are everything but that I’m afraid!
They may have started as really good but, over time the corruption have sneaked in – slowly but surely – even within Amnesty International and, this is more than sad.
Within the past 25 years I have both volunteered and directly worked for 2 of the largest Western NGO’s and sadly, my only comment on both is, that this will never again happen!
Some of therm don’t even try to hide their corruption..
Thanks for taking this up again James!
Sadly, it looks as if we have to start similar organisations all over again and, with certain restrictions for the people working and volunteering for them!
Duck,
Let’s not forget the Classics, Aristotle, “Politics”
} Militaristic states are apt to survive only so long as they remain at war, while they go to ruin as soon as they have finished making their conquests. Peace causes their metal to decay; and the fault lies with a social system which does not teach its soldiers what to make of their lives when they are off duty.” {
The constant need for funding the 5 branches of military have to keep the sowers of tares in the fields. The NGOs. When the monies runs low they turn on each other. Technocracy and efficiency is The DOGE, will break off the scraps around the edges but won’t take long before they are at each other’s throats. Civil war not so much but , in a sense its an internal Mafia war more likely. The home front is still off limits so long as the NGOs can bring home the bacon for the frying pan.
The home front has been open since the Nuremberg regime felt the need to start reprograming Americans…. IMO
But yes, pigs fight when the slop trough gets low
There is one foreign operator in the USA that isn’t obliged to act in accordance with the FARA legislation, can you guess which one?
Here’s a hint: it recently boasted on “X” of “sponsoring” 364 of the (s)elected Congress critters in the latest episode of the US circus called “representative democracy”…
Yea, I think they are actually in the blackmail business and can be persuasive.
Portugal? Lithuania?
Oy vey you mean…
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize”
– Voltaire
“The budget should be balanced, the treasury refilled, public debt reduced, the arrogance of officialdom tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands curtailed, lest Rome become bankrupt.”
– Cicero
WHAT NEEDS TO BE SAID (song)
https://old.bitchute.com/video/lMHyu4q52X3Y/
+ 6 000 000 😉
I am assuming your very sparse comment refers to the Holohoax?
No Jewish Holocaust happened as has been mythed…no ovens, no soap, no sex slaves, no lamp shades, no mass graves, no death from the pest fumigant Zyclon B, no “Grand Plan,” etc. All attempts by unbiased researchers seeking the truth has been thwarted by the Zionists. Deep ground penetrating radar has shown no burials, bones, etc. around the sites.
During WWII the International Red Cross had monthly unrestricted access to every German prison camp and contact with inside men who reported to them in detail the activities at the camps.
In an 11/22/44 letter to U.S. State Department officials, the Red Cross said: “We had not been able to discover any trace of installations for exterminating civilian prisoners. This corroborates a report which we had already received from other sources …”
Dr. Charles Larson headed a team of forensic pathologists sent into the camps at the war’s end to document war crimes. They conducted hundreds of autopsies at more than 20 camps and did not find a single body showing signs of gas poisoning. None have been found since, at any camp.
There were 2.4 million Jews in all of German-occupied Europe. After the war, 3.8 million Jews claimed “survivor” benefits from the German government. The World Almanac: 800,000 more Jews were alive in 1950 than in 1940.
The Red Cross, officially reported less than 300,000 prisoners of all nationalities in the German camps died of all causes, including old age, and barely more than half were Jews. Most died in several severe typhoid epidemics caused by allied wartime conditions from bombing supply shipments, which claimed many lives throughout Germany.
Top allied leaders Eisenhower, Churchill and De Gaulle never mention the cabalistic ‘6 million’ or ‘gas chambers’ or a ‘holocaust’ in their entire works on WWII spanning 10 volumes and 7061 pages
Nor did Patton, the top US General in postwar Europe, in his diaries and hundreds of letters home.
Nor did Truman in his first SOTU after the war in 1946
In 1985 the world’s top holocaust historian, Dr Raul Hilberg, was forced to admit UNDER OATH he had no evidence to prove a single Jew was gassed.
”Holocaust Denial” laws were rolled out across the West soon after, making it illegal to question the official Communist version of WWII in 26 countries!
As I have pointed out here MANY times. For most people, especially under 50, the majority of their knowledge, attitudes, values, etc. have come from the controllers propaganda arm of their nefarious agenda of world domination…the entertainment business, TV, Movies, media, leftist universities, etc. which are dominated by Zionist “Jews” and not the Hebrews of the Bible.
YES, I’M RACIST (essay)
https://old.bitchute.com/video/K3lapB6RKSgU/
I wasn’t referring directly to the Holohoax, but to the powers behind the underlying myth which brought us the Holo- and all other hoaxes ever since. The power which has perpetuated the myth since the beginning of the XX century and which greatly contributed to the myth becoming a “self-fulfilling prophecy”:
https://www.minds.com/ZUGZWANG1939/blog/246-newspaper-articles-about-6-000-000-jews-from-1900-1945-1037772629545177088
Besides defeating Bolsonaro in Brazil, USAID helped destabilize USA indirectly via NGOs that supported Black Lives Matter and Antifa.
https://revolver.news/2025/02/turns-out-the-deep-state-used-usaid-to-oust-bolsonaro-from-brazil/
I wonder if some redundant US federal employees, including those from USAID, FBI, and CIA, will end up working for an NGO or private company, like a mercenary intel army of sorts…
Jo-Ann
Only if they get paid, for the most part, and if rich people have to pay for their own subversion rather then use public money their powers to spread ick will be much reduced……from what I am reading and hearing the USAID money was used to support a number of media outlets via inflated subscriptions.
I don’t think Trump and the people behind him are my friends but it will be kinda nice if we really get less trans and gay stuff and astroturf “movements” burning things down. A few more legacy media and AstroTurf social media influencers (Acedemic agent said that the alt media is almost re-contained because of paid noise makers ) going away would also be kinda nice.
I would assume that the people behind Trump will want to recreate their olde media hegemony like it’s 2001, so that’s something to watch.
I agree that it would be nice if WOKE and the fake alt media disappeared.
Less than 5 years to 2030, so something is coming.
This one has been a hot topic of conversation with a few friends and family. There is no way I could have explained this as well as you have, James. I will be sharing this. Many thanks!
Well, the last part is very important. As a person who has gotten the short side of the stick, I know very well, that in the deepest hell of russian prison/torture program, an NGO voice might often be the only one risen in the defence of the incarcerated, somewhere inbetween of them getting a broomstick up their butts and electricity down their genitals. At that point the one would not give a flying dick whether it is a trojan horse or a psyop or even hitler himself. He’d just want the hell to end. And i know it only makes things more complicated, but i’ve witnessed the whole spectrum of the ‘burn the ~~witch~~ foreign agent!’ perspective..
Yours,
Incurable Romantic
Oh? And who is raising their voice on behalf of the torture victims illegally incarcerated in Guantanamo for God knows how long?
I remember when people always used to complain about how much the US helps all these places… Then you find out what that help really was…but that doesn’t change their minds one bit. Sad world.
ORIGINAL LINK (with 51 comments)
May 21, 2018
Episode 338 – NGOs Are The Deep State’s Trojan Horses
17:46 video length
https://corbettreport.com/ngo/
I love these FLASHBACKS! Corbett ran this as a flashback in Mid-January 2022.
So, this is my third time to watch it…and it really, really helps!
A lot is packed in these 18 minutes.
In 2022, I watched this on the altcensored.com YouTube link.
Corbett showed us how to play his removed YouTube videos on AltCensored.
How to Find Deleted Videos – Questions For Corbett #081
~~WWW corbettreport.com/ngo/#comment-127544
Thanks!
Wish we could have a special tab for all the technical tips that you and a few others provide. Meanwhile I will continue to copy and paste them to a text document.
“Our founders sought to establish the weakest possible federal government capable of performing its essential functions, for three fundamental and intertwined reasons.
First, government is inherently dangerous, so the less power it has, the better.
Second, the states—being closer to the people and more responsive to regional differences and needs—are better equipped to handle most matters than a far-off centralized administration.
Third, the states were prior to the federal government; the people, through their states, created the latter to serve them, not the other way around.”
Michael Anton
As I hear TAC read the words of the F.F. I am reminded of how little “the people” had to do with creating the U.S. Empire, EXCEPT financially, with taxation which they allowed. Why? Their “willful blindness”, surrender of sovereignty, is ultimately responsible. Why is that so hard to admit? And why does it continue, over millennia?
Why does “The Most Dangerous Superstition” (Larken Rose) persevere? Why does any superstition? Is our species doomed to self-destruct? How is it those of us who ask these questions are vilified as anarchists who want chaos? Or, as “trouble makers” who need to be served a cup of hemlock?
>>As I hear TAC read the words of the F.F.>>
I don’t harvest many initials in my life. Please just spell the words for me. Thanks
>>how little “the people” had to do with creating the U.S. Empire, EXCEPT financially, with taxation which they allowed.>>
I have tried as much as I can over the years to help raise the consciousness of folks on all the missing history facts, the truth that we are NOT a republic founded on god nonsense but are a corporation still owned by the Virginia Company who changed their name to the USA after the war.
Often it is very frustrating, like talking to children about things. The brilliant psychopaths who have controlled the natural evolutionary progress of humanity for centuries or perhaps more have propagandized humanity with volumes of lies and distortions.
Combined with the psychological weapons of mass distraction from Freud, Bernays, Pavlov, Skinner and whatever DARPA has come up with recently, most of humanity are equivalent to lab rats “reacting to stimulus” and not using cognitive thinking ability.
Mention anything about metaphysics, spirituality (not religion,) off planet influence, the positive use of the “teacher” plants…Hash, Peyote, Ayahuasca, or any of the other “tin foil hat” subjects, and the blog monkeys hammer away at one.
>>How is it those of us who ask these questions are vilified as anarchists who want chaos?>>
Just more of the same conditioning. I was an adult in the 60’s and have first hand knowledge of the censorship and fear porn of ANYTHING that would elevate consciousness and understanding of life and how things work.
Fresh out of the Army in 1967 I attended a political event with my girl friend on the Berkeley UC Sproul Hall steps with Eldridge Cleaver speaking his line:
“If you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem.”
An hour later we were being beaten and maced at the Oakland Draft Center as payment.
And now, with the digital nonsense the propaganda is 100 fold worse.
SOLUTIONS (essay)
https://old.bitchute.com/video/TsqcMC9tPGg2/
TAC = Tenth Amendment Center – The documented words of early (1700’s) British colonists in N. American who advocated for secession and personal sovereignty. We are reminded of 1. The rich heritage of Western politics starting with the Magna Carta. 2. The high appetite for political lit in the colonies vis-a-vie pamphlets.
Why were some African tribes not enslaved? It was possible, but not economically feasible. They refused to submit. They would fight back and if captured would continually attempt to escape. It was their upbringing. They had been taught to be independent, proud sovereigns, unlike in other tribes that were authoritarian, with violent rulers. The “slave mentality” exists worldwide, expressed as national pride and allegiance to a ruling class as taught from early on in govt. schools. The govt. is sovereign over the citizen in the authoritarian/collectivist political paradigm. If a citizen is resistant to servitude, claims rights, the citizen is vilified as selfish, anti-social, possibly a violent anarchist, someone who refuses to live by any rules, implying that society is only possible if the initiation of deadly threat is present.
Does violence create social order? Or, chaos?
Is fear of violent controls conducive to happiness and productivity? Or is peaceful co-existence, cooperation, a better life? And if so, why settle for a lessor life? Why let others threaten you?
“…. Why were some African tribes not enslaved? …”
They weee not enslaved BECAUSE they were vicious authoritarian aggressors who ENSLAVED THE OTHER TRIBES…. Europeans did not just go about catching African blacks- they were buying blacks whole sale off OTHER blacks.
The mentality that made the Slaver tribes slavers was the proud strong willed freedom loving FOR THEMSELVES. No tribe even stayed free because they lived freedom, they had to be brave and strong as well.
Lolol the tribe where no one listened to the king when he called out the army ended up in chains and sold to the Jewish slavers then shipped to American whites
Here listen to Kurt Saxon reading an olde article on the Congo Slave Trade….lol , nobility of spirit has nothing to do with if you end up enslaved or not
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uTYzflFiRgw&pp=ygUQS2lydCBzYXhvbiBjb25nbw%3D%3D
Kurt Saxon show Congo slave trade part 1
The idea that people only get enslaved because of their poor attitude is about the same as saying women only get raped because they don’t fight hard enough……at the end of the day when it comes to slavery,or rape, very few people are actually going to pick horrible death instead….. as the article the odd Mr Saxon reads shows slaverybwas FAR better then what Africans did to peoples they captured…..though lol I don’t know if he’s right that they should “thank us” hahaha
Part 2 slave trade in the Congo basin , century mag article read by Kurt Saxon on his show
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uTYzflFiRgw&pp=ygUQS2lydCBzYXhvbiBjb25nbw%3D%3D
CORRECTION at his is part 2
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wcDXW-2fFwY&pp=ygUQS2lydCBzYXhvbiBjb25nbw%3D%3D
@ Voluntaryist
Enlightening reply, thanks.
Indeed, Just like our Native American tribes did from Geronimo here in our SouthWest to the Hunkpapa and others wiping out Custer fought back. Out of pride and allegiance to their Sovereignty and history I would imagine.
>>The “slave mentality” exists worldwide, expressed as national pride and allegiance to a ruling class as taught from early on in govt. schools.>>
Yep, and now in this “digital” age the creation of slave mentality to a wide variety of issues gains speed and depth far too quickly. The cut and paste folks who want to be the shot callers in their “prison cells” pretending they are free.
>>…society is only possible if the initiation of deadly threat is present.>>
From my political/social activism I have been shot at, phone tapped, tailed and more in the early days and now shadow banned, censored and kicked off of so-called Alt blogs and others. to repeat… the fundamental tools of deception and control are the encouragement of FEAR and a belief in SCARCITY.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
>>Why let others threaten you?>>
This is from my essay THE BIGGER PICTURE Pt 1 https://old.bitchute.com/video/mOnZDoMdwAwD/
The history of life on this planet has puzzling circumstances, with most facts remaining either mysteriously hidden or quite intentionally unattainable and for now, just speculation.
Csanyi and Kampis of Hungary talk about self organization of living systems as REPLICATION, occurring at all levels: Molecular, Biological, and Social. Every system has its own way it forms and expands and holds its self together.
With humans, a replication of IDEAS is essential, first in forming, then maintaining social systems.
The male-dominator system burned, razed, and destroyed books, temples, holy sites, libraries, tribal ceremony and ritual for thousands of years in the name of “God.”
Their goal: to purge all ideas, memories, and understanding of the prior equal rights, peaceful, goddess/tribal based spiritual expressions from the collective mind of the people.
To then shift over to a male dominated, off planet Sky God, anti-women, rigid rule-book religion, based on fear of everlasting punishment with strict behavioral control.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
The masses are still hung up on exhibiting their religious beliefs with crucifix jewelry or yarmulkes, etc. This nonsense, unproven belief of some supreme creator of all things “validated” only by personal testimony and contrived interpretations of history is VERY dangerous.
It reflects the lack of true awareness iand the very real danger is THEY KILL PEOPLE whom they consider are blasphemous or non believers, etc. We are very far from being civilized for sure.
If we were we would have thank you lights on the rear of our vehicles 🙂
I like your essay, but found it a bit unnatural to read it like that. Do you have a website or blog where I can read more at my own tempo, or do you only publish on bitchute?
Thanks
>>found it a bit unnatural to read it like that.>>
Are you using a phone or a computer? Big diff of course in readability. Plus I haven’t figured out how to get crisp scrip yet.
The space bar will give the stop/go scroll control.
No web footprint to speak of beyond Corbett and BitChute. 50 miles off the grid using 30+ year old equipment and a 16 year old iMac.
Hm. For some reason there is no replybutton on your last comment. Anyway, I use a phone, but it’s ok. I stopped using bitchute though, because I have a limited amount of data on my mobile network, and there is no option for resolution on bitchute. I’m kinda off-grid and try to limit my use of data, and a textfile would be better. But it is what it is. I’ll watch some more of your content now:-)
No button, that’s pretty strange.
Until 2016 I hadn’t watched commercial TV for 50 years except for the occasional Super Bowl at someone else’s place.
Sold our home, went our own way, I eventually got a single wide rental on 47 acres at 6000 feet, a workshop, shooting range and huge garden, with the landlord on the property as well.
He gave me cable TV and free web. Few years a go he put in Elon Musk’s system?? and all is well.
Thanks for watching my vids. Lot of good stuff there beyond what pop culture offers.
Here’s a new post from Robert Malone that pertains to USAID:
The Biggest, Most Corrupt News Organization You Have Never Heard of
The Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project
Robert W Malone MD, MS | Feb 08, 2025
https://www.malone.news/p/the-biggest-most-corrupt-news-organization
Excerpt:
“The Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) is a worldwide collective of investigative journalists established in 2006, primarily funded by USAID and the Soros Foundation. It claims to focus on revealing international corrupt financial transactions, organized crime, and corruption—solely focused offshore and published through local media outlets. Its aim appears to be to influence political movements and shifts in nations not aligned with US interests, without those nations realizing that the USA and George Soros are behind this influence.”
Tuesday February 4, 2025 – The Libertarian Institute – By James Bovard
Forty Years Bashing the National Endowment for Democracy (NED)
https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/forty-years-bashing-the-national-endowment-for-democracy/
EXCERPTS
IMAGE of Elon Musk Tweet where he says:
Those who know, please reply to this post listing all the evil things that NED has done. It’s a long list.
[James Bovard responds]
After that merciless arm-twisting, I have no choice but to recap my National Endowment for Democracy bashes going back to shortly after it was launched in 1983.
In a November 29, 1985 piece in the Oakland Tribune, I hailed NED as “one of the newest, most prestigious boondoggles on the Potomac.” But there were plenty of scoffers early on: “NED has been called many things—an International Political Action Committee, the Taxpayer Funding of Foreign Elections Program, and a slush fund for political hacks who like to travel to warm climates in cold weather. In less than two years, NED has lived up to all these epithets.” My op-ed concluded, “The sooner NED is abolished, the cleaner our foreign policy will be.”
The following year, after fresh NED scandals, Senator Ernest Hollings (D-SC) howled, “This thing is not the National Endowment for Democracy but the National Endowment for Embarrassment.” Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) complained, “From its very inception, the National Endowment for Democracy has been riddled with scandal and impropriety.”
But it was a “jobs for the boys” program that enabled politicians to launder money to plenty of their aides and donors, so it survived one pratfall after another.
In 2006, in “Defining Democracy Down” in The American Conservative, I wrote:
“In 2001, NED quadrupled its aid to Venezuelan opponents of elected president Hugo Chavez, and NED heavily funded some organizations involved in a bloody military coup that temporarily removed Chavez from power in April 2002. After Chavez retook control, NED and the State Department responded by pouring even more money into groups seeking his ouster.
The International Republican Institute, one of the largest NED grant recipients, played a key role both in the Chavez coup and also in the overthrow of Haiti’s elected president, Jean-Bertrand Aristide…
…The U.S. pulled out all the stops to help our favored candidate win a ‘free and fair’ election in 2004 in the Ukraine. In the two years prior to the election, the United States spent over $65 million ‘to aid political organizations in Ukraine, paying to bring opposition leader Viktor Yushchenko to meet U.S. leaders and helping to underwrite exit polls indicating he won a disputed runoff election,’ according to the Associated Press. Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) complained….
“Internews Network” & Jeanne Bourgault
Saturday Feb 8, 2025 – Zero Hedge
USAID Funded Massive ‘News’ Platform, Extending ‘Censorship Industrial Complex’ To Billions Worldwide
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/usaid-funded-massive-global-state-propaganda-news-matrix-nearly-billion-people-reach
Monday February 3, 2025
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt blasts USAID
[LIST]
https://corbettreport.com/subscriber-announcement-and-february-open-thread/#comment-173359
For example:
Hundreds of millions of dollars to fund “irrigation canals, farming equipment, and even fertilizer used to support the unprecedented poppy cultivation and heroin production in Afghanistan,” benefiting the Taliban
“USAID, which helped fund opium traffickers in Laos, the forced sterilization of some 300,000 indigenous Peruvian women, Salvadoran death squads and Guatemala’s genocidal army, continues to operate — and subvert — to this day.”
Quote from a comprehensive article by CounterPunch’s Brett Wilkins on Dan Mitrione, former FBI agent who worked for USAID’s Office of Public Safety – or OPS, for short.
I mean, c’mon, “Ops”?!? Are they mocking us?
Oh, yeah, that’s right…
They are!!!
https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/08/13/teaching-torture-the-death-and-legacy-of-dan-mitrione/
James, you’re only seven years ahead of the curve now champ so high time you lifted your game, or I’ll be forced to get all my prophetic analysis from Raymond Kurzweil. 😀
speaking of the devil: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEztHu4NHrs
Oh, just finished reading all your comments… So, so sad!!
Dear James:
Could the/a complete change to or, within Western NGO’s be an idea for a new episode of your “Solution Watch” – in an attempt to make some real positive changes within these organisations and, to get some ideas on how to do so the best way!?
Thanks.
This is an excellent synopsis of a very troubling topic.
Thanks James!