It’s the most common question confronting any would-be researcher of conspiracy reality: Who’s at the top of the pyramid? Join James for today’s edition of Questions For Corbett where he talks to Charlie Robinson and Derrick Broze about how they answer that question, and James answers the question himself.
Video player not working? Use these links to watch it somewhere else!
WATCH ON: 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
or DOWNLOAD THE MP4
SHOW NOTES:
Interview 600 – James Corbett on The Mind Renewed
Charlie Robinson: Macroagressions podcast / Activist Post
The Octopus of Population Control
Derrick Broze – The Conscious Resistance Network
Thank you James. Knowing this hidden structure doesn’t help without the addresses. That’s where we all should go then the mob may be able to stop something like the Stratospheric Aerosol Injection plan. Then the plan after plan may be reduced. Wielded power has the jump on us. Doesn’t mean a thing to the unconscious. What does the steer dream in the feed lot outside Sterling Colorado? I’m afraid if we get educated we will come to many of the same conclusions the ruling powers came to. Why must meaning be made compulsory? Maybe , I am cause you are . Now act accordingly.
Radical revolutionary movements of the human heart and mind on a whole population scale …
Away from centralised power
Yes thank you James and others for your work .🙏
Take full responsibility for whom and what you are
Then start in yr small community
However small that maybe
Start with yourself
Shop at markets , read more
Be kind , share , be optimistic of brighter days in the realms of freedom .
Positive mental attitude towards freedom in the most powerful way , local boots on the ground no weapons.
From an industrial punk band I grew up on
On the centralised powers or mr global or mr Freemason or mr Jesuit …..
You are an inspiration to me
U are an inspiration of how not to be ,you are inspiration to achieve a simpler better way of life
The Kali Yuga ! Struggle !🏆🌞( killing Joke ) (extremities dirt and various repressed emotions )
)what we need is wisdom – herbet selby jr
Frankists , for those who got kinda confused on Mr Robinsons confusing talking around them, can be found on Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabbatai_Zevi
I would disagree with all Jewish related issues being from this one sect since (see Jewish Revolutionary Spirit by EM Jones) these issues predate the chap himself by a long time and also “culture of Critique” by Kevin Macdonald gives Evolutionary Psychology reasons rather then spiritual ones for these issues
Agreed. Sabbatean-Frankism is just one of may cults within a wider framework of Talmudist and Kabbalistic ideology.
Indeed.
You guys are obsessed with ‘the Jews’. Can’t take you seriously as thinkers or researchers. You just love to wallow in ignorance.
Anon
If you want the historical evidence of the kind of things Jews have done and are still doing
(Jewish Israeli holocaust survivor was author) Shahak : “jewish history Jewish religion “
“the Jewish revolutionary spirit “ by EM Jones quotes a lot from Jewish historians
”culture of critique “ by Kevin Macdonald goes into a lot of the history and group survival strategies but from an evolutionary psychology POV
considering how much history there ia out there it’s clearly ignorance or social signaling to NOT see Jewish influence esp over the last 100 years or so
You can find dirt on pretty much any culture. Singling out Jewish culture for extra-special judgement is quite frankly absurd and intellectually lazy. Go do some thinking instead of fastening upon the first conclusion that hits your brain. All the best.
Anon
”…..You can find dirt on pretty much any culture. Singling out Jewish culture for extra-special judgement is….”
which fallacy are you using here?
I can not find “the dirt in any culture” in history.
IF i could “find the dirt in any culture” this would IN NO WAY make the “dirt” untrue.
You are either
a)ignorant because you don’t know the (quite open) history of Jewish influences
b) Social signaling your a good boy and don’t think anything that is not approved as good person thoughts (by the people who run things, lol)
c) Just kvetching and throwing social / emotional control words around
I could now launch into a long list of links and books and history and all the rest …..but I listed three books to you that mostly use Jewish written history to talk about how Jews influenced events to suit their own ethnic needs (and why would they NOT don this???? Everyone with sense does does)
No offense, but you’re really not that bright. Take care.
Oh noooooooooooo
a person online said I was dumb.
That totally invalidates all those historical facts….because I am dumb.
maybe it’s because I am dumb but how does that work? Does me being such a fool make Shahak dumber??? Does the time line re write itself around my stupidity???? Lol
Anon
Let’s talk body count. What is there to racking up the largest body count and having someone else pay for it. Is there some magic number to reach to be valid… A ratio between the money spent per body destroyed? Are the piles of dead a part of Jewish life ? POSIWID. Tell us, I’m curious. This magazine doesn’t get many jew spokesperson often enough.
I would argue that you conflating Jews with Zionists – which are very different – proves your own ignorance. Do a bit of your own research; there are plenty of Jews and rabbis that are anti-Zionists.
That is debatable and comes down to how you define Zionism:
1. As and end goal or,
2. As a process to the said end goal.
If you define Zionism as the objective to rebuild the temple, re-establish temple worship, in-gather Jewish exiles into a nation state, then Zionism is fundamental and inseparable to the religion of Judaism owing to the relevant prophecies in the Tanakh. In this sense it is literally impossible to be religiously Jewish and be anti-Zionist.
The only way you can square the circle is if you define Zionism to mean the process by which these objectives/prophecies are fulfilled and not the end goal itself. Groups like Neturei Karta only object to the fact that Israel is being restored prior to the messiah’s proclamation and not before. This would be a very odd definition. Of course this ambiguity can be used to strategically muddy the waters.
When I wrote on the topic, I used a Jewish source for the definition of Zionism which defines it as national movement for the return of the Jewish people to their homeland and the resumption of Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel.
You say that
I would tend to disagree with that. Zionism is a political movement, not a religious one. I understand your take as being one whereby many Jews view it as inseparable to Judaism, but that is fundamentally flawed and not substantiated in the Torah.
Furthermore, it is becoming more and more apparent, that the so-called original claims to the Holy Land are not very well rooted in fact, but rather in myth. Israel’s top archeologist who spend many decades researching the so-called Exodus (of Israelites from Egypt) found zero evidence to support/corroborate this claimed event (which was written about many centuries later with an obvious/apparent agenda):
– The Story of Israel is a Lie (video)
P.S.: Thank you for the respective debate.
I would say that they do not “want” central control. They “need” central control. They fear the cycle of time that is currently happening, so they need to re-set it when humans are awakening to their true inherent powers. That is the missing part of the answer to the question. The other level basically of the story here. That greater answer to why and how it all began. You have the entire physical structure in the material plane mapped out and defined so well James and friends. Wow. I am so deeply appreciative of your work and the many you host. I study the spiritual side of it also and can see the extended picture of how this involves the lower 4th astral dimension that is connected to our realm here and how that is part of the “What is at the Top”. At their top is an Elemental Being that has been constructed from the thoughts, feelings, and emotions of individuals over millenia who do not want to be a part of the Original Organic timeline of death and rebirth. The true spiritual realms are relegated to positions of service, not positions of authority and status. Larger beings with smaller beings inside…Like the Russian Dolls. That is a construct that these individuals arriving and living in the egoic challenged Earth realm decided was not for them. They don’t want everyone to be truly equal. They want to be at the top and they fear their position and status being removed because they would have to ultimately “FACE” who they really are…weak and unable to do the incredibly hard work of overcoming the lure here of materialism as being the end all, which it is not. They cannot merge and phase into higher spiritual planes because of their decisions to merge with metal and to be perverse and inverted. So they confuse humans and program them with false belief systems that limit their understanding of how reality is truly constructed. You are correct in saying it is a mindset, and the rest of that is that it is a being that is of a lower nature that has been created and it infests minds and takes over if there are openings to get in and then those impulses are given in to. They ultimately lose their “soul”. They become lost in space, in the lower metal, too heavy to rise and no longer able to connect, to the stream of Organic consciousness. There is much much more to explain. And you have ultimately described in your work, the type of structures they need to continue being of cyborg nature…cold, empty, sterile, aligned with algorithms and mathematics and a total mimimcy of the Feminine, which is Key to the whole big picture…they need to remove the feminine for a reason. But this is the time frame where that energy of the feminine comes back on line so to say…it’s not Tik Tok for us…it’s Tik Tok for THEM…Their time is running out…And a whole lot more of us better SEE it that way and Say it that way. My deepest gratitude for all James…
What I believe we should all do is to send the video of the philosophy of liberty to everyone we know. That short video makes it clear that any hierarchy of control is illogical and self-contradictory.
Canukistan
there will always be hierarchy because it’s the natural order of things- do you let your kids eat whatever they feel like and go wherever they like? If you get a weird rash you take the advice of a crazy duck n the internet or your doctor ? If your going somewhere do you ask the fentanyl zombie for directions?
Hireachy of control is just as natural because some people actually know WTF they are doing and some people do not….hence on a ship the captain gets to direct his crew EVEN if the guy getting told what to do thinks he knows better. What’s NOT natural is how pathetic and domesticated normal people have become-the old saying people get the governance they deserve is kinda true because they will always receive the worst service at the highest price leaders can provide while staying in charge.
Joseph Conrad had an interesting take on the hierarchy of control: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/220/220-h/220-h.htm
SOLUTION that anyone can do… A MUST-SEE Video – #SolutionsWatch
Canukistan Freek says:
“What I believe we should all do is to send the video of the philosophy of liberty to everyone we know.
That short video makes it clear that any hierarchy of control is illogical and self-contradictory.”
NOTE – At the top right of this webpage is an image link to ‘The Philosophy of Liberty’ | Self-Ownership.
The “Philosophy of Liberty” is based on libertarianism (Freemasonic enlightenment philosophy) and is ultimately incoherent as it denies the natural order of humanity. Just as there is no “social contract” within a family (children do not “agree” to be ruled by their parents), there are no foundational principles that can be bootstrapped into a coherent system of governance based on contractual relations. Just as you can get bad parents, you can also get bad kings, but that doesn’t negate the general principle that the natural order of control is via nations (a family of families) and their monarchs. We still have kings today, it is just that they are hidden behind a veil of “democracy”.
This may be controversial but I would even go as far as to say that a bad king is still better than mob rule. Of course, you can define the formal system of anarchy to include the “anarchy” of nation states and their kingdoms as a kind of “mob-rule” of jurisdictions. But the analogy breaks down owing to the sheer scale of nation states and the fact that the people within them do most often share a common language, religion and culture.
This erase more than 98% of human existence that rule themselves without kings. You are blind to your own argument. You are naturalising king’s power over “families of families” without seeing that is has nothing to do with natural order.
I mean, even nowadays there are people which lives will be marginally influenced by any so-called rulers. Yet I think it is harder and harder to live out of their influence. It does not mean it is the only way.
Xobolo
“…This erase more than 98% of human existence that rule themselves without kings. You are blind to your own argument. You are naturalising king’s power over “families of families” without seeing that is has nothing to do with natural order…..”
I am not sure what he would argue to your point but I will point out that this “98%” of human existence without rulers is in Primative societies- you don’t need a king if your running around gather roots and poking animals with pointy sticks.
THE MOMENT you start getting above that level you have the arrival of a class of people who organize the various tasks…..you can not organize masses of people and various tasks that must be done so they get food without that layer.
So unless your planning to go with the Primativist’s and back out of Industrial society you are stuck with SOME KIND of ruling class – how evil or useful they are depends on the situation and the people they rule over…..the thing is that if we went full Teddy K and destroyed industrial society the natural drive will always be to rebuild it because having the tools civilization provides will give people the power to overrun and destroy those who do not have such tools.
The silly idea that we only invented war after civilization is shown as false when you look at Stone Age massacres and Primative peoples who waged war against each other in modern times
From my research on this topic, I think it is quite evident that at the very top, we are looking at a demonic entity, i.e., Satan (Lucifer the fallen angel).
See my latest related article/deep dive on this:
A large part of this thesis is that those upper managers at the very top (bloodline families from Europe such as those from the Black Nobility, the Rothschilds, et al) revere him and are part of this Luciferian (and Sabbateans & Sabbatean Frankists) cult.
Similar to the Committee of 300 list, there also exists a pretty good list of the middle-managers just beneath the upper-managers here:
It’s not that difficult to verify many of the names therein to see how much power and control they exert over various corporate, political, and social spheres.
But we must not also forget the upper-managers of the International Banking Cartel pyramid which I write a lot about on my Substack. They are the ones, after all, commanding all those very profitable banker wars, and they are the ones that are commanding the set up of the new (Digital ID-based) CBDC-style monetary system across the planet.
The lower-level managers – including Presidents, Prime Ministers, and the like are but their Useful Idiots like Mark Carnage who doesn’t have a noble bone in lineage or his body, but yet is convinced he won’t be tossed aside like a smelly rag doll when his usefulness runs out.
That is my general/simplistic take on this Q.
Mr Corbett gave the solution at the end….become less dependent on the system.
The thing is that most people don’t want to loose the nice things the system gives them, which is fine- some people are naturally going to be farm animals. In the before times they were the slaves and serfs. They are just unlucky enough to live when their masters are working for satan and want them dead.
Mr Corbett is also right that it’s not a single group, but it’s less ideology the the way any system works. Human society is like an organism or a machine and the people in it spend plenty of time operating as its parts…..those parts are mostly going to just react to inventives and do what’s best for themselves EVEN if this leads to emergent properties that are negative. The Unabomber, that edgy fellow, wrote this in the most sininct and clear manner in his book.
The two problems that you can probably never solve are
a)As society gets more technological and work specializes there will be more and more need to organize things
b) any society that refuses to, or can’t ,get more technological will get eaten by one that does.
Luckily the endless repeat in all societies of power accruing in fewer hands is somewhat balanced by the decay and collapse we see in cyclical history….so let us be thankful that nothing man made lasts forever! All you can do is
a)make yourself as independent from the system as you can so your not easily controlled
b)get into a group with others and look out for your own interests (if your successful one day in the future your group will go thru the whole cycle of internal power falling into fewer hands btw)
At the end of the day you can serve God or satan – there is no total freedom except for your choice of which master you want
The problem with this attitude is that if everyone just sits back and does NOTHING, these powers-that-ought-not-be will unabatedly continue on with more and more and more and more schemes (Digital ID, CBDCs, AI-Surveillance, etc.). And 99.9% of the masses who don’t find and use alternatives will be left slaves to the beast systems.
A good example was when James went to a conference (in Malaysia if I recall correctly) and the hotel he was staying at would not use cash. You can only resist like this for so long.
Yes, I agree with the do not comply thing. But the fact of the matter is, MORE needs to be done that just adopting this oversimplistic mindset.
The AI realm is expanding at an astronomical/exponential pace. In my opinion, it is unrealistic – and perhaps careless – to maintain this attitude since AI WILL be taking more and more space whether we like it or not.
I am not pretending to have all the solutions – but more radical ones are/will be needed, lest we really get sucked into the Beast System (whether we like like it or not, or plan otherwise) with no way out.
Another practical example – something I’ve been tracking and writing about over the years – is how it is just a matter of time when ALL airports will only allow travelers if they submit to the biometric face scan (or equivalent). What does James, or you, do then? Never fly again? Use boats/cruises to travel abroad in lieu?
What’s the solution in this case for “becoming less dependent on the system?
I think that is a very legit Q that deserve added scrutiny. But, as James seldom seems to read comments here (or at least reply to them) even though many of us pay $$ to place them here, I guess we won’t get to know.
Respectfully,
Yet another example has to do with chemtrails.
They grace the skies in Canada about 5-6 days a week. The negative health effects are measurable and grave. Similar in China and many other countries. Not sure about Japan.
How, exactly, does one “become less dependent on the system” or extricate themselves from such a harmful environment (with the exception of moving out – which I did – and I haven’t seen any in the past nine months living in Thailand)?
There are many such kinds of examples. So, the oversimplistic view that we merely become less dependent on these systems carries an obvious elephant in the room. Not realistic.
Dan – I’ve been living in Thailand for over 7 years and have yet to see nary a one. Also, since you’ve been in Thailand for 9 months then you were here for the announcement of Princess Ba’s death. She had been in a coma for over 3 years after succumbing to, I believe it was the 3rd Pfizer booster. She was Thailand’s equivalent of Princess Di and her death was a heavy blow to the entire nation as she was the perfect choice to succeed the king. What surprised me was the king not in the loop regarding the dangers of the mRNA injections. It wasn’t until he consulted Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi that he understood what was going on – https://odysee.com/@ProgressiveTruthSeekers:3/44-year-old-Thai-Princess-Bajrakitiyabha-in-Coma:4
Dan
i see your point that most people will do nothing, it’s not wrong.
on the other hand I will answer the question of what to do when airports don’t allow you to fly without a butt probe is DONT fly. If you don’t want what they offer then their withholding it is not a big deal to you.
The masses will never “wake up “, because they lack virtue…..so you are left with the choice of either taking control of the masses and making them agree with you (good luck if you don’t have free stuff for them) or you can find your own way to extract the means of life from your environment and do your own thing.
is that oversimplified? YES, it is, you should be doing whatever you can to take some control over your environment (which is why voting is worth the effort of getting to the polls and ticking a box) but mainly you need to get some buddies who can make a voting bloc and your own independent system to exist as much as possible outside their system.
It’s over simplified because there is no total solution- you can not exit to sea stead nor can you take back DC and restore the constitution but you CAN ignore HR vax regulations if you don’t mind being “poor”.
You won’t find a solution in politics (but you might find a band aid) and you won’t find a solution waking up the normies (what are they gonna do? Not much if the HR lady says they can’t) You won’t even find a solution doing what I say and living outside the system as much as possible (you still need SOME interaction with the system)
Get some IRL buddies you could do crimes with (dont actually do crimes) and find a skill people want (mechanics are still pretty useful and people will always want a guy to clean their drains and plenty of folks don’t know crap about their laptop even as the price goes up )
but since I kinda agree with you that my solution is not a TOTAL solution why don’t you give us a list of your own ideas?
Thanks for your take on these Duck. I totally agree with
Spot on. They mostly lack courage, which I suppose can be included in virtue itself (as per the original meaning of the word).
For your take on “DONT fly” well I am going to keep flying until it comes to that point. I will have to re-assess/re-evaluate my [very limited] options thereafter.
I think the next 2-3 years will be quite critical and telling. I honestly don’t think the globalists will be able to successfully implement all these beast systems they want. They’ll try and most of the plebs, as you say will never wake up and will have to go along with these. Just yesterday, I got a news release that the major banks in Canada are getting the tokenized version of the dollar ready along with hooking up the system to the global control grid. I have been taking many steps to extricate myself from this system and am fairly confident that when that switch gets flipped, I’ll be okay – unlike the masses.
God gave me a brain to be used for reason and wisdom. I never take that gift for granted.
Godspeed.
Also as an addendum I will say that AI is probably nothing but a massive scam- the only people it will replace are the ones who are doing BS jobs already….that’s most people who really are “ useless eaters” and ought to work in bettering themselves before the oligarchs murder them.
Dont expect Mr Corbett to tell you how to fix the world because you will firstly be disappointed and secondly (I suspect) disappoint him
If you believe in the beast system then you will literally starve to death before joining it….so doing without TV and Uber Eats will
be small potatoes
Duck,
Just so you know, you no longer can use the term Artificial Intelligence (AI).
It’s fake.
I know because the government told me so.
It is now…officially…
~~~ SUPER INTELLIGENCE (SI) – Government Mandated Nomenclature ~~~
https://corbettreport.com/9-11-battle-royale-and-september-open-thread/#comment-189879
lol, rebranding for the new campaign I bet. 🙂
Oh, don’t your worry. ‘Scientist AI’ will save us.
Meet ‘Scientist AI’ from LawZero to usher in the new ‘Trust the Science’ Know-it-All AI God (brought to you by The Gates Foundation)
Well James does have regular solutions episodes and accompanying guests which are good. But it would still be nice to have some engagement with him here in his own forum, as I see some very smart voices in this space. Community, after all, is what will make a difference going forward; apart from practical skills and the like, we can each share our knowledge and creative ideas on how to counter these beast systems.
Dan
”….Community, after all, is what will make a difference going forward; apart from practical skills and the like, we can each share our knowledge and creative ideas on how to counter these beast systems…..”
Yes, that’s true but IMO the internet is not where you have community or action happen…..don’t get me wrong I love all the stuff I can find on the internet and have had great fun arguing and even meet IRL friends THRU the internet but it’s really become interactive TV for most of us. Knowing has to move to doing or it’s not particularly valuable.
knowing the weather forecast is not much use if you don’t get yourself an umbrella. 🙂
Decentralize Decentralize Decentralize makes sense to me.
Zero theft makes sense to me.
Zero lies makes sense to me.
Zero paid employees in govt and ngo’s makes sense to me
Zero forced coerced charity makes sense to me
Elegant bullet proof local forceless costless process systems make sense to me
Voluntaryism makes sense to me
Helping all flourish and thrive to the best of their ability makes sense to me
Much more to say but not much time at the moment and so a few questions to start:
Where did the concept of privacy come from and why and when and who invented it and when did it become prevalent ?
What % of the population actually believe in the concept that all human beings are created equal versus what % only say they do versus what % don’t know?
From a libertarian perspective. how much property and/or territory can one person or average size family actually protect and why would they need more?
What % of the population actually believe we are or at least might be here to help all human beings flourish and thrive?
Why do libertarians believe in usery?
How was “social credit” in Alberta and elsewhere meant to work ?
Hmmm…..
Great simple elegant Solutions to follow another day soon i hope
Very interesting! I really appreciated Robinson’s and Broze’s answers to the question of Who’s at the Top. But, I have to agree with you, James Corbett. Centralized Authority is always at the top. I’m afraid the only thing we can do is to resist centralized authority whereever it pops it’s head up. Whether in our town governments or in our community group settings. One has to be vigilant in paying attention when it starts to happen and quash it right away.
Thanks for all the work you do!
Kare4
”….I’m afraid the only thing we can do is to resist centralized authority whereever it pops it’s head up…”
that is a good idea I can get behind- but the actual method of doing so is kinda the issue.
HOW do you quash it?
They are called ‘SECRET’ societies for a reason. The obvious ones are only worker bees.
I’d offer to be more in the here and now and understand your limitations.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
POTENTIAL FOR GROWTH
Even if our history was just 100,000 years, that is 17,000 generations!!
So if we can get dvd’s, cell phones, trips into space in just 3 gens, just imagine what our ancestors might have done.
– Randal Carlson
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
CONTROL OF HUMANITY
In the 60’s many of us were on journeys of exploration of higher consciousness, besides meditation, reading books, food changes, contacting gurus and shaman and the such, were the teacher plants…Psilocybin, Peyote, Mescaline, high quality Indicus/Sativa and Hashish, and even pure LSD.
Much like slave owners didn’t want slaves to learn to read because they’d learn about laws and rights, etc., the controllers have maintained a lock on esoteric and metaphysical knowledge.
IE: the ability to heal ourselves, understand the bigger picture of life, etc.
That recent period of exploration frightened them and harsh laws, media, and police effort came down on us. They desire people use stimulants like meth or depressants and alcohol with its infantile behavior because none add to one’s expansion but rather makes them easy to manipulate.
Like Rockefeller said after taking over education in 1912 or so…
“We want workers, not thinkers.”
HONORING LIFE
Life’s no longer cherished by most people. Few honor the magnificence of what being alive is beyond their own, small, pathetic habits and issues. Few understand our multi million year history, and are caught up in belief systems used to stultify one’s ability to heal and learn and grow.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
My awakening came in Berkeley though Sandoz LSD in 1968. The Native Americans use Peyote and the Sun Dance, and pain to achieve it. The Hawaiian path is just sound, no instruments or drugs. East Indians use meditation.
An old acquaintance, the late Wallace Black Elk would get buried for three days (with an air source of course.) This correlates to the use of sensory deprivation tanks.
Seems the universe doesn’t want us to miss out if we chose to 🙂
Don’t worry, be happy, what will be will be.
YOUR MOMENT IN THE SUN
https://old.bitchute.com/video/zfTxMV8lPrX1/
>>…be more in the here and now and understand your limitations.>>
A little clarity here. If one can maintain a clear perspective of who, what, and where they are and not linger in the fear porn found so much on the web then you will be in a stoic mind set of taking care of the things at hand at not torturing yourself about all the what if’s.
Spend more time with people who love you or dig you and far less on line in any fashion. The Earth speaks but you need to listen. Be outdoors as much as possible, barefoot when you can on the dirt.
And understanding your limitations supports that. You don’t try to run a marathon when at best you can only do a mile or so. If you can get together with other locals with each offering their strengths to the group…first aid, gardening, massage, carpentry, IT skills, mechanical abilities, organizational, etc. then group may even be cognizant of their limitations and work on building a stronger, more focused muscle.
Worth the read…
SOLUTIONS (essay)
https://old.bitchute.com/video/TsqcMC9tPGg2/
I think the strongest point here is that people get too caught up trying to identify one person, family, organization, or group at the very top, when the bigger problem is the structure itself.
Power doesn’t necessarily need one mastermind controlling everything. You can have governments, corporations, financial institutions, intelligence agencies, NGOs, and wealthy individuals all pursuing their own interests while still benefiting from the same increasingly centralized system. Their interests can overlap without everyone sitting in the same room following one master plan.
That’s also why I think the point about becoming less dependent on the system matters more than endlessly trying to figure out who the final boss is. If somebody has control over your income, food, information, money, or ability to function, they have leverage over you regardless of whose name is technically at the top.
I’m still skeptical of claims that can’t actually be proven, but the concentration of power itself is something worth paying attention to. Instead of obsessing over finding one hidden ruler, I’d rather understand the incentives, follow the money and institutions, and build as much personal independence as realistically possible.
“I think the strongest point here is that people get too caught up trying to identify one person, family, organization, or group at the very top, when the bigger problem is the structure itself… Their interests can overlap without everyone sitting in the same room following one master plan.”
I agree with the first part but not the second. There are many groups involved but the historical reality is that they have a shared basic ideology and religious/philosophical world view (with variations on a theme). If the “elites” had radically different competing worldviews then you simply wouldn’t get the historic continuity that we see and these differences would be much more clearly manifest as global conflicts.
Derrick Duck
”….If the “elites” had radically different competing worldviews then you simply wouldn’t get the historic continuity that we see and these differences would be much more clearly manifest as global conflicts…..”
You have a point there BUT AA counter point is that if all the elite were actually ideologically driven (rather then driven by incentives) then we would already be in the pods.
I don’t doubt that they have similar ideas, but maybe Accedmic Agent is correct and ideology REALLY = “BS BS BS Therefore I rule”
The continuation of a general path of events could be an Emergent Property of the system of all the people having incentives to do similar things.
I think Academic Agent is saying that superficial reasons are provided to the general public about the legitimacy of this or that government. I agree with that. But, ultimately, people are driven by religious and ideological conviction and this is the driving force in history.
Derrick Duck
”….ultimately, people are driven by religious and ideological conviction and this is the driving force in history….”
Yes, that’s true for the most part but there are two other factors to consider
1) The system itself takes on properties – almost a life orbit’s own- and a lot of people who look like their in power may be just being driven along to goals the system “chooses” (that’s not the right word I know since it’s not conscious any more then an ant hill is)
THESE kind of people are technocrats because they manage but don’t really have goals for the most part.
2) The % of people who make real changes to the pus of history is very very low….these folks would be what the chap (link below) would call extreme outliers…..such folks (in today’s tech) are kinda like the “conditioners” in “abolishon if man) by CS Lewis- driven by whatever weird drives it remants of “the Tao” is left in them.
These kind of people would be “beyond” (perhaps beneath) ideology or morals.
link
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wvcB-M3MQ0c&ra=m
channel : the past 33yrs , kinda looks at stuff from a cybernetics pov which is cool since I’m interested in that myself from reading AI stuff
For some reason this makes me really angry. I’ll try to analyze why later. This whole medieval/ancient/secret/occult/satanic bs, that’s exactly why the mainstream thinks we wear tinfoil hats, and maybe rightfully so
I get ya on that Hughsername.
I wince and grit my teeth when I see Mr. ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ inappropriately approach Mr. Norm Normie with this esoteric stuff. Mr. ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ knows full well that the topic is beyond the immediate reality of Norm. I consider that “malicious intent.” Mr. ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ lost his way…he is not trying to better conditions.
Mr. ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ needs a lesson in manners and appropriate conversations.
In my opinion, conversations on the “whole medieval/ancient/secret/occult/satanic” esoteric stuff are best be had on forums designed for them. …like this one.
…like this one? I hope not. But it’s the sabbatean frankists i tell ya, or is it the people’s front of Judea? Lizards, aliens? Really? Just when the conspiracy realist sphere seems to have agreed to not “believe” anything or anyone without solid proof, this bs starts again. Where’s the proof for any of it? Anybody can go look up some secret groups or organizations from the past or even aliens and pretend they’re ruling the world of today, there’s still no proof for any of it, and what does it matter anyway, as James, Larken, Griffin or Derrick point out, just to name those few. That’s also why i have my troubles with people like Passio, who’s surely on the right side when it comes to human freedom but who’s so much into the obscure that it’s painful to listen to.
Really, I hear ya. Personally, I demand solid hard-copy facts and thorough research. Some people don’t have those standards. As a group, we have a “Conspiracy Culture.”
EXAMPLE:
The 2016 Melbourne thunder asthma storms were an international incident.
However, on various threads and platforms, some people were making all kinds of geoengineering | chemtrail claims without solid evidence. It became a mob of loud voices concluding something with nothing of substance to support the conclusion. I remember. Because the asthma scenario was a somewhat unusual event, the void of the mystery was filled by conjecture…which was mind-folded as factual, when in fact, it was not factual.
I contend that the 2016 Melbourne thunder asthma storms resulted from the ergot of the Rye fields. I have solid evidence from a number of sources, plus I know the toxicity subject matter.
An ignored Headline:
Toxic mold is the deadly culprit that killed 8 people and sickened hundreds more in Australia’s asthma thunderstorm
Part of a thorough SUBTHREAD (but other threads exist)
https://corbettreport.com/weather-is-not-climate/#comment-34615
Ah yes, i remember reading your comments about that! Good example indeed.
Canard –
Definition – a false or unfounded report, rumor, belief or story. A fabricated report.
Probably one of the toughest things to find is something that is not there.
Hat tip to Derrick Broze…
A MYTH…
“Nazi Germany used Fluoride in the water to control people.”
QUEUED VIDEO
https://youtu.be/F60-cYVA9_A?t=1188
I can attest to Derrick Broze. I’ve spent countless hours (years) in the fluoride research space.
“…..Anybody can go look up some secret groups or organizations from the past or even aliens and pretend they’re ruling the world of today….”
Consider that
a) The Mafia is a legit secret society that has carried on for centuries- right down to weird initiation rituals
b) The zizzians and rationalists and other freaks like that have plenty of links to the Tech Bros and there are documented cults in Silicon Valley
c) There are a lot of documented satanic cults and murders you can read about in modern times – the satanic panic was mostly a media wash over of actual crimes that people ended in in jail for doing….everything from the Italian “beasts of satan” to the OTO and Scientology
Cults and conspiracy are not weird or odd, they are the basic operating procedure for a lot of what went on in history and goes on now.
great book is “children for the devil” by Tim tate
Hughsername
A good place to start learning about cults in conspiracy is anything by Prof Richard Spence, an actual historian, who has a ton of books and papers as well as the great podcast “strange as it seems” (also on YT and patreon)…..the fact that the normie thinks cults running stuff is crazy is just an example of them thinking what they are told to think.
the mainstream media thinks we wear tinfoil hats because they are paid to think that, while the mainstream person thinks it because they think what they are told is the popular thing to think.
The flip side are people who accept any BS idea without looking into the history- they are mostly just feral normies who wandered out of their pasture.
I used to think that you could wake the normie up, but as Mr Corbett said “you can’t wake up someone pretending to be asleep” …..the elites conception of the normie as grazing cattle is not incorrect- No human should care if a cow thinks he wears tinfoil underwear. If someone demands a cult free (or an All cult) version of history and how the world works then they just want their own beliefs ratified and validated which is exactly how such people are controlled
I think the “elite” are mainly groups of criminals who work together to keep things secret.
Like many mafia organizations.
But how are these criminal organizations so unified and stable?
While there are many wars, these criminals seem to fully support each other.
And the groups never seem to fight each other.
Unlike the drugs lords or war lords, who try to steal each other’s treasures.
And how are these criminals able to do all this harm to people without
any resistance from these people?
To explain this, people find answers in ancient or occult ideas.
As these ideas are about the manipulation of masses.
But are these ideas not part of the manipulation?
How can they do such harm without the people reacting? The psychological norm is to conform because that’s how for thousands of years people lived in society and grew food and stored it and distributed it….the ruling class was there to farm them and like a good farmer the needed to care for their possessions.
the environment has changed because we now have a ruling class that does not think it needs to protect its farm- because they gain their wealth via less obvious means. The feedback no longer restrains them while the people have their warning signals damped down and thus don’t react
I think it is far more complex.
I think that cult-like systems are the common way of rulers to unify the people
and have unity among themselves.
This cult system helps to justify the power of the rulers and contributions to those rulers.
Without the cult system the people tend to listen to the people they regard
smarter and wiser. Which is how many “primitive” tribes work.
But in the “civilized” world we have idiots who get popular,
because they (or someone else) paid people to write nice stuff about them.
And those idiots usually make decisions based on who pay the most.
Unless the blackmailer wants some other decision.
Zyxzven
yes, that’s a good may to describe how society regulates opinion- I don’t think there is much difference between why we listen to the tribal wise dude or the lab coated one though- the mechanism that makes us pay attention is the same it’s just that the system of society has changed so people can “hack” our normal and normally healthy impulse to take advice from our betters. With media they can short across the points to give us ideas that in ye olden dayes we would have rejected.
In a lot of ways the most evil genius of the la st century was Edward Bernayes who invented modern advertising…the techniques are not even new (he stole them from his uncle who may have stolen them from the Bavarian Illumati who DID steal them from the Jesuit’s who probably got them from somewhere…..industrial society makes it so they can hack those trust systems and we don’t get instant feedback when it’s evil or stupid advice.
Kinda reminds me of those experiments where you pull an animal brain apart and stimulate bits of it, though right now society reminds me of a dying chicken doing its flap dance or a rat doing the helicopter with its tail when you pop it in the head
My take is the NCS, during JE Hoover’s time, relied more and more on the Kievan Mob as muscle at the same time as the Kievans took down Stalin and control of the USSR. Using the wealth of the Soviet Block they became unstoppable in the US. Lazar Kaganovich’s nephew and Godson born Mikhail Kaganovich was laundered through Athens University and became Donald Kagan. This granted him access to the US through Berkley and Yale and subsequently West Point. He also became head of the Ukrainian Brooklyn Mob. A role his two sons Robert and Frederick now share. The Kaganovich/Kagan bloodline is dynastic.
Everyone now at the top of US empire now answers to the Kievans such as Netanyahu, Nuland, Bessent. Other bloodlines such as the Rothschilds, Rockefellers etc have essentially been outplayed by what was the hired guns. They wanted a kind of aristocratic order. The Kievans are just thugs with no need of finery or high culture. That’s why things are so bad.
I don’t think this question can be answered using purely rationalistic thought processes as it touches on the spiritual realm. The Orthodox Christian worldview I think is internally consistent and historically coherent. God made both angels and humans with free will. Satan rebelled and was given temporary dominion over the earth. God uses evil as a pedagogical system based on His secondary will (i.e. not His primary will given that people have free choice). In John Chapter 8, Jesus calls the Scribes, the Pharisees, and the Elders “children of the devil”, i.e. Satanists. Freemasonry is ultimately Kabbalistic and this is revealed in the higher degrees. Freemasonry has the objective to rebuild the temple and install a global ruler over all nations. There are variations on a theme but this is the religious worldview that binds the global elite together. There may be competing factions within this set, but they are all unified in their religious worldview and their hated of Christianity. If they did not all agree on the basic religious doctrine then the infighting would be far more visible and easier to decode. The fact is there is religious and political continuity thought the centuries and millennia is testament to this. No need to introduce aliens, reptilians etc.
The solution: Read the Holy Scriptures and visit an Orthodox Church.
My take: secret societies acted as the original globalist orgs. A way to organise power outside of the statse, rulers and the church.
Now that machinery is broadly visible, secret societies are no longer needed. Now we have a huge decentralised mesh of elite institutions, forums, NGOs, etc attended by people with a terrible case of groupthink. It’s less secret societies and more a powerpointocracy, Bland and easily overlooked.
The decentralisation is the key feature – they have no central command that could be attacked. Soft-power influence and true believers instead of brittle, binding policies.
The decentralised elite networks’ impetus is to centralise control for the rest of us, and I think that’s the clue. We should form our own decentralised networks and parallel solutions that are inherently resistant to centralisation.
Part 1: – Well, you have inspired me James (once again). I am planning on exploring these topics further. I couldn’t agree more with what you said in the clip used by Derrick:
“The question “Who is at the top of the pyramid?” is the the wrong question because I don’t think this is about individuals. Of course there are individuals in positions of power. [. . .] But it is not the people who are really the top of the pyramid. What is at the top of the pyramid, fundamentally, is an ideology. It is the ideology of the centralisation of control in the hands of a few powerful people. [. . .] Once we frame the question in the proper way, rather than who is at the top of pyramid, what is at the top of the pyramid, I think we can arrive at an answer better to solve this problem. Because if the question is “who” is at the top of the pyramid, and we identify the individual names of the individual people who are in certain positions of power, then, the obvious logic of the situation is, well, we get rid of those people. [. . .] Everything will be better because the top of the pyramid has been removed.”
“But, in reality, [. . .] if you removed those particular individuals from their particular positions of power, there would be a million people trying to jump into those positions as quickly as possile to take that ppwer for themselves. Because they believe in centralised authority. They believe in the idea that a few people should be ruling over, managing, stewarding the masses. So, fundamentally, what we’re against is that idea and if we can deliegitimise the idea in the minds of the people, then, it does not matter who is sitting in those positions of power because power will not exist, will not function in a society where people do not recognise the legitimacy of that power.”
I have looked into power structures for many years. I have considered the Committee of 300, the Black Nobs, the Jesuits, the society of the elect, the Crown, etc., and more. The problem I encounter is that historical claims frequently lack verifiable evidence. This isn’t to refute the evidence offered, only to observe that the further I go back in time the less able I am to verify it. I feel the more I look the less I know “who” is in charge but the more I think I understand about “what” is in charge. All I know, for certain, is that powerful individuals preside over a system which serves them—oligarchs exist.
Consequently, I have tended to focus on systems of power which operate through mechanisms I believe I can verify. I have suggested the Global Public-Private Partenership (G3P) as the system I think is observably in operation today. Not so much a person or a group, but rather an oligarch-led network which converts global policy agendas into the laws and regulations that actually impact our lives.
https://iaindavis.com/what-is-the-global-public-private-partnership/
Part 2: – I think, within it, there are many competing interest groups and power struggles. There is, however, evidently shared agreement on the direction of travel. All G3P institutions and aligned individuals want to install Tehnocracy and subject populations to the so-called digital transformation that will enable technocratic rule. I suggest the Agentic State is imminent. But, as you rightly observed, regardless of their animosities and their squabbles, the oligarch serving G3P network share the fundamental ideology of centralised control. For want of a better term, let’s call the members of the G3P network “uber-statists.”
In thinking of solutions, the problem I foresee is that the uber-statists propaganda, spanning over centuries, has worked. The vast majority of the world’s population genuinely believe that obedience to authority is essential. For many, obedience has become a virtue. These “statists” cannot imagine how the world could possibly function unless they obey the uber-statists. They have accepted the lie that a society without rulers is a society without rules. That anarchy is chaos and that spontaneous order doesn’t exist.
For those of us who know this is not the case, how, then, do we address this issue? Parallel societies have existed before, many still do, but these are enclaves tolerated by the statist, and often, eventually not tolerated. The statists obedience extends to following orders to kill. This has always been a massive problem for any breakaway or anarchist society. Even the Black Army was defeated.
So, to your questions:
Part 3: –
1. What should people do?
This depends on the objective. If it is just to survive outside of digital enslavement then obviously we need to construct parallel societies and try to live as indepnedently from the state as possible. The means that we accept that the statists are lost and we abandon them to their fate. The problem I have with this is that many of the people I love are statists. I don’t think I can just stand by and watch them sink into technological slavery. I have, therefore, thought about a possible wider solution that I call Voluntary Democracy.
https://iaindavis.com/?s=Voluntary+Democracy
Democracy is not “representative democracy.” That the two are falsely equated is another uber-statist deception. Democracy simply means governance under the rule of law. The original demokratia was a system of executive, legislature, and judiciary where all three branches of government were filled, on a temporary basis, by a random sortition of the people. Cricially, the courts (the Dikesteria) were the highest law of the land. They were completely jury controlled and the jury’s only consideration was the restoration of justice. Any jury, anywhere in the jurusdiction, could annul any and all legislation whenever it was found wanting in a jury led trial.
I hasten to add that I am by no means saying that Voluntary Democracy is “the” solution. I am certain there are many things I have overlooked, many questions I haven’t considered and problems I haven’t even started to address, let alone resolve. Voluntary Democracy is just my suggested starting point for a conversation about a new kind of social structure. It just happens to be based on a very old idea—“demokratia.”
Part 4:
2. How does this solve the problem?
With Voluntary Democracy, for statists, the wheel does not have to be reinvented. They still have their separation of powers and a system of governance.
For voluntaryists, the rule of law would protect their inalianeble rights. In such a system, legislation would be a much slower and a far more deliberative process. As any legislation can be annulled at any time if any jury finds any aspect of it unjust, justice would be served far more readily. Essentially, legislation and regulation would only exist to address larger scale social problems.
Voluntary Democracy wouldn’t be perfect, there’s no such thing as Utopia. There are issues like infrastructure development, perhaps requiring compulsory purchase, that would still need to be carefully considered. But if justice and genuine equality under the rule of law is the prevailing social imperative, I suggest both statists and voluntaryists could potentially live in peace, side-by-side. This would necessitate the contruction of a completely new value system, the acceptance of individual sovereignty and individual reponsibility, but it could be done. Maybe over a generation or two. The abiding principle would be absolute equality inder the rule of law.
For oligarchs, Voluntary Democracy would be completely useless. With all three branches of governance (let’s call it a jurisdiction) filled through a random sortition of the people, who only serve on a temporary basis before returning to their normal lives, oligarchs would have no group of “politicians” to corrupt. They could not use legislation or regulation to get what they want. Lobbying would be pointless in any event, because injustice would immediately be annulled by a jury sitting in a court somewhere in the jurisdiction.
Anyway, I am still working on it, but my suggestion is Voluntary Democracy.
Ian
Your ideas are interesting but are not going to work outside of a small Polis where most people know most people and folks can not avoid pain if they make stupid decisions…..in the modern world you simply can not run a complex business if you can not predict what the laws and situation will be like in the immediate future.
”….Democracy simply means governance under the rule of law. …”
The meaning of “rule of law” kinda goes away when you can have the assembly ostracize or execute someone because a good speaker convinced them to vote to do so. The Athenian assembly was mostly retatded and did stuff like that a lot.
“…..The original demokratia was a system of executive, legislature, and judiciary where all three branches of government were filled, on a temporary basis, by a random sortition of the people. Cricially, the courts (the Dikesteria) were the highest law of the land. They were completely jury controlled and the jury’s only consideration was the restoration of justice. Any jury, anywhere in the jurusdiction, could annul any and all legislation whenever it was found wanting in a jury led trial. ….”
That kinda removes “rule of law” if the law can be annulled by some random dudes “because” …. Jury nullification is kinda the same thing but without the extra problems. Jury decisions that a particular white guy seen killing a particular black guy didn’t actually do it were quite common back in the day and the Clancy trial is (whichever way you feel) another example of nullification- BUT on a case by case basis there is little lasting harm to rule of law as an idea.
The Romans had a much better system that lasted for longer where the people who had more of a stake (as fighters and by paying for stuff) in the state had most of the power- THAT system is also not great in a world with tech power ton inflict will upon the people
Thank’s Duck, I am not suggesting that people should be unclear about the Law. In a Voluntary Democracy (VolDem) it would be unlawful to comit murder, assault, rape, theft, trespass, coercion, and deception. Everyone would be clear on this. All would understand objective morality in a VolDem.
The “Rule of Law” would not be decreed by human beings in a VolDem. It would be based upon Natural Law justice judged and restored by the people in jury-led trials.
If legislation (which is not Law) is found to be unjust by a jury it would be annulled. But what is the purpose of unjust legislation? Roman Law consolidated power in the hands of an oligarchy. It was, and in its modern form is, no kind of justice system at all.
In a VolDem everyone would have an equal stake in maintaining justice.
Ian
“…In a Voluntary Democracy (VolDem) it would be unlawful to comit murder, assault, rape, theft, trespass, coercion, and deception. Everyone would be clear on this. All would understand objective morality in a VolDem. …”
Thats the heart of the problem you need to solve
The place where everyone understands (and follows) objective morality is a place that would not require law or government…. thats why government and law will be with us forever IMO. – we do not generally need to make laws to stop people doing things they do not want to do, every bad thing we make a law against is made because doing that thing is attractive……in a small Polis VolDem can work but it can not work when you get too far above Dunbars number and its harder to enforce social punishments (which is what law replaces, after all)
I will say that this is the difference between constrained and unconstrained views of humanity….and it does not appear that we can be perfected by marxists or other utopians which is probably for the best 🙂 If we ever get perfected then we wont be humans anymore, we would be products of other peoples will
Duck,
You wrote:
“The place where everyone understands (and follows) objective morality is a place that would not require law or government”
Yes, I agree. If such a Utopia existed we would not need any kind of process to deal with those who cannot live honoroubly, that is, they live by objective morality. Alas, we do not live in Utopia nor are we likely to ever live in one.
You add:
“. . . thats why government and law will be with us forever IMO.”
This is a non sequitur in my view. It assumes that government’s do something to protect those who live honourably. It also assumes that only government can provide such protection, and further, that the intended purpose of government “law”–which is legislation and not law–is to provide said protection.
None of those assumptions hold in my view. Therefore, I have suggested VolDem precisely because some people will commit objectively immoral acts. But, through a system of real democracy, which has nothing to do with governments or states, we, the people, can manage society (a VolDem jusrisdiction) ourselves without relying on any third party authority.
Ian
Your understanding of society is IMO flawed, because you are operating on a moral frame work rather then a mechanical / economic view of how things ACTUALLY work.
You have no natural rights UNLESS you can defend them- and your fk’d if you try to defend them without help from others….tjays where moralistic thinking is needed,so your all on the same page
”…..This is a non sequitur in my view. It assumes that government’s do something to protect those who live honourably…..”
NO – “honorable behavior” is a moral term and power does not operate in terms of morality. Governance only operates in terms of honor and morality IN SO FAR as the people they rule are able and will to make them do so.
“…. It also assumes that only government can provide such protection,….”
well, NO and YES…..If the village gets fed up with you raping kids and stealing goats and decides to lynch you they don’t need a formal “government” but they ARE acting as a group to do the same things. They, like any mob or group, will have people they listen to who guide their actions and such people basically ARE the government.
Ideally yo ur leaders have the same moral framework as you.
Now you could also run things like the Vikings did and have feuds and honor killings and such like – they regulated such behavior somewhat with law but everyone understood that if you were too weak to defend them you had no rights
“…..and further, that the intended purpose of government “law”–which is legislation and not law–is to provide said protection….”
NO, the main purpose for which governments form is to extract wealth and productivity from the people – “farming” them. THe bandits decided to settle down and farm folks rather then just raid them.
Regulation of violence is a by product of what’s good for the king.
Ian, I agree with a lot of what you say and parallel societies are something that everyone should consider as a means of survival with an ever more totalitarian government. However, it seems to me you’re trying to “bootstrap” a governance structure from purely libertarian-type principles which causes some issues:
“The vast majority of the world’s population genuinely believe that obedience to authority is essential.”
I would argue that authority is essential for any civil society. A trivial example of a children submitting to the authority of their parents illustrates this point. Authority is a natural phenomenon. The question is: what are the limits of such authority in terms of morality and scale. In my view, you need a religious framework to answer both questions. They can’t be derived from purely logical or pragmatic first principles.
“The original demokratia was a system of executive, legislature, and judiciary where all three branches of government were filled, on a temporary basis, by a random sortition of the people. Cricially, the courts (the Dikesteria) were the highest law of the land.”
Plato and Thucydides were highly critical of democracy. While not exactly their view, I consider most forms of it to be basically a giant scam. The masses lack knowledge and will succumb to the issues associated with principal-agent problem. For practical reasons the “mysteries of state” (state secrets, diplomacy, intelligence operations, military plans) can only be known by a small group of people. It’s not clear how Voluntary Democracy addresses these issues.
“For voluntaryists, the rule of law would protect their inalienable rights.”
Human rights are a freemasonic invention coming out of the French Revolution as The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (1789). It is a total inversion of the natural/divine system of law. Rights, by definition, have to be granted by some higher power, whether that is explicitly stated or not. The law was traditionally set out as *specific prohibitions*, not wholesale inalienable rights, which will inevitably conflict with one another.
In conclusion, I think some form of parallel society or voluntarism could be a temporary solution if we are being persecuted, so I’m not pooh-poohing your suggestions, but I think that systems that deny the legitimacy of all state authority, rely on democratic mechanisms for existential state policy direction, and promote “rights” in lieu of are going to be unusable.
Well stated. It’s an old switcharoo, replace “freedoms” with “rights”, imbue it with some “security” et voila here we are.
Finally a member of the poultry family on the Corbet Report with whom I can relate.
😉 That last line brings a wide grin.
Thanks yet again Derrick; absolutely, human rights are behavioural permits, and no rights at all.That is why I said “inailienable rights.”
An inalienable right is the right to do something that is morally right and not morally “wrong,” i.e., any act that is not murder, assault, rape, theft, trespass, coercion, or deception. Inalienable rights are the only rights that exist, that is what I mean by “rights.” There is no conflict.
Rights exist in nature, if maintained they are the foundation of peace in the world, as long as they are not infringed by any other, we remain at peace. You could say they are granted by a higher power because they are not determined by human beings.
All humans are born with equal inalieanble rights because all human being exist in nature (imho) and, crucially, all humans are capable of determining what objective morality and consequently justice, implies.
Ian
”….Rights exist in nature, if maintained they are the foundation of peace in the world, as long as they are not infringed by any other, we remain at peace. You could say they are granted by a higher power because they are not determined by human beings…..”
While I also believe this for religious reasons I must ask how something that HAS NOT PHYSICAL POWER OR EFFECT in the world exists?
If someone violates your rights does the universe step in to stop them?
If not then you are (like me) taking a religious POV – though since I believe that unlimited violence will rain down from a just and all powerful God even that could be argued as violence and power being the only source of “rights “
So in THIS world (and some would argue in the next) “Rights” only exist as a shadow of the ability to inflict violence
Thanks Duck, no need to SHOUT, I hear you and again you ask good questions.
Of course inalienable rights have physical power and effect.
Inalienable (or unalienable) rights are the evident basis for all human interactions and certainly the basis for all human societies. That’s why we generally consider murder, assault, rape, theft, trespass, coercion and deception to be morally “wrong.” They are not acts that anyone has the “right” to commit.
The woolly ones are coercion and deception, I guess, but they’re not woolly at all if we mean to deliberately coerce or deceive at the expense of infringing someone else’s inalienable rights.
The universe is effectively amoral but the laws of nature are in equilibrium. Every action (natural event) elicits an equal and opposite reaction in some form. This is inevitable, not moral. Therefore the universe teaches us the consequences of our actions. But we are social creatures with free will able to discern what we call morality–social equilibrium.
As we require respect for all inalienable rights to be maintained, in order to live in peace, objective morality obeys the same universal law of equilibrium. This is not surprising. It is a fundamental law of nature and we are natural beings who live in social groups. All animals have to obey the same universal laws (there is no choice) in order to live and to maintain social constructs.
But we are one of the few animals that can understand this Natural Law and and we have consequently developed systems–morality and law for example–in order to put them into a formal social and systematic framework.
Violence is not the source of inalienable rights. Indeed the initiation of force requires a response precisely because such violence breaks the Natural Law of equilibrium and, understanding objective morality, we know that justice (equilibrium) must be restored.
I think word “right” is dangerous in this context as it implies that something has been bestowed upon as and as such it can be taken away. By holier than thou, of course.
Word “freedom” is a lot better, sturdier and more accurate. Same purpose but an iron clad word. “Natural freedoms”, in comparison, sounds like you came to a knife fight with a death star in the orbit backing you up.
The reading of “inalienable” I prefer goes something like “not something anyone can put a lien against”.
I would not say that we have developed morality, we have merely discovered it. Just like we have discovered Natural laws or simply the Law. And then we have allowed useful idiots to impose their laws on us.
There is also a big difference between violence and force. The former is nothing but unjust, unlawful, immoral application of the latter.
Ian
Sorry about shouting- I had my glasses off so couldn’t read myself 😉
The critique of you POV is
1) “…But we are one of the few animals that can understand this Natural Law…”
thus it’s not a “law”, but a preference. I can not break the law of gravity, and you yourself call morals “social constructs” that must be maintained.
A CONSTRUCT is made, not inevitable.
2) ”…..Inalienable (or unalienable) rights are the evident basis for all human interactions and certainly the basis for all human societies….”
Then how come so many people lived in slavery or got murdered for their stuff?
“….That’s why we generally consider murder, assault, rape, theft, trespass, coercion and deception to be morally “wrong.”…”
Read some Bronze Age history-Achilles certainly did not agree with you.
“..They are not acts that anyone has the “right” to commit..”
Not to PEOPLE- but beating disobedient slaves or wives was always fine.
You are projecting CHRISTIAN morality backwards in time where it never existed (Roman’s raped slaves and left babies on the roadside and Vikings loved doing the blood eagle..)
Morality is only a law when God spanks you for breaking it. ALL law is only law when you are punished for breaking it
Ian
addendum
The issue is that you are assuming the equilibrium is the aim of the universe, the universe only has an aim if it’s imposed from outside – you can’t create a moral system yourself that’s objectively “true” because it’s self referential and not binding
The universe without God is meaningless and you cat create meaning from within it….as CS Lewis writes when you see thru everything you are blind because you see nothing- that’s why the end point of atheism is nilhism and death
Thanks again Derrick, Demokratia (governance under the Rule of Law) is not “representative democracy” which is what Plato, Aristotle, and Thucydides criticised. There would be no political or democratic “leaders” in a VolDem.
Obedience to authority is pernicious and far from essential. Nothing in human history has ever caused as much destruction, pain, and misery as obedeince to authority. What’s worse, is that it is nothing but a manufactured belief system and one we live without nearly all of the time. We don’t buy goods from someone because we obey their authority. We might choose to accept authority, but only on a contractual basis – – I agree to do what my Doctor tells me.
In a VolDem the people would view universal obedience to authority as morally reprehensible. No one could afford to accept a “mass lack of knowledge” in a VolDem. Without any ruling “authority,” every individual would be equally reponsible for every aspect of VolDem society.
“In a VolDem the people would view universal obedience to authority as morally reprehensible.”
How would the “mysteries of state” be administered? There will arise some situation where secret plans are necessary i.e. defensive strategies if the VolDem is attacked.
If by universal you mean unlimited political compliance then I agree that everyone has to balance political directives with morality.
Then again, doesn’t maintenance of inalienble rights require some type of universal obedience?
There would be no “state” in a VolDem, only voluntary jurisdictions. This is not a trite point. The question is how would people live without the assumed protection and benevolence of a state?
Crucially people would need to think, not like statists, but as voluntaryists who reject the initiation of any force or coercion. They would also have to accept that reponsibility for everything begins and ends with them as sovereign individuals. This is not what statists believe, it is completely at odds with nearly everything statists believe.
But all it requires is a new belief system, and they change constantly.
If people live honoroubly and live objectively moral lives, everyones inalianble right will automatically be observed. The only “obedience” people will need is to refrain from objectively immoral acts.
As we’ve already discussed, this will be beyond the capacity of some who will continue to comit objectively immoral acts. In so doing, by definition, they will infringe someones inalienable rights. Therefore, in a VolDem, justice must be restored through a jury led trial.
Hi James, hi members,
i once came across this world hierachy Pyramid..what do you think?
https://dsmp.io/product/world-hierarchy-pyramid-poster-bulk2/
Best B.
Not for me. But it might be fun to be able to read the upper tiers without forking over $40-$65.
You will make all kinds of enemies promoting this pop-art version of conspiracy theory. Not the least of which are those who love Satan so much that they put him at the very top. The poster puts many hard to read words above him.
~~~ Conspiracy Culture ~~~
Anyone who has been in the space for a while knows that there is a “Conspiracy Culture.”
It starts when after discovering a conspiracy reality, the individual goes down the rabbit hole.
Just like the all-caps thumbnail in the following James Corbett video, eventually the ‘Conspiracy Realist’ concludes “EVERYTHING YOU KNOW IS A LIE.”
There is no manual or rulebook in the “Conspiracy Culture.”
You can have solid, hard-copy receipts or not.
You can quote someone’s fish story or make-up your own.
You can put speculations and facts in a blender and swallow a conspiracy smoothie.
James Corbett probably has an aerial view of this “Conspiracy Culture.”
Twenty years of reading countless comments and endless emails makes for a bird’s eye view in my book.
My bet is that Corbett has a pretty good read on “Conspiracy Culture.”
I am uncertain but oscillate between “nobody” and “something too large (or small) to observe” is at the top. I will briefly lay out my case for each.
For nobody:
In my understanding, the field of biology points out an important fact. We are all creatures eating. Creatures work together to eat and so groups of creatures that work together can collectively compete with other individuals or groups for food. Thus it seems to follow logically that any entity at the top is just that, a group of people eating. So then no single person is truly at the top, and the group seems to have grown smaller as power becomes more centralized. Such groups of individuals likely have their tentacles in all major organizations that provide them access to the levers of power. So it may be that one group is at the top, or some network of groups, but I feel it is best to say no single person or group is at the top yet on some strata some network of groups seems logical to presume as the top strata.
But I go further than that in my thinking. There appear to be changes foisted on humanity that take many generations to play out. Humans are more narrow in their goals. While they seek to ensure the survivability of their offspring they tend to do that by maintaining power structures, keeping their place within those, and acquiring vast wealth and resources. They likely do not actively seek to condition humanity in large ways, except perhaps in the acceptance of the power structure generally. Yet there are very specific changes happening to humanity across generations that do not fit in that scope, perhaps (uncertainty here). The most glaring example is Gene Drives. In a world where it is possible posthumans (or angels/demons/gods) condition the rest of humanity to become like them, gene drives are very concerning.
So then I arrive at considering the prospect that some other entity is affecting humanity and ensuring the power structure exists and used that to ensure its plans are carried out (possibly in a cycle). If true, then either that entity is our creator (or first cause), or perhaps it is some anti-creator force. Perhaps both the creator and anti-creator use the same technology to affect us in different ways. Perhaps one to control, and the other to liberate. This is venturing so deep that we’ve lost control of the variable long ago, but let’s continue this series of deduction to get to the point of what to do about it.
What To Do:
Seek truth, and always tell the truth no matter how difficult it is. Never hide but live in the light of the sun, moon, and stars (or if in total darkness make your own light from within). The light here is of course the truth, which comes in the form of words spoken or writ.
In time the truth shall set you free, or at least I believe this and have seen it happen many times if partly.
In attaining true freedom it will be clear what you should do.
What are gene drives? Is that events where Sydney Sweeney sells lots of pants?
Perhaps, maybe, you are definitely on to something. Possibly…
I think he means the genetic drives we possess- as CS Lewis said in abolition of man people who have the power to reshape humanity kinda step outside it and human morals and thus have no solid guide except their appetites and base desires – the genetic drives
Thanks,
I needed a translator. I hope he concurs.
I found his post non-committal and confusing.
But this is a good place to express speculations I suppose. Even if they are unsupported to my personal satisfaction.
Josh
”…..In my understanding, the field of biology points out an important fact. We are all creatures eating. Creatures work together to eat and so groups of creatures that work together can collectively compete with other individuals or groups for food…..”
Good point
That makes sense of how (for folks who don’t believe in spiritual stuff or even conspiracy) you always see the same pattern emerging because each unit in ten system is eating and doing its thing and the same structures and systems always come up.
ants and termites don’t have a plan but they execute very complex group behaviors and will build big structures without any cabal of Techno ants PLOTTING or designing the nest
That podcast clarified a ton of stuff for me. Thank you. I’ve been running down the legal path behind all of this with Embassy of Light, Liberty Dialogues, and InPowerMovement.org as fast as I can go (w/all the other stuff going on here)…
First came the history that I was NEVER taught in Baltimore Public Schools:
Dr. Eugene Schroder War And Emergency Powers Special Report (1994)
https://archive.org/details/dr.eugeneschroderwarandemergencypowersspecialreport1994
1791 – 1811 First US “Central” Bank. Introduced volatility, inflation and currency crashes $.
1930 BIS Created to Move National Assets
1812 – 1815 The War of 1812 Trashes US Economy when the UK blocked all ocean shipping.
1816 – 1841 Second US “Central” Bank. Bankrupted the government again.
1819 – 1821 Panic of 1819, First Nationwide $ Monetary Collapse
1868 14th Amendment Reclassified all People Living within the borders of the USA as “American Citizens” subject to federal law first and foremost, over State law.
1871 DC Organic Act – Corporatized USA; Confused Role of Congress. This was done on the request of the Rothschild Family in the City of London when the uS government approached them for a bail out.
1893 Panic of 1893 1961 USAID Created-Foreign Assistance Act
1904 Trust Busting Begins in USA
1907 Morgan Orchestrated $ Financial Crash
1913 Fraudulent Fed – 3rd Central Bank
1914 – 1918 WWI – Oligarchs/Central Bank Orchestrated w/False Flag Creation
1917 TWEA – Future Legal Framework to Reverse
1919 Intl Labor Union Created – Wobblies
1929 Bank Orchestrated NYSE Stock Market Crash
1930 Fraudulent “Federal” Reserve Restricts Global Money Supply to Create The Great Depression.
1933 EBRA – FDR Reverses Citizen Status in TWEA to Enemies of the State & Chattel/Collateral for USA, Inc’s debt; Introduced Debt Notes instead of gold and silver backed notes; Corporatized All Countries.
1939 – 1945 WWII – Oligarchs/Central Bank Orchestrated w/False Flag to Force US Involvement
1941 Agency Dept. Consolidation/OSS Created for Oligarchs Kids to Ride Out WWII; Pearl Harbor false flag
1947 OSS Evolves into the CIA w/Natl Security Act, and bankers/corporate leaders get their own spyshop.
1953 – Present MK Ultra Mind Control Experimentation Program Begins… See: Operation Paperclip.
“A Century of Enslavement” prepared me for a LOT of this. Whenever some fact was presented as having been done by a specific act and there was a document that made it so, I went back to the original document and verified that, yes, it really did say that and here is where it says it. I made sure that if challenged, I could show people what the docs said. Example: The DC Organic Act of 1871, which corporatized the United States of America with it’s capitol in The City of Washington, to become THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Implied INC.) headquartered in the District of Columbia. The offending language is right in the beginning of the Act.
WHAT ARE U REALLY WORTH? Remember that whole urban legend about our Birth Certificate making us a “straw man” and collateral for the US debt? After you learn some of that history timeline I posted, you can go see how much our corporate, central bank-controlled country values your “straw man” AND it’s assets (car, home, etc.) and what they are actually worth. Your value will be in a tradeable fund, listed on the NYSE:
CUSIP.COM – CUSIP Lookup and Bond Yields
Log in – Fidelity Investments fixed income.fidelity.com/ftgw/fi/FIServiceSolution?sid=4 en.
http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/CUSIP
“Pronounced “Q-sip,” CUSIP is an acronym for the Committee on Uniform Security Identification Procedures, which oversees the entire CUSIP system. Just like the stock symbols assigned to the shares of a publicly traded company, a CUSIP number is a unique…
CUSIPs are 9-character identifiers that capture an issue’s important differentiating characteristics for issuers and their financial instruments in the U.S. Look up over 100,000 new issue or secondary bonds, bond funds, and CDs by CUSIP with Fidelity’s easy to use tool.”
**First you will need your SSN or the number on your Birth Certificate Security. At birth, we were entered into a unilateral sealed contract by the Federal Reserve Bank (through the overlay of the Corporate entity calling itself THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (IMPLIED INC). [For details, just read the DC Organic Act of 1871. It’s right there in the first couple of paragraphs].
Sealed Unilateral Contracts are abhorrent in the judicial / legal ethics system. They are considered borderline unlawful, because the participants on one side of the contract (our parents) have no idea that a legal condition has been imposed upon them, and their assets (children, homes, all possessions). If they were born after 1933, the same thing happened to their parents.
**Second, you will need a CUSIP member broker to do the looking up part. They charge around $200 and you have to find them. Hopefully, they won’t report to the Mossad or CIA who really don’t want us to find this shit out.
That’s right, we the people AND our assets are considered securitized collateral for present and future debts of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (IMPLIED INC). From the moment I first heard about this in 2010, I thought the whole “Birth Certificate / Straw Man” thing was an urban legend. It isn’t.
You and I, and our assets, are being traded, with no remuneration to ourselves for the Federal Reserve Central Bank’s privilege of doing so on behalf of USA, INC. And, when we die, we have a liquidated value too. Right now, during the Global Financial Elites “Great Culling” – we are worth more to our government’s central bank ledger as dead and liquidated people. [Note: Do learn about the zionist-controlled Bank for International Settlements and it’s deep connections to the Rothschilds, Israel, zionism and Satanism. This is why we are in a Spiritual Battle. If you want to hear a description of the global system that is now in place and operating:
Monsieur Jellen (an attorney who speaks Latin), interviews Cal Washington in Grand Cafe Moai, Maasmechelen, Belgium July 17, 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=K0SZBRCDIxs
**Important Note: If/when you find it, do not try to do anything with the value of that security. It is not yours. It is a legal/financial characteristic of what it means to be you, born and living in the USA, Inc. under a zionist-controlled global central banking system. It is NOT your money and you cannot “cash it out.” You and your assets are a product that has been securitized by our corporate country. We are being traded, or liquidated, for profit to satisfy the debts of USA, INC on the global ledger maintained by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
Thank you 60Giga for this post. Relevant in the extreme. I tried to find an odysee link instead of youtube and came up with this – https://odysee.com/@lancewdetrick:b/IA—Here-for-the-Truth—Cal-Washington—The-Hidden-Industry-Behind-Law—Power:e
The Cal Washington interview led me here – https://www.inpowermovement.org/about
A way out of the Matrix.
Who’s At the Top?Whahahaha, It is ME!
The shadow government and 9/11 criminals
These are the people who start wars and terrorize nations
Levin Ship on:
Shadow Government exposed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in3HomAu1A4
Short Update:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3dxrq9N85E
9/11 Conspiracy solved: Names, Connections, Details exposed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_fp5kaVYhk
Who or what controls the psychopaths?
And what creates the mass hypnosis?
I think it is not just about information and words.
Religious version: Gnosis
The real God is Monad and not the false god of the religions
Additionally there are “fallen angels” who manipulate people.
(MorgueOfficial about Why Monad is too dangerous to teach)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOLoW9tTIac
(Prof Jang on Plato’s Monad)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDt4xnjahnw
Spiritual – I see dead people
What do people see when they can see beyond the veils?
And why are we soo afraid of them?
The spritist view of mental disorders
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZygmyeirBpE
Healing people from psychiatric problems
[I do this too]
Almost any horror movie depicts manipulations by spirits.
Branded (2012) movie about how mass manipulation is caused by spirits.
Small Clip – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2NYtN_RAio
Full movie still on youtube.
[I can see “stuff” around people, manipulating them]
[The “stuff” includes very powerful spirits]
Near death experience – Everything we think about the future is backwards
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmviKRfJ8vI
Every near death experience brings us back to personal responsibility.
And how each of our personal lives are important.
[I never had NDE, but have similar experiences during meditations]
I think that the spiritual / gnosis aspect is interesting.
Because it gives us insight how masses of people are manipulated,
including the people we consider evil.
Instead of victim hood, it promotes self-responsibility.
Great question to ask and then attempt to answer with some input from others that have studied the question “Who’s at the top?”
My short answer, at least for those that employ evil, would be Satan is at the top of the pyramid of Evil.
Perhaps there are other pyramids that focus on something other than evil and yet form a cult of sorts with some “Intentions” of doing good. Yep, from my point of view, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
We have those misguided minions that seem to have actually been taken in by the idea that the “End Justifies the Means” and thus are capable of rationalizing any kind of crime including genocide. Heads of Government ,or the pawns that are put there, always seem to be rationalizing why they seek power over others.
Anyway, it seems to me that there was a lot of evil in the world prior to Jesus Christ coming into it over 2000 years ago, and he addressed what to do about it better than anyone. Thus his disciples changed the world for the better. It is not that evil will ever be completely defeated in this world, but it can be forced back into the shadows where it has far less power.
No one gets out of this world alive. It’s where our spirit goes from here that is the real question, and I believe that the truth is the way to a better world here, and hereafter.
If anyone is interested in looking at my article in relation to this question, I’d love to contribute:
“The Apex of the Pyramid Revealed: The Definitive Forensic Answer to “Who Are ‘They’? and How to Defeat Them”
https://evolutionaryacts.substack.com/p/the-apex-of-the-pyramid-revealed
James, I think there may be a layer missing from the question “Who is at the top?”
Perhaps the first question should be: what is the top not allowed to do to a human being — regardless of economic benefit, political stability, military necessity or technological efficiency?
If we genuinely want to change systems of power worldwide, fundamental rights cannot remain values that are weighed against utility whenever those in power decide that circumstances require it. Human dignity, bodily integrity, freedom of thought and speech, freedom of conscience and fundamental rights have to become non-negotiable constraints on power itself.
And this is precisely why I believe the Kingdom of the Netherlands deserves far more international investigation than it receives.
Do not look at the Netherlands merely through the international image of a small European democracy. The Netherlands is a constitutional kingdom with a representative democracy within a hereditary constitutional monarchy. And before examining what that representation does with power, we should examine who has genuinely equal access to becoming that representation in the first place.
The Dutch electoral system does not give established and new political movements the same starting position.
A new party — or one that failed to obtain a seat at the previous election — must satisfy additional requirements to gain ballot access, including supporting declarations and an electoral deposit. Parties already represented in Parliament are exempt from these requirements.
But the inequality does not stop at ballot access.
There is also public financing and access to political broadcasting.
Under the Dutch Political Parties Financing Act, qualifying parties already represented in Parliament can receive structural public funding. Part of that funding is calculated according to the number of parliamentary seats the party already holds. The money may explicitly be used for information activities, recruitment and election campaigns.
So previous electoral success helps determine the public resources available for the next political contest.
Established parliamentary parties can also receive regular political broadcasting time on the national public broadcasting system. During election periods additional political broadcasting time is made available to parties participating sufficiently nationwide, including qualifying new parties. That distinction matters: the election-period broadcasting provision gives newcomers some access, but it does not erase the broader structural difference in resources and continuous public visibility.
Look at the complete picture.
….
Look at the complete picture.
A new political movement has to finance and organise its attempt to obtain representation, satisfy requirements from which parliamentary parties are exempt, build public recognition and compete against organisations that may already receive public money — partly determined by the seats they already possess — which may legally be spent on information and election campaigning.
Who gets funded affects who has the resources to be heard. And who can be heard affects what choices the electorate is realistically able to encounter.
That is why equality at the ballot box is not the same thing as equal access to political representation.
In a genuinely representative system, there is therefore another fundamental question:
Shouldn’t the voter have equal access to competing political alternatives, while those alternatives have genuinely equal opportunity to reach the voter?
The democratic question begins long before a voter enters a polling station.
Then examine what happens after that representative system has produced legislation.
Article 120 of the Dutch Constitution states:
“The courts shall not review the constitutionality of Acts of Parliament and treaties.”
So we should examine the entire chain:
access to representation → public financing → access to media and the electorate → elections → legislative power → fundamental rights → constitutional review.
When that chain is examined as a whole, the Netherlands becomes a much more interesting case than its international democratic image suggests.
Now look across the Kingdom.
Sint Maarten actually has a Constitutional Court, yet an individual citizen cannot directly bring a constitutional case before it. Only the Ombudsman can initiate that procedure under specific conditions. At Kingdom level, meanwhile, safeguarding fundamental rights, legal certainty and good governance is formally a responsibility of the Kingdom.
That combination deserves serious scrutiny.
But the investigation should not stop at constitutional law.
Map the House of Orange-Nassau historically and internationally. Map the old commercial and financial networks and their modern successors. Map the corporate, educational and alumni networks, international institutions and informal transnational networks. Map the intelligence and security architecture as well.
The Dutch intelligence service, the AIVD, has extensive statutory powers to investigate persons and organisations suspected of threatening the democratic legal order, national security or other “weighty interests of the state.” Under legal conditions and oversight, intelligence powers can include surveillance, interception and hacking.
I am not claiming that holding a dissenting opinion in itself legally permits the state to target someone. The more important question is structural:
Who ultimately defines when a person, movement or idea has crossed from dissent into a threat to the interests of the state — and what genuinely enforceable constitutional boundary protects the individual when that state possesses increasingly powerful technological means?
That question becomes much more important when the separate pieces are examined together rather than in isolation.
And now we are inserting AI into this architecture.
AI is increasingly being connected to political, administrative, intelligence, economic and military systems whose underlying logic often remains utilitarian: efficiency, security, economic growth, stability and strategic advantage. If biological life and fundamental human rights are merely variables within that calculation rather than constraints upon it, AI can enormously amplify an already existing problem.
This is becoming particularly urgent as Europe invests heavily in a war economy.
So perhaps the Netherlands should not be treated as a footnote in the investigation of global power.
So perhaps the Netherlands should not be treated as a footnote in the investigation of global power. Perhaps the Kingdom of the Netherlands should itself be investigated as a case study of how representative, constitutional, dynastic, financial, intelligence, international and technological structures can overlap while responsibility is distributed across different institutions.
And there is another side to this question.
Slovenia in 1990–91 offers an extraordinary historical example worth studying. Slovenia did not simply wish for peace. Before independence it deliberately prepared structures capable of protecting society without trying to defeat the much stronger Yugoslav army in a conventional war. Police, territorial defence and civilian structures were coordinated; critical infrastructure was protected; movement of Yugoslav forces was obstructed; and enormous public legitimacy existed behind the political objective. Thousands of Yugoslav soldiers ultimately deserted or surrendered.
People died, so the Ten-Day War should never be romanticised. But it did not develop into the prolonged catastrophe subsequently experienced elsewhere in former Yugoslavia.
There may be a profound lesson here:
Peace requires architecture too.
Parallel structures therefore need not mean escaping from society. They can mean constructing resilient human structures before a crisis occurs — structures in which human dignity, bodily integrity, freedom of thought and conscience, biological life and fundamental rights constitute boundaries that political, financial, military and technological power cannot simply optimize away.
If we are going to map who is “at the top,” perhaps we should simultaneously ask something even more important:
What constraints apply to whoever gets there — and can an ordinary human being actually enforce them?
Otherwise we may expose or even replace the people at the top while leaving the machinery of power untouched.
IMO…It’s never been about the top of the pyramid… without the base the top of he pyramid falls.
… and so Exit & Build is of core importance.
The Bible has the most reasonable answer – it is demonic powers that energize different leaders through different eras. Clearly, Satan and his spiritual hierarchies are behind the ideologies, the lies, the oppression, the technocracy, being the god of this world and the prince of the power of the air.
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” (Ephesians 6:12)
For those familiar with the ascent and control of the Beast/Antichrist (a Satan-controlled man) via financial and religious means can easily reconcile current affairs to be the precursor of Biblical prophecy. And if Satan is real and the Bible’s prophecy true, then all Truther paths will lead ultimately to the Way, the Truth, and the Life – Jesus Christ.
My God, regarding Robertson…I’ve never heard a man say so much without saying anything. He’s great at dropping “names”, read groups, but their isn’t much to go on from him. Even James called him out on his sources (Coleman). I got the impression he’s more interested in selling his book. Oh well, pimpin’ ain’t easy…
Broze was better, he named some names and kept it real. He is amazingly balanced regarding this subject.
The PTB are in our faces these days with their crap. Political corruption is front and center and politicians and “business leaders” don’t care. They know there is nothing we can do about it and are getting more and more ballsy. I don’t have TDS. I’m a Cunuckistani. But what he does with the stock market is insane. Him and his friends are making a killing off oil futures, etc. And then he advertises advance notice for 100K a year if you join his truth social group (Truth API). I’ve never seen such corruption. it is IN YOUR FACE! They are conditioning us to this.
Thanks James for the real and solid reporting as always.
Kirm says,
“…I’ve never seen such corruption. It is IN YOUR FACE! They are conditioning us to this.”
You said it! I follow the markets and news daily. It is blatant.
Those within his circle who had the pre-knowledge probably made a killing last week buying calls on Greenland stocks.
Sol omnia regit.
James, you’re right that the name at the top is the wrong question. Look at what they do, jointly, in broad daylight and behind closed doors. Controlling the resources. Managing the logistics. Hardening the grids. Siphoning off what they need. Hiding the essential programmes inside infrastructure projects. Culling the herd. Men who compete on everything else run the same programme. Rivals don’t converge on a conspiracy. They converge on a briefing. The briefing is about the Sun.
Cycle 25 outran NOAA’s forecast. Magnetic north is running toward Siberia at 50 km a year. The field has lost 9% in 200 years; the South Atlantic Anomaly is splitting in two. Carrington set telegraph wires sparking in 1859; a comparable CME missed us by nine days in 2012. The Younger Dryas hit 12,900 years ago, half a precession cycle. The last world drowned and Göbekli Tepe went up on the far side. The Vedas describe time as a wheel. An Egyptian priest told Solon the Greeks were children for remembering one flood; Phaethon, son of the Sun, was a periodic shift in the heavens followed by fire on Earth. Derinkuyu: 18 storeys down, room for 20,000.
The receipts. Bezos: $42 million for a 10,000-year clock in a Texas mountain. Svalbard: the seed vault, GitHub’s code on film next door. 2015: the Pentagon moved NORAD back under Cheyenne Mountain, citing EMP. Rushkoff’s billionaires asked how to keep their guards loyal after “the Event.” Their word.
The interval is the constraint. If the cycle is ~12,000 years, a civilization gets that long to climb high enough to ride out the reset. We’re at 0.7 on the Kardashev scale. That’s why it’s all at once: rockets, fusion, orbital solar, AI, the same dozen men. SpaceX’s filing for a million solar satellites running AI data centres calls it “a first step towards becoming a Kardashev II-level civilization” that harnesses the Sun’s full power. Read that with the Latin in mind. AI is the compression tool: two centuries squeezed into the twenty years they think are left.
James asked for a plan. Step one: decide, prepare or accept. If you prepare, three doors: apply for a seat in their cave, become useful enough that they hold the door, or dig your own. Someone has to come out the other side, above all children who carry what we knew. Raise kids who can suture, run a well, keep a generator alive, and put them where the builders are. When money stops working, the surgeon and the engineer are the aristocracy and the billionaire is a man in a hole who needs them. Parallel systems aren’t resistance now; they’re the seed bank after. Knowledge on paper and stone, not a cloud that dies with the grid.
Seeking a friend for the end of the world (good movie btw) What have you noticed where you are? Which door are you working on? I have children and don’t yet know how to get them through it. Any ideas? I’m listening.
What an epiphany! Thank you, James.
You got it! Authority! Is the higher power. Some claim it, take it on for power & control. Sheep follow obediently.
Any authority that is not God is an idol, worshipped for self gratification, like obeying the snake who used fear to entice Adam & Eve to follow him — eat the Apple, get power, knowledge.
Like today, use of fear to entice obedience of the sheeple.
There is a power greater than the top of the pyramid or the head of the octopus—God.
God is in charge, even if we all seem to see evil as in charge. Our glasses are smudged.
God has never broken a promise to us, and won’t start that now.
Jesus will come again, to finish the job of bringing eternal life — SAFE, in peace & joy in heaven with Him.
Satan is at the top of this pyramid. Satan is the ruler of darkness, which includes all of these world leaders that Satan controls.
Matthew 4:8-10
8Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory. 9And he said to him, “All these I will give you, if you will fall down and worship me.” 10Then Jesus said to him, “Be gone, Satan! For it is written,
“‘You shall worship the Lord your God
and him only shall you serve.’”
SATANS KINGDOM IS OF THIS WORLD.
JESUS KINGDOM IS NOT OF THIS WORLD.
John 18:36 Jesus said my kingdom is not of this world.
I agree that it is the belief in power structures which maintains the structure of violence. I trained and worked as a community organiser and began to see power structures at work and how organising worked.
The second step, after bringing people into the same room around a shared interest, was to get them to question their belief in alleged authorities. Then watch with absolute glee as they negotiated with mayors, and others with supposed power, and watch them undermine, denounce, and weaken that power and authority. People need to believe in their own power and the power of an organised collective. They may only believe in one shared interest, like affordable housing, and they are a force to be reckoned with.
Every day we choose who we give our power to, as power is made from collective belief. The believers outnumber the seat(s) of power, and these single points of power depend on believers.
This is a realistic stance and you can see the pyramid structure repeated in governments, corporations, and many other oppressive organisations that use coercion rather than persuasion. There are alternative power structures that are flatter, not pyramid like, and they are more stable and equitable. Leaders come and go as needed. People are not made into dependent children, they don’t fear freedom because its worth the responsibility.
Great points from Derek at the end there, eloquent and an optimistic realist like yourself James. Out attitude drives our beliefs and is our experienced reality. Let’s question our beliefs and begin to believe in betterment.
My numinous instinct tells me that at the tippy top of the Pyramid of Power is that extra dimensional Abrahamic/Jewish tribal war god of the Jews – Yahweh. This mind parasite/virus has something like half the world believing, “I am the Lord your God. You shall have no Gods before me!” Talk about authoritarianism, with his insistence that his victims bow to him at the threat of everlasting Hell!
Downstream from this war god we are given all the entities mentioned by Derrick Broze and Corbett, such as Freemasons, Jesuits, Zionist Jews, etc. This mind parasite/virus has given us fiat money – money made from thin air – Communism, Sabbatean Frankism, and on and on. The Abrahamic / Jewish religious system of loosh harvesting is in the final stages of destroying the Western and Arab worlds with its hyper authoritarian agenda of ruling the world from Jerusalem.
The solution is ridiculously simple – Nature’s God and the Laws of Nature that the Founders of America, regardless of all their personal flaws, had the prescient wisdom to list in the first sentence of the Declaration of Independence as the principles America was founded under, and which made her the ‘shining light on the hill for all other nations to aspire to’. It was Nature’s God and the Laws of Nature that created the erstwhile Land of the Free and Home of the Brave, that we fecklessly gave away to the hook nosed, circumcised tribal war god of the Jews in 1913 with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act, turning us into Judaeo/Christian serfs, slaves, cucks, and putty in the hands of the Jews and all their minions who lust for wealth, power, and control.
It’s always kinda funny to hear folks think that adopting the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and taking up Gnosticism or nature worship is the way to fight the Jewish revolutionary spirit that birthed them
The unfortunate truth about the foundation of America is that a good number of the folks doing it were onboard with the ideals of the French Revolution (though Tom Paine went a wee bit far for most of those guys personal tastes)
The end point of the French Revolution, via the larval stage of the Bolshevik one, is technocracy. The nature worship is a useful idiot you meet in the path.
The issue is that all these ideas taste like honey even if they sicken the stomach after ward
Basically agree with everyone that has said a demon (Satan) is at the top of the pyramid. I think C.S. Lewis’s novel “That Hideous Strength” gives the best insider, boots-on-ground view of what that looks like. His “The abolition of man” give the philosophy/ideology behind it.
I think if you take a symbolic view, saying an “ideology” is at the top is not so different from saying a “spirit” or “demon” is at the top. I think the spirit at the top is a lot darker in intent than simply centralisation of control though. If you just wanted to centralise control you wouldn’t be so keen on killing everything.
Solutions are very old fashioned: humility, fasting, alms-giving and prayer, especially prayer for discernment.
Meow king
The blackest pill I ever had was discussing Abolition Of Man with some folks and finding that they were utterly incapable of understanding even parts one and two.
Some folks just love this system so much they are begging for the darkening mind
Thank you so much for your incredible, sanity-restoring and psychologically liberating body of work. Rooting out the concept of needing external authority to tell us what’s true and allowed, versus consulting our own natural ethics, intelligence, heart and creativity has been a lifelong journey in my experience (and still going)! It’s a deep underlying change that affects the psyche (and body and mind & spirit) in a lot of ways. Overall I’m inclined to agree with Derrick’s formulation in the POP that we have to, among other things, find ways to heal our wounds to a sufficient degree, in order to be able to take responsibility for ourselves and our significant power. Specifically, I feel that many of us have to prove to ourselves that we are good beings, that we will be good enough stewards of ourselves, nature and each other. We need to debunk the myth that humans are bad, to redefine human nature after all the lies we’ve been told about how bad we are, how we could never get along, we would all be greedy and selfish and violent (that’s them, after all, not so much us, or much less us), if we had any power at all. I think we need to discover that we can be safe with ourselves, each other, that we, and the vast majority of humanity, are gentle and smart and good, in our deepest nature. Maybe we need some facts and some therapy but we are good beings in our nature. My thoughts on the solution: to continue to recognize ourselves for the good we carry everywhere we go. Thanks you!
Thank you James for your great work.
Yes, everybody needs to know who is at the top, not for the sake of vengeance, as my username might suggest. 😉
Even though I agree that it would be a solution if nobody recognized the authority of those in power, it feels like one of those utopian ideas that requires everybody to agree on something in order to work. And I rarely agree with everyone.
I would be more than satisfied if my kids and I could at least choose our own way of life. Maybe we would have to move around and try headless capitalism, grey communism, a cultish anarcho-hippie community, or something else entirely. As an anarchist, I don’t wish to impose capitalism, communism, or any other “ism” on anyone. I would tolerate and respect the communist community nearby and the feudal one a little farther away. If those communities want to organize themselves that way, fine by me. Until they try to impose something on us.
That said, I also agree that hierarchical communities create positions of authority, and those positions may attract people who are selfish, ruthless, or obsessed with control. Even if I want nothing to do with them and would rather live quietly in my cabin in the woods, I still need them to be kept in check before they become powerful enough to interfere with my life. They should fear the consequences of abusing their power and have as few incentives as possible to harm others, for our sake and theirs.
I imagine that a psychopath becoming mayor of a small town would be far less dangerous than one sitting at the top of a big tech company. Yes, the mayor would have fewer resources, but more importantly, he would have to operate within certain constraints. In a village, there is a limit to what you can do before your house is surrounded by angry people. They know your name, they know where you live.
And I’m pretty sure that a psychopath might even be more satisfied in that situation. Having external ethical constraints imposed on him could help keep him in check, partially fulfilled and partially sane. For the CEO of a major tech company, there is no clear limits, no repercussions, and most probably a great emptiness inside.
So, after that long detour: if powerful people are identified, scrutinized, and held accountable, the following ones may be less likely to abuse their power. Keeping them in check would prevent them from taking more freedom away from us. And freedom would allow different communities to experiment with whatever systems work best for them.
Peace.
Edmond
”….Yes, the mayor would have fewer resources, but more importantly, he would have to operate within certain constraints. In a village, there is a limit to what you can do before your house is surrounded by angry people. They know your name, they know where you live…..”
Yes, very true….that’s why our current elites like Mass Democracy, no one knows who is in charge.
Also to be fair the masses have degenerated a lot and people often get the kind of governance they deserve
Hi James. My research indicates that the “what” at the top of the pyramid is the central banking system. This is partly because central banking supports centralization, centralization supports belief in authority, and centralization of a currency system is in the best interest of someone who wants to skim off the top and be able to spend it anywhere in the world. In a system like that, the players can rotate in and out, making it very difficult to keep track of who is in power at the moment. Without going any further on that, I think that demonstrates a consistent thread of ideas where everything is “checking out”. As far as what to do about it, I’d say the most effective thing to do is to transition off of their currency. There seems to be two ways to do that; By simultaneously 1.Reducing your need for currency-in-general (through self-sufficiency, etc.) and 2.Replacing their system with a new system…a new system that decentralizes the issuance as much as possible, encourages a more loving set of behavior, and maybe even ends war. I’m actually writing a book about this and I would love to have your feedback. Thank you!
Oh no. Charlie Robinson endorsed by David Icke and Jeff Berwick? And based on the infamous John Coleman? Can’t take him seriously.
Maybe “they” are a manifestation of a much deeper side of ourselves. When you return to Nature and tend to the 10 feet in front of you, that binary “they vs. me” discussion starts to dissolve.
James, greetings from Switzerland. Your distinction between who is at the top of the pyramid and what is at the top stopped me in my tracks. You put into a few words a question I’ve been working on for years. The people at the top change over decades and centuries, yet the pyramid keeps reproducing itself. So I asked what drives it, where it began, and what came before it.
What you call the ideology of centralised control is what I simply call “the system.” It doesn’t need a grander name. My thesis is that the political, financial and religious systems we live in grow out of the same underlying logic, and I trace that logic through five historical layers, from the temple states of the fourth millennium BCE through empire, church and the secular state to today’s global networks. New layers emerge, but older ways of organising and justifying power remain with us. If the system had a beginning, it cannot be explained by human nature alone, and that changes how we think about getting out of it.
History is only part of the question, though. Why do we participate in this system? Why has it proved so durable, even when it harms us? And how might we free ourselves from it? Those questions take me into sociology, psychology and my own life. In my up-coming book and German-language blog, Ein Blick durchs Schlüsselloch, I share parts of my story to bring these abstract questions closer to the reader.
Your insistence on asking what people can do resonates with me. I’ve written about Gandhi’s Satyagraha, the disciplined, nonviolent refusal to cooperate with unjust demands, and about quieter acts: saying no without giving up our dignity, and seeing people beyond the labels that divide us. If a hierarchy relies on our cooperation and on the roles we accept, changing how we act and relate to one another can begin to change its foundations. The path I’m exploring starts with ourselves, extends to our communities and ultimately reaches larger structures.
My account gives particular attention to Europe’s role in developing and spreading many of today’s institutions. I try to ground it in archaeology, academic history, books and documents that readers can examine for themselves. I’m now writing a fuller diagnosis of the system, which I hope to publish in late October or early November.
The historical thesis begins here: https://einblickdurchsschluesselloch.substack.com/p/die-funf-systeme
The blog is in German, but I find Substack’s automatic translation works quite well. I’d be glad to hear where you see a connection, and where you disagree.
Thank you for asking a question that deserves more attention.
Florian Dimitri Leupin
So an idea or principle is at the top, and not the people who act on it. And the solution is to look away. Is this really the best you can do? Just 2 shills for Zionist murderers snd thieves. Taking them out may not solve everything as in the straw man argument you put out, but it would deliver the world from its current catastrophic state.
When selfishness, competition and power are the main drivers of human behavior in a profit-driven system, many people get to be obsessed with the role of “the individual”. Expectedly, they require an evil cabal controlling the world with a supervillain mastermind “at the top” to make sense of their worldview.
But a much more frightening realization is that no one is in control, and the ship of society is sailing rudderless. It is also incredibly empowering – we can realize that it is up to us how we want to shape our lives.
Who’s at the top is basically a “class” of “people”.. my best description of them is the Cowardly Parasite class, they always stay in the shadows and they strip the cream off of everyone else’s life efforts or energy. They do follow an ideology or system which is – me and mine first no matter what the cost to everyone else.
They play their little chess games within their structure, but so long as they are all getting what they basically want, they don’t throw tantrums..
Authority is ……. God, or not-God; Life or Death; Truth or lies; SAFE or unsafe; good or evil; creative or destructive. WOW! A CHOICE! Moment by moment.
Yes, I think it makes sense. It is as old as humanity itself. From the moment two people inhabited the earth, one of the two has tried to take the lead, some in positive ways, some other using means of oppression to get the upper hand. All over history we had antisocial psycopaths who set out to conquer nations, really aiming for the world. Just consider Alexander the Great, Gengis Khan, Julius Caesar, Napoleon to name a few. The only difference between 2000 years ago and now is the degree of sophistication of our present society. Now we have far more lethal weapons that allow one to potentially kill millions of people at once instead of one arrow at a time. And the psyops have become very sophisticated too. So, in the end, nothing has changed on this planet. We still have good people and insane people. What has changed are the means that allow us to do good or evil. How are you using your knife? Will you use it to cut your food or to kill your neighbor to steal his wallet? The knife is not good and is not bad. It all depends on how and for what purpose it is used.
James, I watch/read almost all of your content, but rarely comment as I’m very busy at work. There’s something about this subject and your approach you took to it which resonated with me, in particular, at this time. I’m not a maudlin person by nature, but I was in tears that you put Derrick’s exortation to us to STAY HAPPY in the face of reality at the end of this missive.
Thank you for all the work you do. Your time, heart and mindfulness you give to this work…I appreciate it.
Trying to establish who is at the top of the pyramid of power, humanly, is like trying to identify the founder or head of the New Age movement. It can’t be done, because both are ideologies. The New Age movement and agenda has been described by author Hannah Newman “as the opposite of a bureaucracy … Its organizational chart would resemble a badly knotted fishnet. … Its center is everywhere. … Its life does not hinge on any one [group or leader].” The networks take the same action, she says, not because they collude together, but because they share the same assumptions. “The shared assumptions are the collusion” (The Rainbow Swastika, p217, a book on esoteric fascism).
Hannah continues: “In other words, they are evidence of design, but not human design. New Age spokesmen have no anxiety about their movement being sabotaged from within, due to their deliberate structure of the ‘badly knotted fishnet’. Each network is independent of the others and no one organization or leader is indispensable; therefore, anyone causing a PR disaster or deciding to fight The Plan can be eliminated without damaging the network, with others taking over the function.”
Yes, the heart of the matter is not natural. It is either supra natural or supernatural in origin. Is it coming from extraterrestrials, or is it demonically driven? Only the truth of the matter can lead to the solution and the action we need to take, which is another conversation.
It is telling…
after a couple days (now 9/24 in the U.S.) there were 117 comments on this topic.
Of course, the slowness of summer participation is over, …but still… …the stat is telling.
Hello James !
It is indeed the right way to ask the question. Not who, but what. Though I wish you were familiar–and you might actually be, but I can’t find any reference in the search bar of the website–with the work of Lewis Mumford. Particularly its masterpiece titled the The Myth of the Machine I & II. I never read a better description of this “what” but his Mega-machine concept that sustains the myth of technology driven power (the materialistic side of it) under the auspice of a “Sun God” (the ideological side of it, or Progress nowadays).
As you ask at the end of the video–and as Derick is actually pointing out–Lewis Mumford actually give the keys to what design, build and sustain the Mega-machine. As mentioned, technology and the degree of alienation we concede individually and as a society to its complexity is the root parameter in our lives that has the most leverage in shaping our reality.
Lewis Mumford boiled it down in a other book or rather speech (sorry only got an excerpt in French for you here, it’s a 1963 speech published in the periodic “Technique et Culture, vol. 5, n°1, hiver 1964 éd. John Hopkins University Press”). It is ultimately a choice between Authoritarian technic and Democratic one. But what does he mean by those terms?
Well, define one and you get the other in contrast. What is a Democratic technic? It is one that is understandable, reproducible and sharable by any and all member of a given society. It does not mean that any one got access to the ressources and the knowledge to produce every technical object of one society at every given time. But it means that no one can be, if need be, excluded from a piece of technology that is used in this society.
What does it imply? To put it bluntly: the simpler the better. A good sign of an authoritarian technology is that you profit from a power on which you have no knowledge or control. From this point, you start asking the real questions. The first of which could be: Internet, Democratic or Authoritarian? By all mean authoritarian. Why? Because the infrastructure on which it lays on is so complexe that no one is capable–from the ressources extraction, through the production of its infrastructure, to the installation and maintenance made possible by the whole society and industry that allow such a tech to even exist–to reproduce it from scratch for his or her own means without subduing other humans to be slave workers that would make it possible.
The only question then is: For the rulers of the world–and the ideology that empowers them–to disappear, to which extent are you ready to sacrifice the technological apparatus you’ve trapped yourself in? Because ultimately, the very things that seems to empower you individually, as the computer I am tapping on, are the things that make our collective enslavement.
What to do?
Create interdependences between humans and with there most direct environment. Not with machines.
Hello James. It is the Ecuadorian guy you met in Mexico. Great video. I hope you read this:
Although we agree in the core, the ultimate power (could be) in the torches when they realize there is a vampire. There is one important nuance I believe.
Following the last names and killing the habitants of the highest room in the castle will not destroy the throne. However, that is only one of the objectives, achieving justice. Another objective would be to achieve truth, or to approach at least, to what really happened. If people would see the picture in HD, fewer of them would be black pilled.
Flatearthers and other similar groups need the Jesuits in the throne, or their castle of cards collapses. Naive international relations teachers need the presidents in their throne, or their map disappears. Achieving the highest definition in the timelines will not only help us prepare ourselves for the aiki-do, but it would give us a glance of what is in “their” minds.
There is no mind of-the-individual, it is a reflection of reflections in the diffuse borders of traditions. To understand their mindset is to see through them. That is why it is unavoidable to underline their symbology; it is not Chineese, nor Shintoistic or Nordic, nor Indiginous American or Indian, the Saturn we find after looking is the “Shabat”. The serpent in the Vatican is the Gnostic one, not the Chineese dragon of rain (this, of course, is accompanied by a thorough investigation of last names and historical events; it is very valuable, as you point out in your video) And so, we understand what their modern luciferianism inherited.
But their theology is only one part of it. Another important one would be their political ideology. At this point something becomes crucial in my opinion: The Procolos of the Elders of Sion. My small channel got deleted this year because of my 2 part documentary series on the history of that text. It is the opposite of what Wikipedia says. Take a look at a sentence from Protocol 10:
“Then the institution of a republican era became possible; and then, in the place of the sovereign, we put a caricature of the same in the person of a president, whom we chose from the mob from among our creatures and our slaves.
Thus we laid the mine which we have placed under the Gentiles, or rather under the Gentile nations. In the near future we will make the president a responsible person.”
It is clear they are bragging their power to an outer circle. And it is also clear they planned to use presidents as scapegoats more than a hundred years ago. There is another relevant sentence I’d like to share, very relevant to the topic:
…
Will post the rest of the text as a short comment. You can also find it here:
https://app.notion.com/p/Respuesta-James-Pyramid-3e5a1c4e08e8802b8282da02383cf334
“The society known to us which would be capable of competing with us in these arts, might be that of the Jesuits. But we have managed to discredit these in the eyes of the stupid mob as being a palpable organization, whereas we ourselves have kept in the background, reserving our organization as a secret.
Moreover, what difference will it make to the world who is to become its master, whether the head of the Catholic Church, or a despot of the blood of Zion?
But to us, “The Chosen People”, that matter cannot be indifferent.”
“The Gentiles” and “The Chosen People” are artifacts for anthropologists and psychologists. I believe Power is behind them. In a geographical perspective, the people that live in the top will unconsiously find a mythology to be reflected upon. ¿Or the mythology will find them? One can say they used it to achieve cohesion in their inner circles. But that would be too human-centered. Our ideology is not at the top of the pyramid (unless we hold the torches): its their ideology that is.
Thanks for everything.
Alejandro Veintimilla
http://www.academiablockchain.com
What is money? It is useful but also mutable depending who is dictating its terms . Holding state money can be a liability. And could conceivably destroy one’s savings or supposed wealth. That’s why
to me future transactions must involve wrestling the ongoing disempowerment of citizens via economic monoliths in the form of fiat currency. The future must be all about alternative currencies, and I don’t mean crypto. About 20 years ago, ahead of its time, (or behind?) a group here in Vancouver tried to start a community currency using a token . That’s all “money” is, isn’t it? At least since the age of silver and gold coins. So neighbourhood tokens that can also be traded between broader regions would give straight barter more options
Wonderful presentation and I hesitate to suggest yet another possible group (or maybe an infiltrator to all). I just started following a well-supported concept that the Phoenicians controlled much of the worlds gold from Phrygia to North Africa to Spain to Rome to the entire western world and have been controllers for centuries. https://thedukereport.substack.com/p/stealth-power-with-mrs-heritage-history?utm_source=podcast-email&publication_id=519432&post_id=216826116&utm_campaign=email-play-on-substack&utm_content=watch_now_button&r=fh3lx&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
I heard the Phoenician theory on the delingpod. Some interesting history, but the definition of a modern Phoenician was so fuzzy it seemed to become just a loose synonym for “bad guy”.
Meow king
nerd Containment vs mystery box containment 17 min or so into video linked)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=y8tXxRzQ7yc&ra=m
We have historical evidence of recent Jewish power blocs, we have evidence that rich people form cults and secret societies to propagate their own power, we have rich people doing NGO networks to promote ideology and power of various real people who exist and have recorded acts inside history…….but instead we need to nebulize power out to unknown and unknowable powers so that we have an excuse to never know or do anything.
I believe all kinds of weird things but the idea that Phoenicians exist as a continuous group thru history makes no sense…..it literally is less likely then Q saving us and bringing Kennedys back from the dead, lol
You all dont know because the truth have been hidden for you (us) for 1000 years. James, I admire you for all your work for years, but you still dont know real history at all. Only one person in the world tell the truth about it and have done so for decades, sacrificing everything. You dont even know what the real New world order is. Some points are mentioned here on this podcast, but you people dont know history. To know it all you have to watch this video for a start and all the series on this great persons channels. He has documented everything. If you dont watch and understand this, you will never know anything. It gives all the answers to who our masters are. Im sharing but no people seem able to comprehend the importance of this, and you find all in the descriptions of the videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KptN3K4WasA – and this – as a start of your journey: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-BFmn2S_jU
Here’s Coleman’s source, potentially, for the Committee of 300
https://substack.com/@globalgeopolitic/note/c-346001018
Every year that passes it looks increasingly more like there is a completely separate civilization for which we are the cattle, and what we’re taught about the nature and history of this place we’re born into is largely elaborate fiction.
For decades we’ve had the technology to track and bug their public-facing puppets to see where they go, who they meet up with and what they talk about. The fact that we have nearly zero recordings of them outside of their public scripted appearances reveals a lot.
Animals
”….The fact that we have nearly zero recordings of them outside of their public scripted appearances reveals a lot…..”
Yes, it reveals that we are not creepy weirdos and have lives to live 🙂 lol
Joking but the point I am making is that normal people are normal- they have been trained to be focus on normal
life things and be happy. That is not totally a bad thing TBH
As always thanks for that.
Having had a near death experience once I am well aware of the fact that this life is one layer of being.
I now believe we are living in a soul trap and those of us that have souls stand a chance of escaping it. Perhaps not all of us have souls? Who knows…
I would say that as many people seem to be under or overstanding now the question is what is at the top because I know that when we came out of the womb we were filled with curiosity and not anger although that is something that this system has promoted in us.
The next time I die I shall not be coming back here again as beautiful as it can be sometimes.
Thanks for being you brother and keep on keeping on.